Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:37:26.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Osborne 2005

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2007

John R. te Velde
John R. te Velde
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In JGL 18.4 a review of my book (te Velde 2005) appeared, written by Timothy Osborne. In this Discussion Note, I would like to respond to this review, addressing primarily section 4 (Discussion).

Type
DISCUSSION NOTE
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 243 - 253
Copyright
© 2007 Society for Germanic Linguistics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Featherston Sam. 2005. Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: Some wh-constraints in German. Lingua 115.1525–1550.Google Scholar
Hagerty Michael. 2006. Review of te Velde 2005. http://linguistlist.org/issues/17/17-554.html (25 August, 2007).
Höhle Tilman N. 1983. Subjektlücken in Koordinationen. Manuscript, University of Cologne.
Höhle Tilman N. 1990. Assumptions about asymmetric coordination in German. Grammar in progress. GLOW essays for Henk van Riemsdijk, ed. by Joan Mascaró & Marina Nespor, 221–235. Dordrecht: Foris.
Johnson Kyle. 2002. Restoring exotic coordinations to normalcy. Linguistic Inquiry 33.97–156.Google Scholar
Schwarz Bernhard. 1998. On odd coordinations in German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2.191–219.Google Scholar
Velde John R. te. 2005. Deriving coordinate symmetries: A phase-based approach integrating Select, Merge, Copy, and Match. (Linguistics Today 89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.