Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-md2j5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T00:01:47.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teinver SA and Others v. Argentine Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2018

Anne Collins
Anne Collins*
Affiliation:
Works for Clifford Chance but writes wholly in a personal capacity
*
Email: Anne.Collins@CliffordChance.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 21 July 2017, an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunal (Tribunal) chaired by Judge Thomas Buergenthal, with co-arbitrators Henri C. Alvarez (Claimants’ appointee) and Kamal Hossain (Respondent's appointee), issued its award in Teinver SA and others v. Argentine Republic (Award). The Tribunal upheld, by a majority, several of Claimants’ claims, and ordered Argentina to pay US$320 million in compensation, as well as 20% of Claimants’ legal costs and expenses. On 22 November 2017, Argentina registered a request to have the Award annulled.

Type
Case Summaries
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 179 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Anne Collins 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Award, para. 1147.

2 Award, para. 170.

3 Award, paras. 669–678.

4 Award, para. 660.

5 Award, paras. 884–885.

6 Award, paras. 849–857.

7 Award, paras. 924–927.

8 Award, para. 854.

9 Award, paras. 854–855.

10 Award, para. 865.

11 Award, paras. 659–660.

12 Award, paras. 669–678.

13 Award, paras. 983–986.

14 Award, paras. 1019–1021.

15 Award, paras. 1001–1011.

16 Award, paras. 1033–1039.

17 Award, para. 1038.

18 Award, para. 884.

19 See, e.g., MTD Equity S.dn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, Award, 25 May 2004); Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, 27 August 2009).

20 Award, paras. 886–891.

21 Award, para. 892.

22 Award, paras. 896, 903.

23 Award, para. 906–910.

24 Dissenting Opinion, para. 1.

25 Dissenting Opinion, paras. 40–50.

26 Dissenting Opinion, paras. 95–98.

27 Award, para. 1092.

28 Award, para. 1100.

29 Award, para. 1112.

30 Award, para. 1143.