Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:19:09.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Surface Precipitation During UO2 Leaching Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Daqing Cui ,
Jérôme Devoy  and
Kastriot Spahiu
Daqing Cui
Affiliation:
Studsvik Nuclear AB, SE-611 82 Nyköping, Sweden
Jérôme Devoy
Affiliation:
Studsvik Nuclear AB, SE-611 82 Nyköping, Sweden
Kastriot Spahiu
Affiliation:
SKB, P.O.Box 5864, SE-10240 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

To understand the influence of cations and silica in groundwater on spent fuel corrosion, the leaching behavior of newly reduced UO2.00 in different solutions was investigated. Uranium concentrations in the solutions were measured and the leached UO2 surface and precipitates on it were analyzed by XPS, laser Raman spectroscopy, SEM-EDS and TEM-EDS. It was found that, in air saturated 2 mM HCO3- solutions, the leaching rates of UO2(s) depend on the composition of the leaching solutions. Very similar leaching rates, 0.5 μg • cm-2 • day-1, were obtained in 0.1 M NaCl and 0.1 M KCl solutions, while that in 0.45mM Ca2+ -0.18 mM Mg2+ -0.2 mM SiO2 containing synthetic groundwater was 10 times smaller. Calcite and quartz like precipitates were detected on the corroded UO2(s) surface.

Type
articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 757: Symposium II – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVI , 2002 , II9.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wilson, C.N. Result from NNWS1 Series 3 Bare Fuel Dissolution test, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-7170 (1990)Google Scholar
2. Forsyth, R.S and Werme, L.O, J. of Nuclear Material 190 (1992) 3–19 Google Scholar
3. Matzke, Hj., Journal of Nuclear Material 238 (1996) 58–63 Google Scholar
4. Finn, P.A., Finsh, R., Buck, E. Bates, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 506 (1998) 123–131 Google Scholar
5. De Pablo, J., Casas, I, Gimenez, J., Torrero, M. E., Journal of Nuclear Material 232 (1996) 138–145 Google Scholar
6. Brantner, J., Liddel, K., Role of Ion exchange Reaction in the in situ leaching of uraninite by NH4HCO3 -(NH4)2CO3 -H2O2: Proceeding of 1996 TMS Annual MeetingGoogle Scholar
7. Grambow, B. and Christensen, H., Performance of Spent fuel in European geological environments, Proceeding of International Conference on Scientific Research on the Backend of the Fuel Cycle for the 21st Century, 24–26 October 2000, Avignon, France Google Scholar
8. Grenthe, I., Fuger, J., Konings, et al., Chemical Thermodynamics of Uranium, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1992.Google Scholar
9. Shoesmith, D.W., Journal of Nuclear Material 282 (2000), 1–31 Google Scholar
10. Cui, D., Spahiu, K., Wersin, P., Redox Reactions of Iron and Uranium Dioxide in Simulated Cement Pore Water under Anoxic Conditions, Presented at MRS 2002 fall meeting, Boston, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, 2002 Google Scholar