Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:52:52.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tribological Properties of Ti/Tin Nanomultilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Ph. Houdy
Affiliation:
LMN, Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne, boulevard des Coquibus, 91025 Evry, France.
P. Psyllaki
Affiliation:
CMPMF, Ecole des Mines de Paris, B.P. 87, 91003 Evry, France.
S. Labdi
Affiliation:
LMN, Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne, boulevard des Coquibus, 91025 Evry, France.
K. Suenaga
Affiliation:
CMPMF, Ecole des Mines de Paris, B.P. 87, 91003 Evry, France.
M. Jeandin
Affiliation:
CMPMF, Ecole des Mines de Paris, B.P. 87, 91003 Evry, France.
Get access

Abstract

The tribological behaviour of Ti/TiN amorphous nanometric multilayers is reported in comparison with that of single Ti and TiN layers, in order to study the wear mechanism of nanostructures submitted to that one may call “macroscopic loading”. Ti/TiN nanolayers were deposited onto Si substrate by high vacuum diode r.f. sputtering assisted by in-situ kinetic ellipsometry. Transmission Electron Microscopy (T.E.M.) characterization exhibited the multilayered structure of the films, ascertained by grazing angle X-ray reflectometry and ellipsometry. Sliding wear tests against alumina in dry air showed the ceramic-typed behaviour of the multilayers, the wear of which was partly governed through a microfracture mechanism. Their wear lifetime was found to be higher than that of Ti and TiN single layers and increased with the number of layers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Staia, M. and al, 9th Surf. Modif Tech. Int. Conf, Cleveland, October 29 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Hofmnann, D., Hensel, B., Yasuoka, M. and Kato, N., Surf. Coat. Technol., 61 326 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Hogmark, S. and Hedenqvist, P., Wear, 179 147 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Pelton, A.R. and al, Ultramicroscopy, 29 50 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Ding, Y., Farhart, Z., Northwood, D.O., AT. Alpas, Surf. Coat. Technol., 68/69 459 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Vancoille, E., Celis, J.P. and Ross, J.P., Tribol. Int., 26 (2) 115 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Enders, B., Martin, H. and Wolf, G.K., Surf. Coat. Technol., 60 556 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Hübler, R. and al, Surf. Coat. Technol.,60 551 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Leyland, A. and Matthews, A., Surf. Coat. Technol., 70 19 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Koehler, J.S., Phys. Rev. B, 2 (2) 547 (1970).Google Scholar
11. Lehoczky, S.L., J. Appl. Phys., 49 (11) 5479 (1978).Google Scholar
12. Wen, L.S. and al, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 126 200 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Houdy, Ph. and Boher, P., Vide, Le, les Couches Minces, 259 15 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Labdi, S., Houdy, Ph., Psyllaki, P. and Jeandin, M., E-MRS, Strasbourg, Thin Solid Film, (1995).Google Scholar
15. Papaphilippou, C. and al, 6th Int Conf on Tribology, Budapest, 3 26 (1993).Google Scholar