Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:43:21.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Looking Inward Together: Just War Thinking and Our Shared Moral Emotions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2017

Valerie Morkevičius
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Just war thinking serves a social and psychological role that international law cannot fill. Law is dispassionate and objective, while just war thinking accounts for emotions and the situatedness of individuals. While law works on us externally, making us accountable to certain people and institutions, just war thinking affects us internally, making us accountable to ourselves. Psychologically, an external focus leads to feelings of shame, while an inward focus generates feelings of guilt. Philosophers have long recognized the importance of these two moral emotions. Recently, psychologists have found that feelings of guilt are linked to positive social outcomes, such as the desire for reconciliation and reparation, while shame generates anger and hostility. Just war thinking, as an inward-looking tradition, has a special relationship with guilt. By focusing on moral emotions, just war thinking can move beyond the law in four ways, by developing an ethic of accountability, by providing a foundation for addressing moral injury, by providing a common language for discussing the costs of war, and for identifying ethical problems in radically new contexts.

Keywords

lawjust warpsychologyemotionsshameguiltmoral injuryaccountabilityreparationreconciliation
Type
Roundtable: The Roles of International Law and Just War Theory
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , Winter 2017 , pp. 441 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Jean-Robert Tyran and Lars P. Feld, “Why People Obey the Law: Experimental Evidence from the Provision of Public Goods,” CESifo Working Paper No. 651 (2), January 2002.

2 Childress, James F., Moral Responsibility in Conflicts: Essays on Nonviolence, War and Conscience (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1982), pp. 169–75Google Scholar.

3 Corrigan, John, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Emotion (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

4 Augustine, , The City of God (London: Penguin Books, 1984), p. 564 Google Scholar, 14.9.

5 Aquinas, The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, II.29.1, newadvent.org/summa.

6 Kass, Leon, “The Wisdom of Repugnance,” New Republic 216, no. 22 (1997), pp. 17–25 Google ScholarPubMed, at p. 20. See also Aquinas, Summa Theologica, II.23.4 and II.29.3.

7 Colombetti, Giovanna and Torrance, Steve, “Emotions and Ethics: An Inter-(en)active Approach,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8, no. 4 (2009), pp. 505–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 515.

8 Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, Vol. II (London: Allman, 1817), p. 106 Google Scholar.

9 Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1976)Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., p. 83, II.ii.2.1.

11 Ibid., p. 84, II.ii.2.3.

12 Ibid., p. 86, II.ii.3.4.

13 Powell, Samuel M., The Impassioned Life: Reason and Emotion in the Christian Tradition (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 2016), p. 283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Haidt, Jonathan, “The Moral Emotions,” in Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., and Goldsmith, H. H., eds., Handbook of Affective Sciences (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 852–70Google Scholar, at p. 853. See also de Hooge, Ilona E., Zeelenberg, Marcel, and Breugelmans, Seger M., “Moral Sentiments and Cooperation: Differential Influences of Shame and Guilt,” Cognition and Emotion 21, no. 5 (2007), pp. 1025–1042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 1026.

15 Haidt, “The Moral Emotions,” p. 854.

16 Ibid.

17 Aquinas, , Summa Theologica, II.24.3. In Knuuttila, Simo, Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 254 Google Scholar.

18 Hooge, Zeelenberg, and Breugelmans, “Moral Sentiments and Cooperation,” p. 1025.

19 Haidt, “The Moral Emotions,” p. 859.

20 Ibid.

21 Mead., George Herbert Mind, Self, and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967), p. 255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage Books, 1995), p. 203 Google Scholar.

23 Bedford, Olwen and Hwang, Kwang-Kuo, “Guilt and Shame in Chinese Culture: A Cross-Cultural Framework from the Perspective of Morality and Identity,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33, no. 2 (2003), pp. 127–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 133.

24 Benedict, Ruth, The Chrysanthemum and the Sword (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1989), p. 223 Google Scholar.

25 Ibid. While Benedict's work has been critiqued by many who read it as implying the superiority of guilt cultures (i.e., the West) to shame cultures (i.e., Japan), she herself did not claim that one was superior to the other, nor did she believe that any culture was “purely” one or the other. See Creighton, Millie R., “Revisiting Shame and Guilt Cultures: A Forty-Year Pilgrimage,” Ethos 18, no. 3 (1990), pp. 279–307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Bedford and Hwang, “Guilt and Shame in Chinese Culture,” p. 133.

27 Fontaine, Johnny R. J. et al. , “Untying the Gordian Knot of Guilt and Shame: The Structure of Guilt and Shame Reactions Based on Situation and Person Variation in Belgium, Hungary, and Peru,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 37, no. 3 (2006), pp. 273–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 287.

28 Doosje, Bertjan, Branscombe, Nyla R., Spears, Russell, and Manstead, Antony S. R., “Guilty by Association: When One's Group Has a Negative History,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75, no. 4 (1998), pp. 872–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 872.

29 Ketelaar, Timothy and Au, Wing Tung, “The Effects of Feelings of Guilt on the Behaviour of Uncooperative Individuals in Repeated Social Bargaining Games: An Affect-as-Information Interpretation of the Role of Emotion in Social Interaction,” Cognition and Emotion 17, no. 3 (2003), pp. 429–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, at pp. 431, 445. These results have been replicated in other studies, including Hooge, Zeelenberg, and Breugelmans, “Moral Sentiments and Cooperation,” p. 1032.

30 Ketelaar and Au, “The Effects of Feelings of Guilt on the Behaviour of Uncooperative Individuals,” p. 450.

31 Gilligan, James, “Shame, Guilt, and Violence,” Social Research 70, no. 4 (2003), pp. 1149–180Google Scholar, at p. 1165.

32 Ibid., p. 1168.

33 Nelissen, Rob M. A. and Zeelenberg, Marcel, “When Guilt Evokes Self-Punishment: Evidence for the Existence of a Dobby Effect ,” Emotion 9, no. 1 (2009), pp. 118–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, at p. 118.

34 Tangney, June Price et al. , “Relation of Shame and Guilt to Constructive Versus Destructive Responses to Anger Across the Lifespan,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70, no. 4 (1996), pp. 797–809 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, at pp. 806–807.

35 Doosje et al., “Guilty by Association,” p. 277.

36 Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977), p. 297 Google Scholar. Walzer is not alone in his skepticism about the efficacy of collective guilt. Hannah Arendt likewise opined, “where all are guilty, no one is; confessions of collective guilt are the best possible safeguard against the discovery of culprits.” Arendt, Hannah, Crises of the Republic (New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1972), p. 161 Google Scholar.

37 Doosje et al., “Guilty by Association,” pp. 884–85. On the connection between guilt and formal apology, see McGarty, Craig et al. , “Group-Based Guilt as a Predictor of Commitment to Apology,” British Journal of Social Psychology 44, no. 4 (2005), pp. 659–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. On reparations, see Doosje et al., “Guilty by Association,” and Brown, Rupert et al. , “Nuestra Culpa: Collective Guilt and Shame as Predictors of Reparation for Historical Wrongdoing,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94, no. 1 (2008), pp. 75–90 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

38 Tangney, June Price, Wagner, Patricia, Fletcher, Carey, and Gramzow, Richard, “Shamed into Anger? The Relation of Shame and Guilt to Anger and Self-Reported Aggression,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62, no. 4 (1992), pp. 669–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

39 Bonhoeffer, Dietrich, Ethics (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995)Google Scholar.

40 Gilligan, “Shame, Guilt, and Violence,” p. 1167.

41 Tangney et al., “Shamed into Anger?” p. 670.

42 Bonhoeffer, Ethics, p. 25

43 Tangney at al., “Shamed into Anger?” p. 672.

44 Tangney et al., “Relation of Shame and Guilt to Constructive Versus Destructive Responses to Anger Across the Lifespan,” pp. 799, 806.

45 Gilligan, “Shame, Guilt, and Violence,” pp. 1149–180, at p. 1154.

46 Brown et al., “Nuestra Culpa,” p. 82.

47 Lickel, Brian et al. , “Vicarious Shame and Guilt,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 8, no. 2 (2005), pp. 145–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 152.

48 Nardin, Terry, “Theorising the International Rule of Law,” Review of International Studies 34, no. 3 (2008), pp. 385–401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 392. This distinguishes law from threats and orders.

49 The ICJ nearly admitted this in its 1996 Nuclear Weapons case. See Koskenniemi, Martti, “‘The Lady Doth Protest Too Much’ Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law,” Modern Law Review 65, no. 2 (2002), p. 160 Google Scholar.

50 Koskenniemi. “‘The Lady Doth Protest Too Much’ Kosovo,” pp. 159–75, at p. 159.

51 Ibid., p. 160.

52 Ibid., pp. 172, 174.

53 Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, pp. 3, 96.

54 Morkevičius, Valerie, Realist Ethics: Just War Traditions as Power Politics (Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming 2017)Google Scholar.

55 Secrest, Donald, Brunk, Gregory G., and Tamashiro, Howard, “Empirical Investigation of Normative Discourse on War: The Case of the Donagan-Aquinas Thesis,” Journal of Peace Research 28, no. 4 (1991), pp. 393–406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Litz, Brett T. et al. , “Moral Injury and Moral Repair in War Veterans: A Preliminary Model and Intervention Strategy,” Clinical Psychology Review 29, no. 8 (2009), pp. 695–706 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, at p. 704.

57 Nelissen and Zeelenberg, “When Guilt Evokes Self-Punishment,” Emotion 9, no. 1, pp. 118–22.

58 Bell, Daniel M. Jr., Just War as Christian Discipleship: Recentering the Tradition in the Church Rather Than the State (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Brazos Press, 2009), p. 45 Google Scholar.

59 Colombetti and Torrance, “Emotions and Ethics,” p. 506.

60 Nussbaum, Martha and Kahan, Dan, “Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law,” Columbia Law Review 96, no. 2 (1996), p. 352 Google Scholar.

61 Sparrow, Robert, “Robots and Respect: Assessing the Case Against Autonomous Weapons Systems,” Ethics & International Affairs 30, no. 1 (2016), pp. 93–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Arkin, Ronald, Ulam, Patrick, and Wagner, Alan R., “Moral Decision Making in Autonomous Systems: Enforcement, Moral Emotions, Dignity, Trust, and Deception,” Proceedings of the IEEE 100, no. 3 (2012), pp. 571–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Morkevičius, Valerie, “Tin Men: Ethics, Cybernetics and the Importance of Soul,” Journal of Military Ethics 13, no. 1 (2014), pp. 3–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.