Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:02:38.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The IWW in Turin: “Militant History,” Workers’ Struggle, and the Crisis of Fordism in 1970s Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2017

Nicola Pizzolato
Nicola Pizzolato*
Affiliation:
Middlesex University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyses how in the 1970s a segment of Italian radical activists belonging to the tradition of operaismo (workerism) appropriated and interrogated the history of the International Workers of the World (IWW) using it as a tool of political intervention in the Italian context. Following the upheaval of the ‘Hot Autumn’, the IWW provided to the Italians an inspiring comparison with a militant labour organisation in times of changing composition of the working class and of transformation of the organisation of production. The importance of this political use of the past lies in the way it illuminates the particular context in which these activists operated. In the course of the 1970s, Italian radicals responded to the normalization of industrial relations by joining groups that endorsed a political line tinted with Leninism and advocated a revolution led by a vanguard of militants. This was in contrast to the tenets of shopfloor-centered strategy and grassroots and shopfloor participation typical of operaismo. The – eventually – failed attempt of the ‘militant historians’ to revive, through their distinctive interpretation of the IWW, that political tradition sheds light on the success of the backlash against shopfloor working class militancy at the end of the decade, when vanguard groups had become marginal in the factories and reformist unions lacked a political clout to oppose company restructuring and relocation. This article is based on articles, memoirs and interviews that are evidence of the politically-driven debate about the IWW among Italian radicals. It improves on the existing historiography of the Italian labour movement by resisting its teleological impulse to explain the backlash on the 1980s as an inevitable outcome. It also contributes to the burgeoning transnational labor historiography; it challenges methodological nationalism in the study of workers’ insurgency by charting the influence of US history far beyond its borders and across time, adopting a transnational approach that is, unusually, both geographical and a diachronic. This story tells us more about Italian history than it does about American history, but it is testimony to a far reaching influence of American history and to entanglements that crossed borders through the work of the activists, scholars, and translators who acted as transnational vehicles of ideas and political practices.

Type
Articles
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 91: Thinking Labor Rights Through the Coolie Question , Spring 2017 , pp. 109 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. “Si tratta probabilmente del problema più noto in Italia di tutta la storia del movimento operaio americano.” Ortoleva, Peppino, “Classe operaia e potere politico in USA (1860–1920)”, Primo Maggio 3–4 (1974): 37–56 Google Scholar.

2. Shor, Francis, “Gender and Labour/Working Class History in Comparative Perspective: The Syndicalist and Wobbly Experience in the USA, Australia, and New Zealand”, Left History 11 (2006): 118–36Google Scholar; Shor, Francis, “Left Labor Agitators in the Pacific Rim of the Early Twentieth Century”, International Labor and Working-Class History 67 (2005): 148–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Peterson, Lany, “The One Big Union in International Perspective: Revolutionary Industrial Unionism, 1900–1925’ in Work, Community, and Power: The Experience of Labor in Europe and America, 1920–1925, ed. Cronin, James E. and Siriani, Carmen (Philadelphia, 1983), 49–87 Google Scholar; Burgmann, Verity, Revolutionary Industrial Unionism: The Industrial Workers of the World in Australia (Melbourne, 1995)Google Scholar; Cole, Peter and van der Walt, Lucien, “Crossing the Color Lines, Crossing the Continents: Comparing the Racial Politics of the IWW in South Africa and the United States, 1905–1925”, Safundi: The Journal of South African and American Studies 12 (2011): 69–96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chester, Eric Thomas, The Wobblies in Their Heyday (Santa Barbara, 2014)Google Scholar.

3. van der Linden, Marcel, “Transnationalising American Labor History”, The Journal of American History 86 (1999): 1078–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In the same issue, see also David Thelen, “The Nation and Beyond: Transnational Perspectives on United States History,” 965–75. See also Tyrrell, Ian, “Reflections on the Transnational Turn in United States History: Theory and Practice”, Journal of Global History 3 (2009): 453–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “AHR Conversation: On Transnational History”, with Bayly, C. A., Beckert, Sven, Connelly, Matthew, Hofmeyr, Isabel, Kozol, Wendy, and Seed, Patricia, American Historical Review 111 (2006): 1440–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tyrrell, Ian, Transnational Nation: United States History in Global Perspective Since 1789 (Basingstoke, 2007)Google Scholar.

4. Ian Tyrell, Transnational Nation, 2.

5. Dubofsky, Melvin, We Shall Be All: A History of the Industrial Workers of the World (Chicago, 1969)Google Scholar; Weinstein, James, The Decline of Socialism in America, 1912–1925 (New York, 1967)Google Scholar and by the same author, “The IWW and American Socialism” Socialist Revolution 5 (1970)Google Scholar; Conlin, Joseph, Bread and Roses Too: Studies of the Wobblies (Westport, CT, 1969)Google Scholar and by the same author, Big Bill Haywood and the Radical Union Movement (New York, 1969)Google Scholar; Tyler, Robert L., Rebels in the Woods: The IWW in the Pacific Northwest (Eugene, OR, 1967)Google Scholar; Thompson, Fred, “They Didn't Suppress the Wobblies”, Radical America 1 (1967) 1–5 Google Scholar; Foner, Philip S., History of the Labor Movement in the United States, vol. 4 (New York, 1965)Google Scholar. See also Kornbluh, J.L., Rebel Voices: An IWW Anthology, (Ann Arbor, 1964)Google Scholar and the memoir published in that time: Flynn, Elizabeth Gurley, The Rebel Girl: An Autobiography (New York, 1973)Google Scholar. The Italians were also reading, in translation, Renshaw, Patrick, The Wobblies: The Story of the IWW and Syndicalism in the United States (New York, 1967)Google Scholar.

6. Introduction to Beyond the Nation: Pushing the Boundaries of US History from a Transatlantic Perspective, ed. Fasce, F., Vaudagna, M., and Baritono, R. (Torino, 2003), 11 Google Scholar.

7. Ibid . On the political use of American history in Italy, see Vaudagna, Maurizio, “American History at Home and Abroad”, Journal of American History 81 (1994): 1157–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar and by the same author, “American Studies in Italy: Historical Legacies, Public Contexts and Scholarly Trends”, History of Historiography 51 (2007): 17–63 Google Scholar.

8. Ferner, A. and Hyman, R., eds. “Italy: The Dual Character of Industrial Relations”, in Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, (Oxford, 1998)Google Scholar (with M. Regini).

9. Lichtenstein, Nelson, State of the Union: A Century of American Labor (Princeton, 2002)Google Scholar.

10. Contini, Giovanni, “The Rise and Fall of Shop Floor Bargaining at FIAT, 1945–1980” in The Automobile Industry and its Workers, ed. Tolliday, Steven and Zeitlin, Jonathan (Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar. See also Contini, Giovanni, “Politics, Law and Shop Floor Bargaining in Postwar Italy” in The Automobile Industry and its Workers, ed. Tolliday, Steven and Zeitlin, Jonathan (Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar.

11. Longo, Biagio, “Meno salario, più reddito: la cassa integrazione”, Primo Maggio 5 (1975): 18–33 Google Scholar.

12. These arguments are expounded in a series of key texts, such as Tronti, Mario, Operai e capital (Torino: 1966)Google Scholar; and the edited collection of Panzieri, Raniero, Spontaneità e organizzazione : gli anni del ‘Quaderni rossi’, 1959–1964 (Pisa, 1994)Google Scholar; see also Wright, Steve, Storming Heaven: Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism (London, 2002)Google Scholar; and Trotta, Giuseppe and Milana, Fabio, eds., L'operaismo degli anni Sessanta. Da ‘Quaderni rossi’ a ‘classe operaia’ (Roma, 2008)Google Scholar.

13. Pizzolato, Nicola, “Transnational Radicals: Labour Dissent and Political Activism in Detroit and Turin (1950–1970)”, International Review of Social History 56 (2011): 1–30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Cleaver, Harry, Reading Capital Politically (Austin, TX, 1979), 59–76 Google Scholar.

14. For an overview, see Glaberman, Martin, ed., Marxism for Our Times: CLR James on Revolutionary Organization (Jackson, MS, 1999), xi–xxvi Google Scholar.

15. A. Negri, “John M. Keynes e la teoria capitalistica dello stato nel ’29” in Operai e stato: lotte operaie e riforma dello stato capitalistico tra rivoluzione d'Ottobre e New Deal, ed. A. Negri, S. Bologna, G. P. Rawick, M. Gobbini, L. Ferrari Bravo, F. Gambino (Milan, 1972).

16. Negri, Antonio, Books for Burning. Between Civil War and Democracy in 1970s Italy (London, 2005), xxxiii–xxxivGoogle Scholar.

17. See the introduction of Ferdinando Fasce to Musto, “Gli IWW e il movimento operaio Americano,” Altronovecento 15 (2010), http://www.fondazionemicheletti.it/altronovecento/Default.aspx?id_articolo=15 (accessed January 26, 2017); Bock, Gisella, “L'altro movimento operaio negli Stati Uniti: l'operaio massa e gli Industrial Workers of the World, 1905–1922”, in La formazione dell'operaio massa negli USA 1898/1922, ed. Bock, Gisella, Carpignano, Paolo, Ramirez, Bruno (Milan, 1976)Google Scholar; Haywood, William D., La storia di Big Bill (Milano, 1977)Google Scholar; Ortoleva, Peppino, “Industrial Workers of the World” in Storia del Nord America, ed. Bairati, Piero, (Firenze, 1978)Google Scholar; John, Vincent Saint, L'IWW. La sua storia, struttura e metodi  (Milano, 1971)Google Scholar; Flynn, Elizabet Gurley, La ribelle (Milano, 1973)Google Scholar; Smith, Gibbs Morgan, Joe Hill (Milano, 1973)Google Scholar; Musto, Renato, Gli IWW e il movimento operaio americano (Napoli, 1975)Google Scholar; Jones, Mary Mother, L'autobiografia di Mamma Jones (Torino, 1977)Google Scholar; Chiappetta, Giuseppe, IWW. Storia e considerazioni critiche (Milano, 1978)Google Scholar.

18. Renshaw, Patrick, Il sindacalismo rivoluzionario negli Stati Uniti (Bari, 1970)Google Scholar; Allsop, Kenneth, Ribelli vagabondi nell'America dell'ultima frontiera (Bari, 1969)Google Scholar.

19. Cartosio, Bruno, “Gli emigrati italiani e l'Industrial Workers of the World”, in Gli Italiani fuori d'Italia. Glie emigrati italiani nei movimenti operai dei paesi d'adozione (1880–1940), ed, Bezza, B. (Milano, 1983), 359–96Google Scholar; Dadà, A., “Dadà, Aspetti del sindacalismo rivoluzionario statunitense: l'Industrial Workers of the World”, Ricerche Storiche, a. XI, 1981, 1 Google Scholar, 131–66; Gabaccia, Donna, “Worker Internationalism and Italian Labor History, 1870–1914”, International Labor and Working-Class History 45 (1994): 63–79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Levy, Carl, “Currents of Italian Syndicalism before 1926”, International Review of Social History 45 (2000): 209–250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar for a specific case of an Italian Wobbly returning to Italy.

20. Wright, Steve, Storming Heaven. Class Composition and Struggle in the Italian Autonomist Movement (London, 2002): 191–96Google Scholar.

21. Cartosio, Bruno, “Note e documenti sugli Industrial Workers of the World”, Primo Maggio 1 (1973), 43–44 Google Scholar.

22. Cartosio, “Note e documenti,” 49; Vincent St. John, “Political Parties and the IWW,” ca. 1924. Dated as 1910 in the Cartosio article. Full text in the URL http://www.iww.org/history/library/SaintJohn/parties (accessed February 5, 2015).

23. Tronti, Mario, “La fabbrica e la società”, Quaderni Rossi 2 (1962): 30 Google Scholar.

24. Cartosio, “Note e documenti,” 52: “Dal momento che la lotta di classe era, ogni giorno, la realtà. E sul modo di intervenire nelle diverse realtà di lotta la creatività degli organizzatori e militanti IWW diede la maggiore prova di sé.”

25. Tait, Serena, “Alle origini del movimento comunista negli Stati Uniti: Louis Fraina teorico della azione di massa”, Primo Maggio 1 (1973): 21 Google Scholar.

26. Bologna, Sergio, “Composizione di classe e teoria del partito alle origini del movimento consigliare”, in Operai e Stato, ed. Negri, Antonio et al. (Milano, 1972), 13–24 Google Scholar.

27. Ortoleva, Peppino, “Composizione di classe e crisi dello stato”, Primo Maggio 3–4 (1974): 56 Google Scholar.

28. Preface to Glaberman, Martin, Classe Operaia, Imperialismo e Rivoluzione negli USA (Torino, 1974)Google Scholar.

29. Dulles, F. Rhea, Storia del movimento operaio americano (Milano, 1953)Google Scholar; Gordon, C. S., Parker, V. D., Fattori di pace sindacale negli Stati Uniti: studi e rapporti su industrie americane (Roma, 1960)Google Scholar; United States Department of Labor, Quarant'anni di conquiste del movimento operaio americano (1913–1953) (Roma, 1954)Google Scholar; Brumm, J. and Reedy, T., Il movimento sindacale negli Stati Uniti (Roma, 1952)Google Scholar. For a brief historiographical discussion, see “Classe operaia e potere politico in USA” in Primo Maggio 3–4 (1974)Google Scholar.

30. Glaberman, Classe Operaia. For these connections, see also Boggs, Grace Lee, Living for a Change: An Autobiography (Minneapolis, 1998), 140 Google Scholar.

31. Operai e stato; Rawick, G., Lo schiavo americano dal tramonto all'alba (Milano, 1972)Google Scholar. See Cartosio's preface for the theme of the autonomy of the slave. Through the same connection, it published the book of another member of the group, James Boggs, whose La Rivoluzione Americana, a study of black activism in the 1960s, had been published by Jaca Books (Milan) in 1968.

32. Pizzolato, Nicola, Challenging Global Capitalism: Labor Migration, Radical Struggle, and Urban Change in Detroit and Turin (New York, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Interview with Bruno Cartosio, Futuro Anteriore, 7–8.

33. Archivio Storico Fiat, Fiat: le fasi della crescita (Torino, 1996), 129–38Google Scholar.

34. Pansa, Giampaolo and Romiti, Cesare, Questi anni alla Fiat (Milano, 1988), 10Google Scholar.

35. “Inflazione Italian 1975,” Worldwide Inflation Data, http://it.inflation.eu/tassi-di-inflazione/italia/inflazione-storica/cpi-inflazione-italia-1975.aspx (accessed May 16, 2015).

36. Alemanni, , Ferigo, , Gheddo, , Lattes, , Rispoli, , Sburlati, , and Serafino, Autoriduzione: cronache e riflessioni di una lotta operaia e popolare: settembre-dicembre 1974 (Sapere, 1974)Google Scholar.

37. Marazzi, Christian, “Moneta e capital finanziario”, in Genealogie del futuro. Sette lezioni per sovvertire il presente, ed. Roggero, Gigi and Zanin, Adelino (Verona, 2013), 72Google Scholar.

38. Ramirez, Bruno, “The Working Class Struggle against the Crisis: Self-Reduction of Prices in Italy”, Zerowork 1 (1975): 142–150 Google Scholar. Villani, Luciano, “Neanche le otto lire. Lotte territoriali a Roma (1972–1975)”, Zapruder 32 (2013): 22–39 Google Scholar. “Gli aumenti del metano, l'autoriduzione e le nostre proposte,” Centro Piero Gobetti, Fondo Marcello Vitale, Subfondo Valentina Donvito, folder UA2, Lotte per la casa, Torino, 1969–75; Cherki, Eddi and Wieviorka, Michel, “Autoreduction Movements in Turin, 1974”, in Autonomia. Post Political Politics Semiotext(e) 3 (1980), 72–80 Google Scholar.

39. For this comparison, see the introduction by Peppino Ortoleva for Davis, Mike, “Il cronometro e lo zoccolo”, Primo Maggio 7 (1976): 29Google Scholar.

40. Berti, Lapo, “Astrattizzazione del lavoro”, in La tribù delle talpe, ed. Bologna, Sergio (Milano, 1977), 125–139, at 127Google Scholar.

41. Comito, Vincenzo, La Fiat: tra crisi e ristrutturazione (Roma, 1982)Google Scholar. Berta, Giuseppe, Conflitto industriale e sistema d'impresa alla Fiat, 1919–1979 (Bologna, 1979)Google Scholar.

42. The statistics for absenteeism were marked by a steady increase in Italy (and elsewhere) throughout the early 1970s, going up from 155 million hours in 1968 to 219 million hours in 1971. At FIAT, absenteeism almost tripled between 1968 and 1973. See “Assenteismo e cicli di lotte in Italia”, Primo Maggio 6 (1975–76)Google Scholar.

43. Lapo Berti, “Astrattizzazione del lavoro,” 128.

44. One workerist describes the 1977 upheaval in this way: “The 1977 movement was something completely different. It was a new and interesting movement because, firstly, it did not really have roots in previous movements, or maybe it did, but in a highly complex manner. It clearly had another social basis, different from both 1968 and 1973. It had a social composition based on youth who had broken with or rejected the political elites, including the elites of 1968, including therefore the groups of Lotta Continua, or even of Autonomia Organizzata. So, it broke not only with the traditional communist movement, but also with 1968. It broke exactly with the vision of communism, while, at the end of the day, also the workerists thought of themselves as being the “true communists.” The ‘77 Movement absolutely did not want to be “truly communist.” Cuninghame, Patrick, “For an Analysis of Autonomia: Interview with Sergio Bologna”, Left History 7 (2000) 96Google Scholar.

45. Luca Meldolesi, ‘Per lo sviluppo della tribù: un commento’, in La Tribù delle talpe, 140–48; see also Berardi, Franco, La nefasta utopia di Potere Operaio (Roma, 1998)Google Scholar.

46. Meldolesi, ‘Per lo sviluppo della tribù’, 147.

47. Renzacci, Raffaello, “Lottare alla Fiat”, in Cento… e uno anni di Fiat, a cura di Antonio Moscato (Bolsena, 2000), 54Google Scholar.

48. “Atti del convegno operaio di Lotta Continua”, Bollettino interno 2 (1976 ca)Google Scholar; Bobbio, Luigi, Lotta Continua, storia di un'organizzazione rivoluzionaria (Roma, 1979), 156–58Google Scholar. For a long time, the internal division of the LC caused by the “35 hours” issue continued to be debated. See “Intervento del compagno Mario di Novara,” in Lotta Continua, August 28, 1976, 2.

49. Tesi n. 4, “Le tesi, le relazioni politiche, lo statuto,” Primo Congresso Nazionale di Lotta Continua, Roma, gennaio 1975, Centro Documentazione M. Grassi, Roma. See also Cazzullo, Aldo, I ragazzi che volevano fare la rivoluzione. 1968–1978: Storia critica di Lotta continua (Milano, 1998), 248–52Google Scholar.

50. De Luna, Giovanni, Le ragioni di un decennio: 1969–1979. Militanza, violenza, sconfitta, memoria (Milano, 2011), 120Google Scholar and Bobbio, Lotta Continua, 130.

51. Wright, Steve, “A Party of Autonomy?” in The Philosophy of Antonio Negri: Resistance in Practice, ed. Murphy, Timothy S. and Mustapha, Abdul-Karim (London, 2005)Google Scholar.

52. “Atti del seminario di Padova”, in Comitati autonomi operai di Roma, Autonomia operaia, (Roma, 1976), 50–51 Google Scholar.

53. Ibid. Lo sciogliemento del Gramsci, 54.

54. Musto, Renato, Storia degli IWW. Documenti (Napoli, 1975), xviiiGoogle Scholar and xix.

55. Both the network and the newsletter went into decline and eventually ceased operations in the 1980s. A short account of this group is available at http://www.umanitanova.org/tag/collegamenti-wobbly/ (accessed March 11, 2016).

56. Fasce, Ferdinando, “Gli Industrial Workers of the World: La classe operaia Americana tra spontaneità e organizzazione”, in Le Lotte sociali negli Stati Uniti alla fine del Diciannovesimo secolo (Firenze, 1974)Google Scholar, reprinted in Wobbly! L'Industrial Workers of the World e il suo tempo, ed. Cartosio, Bruno (Milano, 2007), 17–70 Google Scholar.

57. Interview with Bruno Cartosio in Borio, Guido, Pozzi, Francesca, and Roggero, Gigi, Futuro Anteriore: Dai “Quaderni Rossi” ai movimenti globali: ricchezze e limiti dell'operaismo italiano (Roma, 2002)Google Scholar, attached CD-ROM, 5.

58. Sergio Bologna, “Amo il rosso e il nero, odio il rosa e il viola” in Tribù delle Talpe, 156; Mario Tronti, “Lenin in Inghilterra,” Classe Operaia, February 11, 1964.

59. Musto, Storia degli IWW, xl.

60. Tranfaglia, Nicola and Mantelli, Brunello, “Apogeo e collasso della ‘città-fabbrica’: Torino dall'autunno caldo alla sconfitta operaia del 1980’ in Storia di Torino, ed. Tranfaglia, Nicola (Torino: Einaudi, 1999), 829–62Google Scholar.”

61. Revelli, Marco, Lavorare in Fiat (Milano, 1989)Google Scholar; Arisio, Luigi, Vita da capi. L'altra faccia di una grande fabbrica (Milano, 1990)Google Scholar.

62. Serneri, Simone Neri, ed., Verso la lotta armata. La politica della violenza nella sinistra radical degli anni Settanta (Bologna, 2014)Google Scholar.

63. Tranfaglia, Mantelli, “Apogeo e collasso della ‘città-fabbrica,’” 838–849. Though deeply rooted in historical memory, in retrospect this connection is questionable. Of the sixty-one workers dismissed by FIAT for political violence in 1969, only one was eventually identified as belonging to a terrorist group. See Neri Serseri, ed, Verso la lotta armata.

64. For the decline of trade unions’ clout in the 1980s, see Berta, Giuseppe, “L'arena delle relazioni industriali negli anni Ottanta: le occasioni mancate” in Gli anni Ottanta come storia, ed. Colarizi, Simona (Catanzaro, 2004), 345–46Google Scholar.

65. Polo, Gabriele and Sabattini, Claudio, Restaurazione italiana. FIAT, la sconfitta operaia dell'autunno 1980. Alle origini della controrivoluzione liberista (Roma, 2000)Google Scholar; Galli, P. and Pertegato, G., Fiat 1980: Sindrome della Sconfitta (Roma, 1994)Google Scholar; Annibaldi, Cesare, Impresa, Partecipazione, Conflitto. Considerazioni dall'esperienza Fiat. Dialogo con Giuseppe Berta (Venezia, 1944)Google Scholar.

66. Introduction to Beyond the Nation: Pushing the Boundaries of US History from a Transatlantic Perspective, ed. Fasce, F., Vaudagna, M., and Baritono, R. (Torino, 2003), 11Google Scholar.