Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:17:00.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calendar Age of Lisakovsky Timbers Attributed to Andronovo Community of Bronze Age in Eurasia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Irina P Panyushkina ,
Barbara J Mills ,
Emma R Usmanova  and
Li Cheng
Irina P Panyushkina*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Barbara J Mills
Affiliation:
Anthropology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Emma R Usmanova
Affiliation:
Karaganda State University, Karaganda 100028, Kazakhstan
Li Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: panush@ltrr.arizona.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We measured radiocarbon ages of 22 decadal replications and 1 bulk group from 5 tree-ring specimens using acid-base-acid pretreatment and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). The study has the goal of refining the precision and resolution of a segment of the conventional Bronze Age chronology in the Eurasian steppe attributed to the multicultural community known as Andronovo. The archaeological timbers were gathered from 3 cemeteries at the Lisakovsky cluster of sites in Kazakhstan, where there is a prominent Andronovo occurrence that appears to show evidence of overlapping Alakul and Fedorovo cultures in the southern margin of the Eurasian steppe. The new set of Andronovo calendar dates derived from 14C wiggles and a composite floating tree-ring chronology places the cultural overlap from 1780 to 1660 cal BC. Results indicate older ages of artifacts from the Lisakovsky site than were previously determined by the typological chronology, shifting them from the Late Bronze Age to also include the transition between the Middle and Late Bronze Age. The chronological order of the Lisakovsky cemeteries provides strong evidence of contemporaneity of the Alakul and Fedorovo cultures in the Tobol River Valley for a portion of the 120-yr period of occupation. We discuss an application of the dated Alakul-Fedorovo overlap to the relationship and origin of different groups of the Andronovo community in the Ural region. Our results demonstrate the substantial power that tree rings from Bronze Age timbers provide for developing a precise and highly resolved calendar chronology of prehistoric human occupation in the Eurasian steppe during the 2nd millennium BC.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , 2008 , pp. 459 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Anthony, DW. 2007. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 566 p.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, van der Plicht, J, Weninger, B. 2001. ‘Wiggle matching’ radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 43(2A):381–9.Google Scholar
Frachetti, MD. 2004. Bronze Age pastoral landscapes of Eurasia and the nature of social interaction in the mountain steppe zone of eastern Kazakhstan [PhD dissertation]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Gening, VF, Zdanovich, GB, Gening, VV. 1992. Sintashna-1: arkheologicheske pamyatniki ariyskikh piemen Uralo-Kazakhskikh stepey [Sintashta I: archaeological sites of Aryan tribes in the Ural-Kazakh steppe]. Chelyabinsk: Yujno-Uralskoe Publishing House. In Russian.Google Scholar
Gorsdorf, J, Parzinger, H, Nagler, A. 2004. 14C dating of the Siberian steppe zone from Bronze Age to Scythian time. In: Scott, EM, Alekseev, AY, Zaitseva, GI, editors. Impact of the Environment on Human Migration in Eurasia. NATO Science Series IV. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 83–90.Google Scholar
Grigoriev, SA. 2002. The Sintashta culture and Indo-European problem. In: Jones-Bley, K, Zdanovich, D, editors. Complex Societies of Central Eurasia from the 3rd to the 1st Millennium EC: Regional Specifics in Light of Global Models. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 45. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Study of Man. p 148–60.Google Scholar
Hanks, BK, Epimakhov, AV, Renfrew, AC. 2007. Towards a refined chronology for the Bronze Age of the southern Urals, Russia. Antiquity 81(312):353–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koryakova, LN, Epimakhov, AV. 2007. The Urals and Western Siberia in the Bronze and Iron Ages. New York: Cambridge University Press. 383 p.Google Scholar
Kuzmina, E. 1994. Otkuda prishli Indoaryi? Materialnaia kultura piemen andronovskoi obshchnosti i proiskhozhdenie indoirantsev [Whence came the Indo Aryans]. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura. In Russian.Google Scholar
Lange, T, Barbetti, M, Donahue, DJ. 2001. Radiocarbon measurements of tree rings from 14 ka Huon pine. Radiocarbon 43(2A):449–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panyushkina, IP, Sljusarenko, IY, Bikov, N, Bogdanov, E. 2007. Floating larch tree-ring chronologies from archaeological timbers in the Russian Altai between about 800 BC and AD 800. Radiocarbon 49(2):693–702.Google Scholar
Potemkina, TM. 1985. Bronzoviy vek leso-stepnogo Protobolya [Bronze Age of forest-steppe Pritobolye]. Moscow: Nauka. In Russian.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0-26 cal kyr BP Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Rinn, F. 2003. Time Series Analysis and Presentation software (TSAP-Win). User Reference (Version 0.53). RinnTech, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Salnikov, KV. 1967. Ocherki drevney istorii Yuzhnogo Urala [Ancient history of the southern Urals]. Moscow: Nauka. In Russian.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P. 2007. Error and uncertainty in radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 49(2):427–40.Google Scholar
Shishlina, NI, van der Plicht, J, Hedges, REM, Zazovskaya, EP, Sevastyanov, VS, Chichagova, OA. 2007. The catacomb cultures of the north-west Caspian steppe: 14C chronology, reservoir effect, and paleodiet. Radiocarbon 49(2):713–26.Google Scholar
Stefanov, VI, Korochkova, ON. 2006. Urefty-I. Ekaterinburg: Ural State University Press. In Russian.Google Scholar
Sternberg, LSL. 1989. Oxygen and hydrogen isotope measurements in plant cellulose analysis. In: Linskens, HF, Jackson, JF, editors. Plant Fibers. Modern Methods of Plant Analysis. Volume 10. New York: Springer-Verlag. p 89–99.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Reimer, RW. 2005. CALIB radiocarbon calibration [software]. URL: http://calib.qub.ac.uk/calib/.Google Scholar
Usmanova, ER. 2005. Mogil'nik Lesakovskiy: fakti i paralleli [Burial complex Lisakovsky: facts and parallels]. Karaganda: Lisakovsk. In Russian.Google Scholar
Weninger, B. 1997. Monte Carlo wiggle matching. Zur statistischen auswertung der mittelneolithischen 14C-daten von Hasselsweiler 2, Inden 3, and Inden 1. In: Biermann, E, editor. Großgartach und Oberlauterbach. Interregionale Beziehungen im süddeutschen Mittelneolithikum. Archdologische Berichte 8:91–113.Google Scholar