Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:39:52.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fragmenting times: interpreting a Bayesian chronology for the Late Neolithic occupation of Çatalhöyük East, Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2015

Arkadiusz Marciniak ,
Marek Z. Barański ,
Alex Bayliss ,
Lech Czerniak ,
Tomasz Goslar ,
John Southon  and
R.E. Taylor
Arkadiusz Marciniak
Affiliation:
Institute of Prehistory, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, św. Marcin 78, 61-809 Poznań, Poland
Marek Z. Barański
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University of Gdańsk, Bielańska 5, 80-851 Gdańsk, Poland
Alex Bayliss
Affiliation:
Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
Lech Czerniak
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University of Gdańsk, Bielańska 5, 80-851 Gdańsk, Poland
Tomasz Goslar
Affiliation:
Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Rubież 46, 61-612 Poznań, Poland
John Southon
Affiliation:
Keck Carbon Cycle AMS Facility, University of California, Irvine, B321 Croul Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-3100, USA
R.E. Taylor
Affiliation:
Keck Carbon Cycle AMS Facility, University of California, Irvine, B321 Croul Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-3100, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The repetitive and highly structured domestic architecture of Çatalhöyük is a distinctive feature of this important Neolithic settlement. At the very end of the sequence, however, excavations on the surface of the East Mound reveal changes in household construction and burial chambers. Bayesian analysis of 56 AMS radiocarbon dates from these layers allow the date and pace of these changes to be established in detail. Settlement activity on the East Mound ceased just after 6000 cal BC, and was followed by the cessation of Neolithic burial activity a few decades later.

Keywords

ÇatalhöyükLate NeolithicchronologyBayesian statisticspebble floorsburial chambershouseholds
Type
Method
Information
Antiquity , Volume 89 , Issue 343 , February 2015 , pp. 154 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd., 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayliss, A. 2009. Rolling out revolution: using radiocarbon dating in archaeology. Radiocarbon 51: 123–47.Google Scholar
Bayliss, A., Farid, S. & Higham, T.. 2014. Time will tell: practising Bayesian chronological modelling on the East Mound, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Çatalhöyük excavations: the 2000–2008 seasons: 53–90. Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2014. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy. Radiocarbon 36: 425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51: 37–60.Google Scholar
Brown, T.A., Nelson, D.E., Vogel, J.S. & Southon, J.R.. 1988. Improved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30: 171–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cessford, C. 2005. Absolute dating at Çatalhöyük, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995–99 seasons (BIAA Monographs 39; Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 5): 65–99. Ankara: British Institute at Ankara; Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Department of Earth System Science. n.d. W.M. Keck Carbon Cycle Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Laboratory. Available at: http://www.ess.uci.edu/ams (accessed 9 July 2014).Google Scholar
Düring, B. & Marciniak, A.. 2006. Households and communities in the central Anatolian Neolithic. Archaeological Dialogues 12 (2): 165–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S138020380600170X Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Lee-Thorp, J.A. & Tuross, N.C.. 1995. Is tooth enamel carbonate a suitable material for radiocarbon dating? Radiocarbon 37: 285–90.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2006. Çatalhöyük: the leopard’s tale, revealing the mysteries of Turkey’s ancient ‘town’. London: Thames & Hudson Google Scholar
Hodder, I (ed.). 2007. Excavating Çatalhöyük: South, North and KOPAL Area reports from the 1995–99 seasons (BIAA Monographs 37). Ankara: British Institute at Ankara.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230: 241–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/230241a0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marciniak, A. & Czerniak, L.. 2007. Social transformations in the Late Neolithic and the Early Chalcolithic periods in Central Anatolia. Anatolian Studies 57: 115–30.Google Scholar
Marciniak, A. & Czerniak, L. 2012. Çatalhöyük unknown. The late sequence on the East Mound, in Matthews, R. & Curtis, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. Volume I: mega-cites and mega-sites. The archaeology of consumption and disposal, landscape, transport and communicaton: 3–16. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1962. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, first preliminary report, 1961. Anatolian Studies 12: 41–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3642517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellaart, J 1967. Çatal Hüyük: a Neolithic town in Anatolia. London. Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
ORAU Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit. 2014. ORAU. Available at: http://www.c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/ (accessed 9 July 2014).Google Scholar
Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory. n.d. Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory. Available at: http://www.radiocarbon.pl/ (accessed 9 July 2014).Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Ramsey, C. Bronk, Buck, C.E., Burr, G.S., Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Hajdas, I., Heaton, T.J., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., McCormac, F.G., Manning, S.W., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Southon, J.R., Talamo, S., Turney, C.S.M., van der Plicht, J. & Weyhenmeyer, C.E.. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51: 1111–50.Google Scholar
Saliège, J.F., Person, A. & Paris, F.. 1998. Datation du carbonate-hydroxylapatite d’ossements Holocènes du Sahel (Mali, Mauritanie, Niger). Pré-actes du 3ème Congrès International 14C et Archéologie, Lyon, 1998: 172–73. Lyon.Google Scholar
Ward, G.K. & Wilson, S.R.. 1978. Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique. Archaeometry 20: 19–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1978.tb00208.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A., Healy, F., Bayliss, A.. 2011. Gathering time: dating the early Neolithic enclosures of southern Britain and Ireland. Oxford. Oxbow.Google Scholar