Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T06:49:33.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cochlear implantation in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Kanate Vaewvichit  and
Parinya Luangpitakchumpol
Kanate Vaewvichit*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Parinya Luangpitakchumpol
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
*
Address for correspondence: Kanate Vaewvichit, M.D., Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article evaluates and compares the benefits of a House/3M single channel cochlear implant or a Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant on speech recognition in Thai-speaking patients. From 1986–1989, four profoundly deaf adults were implanted with the House/3M prosthesis. Since 1994, nine post-lingually deaf adults and three pre-lingually deaf children have been implanted with the Nucleus prosthesis. One case was implanted with the House/3M prosthesis and in the contralateral ear with the Nucleus prosthesis. The post-operative results were determined according to the ability to understand Thai monosyllabic, bisyllabic open-word sets and everyday sentence tests with, and without, lip reading. The scores were then compared in the House/3M users and the Nucleus users and compared between the House/3M cochlear implant and the Nucleus cochlear implant in the same user. The speech recognition scores on monosyllabic and bisyllabic open-word set demonstrated that the Nucleus users perform at a much higher level than the House/3M users. The results of four pre-lingually deaf children will be reported later after a period of auditory and speech rehabilitation.

Keywords

Cochlear implantThailand
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 113 , Issue 6 , June 1999 , pp. 515 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battmer, R. D., Lenarz, T., Allum-Meckenburg, D. J., Schier, A. S. (1995) Postoperative results for adults and children implanted with the Clarion device. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology (Suppl 166): 254–255.Google ScholarPubMed
Boex, C., Pelizzone, M., Montandon, P. (1996) Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. American Journal of Otology 17: 61–68.Google Scholar
Dowell, R. C., Mecklenbury, D. J., Clark, G. M. (1986) Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implant. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 112: 1054–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyles, J. A., Aleksy, W. L., Boyle, P. J. (1995) Performance changes in University College Hospital/Royal NationalInstitute for the deaf single channel cochlear implant users upgraded to the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology (Suppl 166): 263–265.Google Scholar
Hollow, R. D., Dowell, R. C., Cowan, R. S. C., Skok, M. C., Pyman, B. C., Clark, G. M. (1995) Contining improvement in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology (Suppl 166): 292–294.Google Scholar
Huang, T. S., Wang, N. M., Liu, S. U. (1996) Nucleus 22-channel cochlera mini system implantations in Mandarinspeaking patients. American Journal of Otology 17: 46–52.Google Scholar
Kessler, D. K., Yanda, J. L., Rebscher, S. J., Jackler, R. K. (1986) The UCSF/Storz multichannel cochlear implant: patient results. Laryngoscope 96: 597–603.Google Scholar
Loeb, G. E., Kessler, D. K. (1995) Speech recognition performance over time with the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology (Suppl 166): 290–292.Google ScholarPubMed
Parkin, J. L., Randolph, L. J., Parkin, B. D. (1993) Multichannel (Ineraid) cochlear implant update. Laryngoscope 103: 835–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed