Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:22:58.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coupled Mechanism on Interfacial Slip and Shear Lag for Twin-Cell Composite Box Beam Under Even Load

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

J. Yu ,
S. W. Hu ,
Y. C. Xu  and
B. Fan
J. Yu*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Structural EngineeringNanjing Hydraulic Research InstituteNanjing, China College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjing, China
S. W. Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Structural EngineeringNanjing Hydraulic Research InstituteNanjing, China
Y. C. Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Structural EngineeringNanjing Hydraulic Research InstituteNanjing, China
B. Fan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Structural EngineeringNanjing Hydraulic Research InstituteNanjing, China College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjing, China
*
*Corresponding author (yzyzyz322@126.com)
Get access

Abstract

A model of Twin-cell Composite Box Beam (TCCBB), which is composed of concrete plate and thin-walled steel box beam with twin-cell, is proposed in this paper. Combined with structural features, longitudinal interfacial slip mode (LISM) and related shear hysteresis functions (SHFS) of this TCCBB model are defined respectively; analytical formulation describing combination effect between interfacial slip and shear lag is launched for this TCCBB model under even load. Based on established governing differential equations and its relative boundary conditions (calculated with compatible mechanism of interfacial slip and shear lag effect), closed form solutions of normal stress and shear stress are derived for this TCCBB model, as well as effective shear-lag coefficient and effective coupled behavior coefficient. To obtain more accurate computational results of specific coupled mechanism of this TCCBB model, numerical example is carried out to analyze and predict coupled mechanism of interfacial slip and shear lag effect for this type of composite structures.

Keywords

TCCBB modelCoupled mechanismInterfacial slipShear lag effect
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 601 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kemp, A. R., “Differences in Inelastic Properties of Steel and Composite Beams,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 34, pp. 187–206 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Yassin, A. Y. M. and Nethercot, D. A., “Cross-Sectional Properties of Complex Composite Beams,” Engineering Structures, 29, pp. 195–212 (2007).Google Scholar
3. Dikaros, I.-C. and Sapountzakis, E.-J., “Nonuniform Shear Warping Effect in the Analysis of Composite Beams By Bem,” Engineering Structures, 76, pp. 215–234 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Miao, L. and Chen, D., “The Effect of Shear Lag on Long-Term Behavior of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams,” Advanced Materials Research, 255-260, pp. 1070–1076 (2011).Google Scholar
5. Chang, S.-T., “Shear Lag Effect in Simply Supported Prestressed Concrete Box Girder,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 9, pp. 178–184 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Zhang, Y.-H., “Improved Finite-Segment Method for Analyzing Shear Lag Effect in Thin-Walled Box Girders,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 138, pp. 1279–1284 (2012).Google Scholar
7. Zhang, Y.-P. and Li, C.-X., “Influence of Main Structural Dimension on the Shear Lag Effect of Box Girder Used in Cable-Stayed Bridge,” Applied Mechanics Materials, 405-408, pp. 1483–1488 (2013).Google Scholar
8. Bu, J.-Q. and Mo, J.-L., “Shear Lag Effect for PC Continuous Curved Box-Section Girder Bridge Under The Moving Vehicular Loads,” Civil Engineering and Technology, 2, pp. 25–33 (2013).Google Scholar
9. Jiang, R. J., Wu, Q. M., Xiao, Y. F., Yi, X. W. and Gai, W. M., “Study on Shear Lag Effect of A Pc Box Girder Bridge With Corrugated Steel Webs Under Self Weight,” Applied Mechanics Materials, 638-640, pp. 1092–1098 (2014).Google Scholar
10. Lertsima, C., Chaisomphob, T. and Yamaguchi, E., “Stress Concentration Due to Shear Lag in Simply Supported Box Girders,” Engineering Structures, 26, pp. 1093–1101 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Zhou, W.-B., Jiang, L.-Z., Liu, Z.-J. and Liu, X.-J., “Closed-Form Solution to Thin-Walled Box Girders Considering Effects of Shear Deformation and Shear Lag,” Journal of Central South University, 19, pp. 2650–2655 (2012).Google Scholar
12. Gordaninejad, F. and Ghazavi, A., “Effect of Shear Deformation on Bending of Laminated Composite Beams,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 111, pp. 159–164 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Pluzsik, A. and Kollar, L.-P., “Effects of Shear Deformation and Restrained Warping on the Displacements of Composite Beams,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 21, pp. 1517–1541 (2002).Google Scholar
14. Esendemir, U., Usal, M. R. and Usal, M., “The Effects of Shear on the Deflection of Simply Supported Composite Beam Loaded Linearly,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 25, pp. 835–846 (2006).Google Scholar
15. Lopez-Anido, R. and Gandarao, H. V. S., “Warping Solution for Shear Lag in Thin-Walled Orthotropic Composite Beams,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 122, pp. 449–457 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Zhou, W.-B., Jiang, L.-Z. and Liu, Z.-J., “Closed-Form Solution for Shear Lag Effects of Steel-Concrete Composite Box Beams Considering Shear Deformation and Slip,” Journal of Central South University, 19, pp. 2976–2982 (2002).Google Scholar
17. Henriques, D., Gonçalves, R. and Camotim, D., “A Physically Non-Linear GBT-Based finite Element for Steel and Steel-Concrete Beams Including Shear Lag Effects,” Thin-Walled Structures, 90, pp. 202–215 (2015).Google Scholar
18. Hu, S.-W., Yu, J. and Zhang, W.-J., “Analysis of Shear Lag Effect in Double-Box Composite Beams with Wide Flanges Under Concentrated Loading,” Engineering Mechanics, 32, pp. 120–130 (2015).Google Scholar
19. Hu, S.-W., Yu, J., Huang, Y.-Q. and Xiao, S.-Y., “Theoretical and Experimental Investigations on Shear Lag Effect of Double-Box Composite Beam with Wide Flange Under Symmetrical Loading,” Journal of Mechanics, 31, pp. 653–663 (2015).Google Scholar
20. Yu, J., Hu, S.-W., Zhang, Z.-G. and Wei, C.-J., “Shear Lag and Related Parameter Impact Researches for Twin-Cell Composite Box Beam under Concentrated Loads,” Journal of Mechanics, 33, pp. 443–460 (2017).Google Scholar
21. Dezi, L., Gara, F. and Leoni, G., “Shear-Lag Effect in Twin-Girder Composite Decks,” Steel and Composite Structures, 3, pp. 111–122 (2003).Google Scholar
22. Gara, F., Ranzi, G. and Leoni, G., “Partial Interaction Analysis with Shear-Lag Effects of Composite Bridges: A Finite Element Implementation for Design Applications,” Advanced Steel Construction, 7, pp. 1–16 (2011).Google Scholar
23. Lin, Z. B. and Zhao, J., “Modeling Inelastic Shear Lag in Steel Box Beams,” Engineering Structures, 41, pp. 90–97 (2012).Google Scholar
24. Ecsedi, I. and Baksa, A., “Analytical Solution for Layered Composite Beams with Partial Shear Interaction Based on Timoshenko Beam Theory,” Engineering Structures, 115, pp. 107–117 (2016).Google Scholar
25. Code for Design of Steel Structures, GB50017-2003 China Planning Press, Beijing (2003).Google Scholar
26. Code for Design of Concrete Structures, GB50010-2010, China Architecture Industry Press, Beijing (2010).Google Scholar