Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:37:24.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk, Science, and Law in the WTO: The Centrality or Institutional Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Gregory Shaffer
Gregory Shaffer*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Risk, Science, and Law in the WTO
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 104 , 2010 , pp. 19 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Sungjoon Cho did not submit remarks for the Proceedings.

1 Robin Feldman, The Role of SCIENCE in LAW xi (2009).

2 Mark Pollack & Gregory Shaffer, When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods (2009).

3 Wiener, Jonathan B. & Rogers, Michael D., Comparing Precaution in the United States and Europe, 5 J. Risk Res. 317, 320 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity 171 (Ritter, Mark trans., 1992)Google Scholar.

5 Guzman, Andrew T., Food Fears: Health and Safety at the WTO, 45 Va. J. Int’l L. 1 (2004 Google Scholar).

6 Scott, Joanne, European Regulation of GMOs and the WTO, 9 COLUM. J. EuR. L. 213 (2003)Google Scholar.