Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:41:09.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

South-South Dialogue: In Search of Humanity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

Bryan Mukandi*
Affiliation:
School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Bryan Mukandi, School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, Level 3, Forgan Smith Building (1), The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia. Email: b.mukandi@uq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This paper is a meditation on the idea of South-South dialogue, beginning with the South-South Dialogues: Situated Perspectives in Decolonial Epistemologies symposium held at the University of Queensland in 2015. I interrogate the concept of South-South dialogue, apposing it to the Cartesian ‘I think’, and then question the plausibility of the concept. On the basis of a Gadamerian conception of understanding, I suggest that what passes for South-South dialogue is in fact more likely to be North-South or even North-North dialogue. This is buttressed by an examination of Valentin Mudimbe's Parables and Fables. I go on to suggest, however, that by staying within the realm of the concept, in what could be called a Cartesian paradigm, Mudimbe misses the important role that South-South dialogue can play. Drawing on the work of Sara Motta, Tsitsi Dangarembga's Nervous Conditions and the concept of hunhu, I claim that the promise of South-South dialogue is the creation of spaces in which humanity is fostered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adichie, C. (2007). Half of a yellow sun. London, UK: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Andreotti, V. (2016a). The difficulties and paradoxes of interrupting colonial totalitarian logicalities. In Duarte, E. (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2015 (pp. 284288). Urbana, Illinois: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar
Andreotti, V. (2016b). The educational challenges of imagining the world differently. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du Développement, 37 (1), 101112. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2016.1134456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, G. (2014). The Con-Stitutional Re-Cognition (S)cam-Pain: The campaign for the hidden recognition of first nations peoples’ racial inferiority. Indigenous Law Bulletin, 8 (15), 2730.Google Scholar
Chamoiseau, P. (1997). Texaco. trans by Réjouis, Rose-Myriam & Vinokurov, Val (Eds.). London, UK: Granata Books.Google Scholar
Dangarembga, T. (2001). Nervous conditions. London, UK: Women's Press Classic.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. trans. by Bass, Alan (Ed.). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1984). The philosophical writings of descartes: Volume II. trans. by Nottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, & Murdoch, Dugald (Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dussel, E. (1996). The underside of modernity: Apel, Ricoeur, Rorty, Taylor, and the philosophy of liberation. trans. by Mendieta, Eduardo (Ed.). Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, White masks, trans by Philcox, Richard(Ed.). New York, NY: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (2008). Demons, dreamers, and madmen: The defense of reason in descartes's meditations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funkadelic. (2005). Free your mind. . .and your ass will follow. Southfield, Michigan: Westbound Records.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (2000). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity, subject and person. Continental Philosophy Review, 33 (3), 275287. doi: 10.1023/A:1010086224341.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method. trans. by Weinsheimer, Joel & Marshall, Donald (Eds.). London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gerima, H. (Director & Writer). (1993). Sankofa [DVD]. USA, Ghana, Burkina Faso, UK, Germany: Channel Four Films.Google Scholar
Heyman, W., & Stronza, A. (2011). South-south exchanges enhance resource management and biodiversity conservation at various scales. Conservation and Society, 9 (2), 146158. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.83724Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1988). Stages on life's way: Studies by various persons. trans. by Hong, Howard & Hong, Edna (Eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. trans. by Lingis, Alphonso (Ed.). Pittsburg, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies, 21 (2–3) 240270. doi:10.1080/09502380601162548Google Scholar
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2012). Levinas's hegemonic identity politics, radical philosophy, and the unfinished project of decolonization. Levinas Studies, 7 (1), 6394.Google Scholar
Marechera, D. (1993). The house of hunger. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Motta, S.C. (2011). Notes towards prefigurative epistemologies. In Motta, S. & Gunvald Nilsen, A. (Eds.), Social movements in the global south: Dispossession, development and resistance (pp. 178199). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mudimbe, V. (1991). Parables and fables: Exegesis, textuality, and politics in Central Africa. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Mudimbe, V., & de Sousa Santos, B. (2014, February 4). Conversation of The World - Valentin Y. Mudimbe and Boaventura de Sousa Santos [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvHFQGMtKlY. Accessed 29 March 2016.Google Scholar
Mukandi, B. (2015). Chester Himes, Jacques Derrida and inescapable colonialism: Reflections on African philosophy from the diaspora. South African Journal of Philosophy, 34 (4), 526537. doi:10.1080/02580136.2015.1113821Google Scholar
Mungwini, P. (2015). Dialogue as the negation of hegemony: An African perspective. South African Journal of Philosophy, 34 (4), 395407. doi:10.1080/02580136.2015.1120136Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the savages: Savaging the disciplines. Canberra, Australia: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (2001). The gay science: With a prelude in German rhymes and an appendix of songs. trans, by Nauckhoff, Josefine (Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramose, M. (1999). African philosophy through Ubuntu. Harare, Zimbabwe: Mond Books.Google Scholar
(1979). Third world quarterly. 1(2), 117–122. doi: 10.1080/01436597908419428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak?. In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271313). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Sridharan, K. (1998). G-15 and South-South cooperation: Promise and performance. Third World Quarterly, 19 (3), 357374. doi: 10.1080/01436599814299.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2002). Gadamer on the human sciences. In Dostal, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 126142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warnke, G. (2002). Hermeneutics, ethics and politics. In Dostal, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 79101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warnke, G. (1979). South-South dialogue. Third World Quarterly, 1 (2), 117122. doi: 10.1080/01436597908419428.Google Scholar