Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:40:58.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Considerations in the Development of a Piezoelectric Transducer Cochlear Implant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

N. Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221
R. D. Roseman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221
Get access

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss results from the inability of the inner ear cochlear organ of Corti to transduce mechanical energy incident in the cochlea to electrical signals in auditory nerve fibers. Cochlear implant devices are used to alleviate this condition. Piezoelectric materials offer the unique scope of functioning as cochlear implants, possibly enabling simplification of the process of electrical stimulation and enhancing knowledge of the workings of both the healthy and artificially stimulated inner ear. The requirements imposed on such a device are discussed. It is believed that flexible piezoelectric PVDF and ceramic-polymer composites are best suited for this application. The design of a device which utilizes the bending piezoelectric mode, and results of testing the same in air are presented. Present work is aimed at understanding the fundamental dynamic piezoelectric properties in this mode and is expected to result in a device suitable for in vitro and in vivo testing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cohn, A., in Medical Audiology. Disorders of Hearing, edited by Martin, F.N. (Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ, 1981). p. 240 Google Scholar
2 Feigenbaum, E., IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 6 (2), 1021 (1987).10.1109/MEMB.1987.5006402Google Scholar
3 House, W.F., The Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 19 (2), 217218 (1986).Google Scholar
4 Fravel, R.P, The Otolaryngologic Clinics of NorthAmerica 19 (2), XIXXII (1986).Google Scholar
5 Mukherjee, N., Roseman, R.D., and Willging, J.P., Procs. Symp. A: Bioceramics; Materials and Applications, The 101st, Ann. Conf. Am. Cer. Soc. 1999, In press.Google Scholar
6 Mukherjee, N., Roseman, R.D., and Willging, J.P., Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (Applied Biomaterials), accepted (1999).Google Scholar
7 Glattke, T.J., in MedicalAudiology: Disorders of Hearing, edited by Martin, F.N. (Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ, 1981). pp. 195219.Google Scholar
8 Klicker, K.A., Biggers, J.V., and Newnham, R.E., J. Am. Cer. Soc. 64 (1), 5 (1981).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09549.xGoogle Scholar
9 Shamma-Donoghue, S.A., May, G.A., Cotter, N.E., White, R.L., and Simmons, F.B., IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev. ED–29 (1), 136144 (1982).10.1109/T-ED.1982.20671Google Scholar
10 Olson, E.S., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 (6), 34453463 (1998).10.1121/1.423083Google Scholar
11 Lovinger, A.J., Science 220, 1115 (1983).10.1126/science.220.4602.1115Google Scholar
12 Pickles, J.O., in Cochlear Implants, edited by Gray, R.F. (Croom-Helm, London, 1985) pp. 2749.Google Scholar
13 Hayakawa, R., Wada, Y., in Advances in Polymer Science Vol. 11 (Springer-Verlag, NY, 1973).Google Scholar
14 Takamatsu, T., Tian, R.W., and Sasabe, H., Proc. 5th Intern. Symp. Electrets (1985) (IEEE Press, New York).Google Scholar