Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:51:55.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women Who Win: Social Backgrounds, Paths to Power, and Political Ambition in Latin American Legislatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2011

Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer
Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer
Affiliation:
University of Missouri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on women in Latin American politics in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s showed that very few women ran for and won political office and that those who did often did not fit the mold of the typical legislator. Yet significant cultural, social, and political changes have occurred over the past 30 years, and few studies have reexamined the types of women who win political office in the region today. In this article, I examine the social backgrounds, paths to power, and political ambition of women and men elected to national legislatures in Argentina, Colombia, and Costa Rica. I argue that women and men are likely to be more similar than different, given the tight constraints imposed on legislative candidates in democratic elections, and empirically examine this hypothesis with data from an original survey of legislators conducted in 2001–2. I find that, indeed, women and men are quite similar on an array of characteristics. Women who win elected office in Latin America today do so by playing the traditional, male-defined, political game.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 1 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Best, Heinrich, and Cotta, Maurizio, eds. 2000. Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848–2000: Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botero, Felipe. 2008. “Ambitious Career-seekers: An Analysis of Career Decisions and Duration in Latin America.” Ph.D. diss. University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1995. Political Recruitment across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2d ed.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chaney, Elsa M. 1979. Supermadre: Women in Politics in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Craske, Nikki. 1999. Women and Politics in Latin America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. “Introduction.” In Women, Politics, and Quotas, ed. Dahlerup, Drude. New York: Routledge, 3–31.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43 (2): 73–92.Google Scholar
Diamond, Irene. 1977. Sex Roles in the State House. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 1997. “Change and Continuity in the Relationship Between Private Responsibilities and Public Officeholding: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 569–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Ford, Lynne E.. 1997. “Change and Continuity Among Women State Legislators: Evidence from Three Decades.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (1): 137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Linda L., and McClure, Robert D.. 1989. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 642–59.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2005. Women and Politics in Chile. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (September): 393–425.Google Scholar
Organization, Gallup. 2001. Latin American Women Leadership Study. Commissioned by the Inter-American Development Bank in collaboration with the Inter-American Dialogue. http://forms.iadb.org/sds/doc/GallupStudyEnglish.pdf (accessed September 2, 2008).Google Scholar
Gertzog, Irwin N. 2002. Women's Changing Pathways to the U.S. House of Representatives: Widows, Elites, and Strategic Politicians. In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 95–118.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala N. 2003. “Women and Democracy.” In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, 2d ed., ed. Dominguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 118–36.Google Scholar
Inter-American Dialogue. 2008. “Women and Power in the Americas: A Report Card.” In Women in the Americas: Paths to Political Power. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank, Inter-American Dialogue, League of Women Voters.Google Scholar
IPU. 2010. “Women in National Parliaments, as of April 30, 2010.” Inter-Parliamentary Union, http://www.ipu.org (accessed May 24, 2010).Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane S., and Wolchik, Sharon L., eds. 1998. Women and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1997. “Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 613–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2002. “Explaining the High Level of Party Discipline in the Argentine Congress.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. New York: Cambridge University Press, 147–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2009. “The Recruitment and Selection of Legislative Candidates in Argentina.” In Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, ed. Siavelis, Peter M. and Morgenstern, Scott. College Park: Penn State Press, 41–75.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P., Saiegh, Sebastian, Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano. 2002. “Amateur Legislators—Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 656–69.Google Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2006. “The Changing Party of the Institutional Revolution: Electoral Competition and Decentralized Candidate Selection.” Party Politics 12 (3): 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latinobarómetro. 2004. Informe Resumen: Una Década de mediciones. Santiago de Chile: Corporación Latinobarómetro.Google Scholar
Latinobarómetro. 2009. Informe. Santiago de Chile: Corporación Latinobarómetro.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.'” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Jutta, Borner, Jutta, and Caminotti, Mariana. 2007. Las Legisladoras: Cupos de Género y Política en Argentina y Brasil. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editora Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010. “Second Among Unequals? A Study of Whether France's 'Quota Women' are Up to the Job.” Politics & Gender 6 (March): 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1996. “Women Politicians: Transforming Westminster?” In Women in Politics, ed. Lovenduski, Joni and Norris, Pippa. New York: Oxford University Press, 91–104.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Franklin, Mark. 1997. “Social Representation.” European Journal of Political Research 32: 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, J. Mark, G., Daniel Zovatto, Florez, Fernando Carrillo, and Zavala, Andres Allamand. 2002. Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rhode, David. 1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Cira, Tirza. 1993. Las Mujeres en los Parlamentos Latinoamericanos. Valparaíso, Chile: Centro de Estudios y Asistencia Legislativa, Universidad Católica de Valparaíso.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1997. “A View of Their Own: Women's Committee Leadership Styles and State Legislatures.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Germain, Michelle A. 1993. “Paths to Power of Women Legislators in Costa Rica and Nicaragua.” Women's Studies International Forum 16 (2): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Germain, Michelle A., and Metoyer, Cynthia Chavez. 2008. Women Legislators in Central America: Politics, Democracy, and Policy. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. Political Power and Women's Representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 1979. Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith. 2007. The New Politics of Inequality. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and Heath, Roseanna M.. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities Than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test.” Women & Politics 24 (4): 77–101.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili, Konate, Dior, and Lowe-Morna, Colleen. 2006. “Sub-Saharan Africa: On the Fast Track to Women's Political Representation.” In Women, Quotas, and Politics, ed. Dahlerup, Drude. New York: Routledge, 112–37.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. 2002. Human Development Report: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Louise. 2004. “Quotas: Changing the Way Things Look without Changing the Way Things Are.” Journal of Legislative Studies 10 (1): 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Shirley, and Lascher, Edward L. Jr. eds. 1993. Ambition and Beyond: Career Paths of American Politicians. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.Google Scholar
Zetterberg, Pär. 2008. “The Downside of Gender Quotas? Institutional Constraints on Women in Mexican State Legislatures.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 442–60.Google Scholar