Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:13:00.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling the Elastic Fields in Epitaxially Grown Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Ganesh Vanamu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM-87131, U.S.A.
Tariq A. Khraishi
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM- 87131, U.S.A.
Abhaya K. Datye
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM-87131, U.S.A.
Saleem H. Zaidi
Affiliation:
Gratings, Inc., 2700 B Broadbent Pkwy NE, Albuquerque, NM 87107.
Get access

Abstract

A model was developed to calculate the elastic fields, including strain energy density, in multilayers grown epitaxially on a planar substrate. This model works well for compliant and non-compliant substrates. In particular we illustrate the model for four layer heterostructure and apply it for graded Ge (SixGe1−x) grown on a planar silicon substrate. Using the equations for static equilibrium and Hooke's law for isotropic materials under a plane stress condition, the elastic fields associated with each layer were calculated. The strain partitioning in this model reduces to the limiting case of a two- layer structure available in the literature. As it turns out here, strain partitioning is a function of the bulk unstrained lattice parameters, elastic constants and thicknesses of the layers. The model was qualitatively verified by comparing the strain energy density with the dislocation density away from a relatively thick substrate. This model helps shed some light on the factors important in achieving defect free multilayers for optoelectronic devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Samavedam, S. B., Fitzgerald, E. A., Journal of Applied Physics 81, 3108 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Fitzgerald, E. A., Xie, Y. H., Monroe, D., Silverman, P. J., Kuo, J. M., Kortan, A. R., Thiel, F. A. and Weir, B. E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10, 1807 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Schaffler, F., Tobben, D., Herzog, H. R., Abstreiter, G., and Hollander, B., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 7, 260 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Iyer, S. S., Patton, G. L., Stork, J. M. C., Meyerson, B. S., and Harame, D. L., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 36, 2043 (1989).Google Scholar
5. People, R., IEEE J. Quantum Electron QE- 22, 1696 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Zubia, D., Hersee, S. D., Khraishi, T. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 740 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Lo, Y. H., Appl. Phys. Lett 59, 2311 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Teng, D. and Lo, Y. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 43 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Freund, L. B. and Nix, W. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 173 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Hirth, J. P. and Evans, A.G., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 2372 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Wakeland, P., Khraishi, T. A., Zubia, D., Journal of Electronic Materials 32, 836 (2003).Google Scholar