Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:44:05.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Root and Shoot Interference in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Emilie E. Regnier
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois
Edward W. Stoller
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric. Res. Serv.
Emerson D. Nafziger
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., 1102 S. Goodwin, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Common cocklebur root and shoot interferences were investigated as factors causing soybean yield reductions in the field. Significant decreases in soybean yield resulted from common cocklebur shoot interference when the two were grown together with the common cocklebur roots confined in plastic bags. Soybean yield decreased further when common cocklebur roots were not confined, but this decrease resulted, in part, from increased common cocklebur shoot growth. Wire mesh cylinders of varying diameters, placed in gaps in the soybean rows and designed to spatially restrict soybean shoot growth, reduced yield more than did gaps alone. When similar cylinders lined with black plastic were placed next to the soybean rows to restrict both within-canopy light and space for soybean shoot growth, soybean yield was reduced most (44%) with concomitant changes in stem height, stem diameter, lodging, and branches, nodes, and pods/plant. Interference of common cocklebur with soybeans resulted primarily from shoot interference, and competition for light within the soybean canopy implicated as the major factor causing the soybean yield reduction.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L. and Oliver, L. R. 1977. Competition, threshold levels, and control of cocklebur in soybeans. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. and Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 83. 27 pp.Google Scholar
2. Beatty, K. D., Eldridge, I. L., and Simpson, A. M. Jr. 1982. Soybean response to different planting patterns and dates. Agron. J. 74:859862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bloomberg, J. R., Kirkpatrick, B. L., and Wax, L. M. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:507513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dekker, J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1983. Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). I. Growth Weed Res. 23:91101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. deWit, C. F. 1960. On competition. Versl. Lanbouwk. D. Onderz. 66:182.Google Scholar
6. Felton, W. L. 1976. The influence of row spacing and plant population on the effect of weed competition in soybeans. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 16:926932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hagood, E. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L. Jr., and Schreiber, M. M. 1981. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 28:729734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Heindl, J. C. and Brun, W. A. 1983. Light and shade effects on abscission and 14C-photoassimilate partitioning among reproductive structures in soybeans. Plant Physiol. 73:434439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Johnston, T. J., Pendleton, J. W., Peters, D. B., and Hicks, D. R. 1969. Influence of supplemental light on apparent photosynthesis, yield, and yield components of soybeans (Glycine max). Crop Sci. 9:577581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kemp, D. R., Auld, B. A., and Medd, R. W. 1983. Does optimizing plant arrangements reduce interference or improve the utilization of space? Agric. Systems. 12:3136.Google Scholar
11. Kirkpatrick, B. L., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1983. Competition of jimsonweed with soybeans. Agron. J. 75:833836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Mitchell, R. L. and Russell, W. J. 1971. Root development and rooting pattern of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) evaluated under field conditions. Agron. J. 63:313316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Nienhuis, J. and Singh, S. P. 1985. Effects of location and plant density on yield and architectural traits in dry beans. Crop Sci. 25:579584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Ramseur, E. L., Wallace, S. U., and Quisenberry, V. L. 1984. Distribution pattern of yield components in “Braxton” soybeans. Agron. J. 76:493497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Regnier, E. E. 1986. Aspects of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium L.), and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) interference with soybeans. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL. 116 pp.Google Scholar
17. Ross, M. A. and Harper, J. L. 1972. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J. Ecol. 60:7788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Schou, J. B., Jeffers, D. L., and Streeter, J. G. 1978. Effects of reflectors, black boards or shades applied at different stages of plant development on yield of soybeans. Crop Sci. 18:2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. Pages 102104.Google Scholar
20. Stivers, R. K. and Swearingin, M. L. 1980. Soybean yield compensation with different plant populations and missing plant patterns. Agron. J. 72:98102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Stoller, E. W. and Woolley, J. T. 1985. Competition for light by broadleaf weeds in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33: 199202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar