Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:24:07.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Existence and God's Attributes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

James E. Tomberlin
Affiliation:
California State University, Northridge

Extract

The purpose of the present paper is to formulate and (hopefully) resolve a certain puzzle surrounding God's existence and the standard attributes traditionally assigned to God (omnipotence, perfect goodness, omniscience, and the like).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 220 note 1 For the argument see my papers: Singular Terms and Truth-Values’, Logigue et Analyse, Vol. XI (December 1968): 516520Google Scholar; Plantinga's Puzzles About God and Other Minds’, The Philosophical Forum, Vol. I, No. 3 (Spring 1969): 365–92Google Scholar; A Correct Account of Essentialism?’, Critica, Vol. IV, No. 11–12 (May-September 1970): 5564Google Scholar; Prior on Time and Tense’, Review of Metaphysics, Vol. XXIV, No. 1 (September 1970): 5781.Google ScholarOmniscience and Necessity: Putting Humpty-Dumpty Together Again’, The Philosophical Forum, Vol. II, No. 1 (Fall 1970): 149–51Google Scholar; Malcolm on the Ontological ArgumentReligious Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1 (March 1972): 6570CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and ‘Existence and Existence Attributes’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (forthcoming).

page 220 note 2 For details, see my papers: ‘Prior on Time and Tense’, op. cit.; Existence-Attributes: A Second Look’, Review of Metaphysics, Vol. XXIV No. 4 (June 1971): 737–8; and ‘Existence and Existence Attributes’, op. cit.Google Scholar

page 221 note 1 Pike, Nelson, ‘Omnipotence and God's Ability to Sin’, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 3 (July 1969): 208–16.Google Scholar

page 221 note 2 Ibid. p. 208.

page 221 note 3 Ibid. p. 209.

page 223 note 1 I am indebted to my colleagues, Frank McGuinness and Dan Sedey, for valuable advice and criticism.