Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:18:01.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds and Resistance Management Strategies: An Indiana Grower Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William G. Johnson  and
Kevin D. Gibson
William G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Kevin D. Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: wgj@purdue.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corn and soybean growers across Indiana were surveyed during winter 2003/2004 to assess their perceptions about the importance of glyphosate-resistant weeds and management tactics to prevent development of resistant populations. The survey showed two intriguing observations. First, 65% of survey respondents expressed moderate or low levels of concern about weeds developing resistance to glyphosate, whereas 36% expressed a high level of concern. Second, when asked an open-ended question regarding the factors that contribute to development of glyphosate-resistant weeds, 58% of the responses included repeated use of the same mode of action. Other factors such as poor application techniques or timing (33%), unique weed characteristics (8%) and changes in tillage practices (1%) were also mentioned. The survey showed that even though a relatively low percentage of respondents were highly concerned about resistance, they still expressed a willingness to use field scouting, tank-mix partners with glyphosate for burn-down and postemergence weed control, and soil-applied residual herbicides as resistance management strategies. This survey also showed that growers who farm 800 ha or more were more concerned about glyphosate resistance and more likely to adopt resistance management strategies than smaller growers.

Keywords

Glyphosatecorn, Zea mayssoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrSurveyGRglyphosate-resistant
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 768 - 772
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2005. United States Department of Agriculture NASS-Acreage. Web page: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bba/acrg0605.txt. Accessed: August 2005.Google Scholar
Aref, S. and Pike, D. R. 1998. Midwest farmers perceptions of crop pest infestations. Agron. J. 90:819–825.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Johnson, B., Gibson, K., and Weller, S. 2004. Crop rotation and tillage system influence late-season incidence of giant ragweed and horseweed in Indiana soybean. Online. Crop Manage. DOI:10.1094/CM-2004-0923-02-BR.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L., Morrison, I. N., and Kelner, D. 1997. Field and producer survey of ACCase resistant wild oat in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:709–715.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, L. D., Padgette, S. R., Kimball, S. L., and Wells, B. H. 1997. Perspectives on glyphosate-resistant weeds. Weed Technol. 11:189–198.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Herms, C. P., and Doohan, D. J. 2002. Crop rotation and tillage system effects on seedbanks. Weed Sci. 50:448–460.Google Scholar
Czapar, G. G., Currey, M. P., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois. Weed Technol. 11:828–831.Google Scholar
Davis, V., Johnson, B., and Nice, G. 2004. Welcome to the home of horseweed. Web page: http://www.btny.purdue.edu/weedscience/marestail/index.htm. Accessed: September 1, 2005.Google Scholar
DeGennaro, F. P. and Weller, S. C. 1984. Differential susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 32:472–476.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Jans, S., and Smith, M. 1998. Issues in the economics of pesticide use in agriculture: a review of empirical evidence. Rev. Agric. Econ. 20:462–488.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Johnson, W. G., and Hilger, D. 2005. Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol. 19:1065–1070.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Johnson, W. G., and Hilger, D. 2006. Farmer perceptions of weed problems in corn and soybean rotation systems. Weed Technol. 20:777–781.Google Scholar
Johnson, B., Barnes, J., Gibson, K., and Weller, S. 2004. Late season weed escapes in Indiana soybean fields. Online. Crop Manage. DOI:10.1094/CM-2004-0923-01-BR.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, R. S., Lindner, R. K., Pannel, D. J., and Powles, S. B. 2002. Resistance and the herbicide resource: perceptions of Western Australia grain growers. J. Crop Protect 21:1067–1075.Google Scholar
Loux, M., Stachler, J., Johnson, B., Davis, V., Nice, G., and Nordby, D. 2005. Horseweed biology and management. Purdue University Coop. Ext. Pub. ID-323.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. 2003. Use of soybean production surveys to determine weed management needs of South Carolina farmers. Weed Technol. 17:195–201.Google Scholar
Patzoldt, W. H., Hager, A. G., and Tranel, P. J. 2004. Evaluation of glyphosate responses in tall waterhemp (A. tuberculatus) using a quantitative genetics approach. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 44:231.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. M., Sellers, B. A., and Smeda, R. J. 2004. Differential response of common ragweed to glyphosate. Champaign, IL: North Central Weed Science Society. Abstract 59:27.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 2000. The impact of glyphosate-tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Manage. Sci. 56:320–326.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L. 2002. A regional perspective on glyphosate resistance management. Champaign, IL: North Central Weed Science Society. Abstract 57:213.Google Scholar
Trainer, G. D., Loux, M. M., Harrison, S. K., and Regnier, E. 2005. Response of horseweed biotypes to foliar applications of cloransulam-methyl and glyphosate. Weed Technol. 19:231–236.Google Scholar
Zelaya, I. A. and Owen, M. D. K. 2002. Potential for selection of glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus tuberculatus . Champaign, IL: North Central Weed Science Society. Abstract 57:159.Google Scholar