Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:15:00.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of off-Diagonal Disorder on Alloy Phase Stability: An Application To The Ni-Pt System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

M. Sluiter
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, L-268, Livermore, CA 94550
P.E.A. Turchi
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, L-268, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Extract

The occurrence of ordering in the Ni-Pt alloy system seems to violate theoretical predictions based on a tight-binding description of the electronic structure [1,2,3]. In these descriptions of transition metal alloys, ordering is predicted if the d-band is about half filled, and phase separation is predicted if the d-band is almost empty or almost full. This so-called bandfilling argument clearly fails in the case of Ni-Pt alloys, which order despite an almost filled d-band. The band filling rule is derived under the assumption that off-diagonal disorder (ODD), that is, the difference in d-bandwidths of the constituents, can be ignored. In Ni-Pt that is not the case, the d-bandwidths of the pure elements Ni and Pt are 0.32 Ry and 0.57 Ry, respectively [4]. However, it has been argued that taking ODD into account would result in an even stronger phase separation tendency in the theoretical prediction [2]. Magnetism is not a factor in equiatomic Ni-Pt alloys, and thus can not be invoked to correct the erroneous prediction. Other factors, such as spin orbit coupling in the relativistic description of Pt can change the prediction only if very large spin orbit splitting is assumed on the Pt atom [5].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Heine, V. and Samson, J., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 13, 2155 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Bieber, A. and Gautier, F., Acta Met. 34, 2291 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Sluiter, M., Turchi, P.E.A., and de Fontaine, D., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 17, 2163 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Papaconstantopoulos, D. A., “Handbook of the Bandstructure of Elemental Solids,” (Plenum, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
5. Treglia, G. and Ducastelle, F., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 17, 1935 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Ducastelle, F., “Alloy Phase Stability” NATO ASI Series E: Applied Sciences - Vol. 163, ed. by Stocks, G. M. and Gonis, A., (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1989). p. 293.Google Scholar
7. Andersen, O. K., Klose, W., and Nohl, H., Phys. Rev. B17, 1209 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Pinski, F. J., Ginatempo, B., Johnson, D. D., Staunton, J. B., Stocks, G. M., and Gyorffy, B. L., submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. ((1990);Google Scholar
8a. and Johnson, D. D., private communicationGoogle Scholar
9. Sluiter, M. and Turchi, P.E.A., Phys. Rev. B., submitted.Google Scholar
10. Blackman, J. A., Esterling, D. M., and Berk, N. F., Phys. Rev. B4, 2412 (1971).Google Scholar
11. Gonis, A. and Garland, J. W., Phys. Rev. B16, 1495 (1977).Google Scholar
12. Kanamori, J. and Kakehashi, Y., J. Phys. (Paris) Colloq. 38, c7274 (1977).Google Scholar
13. Kikuchi, R., Phys. Rev. 81, 988 (1951);Google Scholar
13a. and de Fontaine, D., Sol. St. Phys. 34, 74 (1979).Google Scholar