Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:50:39.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slow crack growth of CVD diamond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M.D. Drory  and
C.F. Gardinier
M.D. Drory
Affiliation:
Crystallume, 125 Constitution Drive, Menlo Park, California 94025
C.F. Gardinier
Affiliation:
Crystallume, 125 Constitution Drive, Menlo Park, California 94025
Get access

Abstract

Slow crack growth in CVD diamond has been observed from indentation experiments. Diamond films of 400 μm thickness were prepared by plasma-enhanced CVD on a silicon substrate, subsequently removed from the substrate, and polished for indentation testing. A microhardness tester was used to produce Vickers indentations under low load. Crack length measurements over time revealed susceptibility to slow crack growth in ambient testing conditions. The stress-corrosion susceptibility coefficient, N, was measured as 9.3.

Type
Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 1992 , pp. 781 - 783
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.O'Hern, M. E., McHargue, C. J., Clausing, R. E., Oliver, W. C., and Parrish, R. H., in Extended Abstracts No. 19, Technology Update on Diamond Films, edited by Chang, R. P. H., Nelson, D., and Hiraki, A. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), p. 131.Google Scholar
2.Jassowski, D. M.. “Investigation of Applications of Diamond Film,” Aerojet TechSystems Final Report of Air Force contract #F04611–88-C-0074, August 1989.Google Scholar
3.Drory, M. D., Gardinier, C. F., and Speck, J. S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 12, 3148–3150 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wiederhorn, S. M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 19, 169–181 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Michaleske, T. A., Bunker, B. C., and Freiman, S. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 (10), 721–724 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ferber, M. K. and Becher, P. F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (7), 2038–2046 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Evans, A. G. and Charles, E. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 59 (7–8), 371–372 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gupta, P. K. and Jubb, N. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64 (8), C112–114 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Anstis, G. R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B. R., and Marshall, D.B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64(9), 533–538 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Wiederhorn, S. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 50 (8), 407–414 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar