Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:52:14.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sound as Multiplicity: Listening with Thoreau, Cage and Serres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

Ben Byrne*
Affiliation:
RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC, 3001

Abstract

Despite the gradual proliferation of scholarly work around sound, and in particular its role in experimental music, there is little explicitly sonic philosophy that attempts to provide a ground for such research. Decades after the work of Pierre Schaeffer to theorise the objet sonore – sound object – and John Cage’s (1973: 10) call to ‘let sounds be themselves’, there remain few ontological and epistemological frameworks to support investigations into aesthetic, ethical and political questions related to experimental music practice and the place of sound in it. This makes writing about sound difficult and contributes to a lack of clarity or specificity in the use of terms such as ‘sound’, ‘noise’ and ‘silence’. In this article I seek to address this, connecting the work of transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau, experimental music composer and thinker Cage and philosopher Michel Serres with my own experience to develop an account of sound in experimental music that approaches it as multiplicity. This allows sound to be heard as physical, perceptual and conceptual and brings into question the reproducibility of sound, emphasising the place of sound as part of its environment.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, C. 2008. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1992. The Creative Mind (trans. M. L. Andison). New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 2001. Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness (trans. F. L. Pogson). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 2007. Creative Evolution, trans. A. Mitchell). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bock, J. 2006. There is Music in Every Sound: Thoreau’s Modernist Understanding of Music. Current Objectives of Postgraduate American Studies 7. http://copas.uni-regensburg.de/article/view/85/109 (accessed 9 September 2017).Google Scholar
Cage, J. 1970. Defense of Satie. In R. Kostelanetz (ed.) John Cage. New York: Prager.Google Scholar
Cage, J. 1973. Silence. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference & Repetition, trans. P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, F. 2009. Sounding New Media: Immersion and Embodiment in the Arts and Culture. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Gann, K. 2010. No Such Thing as Silence: John Cage’s 433. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. W. 2009. Chance, Indeterminacy, Multiplicity. In A. J. Jorquera (ed.) The Anarchy of Silence: John Cage and Experimental Art. Barcelona: Museu d’Art Contemporani de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Kahn, D. 2001. Noise Water Meat: A History of Sound in the Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Migone, C. 2012. Sonic Somatic: Performances of the Unsound Body. Berlin: Errant Bodies Press.Google Scholar
Nyman, M. 1999. Experimental Music: Cage and Beyond. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Serres, M. 2009. Genesis, trans. G. James and J. Nelson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thoreau, H. D. 1897. Walden. Boston and New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar