Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:55:31.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizational economics: applications to metropolitan governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2010

ELINOR OSTROM
ELINOR OSTROM*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, and Arizona State University, Tempe, United States
*
*Email: ostrom@indiana.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This comment relates to Richard Posner (2010), the lead article for this issue. Posner applies ‘the principles of organization economics’ to the study of diverse types of organizations. His study comparing the FBI to other types of police organization is important and compatible with the study of urban policing in American metropolitan areas. Many policy prescriptions are based on an inadequate understanding of the diversity of urban public good production functions and a lumping together of every type of police service. A brief review of research related to the concept of polycentricity as related to urban services in metropolitan areas is provided as a way of further illustrating Posner's concern that finer distinctions need to be made in the way scholars analyze organizational economics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 109 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, C. (2008), ‘Piling on: multilevel government and the fiscal common-pool’, American Journal of Political Science, 52 (4): 802–820.Google Scholar
Boyne, G. (1992), ‘Local government structure and performance: lessons from America’, Public Administration, 70: 333–357.Google Scholar
Dilorenzo, T. (1983), ‘Economic competition and political competition: an empirical note’, Public Choice, 40: 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, E. A. (1986), ‘The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools’, Journal of Economic Literature, 24: 1141–1177.Google Scholar
McGinnis, M. (ed.) (1999), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakerson, R. (1999), Governing Local Public Economies: Creating the Civic Metropolis, Oakland: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Oakerson, R. and Parks, R. (1989), ‘Local government constitutions: a different view of metropolitan governance’, American Review of Public Administration, 19 (4): 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2007), ‘Challenges and growth: the development of the interdisciplinary field of institutional analysis’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 3 (3): 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Parks, R. (1999), ‘Neither Gargantua nor the Land of Lilliputs: conjectures on mixed systems of metropolitan organization’, in McGinnis, M. (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 284–305.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Parks, R., and Whitaker, G. (1978), Patterns of Metropolitan Policing, Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Parks, R., and Whitaker, G. (1999), ‘Defining and measuring structural variations in interorganizational arrangements’, in McGinnis, M. (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 265–283.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1999), ‘Polycentricity (Part 1)’, in McGinnis, M. (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 52–74.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (2008a), The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration, 3rd edn, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (2008b), The Political Theory of a Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment, 3rd edn, Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., and Warren, R. (1961), ‘The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry’, American Political Science Review, 55 (4): 831–842.Google Scholar
Parks, R. (1985), ‘Metropolitan structure and systemic performance: the case of police service delivery’, in Hanf, K. and Toonen, T. A. J. (eds.), Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary Systems, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 161–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. (2010), ‘From the new institutional economics to organization economics: with applications to corporate governance, government agencies, and legal institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 6 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Sancton, A. (2000), The Assault on Local Government, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M. (1986), ‘Fragmentation and the growth of government’, Public Choice, 48: 255–263.Google Scholar
Stephens, G. R. and Wikstrom, N. (2000), Metropolitan Government and Governance: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Analysis, and the Future, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teske, P., Schneider, M., Mintrom, M., and Best, S. (1993), ‘Establishing the micro foundations of a macro theory: information, movers, and the competitive local market for public goods’, American Political Science Review, 87 (3): 702–713.Google Scholar