Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:03:22.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enacting agency: exploring how older adults shape their neighbourhoods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2018

Carri Hand*
Affiliation:
School of Occupational Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Graduate Program in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Debbie Laliberte Rudman
Affiliation:
School of Occupational Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Graduate Program in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Suzanne Huot
Affiliation:
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Canada
Rachael Pack
Affiliation:
Department of Women's Studies and Feminist Research, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Jason Gilliland
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, School of Health Studies, Department of Paediatrics and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: chand22@uwo.ca

Abstract

Within research on ageing in neighbourhoods, older adults are often positioned as impacted by neighbourhood features; their impact on neighbourhoods is less often considered. Drawing on a study exploring how person and place transact to shape older adults’ social connectedness, inclusion and engagement in neighbourhoods, this paper explores how older adults take action in efforts to create neighbourhoods that meet individual and collective needs and wants. We drew on ethnographic and community-based participatory approaches and employed qualitative and geospatial methods with 14 older adults in two neighbourhoods. Analysis identified three themes that described the ways that older adults enact agency at the neighbourhood level: being present and inviting casual social interaction, helping others and taking community action. The participants appeared to contribute to a collective sense of connectedness and creation of social spaces doing everyday neighbourhood activities and interacting with others. Shared territories in which others were present seemed to support such interactions. Participants also helped others in a variety of ways, often relating to gaps in services and support, becoming neighbourhood-based supports for other seniors. Finally, participants contributed to change at the community level, such as engaging politically, patronising local businesses and making improvements in public places. Study findings suggest the potential benefits of collaborating with older adults to create and maintain liveable neighbourhoods.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, GJ, Evans, J and Wiles, JL (2007) Re-spacing and re-placing gerontology: relationality and affect. Ageing and Society 33, 13391373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A (2006) Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science 1, 164180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryman, A (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research 6, 97113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffel, T, Phillipson, C and Scharf, T (2013) Experiences of neighbourhood exclusion and inclusion among older people living in deprived inner-city areas in Belgium and England. Ageing & Society 33, 89109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, VF, Lavoie, J-P and Rose, D (2012) Revisiting the role of neighbourhood change in social exclusion and inclusion of older people. Journal of Aging Research 2012, 1148287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpiano, RM (2009) Come take a walk with me: the ‘Go-Along’ interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place 15, 263272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P and Nieuwenhuijsen, ER (2009) Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review. Maturitas 64, 1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cresswell, T (2004) Place: A Short Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cutchin, MP (2004) Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 58, 303312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degnen, C (2016) Socialising place attachment: place, social memory and embodied affordances. Ageing & Society 36, 16451667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J ([1929] 1989) Experience and Nature, 2nd Edn.LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, R, Manley, DJ and Sabel, CE (2008) Neighbourhood effects on health: does it matter where you draw the boundaries? Social Science & Medicine 66, 12411255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, H and Cutchin, MP (2017) Changing neighborhoods and occupations: experiences of older African-Americans in Detroit. Journal of Occupational Science 24, 2, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, PJ (2011) Natural neighborhood networks: important social networks in the lives of older adults aging in place. Journal of Aging Studies 25, 263271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, P (2014) The role of social engagement and identity in community mobility among older adults aging in place. Disability & Rehabilitation 36, 12491257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hand, C, Huot, S, Laliberte Rudman, D and Wijekoon, S (2017 a) Qualitative–geospatial methods of exploring person–place transactions in aging adults: a scoping review. The Gerontologist 57, e47e61.Google ScholarPubMed
Hand, C, Laliberte Rudman, D, Huot, S, Gilliland, J and Pack, R (2017 b) Toward understanding person–place transactions in neighborhoods: a qualitative-participatory geospatial approach. The Gerontologist 58, 89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huot, S and Laliberte Rudman, D (2015) Extending beyond qualitative interviewing to illuminate the tacit nature of everyday occupation: occupational mapping and participatory occupation methods. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health 35, 142150.Google ScholarPubMed
Kusenbach, M (2003) Street phenomenology: the go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography 4, 455485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lager, D, Van Hoven, B and Huigen, PPP (2013) Dealing with change in old age: negotiating working-class belonging in a neighbourhood in the process of urban renewal in the Netherlands. Geoforum 50, 5461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lager, D, Van Hoven, B and Huigen, PPP (2015) Understanding older adults’ social capital in place: obstacles to and opportunities for social contacts in the neighbourhood. Geoforum 59, 8797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, M, Cooper, B, Strong, S, Stewart, D, Rigby, P and Letts, L (1996) The person–environment–occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 63, 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, MP and Nahemow, L (1973) Ecology and the aging process. In Eisdorfer, C and Lawton, MP (eds), The Psychology of Adult Development and Aging. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 464488.Google Scholar
Lecompte, M (2002) The transformation of ethnographic practice: past and current challenges. Qualitative Research 2, 283299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levasseur, M, Généreux, M, Bruneau, J-F, Vanasse, A, Chabot, E, Beaulac, C and Bédard, M-M (2015) Importance of proximity to resources, social support, transportation and neighborhood security for mobility and social participation in older adults: results from a scoping study. BMC Public Health 15, 503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieblich, A, Tuval-Mashiach, R and Zilber, T (eds) (1998) Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation, Vol. 47. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Y, Lynham, S, Guba, E (2011) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In Denzin, N and Lincoln, Y (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th Edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 97128.Google Scholar
Loebach, J and Gilliland, J (2016) Neighbourhood play on the endangered list: examining patterns in children's local activity and mobility using GPS monitoring and qualitative GIS. Children's Geographies 14, 573589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEachren, AM (1994) Visualization in modern cartography: setting the agenda. In MacEachren, AM (ed.), Visualization in Modern Cartography. Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier Science, pp. 113Google Scholar
Martinson, M and Minkler, M (2006) Civic engagement and older adults: a critical perspective. The Gerontologist 46, 318324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minkler, M and Wallerstein, N (eds) (2008) Community-based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes, 2nd Edn.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Nunkoosing, K (2005) The problems with interviews. Qualitative Health Research 15, 698706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillipson, C (2007) The ‘elected’ and the ‘excluded’: sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing & Society 27, 321342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenburg, R (1989) The Great Good Place: Cafe's, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. New York, NY: Marlowe and Company.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, DE (2005) Language and meaning: data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology 52, 137145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reissman, CK (2007) Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, RI and Parmelee, PA (1992) Attachment to place and the representation of the life course by the elderly. In Altman, I and Low, SM (eds), Place Attachment. Human Behavior and Environment. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 139163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamon, D (1979) A Geography of the Lifeworld. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Shoval, N, Auslander, G, Cohen-Shalom, K, Isaacson, M, Landau, R and Heinik, J (2010) What can we learn about the mobility of the elderly in the GPS era? Journal of Transport Geography 18, 603612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, LA, Ahluwalia, MK, Arora, AK and Mattis, JS (2007) The pond you fish in determines the fish you catch: exploring strategies for qualitative data collection. The Counseling Psychologist 35, 295327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, SJ (2010) Qualitative quality: eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 16, 837851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vine, D, Buys, L and Aird, R (2014) Conceptions of ‘community’ among older adults living in high-density urban areas: an Australian case study. Australasian Journal on Ageing 33, E1E6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, H-W, Iwarsson, S and Oswald, F (2012) Aging well and the environment: toward an integrative model and a research agenda for the future. The Gerontologist 52, 306313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wengraf, T (2001) Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-structured Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, JL and Jayasinha, R (2013) Care for place: the contributions older people make to their communities. Journal of Aging Studies 27, 93101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, F (2012) ‘You have to engage with life, or life will go away’: an intersectional life course analysis of older women's social participation in a disadvantaged urban area. Geoforum 43, 12961305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar