Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:21:43.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes and News

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and News
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1935

References

1 I must add that the Norwich representatives of the Electricity Board extended facilities for utilizing their pylon for photographs and generally showed a keen interest in what was going on. No doubt, if representations had been made from the right quarter, the Electricity Board would have planted its pylon elsewhere.

2 These were caused by the outflow from a modern drain.

3 Whether this was really done by the finger-nail or by an implement giving a similar impression I should hardly like to say.

4 Antiquaries Journal, 1934, p. 119, fig. 57.Google Scholar

1 But it should be said in fairness to Lamprey, the supposed author, that he himself recognized the thinness of the White Horse standard tradition. The ‘Standard Field’ of Stukeley, Itinerarium Curiosum, 2nd edition, 11, plate XXXIII, has obviously no connexion with it.

2 It seems possible that the name may have been suggested by a hypothetical earlier name ‘hoar stone’, but I know of no specific evidence for such a name here. O.G.S.C.

* See ANTIQUITY, March 1935, pp. 3856, 8 plates.Google Scholar