Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:28:30.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are the Current Models Helpful to Understanding Staebler-Wronski Degradation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Bolko von Roedern*
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401-3393, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

This contribution reviews the compatibility of Staebler-Wronski models with experimental data and observations. The review will show that neither the “bond-breaking models” (originally proposed by Dersch and Stutzmann) nor the “defect conversion” models (originally proposed by Adler) can explain all observations on films and/or solar cells. It has been well accepted for some time that experimental stress and recovery phenomena, both on films and devices, always identify both “slow” and “fast” degradation and recovery mechanisms. It is argued that the quintessential understanding of the Staebler-Wronski mechanisms will come from identifying a fundamental physical process that provides a quantitative understanding of the “coupling” between the slow and fast mechanisms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dersch, H., Stuke, J., and Beichler, J., Applied Physics Letters 38 (1981), 405.Google Scholar
2. Adler, D., Solar Cells 9 (1983), 3.Google Scholar
3.BRoedern, . von, Applied Physics Letters 62 (1993), 1368.Google Scholar
4. Pearce, J.M., Koval, R.J., Collins, R.W., Wronski, C.R., Al-Jassim, M.M., and Jones, K.M., Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (2002), 1098.Google Scholar
5. Yang, L., Chen, L., and Li, Y.-M., Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1992,” 258 (1992), 365.Google Scholar
6. Yang, L. and Chen, L.-F., Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1993,” 297 (1993) 619.Google Scholar
7. Xu, X., Yang, J. and Guha, S., Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1993,” 297 (1993), 649.Google Scholar
8. Roedern, B. von, Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1991,” 219 (1991), 493.Google Scholar
9. Gleskova, H., Morin, P.A., and Wagner, S., Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1993,” 297 (1993), 589.Google Scholar
10. Han, D. and Fritzsche, H., Journal Non-Crystalline Solids 59&60 (1983), 397.Google Scholar
11. Yoshida, M. and Taylor, P.C., Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1992,” 258, (1992), 347.Google Scholar
12. Heck, S. and Branz, H.M., Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous and Heterogeneous Silicon-Based Films - 2001,” 664 (2001), A12.2.Google Scholar
13. Roedern, B. von and Cueto, J.A. del, Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous and Heterogeneous Silicon Thin Films - 2000,” 609 (2000), A10.4.Google Scholar
14. Fujikake, S., Ota, H., Oshawa, M., Hama, T., Ichikawa, Y., and Sakaii, H., Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 34 (1994), 449.Google Scholar
15. Stradins, P., Shimizu, S., Kondo, M., and Matsuda, A., Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous and Heterogeneous Silicon-Based Films - 2001,” 664 (2001), A12.1.Google Scholar
16. Yang, J. and Guha, S., Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings “Amorphous and Heterogeneous Silicon Thin Films: Fundamentals to Devices,” 557 (1999), 239.Google Scholar
17. Roedern, B. von, Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “II-VI Compound Semiconductor Photovoltaic Materials,” 668 (2001), H6.9.Google Scholar
18. Redfield, D. and Bube, R., Materials Research Society Symposia Proc. “Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1993,” 297 (1993), 607.Google Scholar