Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:02:05.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Migration and ethnicity in prehistoric Cyprus: Technology as habitus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

David Frankel
David Frankel*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Melbourne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the third millennium cal BC, there were major changes in many aspects of Cypriot material culture, technology and economy which characterize the division between the Chalcolithic and early Bronze Age on the island. Many innovations can be traced to Anatolian antecedents. These include a very wide array of domestic as well as agricultural and industrial technologies. Their nature and range make it possible to argue strongly for the movement of people to the island, rather than for other mechanisms of technology transfer and culture change. This identification of an intrusive group, with distinctive patterns of behaviour (habitus), opens up questions of prehistoric ethnicity, and the processes by which the initial maintenance of different lifeways by indigenous and settler communities eventually gave way to a common cultural system.

Les changements profonds qui prirent place dans de nombreux aspects de la culture materielle cypriote, de la technologie et de l'économie pendant le troisième millénaire BC, caractérisent, dans l'île, la division entre le chalcolithique et l'âge du bronze ancien. Bon nombre d'innovations peuvent être reliées à leurs antécédents anatoliens. Celles-ci comprennent un large ensemble de technologies domestiques, agricoles et industrielles qui à cause de leur nature et leur importance permettent de démontrer de façon convaincante que ces innovations sont dues à un afflux de populations nouvelles sur l'île. Il n'est donc pas nécessaire d'invoquer d'autres mechanismes de transfert de technologie et de changement de culture. L'identification d'un groupe intrusif à comportement distinct (habitus), permet de s'interroger sur l'ethnicité préhistorique ainsi que sur le processus qui a servi à maintenir initialement un style de vie différent pour les communautés indigènes et pour celles des immigrants, avant que celle-ci ne soit remplacé petit à petit par un système culturel commun.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Während des dritten Jahrtausends kal. BC fanden wichtige Änderungen in vielen Aspekten der zyprischen materiellen Kultur, Technologie und Ökonomie statt, die Trennung von Chalkolithikum und Frühbronzezeit auf der Insel charakterisieren. Viele lnnovationen können auf anatolische Vorläufer zurückgeführt werden. Diese Innovationen schließen eine beachtlichc Reihe von sowohl häuslichen als auch landwirtschaftlichen und industriellen Technologien ein. Ihre Art und ihr Umfang sprechen weit eher für die Wanderung von Menschen als für andere Mechanismen des Technologietransfers und Kulturwandels. Diese Identifikation einer eindringenden Gruppe mit andersartigen Handlungsweisen (habitus) eröffnet Fragen zur prähistorischen Ethnizität und zu den Prozessen, durch die ursprüngliche Beibehaltung der verschiedenen Lebensweisen der Einheimischen einerseits und Siedlergemeinschaften andererseits letztlich einem gemeinsamen kulturellen System Platz machte.

Keywords

archaeologyBronze AgeChalcolithicCyprusethnicitymigrationprehistorytechnology
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , 2000 , pp. 167 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W., Van Gerven, D. and Levy, R., 1978. The retreat from migrationism. Annual Review of Anthropology 7:483–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, D., 1990. Migration in archaeology: the baby and the bathwater. American Anthropologist 92:895–914.Google Scholar
Anthony, D., 1997. Prehistoric migration as a social process. In Chapman, J. and Hamerow, H. (eds), Migrations and Invasions in Archaeological Explanation: 21–32. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 664.Google Scholar
Banks, M., 1996. Ethnicity: Anthropological Constructions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barber, E.J.W., 1991. Prehistoric Textiles: The Development of Cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with Special Reference to the Aegean. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, G.C., 1987. Ethnicity and practice. Comparative Studies in Society and History 29:24–55.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catling, H.W., 1966. Cyprus in the Early Bronze Age. The Cambridge Ancient History, rev. edn, Vol. 1, Ch. XXVIb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1997. The impact of modern invasions and migrations on archaeological explanation. In Chapman, J. and Hamerow, H. (eds), Migrations and Invasions in Archaeological Explanation. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 664.Google Scholar
Crewe, L., 1998. Spindle Whorls: A Study of Form, Function and Decoration in Prehistoric Bronze Age Cyprus. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology Pocketbook 149. Jonsered: Paul Åströms Forlag.Google Scholar
Croft, P., 1991. Man and beast in Chalcolithic Cyprus. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 282/3:63–80.Google Scholar
Croft, P., 1996. Animal remains. In Frankel, D. and Webb, J.M. (eds), Marki Alonia. An Early and Middle Bronze Age Town in Cyprus. Excavations 1990–1994: 217–223. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 123. Jonsered: Paul Åströms Forlag.Google Scholar
Croft, P., 1998. Animal remains: synopsis. In Peltenburg, E. et al. (eds), Lemba Archaeological Project II. 1A. Excavations at Kissonerga-Mosphilia 1979–1992: 207–214. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 70:2. Jonsered: Paul Åströms Forlag.Google Scholar
Denning, G., 1992. Mr Bligh's Bad Language: Passion, Power and Theatre on the Bounty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dikalos, P., 1962. The Stone Age. The Swedish Cyprus Expedition, Vol. IV1A:1–204, Lund: The Swedish Cyprus Expedition.Google Scholar
Emberling, G., 1997. Ethnicity in complex societies: archaeological perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Research 5:295–344.Google Scholar
Flannery, K.V., 1972. The origins of the village as a settlement type in Mesoamerica and the Near East: a comparative study. In Ucko, P.J., Tringham, R. and Dimbleby, G.W. (eds), Man, Settlement and Urbanism: 23–53. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Flannery, K.V., 1993. Will the real model please stand up? Comments on Saidel's ‘Round House or Square’. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 6:109–117.Google Scholar
Frankel, D. and Webb, J.M., 1996. Marki Alonia. An Early and Middle Bronze Age Town in Cyprus. Excavations 1990–1994. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 123. Jonsered: Paul Åströms Forlag.Google Scholar
Frankel, D. and Webb, J.M., eds, 1998. Three faces of identity: ethnicity, community and status in the Cypriot Bronze Age. Mediterranean Archaeology 11:1–12.Google Scholar
Frankel, D., Webb, J.M. and Eslick, C., 1996. Anatolia and Cyprus in the third millennium BCE. A speculative model of interaction. In Bunnens, G. (ed.), Cultural Interactions in the Ancient Near East. ‘Abr Nahrain Supplementary Volume 5:37–50.Google Scholar
Gale, N.H., 1991. Metals and metallurgy in the Chalcolithic period. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 282/3:37–62.Google Scholar
Hall, J.M., 1997. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S., 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Reconstructing Identities in the Past and the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keswani, P.S., 1994. The social context of animal husbandry in early agricultural societies: ethnographic insights and an archaeological example from Cyprus. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13:255–277.Google Scholar
Kirch, P.V., 1980. The archaeological study of adaptation: theoretical and methodological issues. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 3:101–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, A.B., 1993. Social complexity: incipience, emergence and development on pre-historic Cyprus. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 292:85–106.Google Scholar
Knapp, A.B., in press. Conceptual boundaries and archaeological ethnicity: the case for prehistoric Cyprus. In Brown, K. and Hamilakis, Y. (eds), Inhabiting the Margins.Google Scholar
Knapp, A.B. and Cherry, J.F., 1994. Provenience Studies and Bronze Age Cyprus. Production, Exchange and Politico-Economic Change. Monographs in World Archaeology 21. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, R., ed., 1984. The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Lancaster: Reidel.Google Scholar
Manning, S.W., 1993. Prestige, distinction and competition: the anatomy of socioeconomic complexity in 4th-2nd millennium BCE Cyprus. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 292:35–58.Google Scholar
Mellink, M.J., 1991. Anatolian contacts with Chalcolithic Cyprus. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 282/3:167–175.Google Scholar
Peltenburg, E., ed., 1985. Lemba Archaeological Project I. Excavations at Lemba Lakkous, 1976–1983. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 70: 1. Göteborg: Paul Åströms Forlag.Google Scholar
Peltenburg, E., 1991. Local exchange in prehistoric Cyprus: an initial assessment of picrolite. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 282:107–126.Google Scholar
Peltenburg, E., 1993. Settlement discontinuity and resistance to complexity in Cyprus ca. 4500–2500 BCE. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 282/3:9–23.Google Scholar
Peltenburg, E., 1996. From isolation to state formation in Cyprus, c. 3500–1500 BC. In Karageorghis, V. and Michaelides, D. (eds), The Development of the Cypriot Economy: 14–44. Nicosia: University of Cyprus and the Bank of Cyprus.Google Scholar
Peltenburg, E., ed., 1998. Lemba Archaeological Project II.1A. Excavations at Kissonerga-Mosphilia 1979–1992. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 70:2. Jonsered: Paul Åströms Forlag.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M., 1962. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rogers, E.M., 1983. Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd edn. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B., 1992. Technological Perspectives on Behavioural Change. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D.W., 1970. The postmigration culture: a base for archaeological inference. In Longacre, W.A. (ed.), Reconstructing Prehistoric Pueblo Societies: 175–193. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J., 1989a. Introduction. In Shennan, S.J. (ed.), Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity: 1–32. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J., 1989b. Cultural transmission and cultural change. In van der Leeuw, S.E. and Torrence, R. (eds), What's New? A Closer Look at the Process of Innovation: 330–346. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A.G., 1981. Plough and pastoralism: aspects of the Secondary Products Revolution. In Hodder, I., Isaac, G. and Hammond, N. (eds), Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honour of David Clarke: 261–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, J.R., 1962. The Early Cypriot Bronze Age. The Swedish Cyprus Expedition, Vol. IV1A:205–401. Lund: The Swedish Cyprus Expedition.Google Scholar
Stos-Gale, Z.A., Macdonald, C.F. and Gale, N. H., 1991. New studies of Chalcolithic and early Bronze Age copper metallurgy in Cyprus. In Mohen, J.-P. and Eluère, C. (eds), Découverte du Métal: 341–356. Amis du Musée des Antiquités Nationales, Millénaires, Dossier 2. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Swiny, S., 1989. From round house to duplex: a re-assessment of prehistoric Cypriot Bronze Age society. In Peltenburg, E. (ed.), Early Society in Cyprus: 14–31. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, J.M., 1992. Funerary ideology in Bronze Age Cyprus – toward the recognition and analysis of Cypriot ritual data. In Ionnides, G.C. (ed.), Studies in Honour of Vassos Karageorghis: 87–100. Nicosia: Society of Cypriot Studies.Google Scholar
Webb, J.M., 1995. Abandonment processes and curate/discard strategies at Marki Alonia, Cyprus. The Artefact 18:64–70.Google Scholar
Webb, J.M., 1998. Lithic technology and discard at Marki, Cyprus. Consumer behaviour and site formation in the prehistoric Bronze Age. Antiquity 278:796–805.Google Scholar
Webb, J.M., in press. Engendering the built environment: household and community in prehistoric Bronze Age Cyprus. In Bolger, D. and Serwint, N. (eds), Engendering Aphrodite: Women and Society in Ancient Cyprus. Cyprus-American Archaeological Research Institute Monograph II.Google Scholar
Webb, J.M. and Frankel, D., 1999. Characterising the Philia facies: material culture, chronology and the origins of the Bronze Age in Cyprus. American Journal of Archaeology 103:3–43.Google Scholar
Weissner, P., 1982. Beyond willow smoke and dogs' tails: a comment on Binford's analysis of hunter-gatherer settlement systems. American Antiquity 47:171–178.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, C., 1991. Picrolite, its nature, provenience, and possible distribution patterns in the Chalcolithic period of Cyprus. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 292:127–138.Google Scholar