Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:01:27.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decentralisation, participation and accountability in Sahelian forestry: legal instruments of political-administrative control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Extract

Colonial relations of political administration are being reproduced in the current era of participation and decentralisation. In natural resource management, participation and decentralisation are promoted on the basis that they can increase equity, yield greater efficiency, benefit the environment and contribute to rural development. Reaping these benefits is predicated on (1) the devolution of some real powers over natural resources to local populations, and (2) the existence of locally accountable authorities to whom those powers can be devolved. However, a limited set of highly circumscribed powers are being devolved to locally accountable authorities, and most local authorities to whom powers are being devolved are systematically structured to be upwardly accountable to the central state, rather than downwardly accountable to local populations. Many of the new laws being passed in the name of participation and decentralisation administer rather than enfranchise. The article examines the historical legal underpinnings of the powers and accountability of state-backed rural authorities (chiefs and rural councils), the authorities through which current natural resource management projects in Burkina Faso and in Mali represent local populations, and the decisions being devolved to local bodies in new natural resource management efforts. Without reform local interventions risk reproducing the inequities of their centralised political-administrative context. Rather than pitting the state against society by depicting the state as a negative force and society and non-state institutions as positive—as is done in many decentralisation and participatory efforts—this article suggests that representation through local government can be the basis of general and enduring participation by society in public affairs.

Résumé

Cet article suggère que les rapports coloniaux de l'administration politique sont reproduits dans l'ère actuelle de la participation et de la decentralisation. En matière de gestion des ressources naturelles, on encourage la participation et la décentralisation en partant du principe qu'elles accroissent l'équité rurale, augmentent les rendements, sont favorables à l'environnement et contribuent au développement rural. Les conditions de jouissance de ces bénéfices regroupent (1) le transfert aux populations locales de certains pouvoirs réels sur les ressources naturelles et (2) l'existence d'autorités responsables sur le plan local auxquelles ces pouvoirs peuvent être transférés. Or, seul un ensemble limité de pouvoirs fortement circonscrits sont actuellement transférés à des autorites responsables sur le plan local et la plupart des autorités locales qui bénéficient d'un transfert de pouvoirs sont systématiquement structurées de manière à être responsables devant l'Etat central, et non pas devant les populations locales. Parmi les nouvelles lois passées au nom de la participation et de la décentralisation, nombreuses sont celles qui administrent plutot qu'elles affranchissent. Cet article étudie les fondements juridiques historiques des pouvoirs et la responsabilité des autorités locales soutenues par l'Etat (chefs et comites ruraux), les autorités à travers lesquelles les projets de gestion des ressources naturelles au Burkina Faso et au Mali représented les populations locales ainsi que les décisions déléguées aux organismes locaux dans le cadre de nouveaux projets de gestion des ressources naturelles. Sans une réforme, les interventions locales risquent de reproduire les inégalités de leur contexte politico-administratif centralisé. Au lieu d'opposer l'Etat à la société en décrivant l'Etat comme une force négative et la société et les institutions non étatiques comme positives, comme c'est le cas dans de nombreuses initiatives de décentralisation et de participation, cet article suggère qu'une représentation passant par l'administration locale peut être la base d'une participation générate et durable de la société aux affaires publiques.

Type
Who's to control the forests?
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamolekun, Ladipo. 1991. ‘Promoting African decentralisation’, Public Administration and Development 11, 285–91.Google Scholar
Agrawal, Arun. 1997. ‘Community in Conservation: beyond enchantment and disenchantment’. Conservation and Development Forum Working Paper No. 1, draft, 18 March, Gainesville FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Ahuluwalia, Meenakshi. 1997. ‘Representing communities: the case of a community-based watershed management project in Rajasthan, India’, IDS Bulletin 28 (4), 2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandre, Pierre. 1970a. ‘Chiefs, commandants and clerks: their relationship from conquest to decolonisation in French West Africa’, in Crowder, Michael and Ikime, Obaro (eds), West African Chiefs: their changing status under colonial rule and independence, pp. 213. New York: Africana.Google Scholar
Alexandre, Pierre. 1970b. ‘The problems of chieftaincies in French-speaking Africa’, in Crowder, Michael and Ikime, Obaro (eds), West African Chiefs: their changing status under colonial rule and independence, pp. 2478. New York: Africana. First published as ‘La problème des chefferies en Afrique noire française’, Notes et études documentaires, No. 2508, 10 February 1959.Google Scholar
Aubréville, August. 1939. ‘L'utilisation totale des bois tropicaux de l'ouest africain’, Revue des eaux et forets, June, pp. 485-95 and 599608.Google Scholar
Baland, Jean-Marie, and Platteau, Jean-Philippe. 1996. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: is there a role for rural communities? Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Banuri, Tariq, and Margolin, Frédérique Apffel. 1993. Who will Save the Forests? Knowledge, power and environmental destruction. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Bassett, Thomas J., and Crummey, Donald E. (eds). 1993. Land in African Agrarian Systems. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bayart, Jean-Francois. 1993. The State in Africa: the politics of the belly. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann von, F. 1995. ‘Property Rights and Common Resources’. Paper prepared for the Agrarian Questions Conference, Wageningen, 22-4 May.Google Scholar
Berry, Sara. 1989. ‘Social institutions and access to resources’, Africa, 59 (1), 4155.Google Scholar
Berry, Sara. 1993. No Condition is Permanent: the social dynamics of agrarian change in sub-Saharan Africa. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bertin, Andre. 1919. La Question forestière coloniale: mission d'études forestières envoyée dans les colonies françaises par les Ministères de la Guerre, de l'Armement et des Colonies. Paris: Émile Larose.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 1982. ‘Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities’, Journal of Political Economy 90 (5), 9881002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, Piers. 1985. The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in the Third World. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Buell, Raymond Leslie. 1928. The Native Problem in Africa. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Faso, Burkina, Government of. 1993a. ‘Schema directeur pour l'aménagement des formations naturelles autour de Ouagadougou’, Résumé, Ouagadougou: UNDP/FAO/MET/Direction de l'Environnement.Google Scholar
Faso, Burkina, 1993b. ‘Aménagement des forêts naturelles pour la sauvegarde de l'environnement et la production de bois: plan d'aménagement et de gestion de la forêt classée du Nazinon’. Ouagadougou: UNDP/FAO/MET (OF:BKF/89/011).Google Scholar
Faso, Burkina, 1993c. ‘Aménagement des forêts naturelles pour la sauvegarde de l'environnement et la production de bois: status de l'Union pré-cooperative des groupements de gestion forestière.’ Ouagadougou: UNDP/FAO/MET (OF:BKF/89/011).Google Scholar
Faso, Burkina, 1993d. ‘Loi No. 007/93/ADP portant régime électoral des conseillers de village, de secteur communal, de département et de province.’ Ouagadougou: Government of Burkina Faso.Google Scholar
Faso, Burkina, 1997. ‘Code forestier au Burkina Faso’. Law No. 006/97/ADP portant, Ministere de l'environnement et de l'eau, 17 March 1997, Ouagadougou: Government of Burkina Faso.Google Scholar
, CARE-Mali. 1993. ‘Ogokana’. Agriculture and Natural Resources Technical Report Series, Projet d'agro-sylviculture villageoise de Koro, December.Google Scholar
Michael, Cernea (ed.). 1985. Putting People First: sociological variables in rural development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chanock, Martin. 1991. ‘Paradigms, policies, and property: a review of the customary law of land tenure’, in Mann, Kristin and Roberts, Richard (eds), Law in Colonial Africa, 6184. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Chauveau, Jean-Pierre. 1994. ‘Participation paysanne et populisme bureaucratique: essai d'histoire et de sociologie de la culture de développement’, in Jacob, Jean-Pierre and Delville, Philippe Lavigne (eds), Les Associations paysannes en Afrique: organisation et dynamiques 2560. Marseilles: APAD; Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Cline-Cole, Reginald. 1996. ‘Dryland forestry: manufacturing forests and farming trees in Nigeria’, in Leach, Melissa and Mearns, Robin (eds), The Lie of the Land: challenging received wisdom on the African environment, 122139. Oxford: James Currey; Portsmouth NH: Heinemann, for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Cohen, John, and Uphoff, Norman. 1977. Rural Development Participation: concepts and measures for project design, implementation and evaluation. Ithaca NY: Rural Development Committee, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stephen S., Dyckman, John W., Schoenberger, Erica, and Downs, Charles R. 1981. ‘Decentralisation: a Framework for Policy Analysis’, Report of the Project on Managing Decentralisation, Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John L., and Roberts, Simon. 1981. Rules and Processes: the cultural logic context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conyers, Diana. 1984. ‘Decentralisation and development: a review of the literature’. Public Administration and Development 4, 187–97.Google Scholar
Cooper, Frederick. 1996. Decolonisation and African Society: the labor question in French and British Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cousins, Ben. 1997. ‘How do rights become real? Formal and informal institutions in South Africa's land reform’, IDS Bulletin (4) 5968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, L. Gray. 1958. Local Government in West Africa. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, Richard, and Manor, James. 1994. ‘Enhancing Participation and Institutional Performance: democratic decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa’. Report to ESCOR, the Overseas Development Administration, on Phase Two of a Two Phase Research Project. London: Economic and Social Committee on Overseas Research.Google Scholar
Michael, Crowder, and Ikime, Obaro (eds). 1970. West African Chiefs: their changing status under colonial rule and independence. New York: Africana.Google Scholar
Cruise, O'Brien Donald. 1975. Saints and Politicians: essays in the organisation of a Senegalese peasant society. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Degnobl, Tove. 1995. ‘The Terroir Approach to Natural Resource Management: panacea or phantom? The Malian experience’. Papers of the Fifth Annual Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bodoe, Norway, 24-8 May.Google Scholar
Delevoy, G. 1923. ‘La conservation des forets coloniales’, Bulletin de la Société centrale forestière de Belgique, September, 465-78, and October, 525-42.Google Scholar
Deschamps, Hubert. 1963. ‘Et maintenant, Lord Lugard?Africa 22 (4), 293306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diallo, Mahamadou A. 1994. ‘Problématique de la décentralisation au Niger.’ Preparatory document for the Praia conference, CILSS, Republique du Niger, financed by the Netherlands and USAID-Niger, May.Google Scholar
Donnelly-Roark, Paula. 1997. ‘Reinventing Decentralisation Burkinabé Style: progress and strategy notes’. Mimeo, 17 April.Google Scholar
Downs, R. E., and Reyna, S. P. (eds). 1988. Land and Society in Contemporary Africa. Hanover NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul R. 1978. The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Elbow, Kent M. 1996. ‘Legislative Reform, Tenure, and Natural Resource Management in Niger: the new Rural Code’. Madison WI: Land Tenure Center, for CILLS and USAID.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Lars. 1995. ‘Creating Local Democratic Politics from above: the “gestion des terroirs” approach in Burkina Faso’. Working paper, mimeo.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1997. ‘The eclipse of the state? Reflections on Stateness in an era of globalisation’, World Politics 50, 6287.Google Scholar
Evers, Yvette. 1994. ‘Local Institutions and Natural Resource Management in the West African Sahel: policy and practice of “gestion de terroir” in the Republic of Mali’, Rural Resources, Rural Livelihoods Working Paper No. 5, Manchester: Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Fairhead, James, and Leach, Melissa. 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. 1996. ‘Transnational Topographies of Power: beyond “the state” and “civil society” in the study of African polities’.Google Scholar
Fisiy, Cyprian F. 1992. Power and Privilege in the Administration of Law: land law reforms and social differentiation in Cameroon. Research Reports 1992/48, Leiden: African Studies Center.Google Scholar
Fisiy, Cyprian F. 1995. ‘Chieftaincy in the modern state: an institution at the crossroads of democratic change’, Paideuma 41, 4962.Google Scholar
Fiszbein, Ariel. 1997. ‘Decentralisation and Local Capacity: some thoughts on a controversial relationship’. Paper presented at the FAO/UNCDF/World Bank Technical Consultation on Decentralisation, Rome, 1518 December.Google Scholar
Foltz, William J. 1965. From French West Africa to the Mali Federation. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, M., and Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. African Political Systems, 1987. Reprinted London: KPI for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Louise, Fortmann. 1995. ‘Talking claims: discursive strategies in contesting property’, World Development 23 (6), 1053–63.Google Scholar
Gellar, Sheldon. 1995. Senegal: an African nation between Islam and the West. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Geschiere, Peter. 1993. ‘Chiefs and colonial rule in Cameroon: inventing chieftaincy, French and British style’, Africa 63 (2), 151–75.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Ran. 1997. ‘Review symposium: Mahmood Mamdani and the analysis of African society’, African Sociological Review. 1 96144.Google Scholar
Guha, Ramchandra. 1990. ‘An early environmental debate: the making of the 1878 Forest Act’, Indian Economic and Social History Review 27 (1), 6584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Jane. 1992. ‘Representation without taxation: an essay on democracy in rural Nigeria, 1952-90’, African Studies Review 35 (1), 4179.Google Scholar
Guyer, Jane. 1994. ‘The spatial dimensions of civil society in Africa: an anthropologist looks at Nigeria’, in Harbeson, John W., Rothchild, Donald and Chazan, Naomi (eds), Civil Society and the State in Africa, 215–29. Boulder CO: Lynne Reiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science 162, 1243–8.Google Scholar
Hesseling, Gerti. 1996. ‘Legal and Institutional Incentives for Local Environmental Management’. Occasional Paper No. 17, Roskilde: International Development Studies, Roskilde University.Google Scholar
Hesseling, Gerti, with Smit, M. Sypkens. n.d. (c. 1984). ‘Le droit fonder au Senegal: l'impact de la réforme foncière en Basse-Casamance’. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organisations and states. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hubert, Henry. 1920. ‘Le Désèchement progressif en Afrique occidentale’. Comité d'études historiques et scientifiques de l'Afrique occidentale française. Paris: Government of France.Google Scholar
Karlstrom, Mikael. 1996. ‘Imagining democracy: political culture and democratisation in Buganda’. Africa 66 (4), 485505.Google Scholar
Kini, Rémi. 1995. ‘An Evaluation Study of Natural Forest Management for Wood Fuel Production in the Sahel: a Burkina Faso case’. Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, East Lansing MI: Department of Resource Development, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. 1974. ‘The political economy of rent-seeking society’. American Economic Review 64 (3), 291303.Google Scholar
Leonard, David K., and Marshall, Dale-Rogers (eds). 1982. Institutions of Rural Development for the Poor: decentralisation and organisational linkages. Research Series No. 49, Berkeley CA: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Little, Peter D. 1994. ‘The link between local participation and improved conservation: a review of issues and experiences’, in Western, David and Wright, R. Michael (eds), Natural Connections: perspectives in community-based conservation, 347–72. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Lund, Christian. 1998. Law, Power and Politics in Niger: land struggles and the Rural Code. Hamburg: Lit.Google Scholar
Mahwood, Philip. 1982-1983. ‘The place of traditional political authority in African pluralism’, Civilisations XXXII (2), XXXIII (1), 209–37.Google Scholar
Mair, Lucy P. 1936. Native Policies in Africa. New York: Negro University Press.Google Scholar
Mali, Republique du. 1977. ‘Ordonnance N77-44/CMLN due 12 juillet 1977 portant réorganisation territoriale et administrative de la Republique du Mali’.Google Scholar
Mali, Republique du. 1991. ‘Code électoral’, Ordonnance No. 91–074/P-CTSP du 10 Octobre.Google Scholar
Mali, Republique du. 1994a. ‘Loi No. 94 /AN-RM portant organisation de l'exploitation du transport et du commerce du bois’. Assemblee Nationale.Google Scholar
Mali, Republique du 1994b. ‘Projet de loi portant principles de constitution et de gestion du domaine des collectivités territoriales décentralisées’. Primature, Mission de décentralisation. April.Google Scholar
Mali, Republique du 1994c. ‘Loi No. 94 /AN-RM fixant les conditions de gestion des ressources forestiers’. Bamako: Assemblée Nationale.Google Scholar
Mali, Republique du 1995. ‘Loi No. 95–034, portant code des collectivités territoriales en Republique du Mali’, adopted 27 January.Google Scholar
Mali, Republique du 1996. ‘Loi No. 96–050, portant 'principes de constitution et de gestion du domaine des collectivités territoriales’, adopted 16 October.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. Citizen and Subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 1997. ‘Response to Comments’, African Sociological Review 1-2, 145–55.Google Scholar
Manor, James. 1997. ‘The Political Economy of Decentralisation’. Draft of paper prepared for the World Bank and presented at the FAOAJNCDF/World Bank Technical Consultation on Decentralisation, Rome, 1518 December.Google Scholar
Marcussen, Henrik Secher. 1994. ‘The Need for a New Perspective on the Sahelian State’. Occasional Paper No. 12, Roskilde: International Development Studies, Roskilde University.Google Scholar
Mazonde, Isaac Ncube. 1996. ‘The Basarwa of Botswana: leadership, legitimacy and participation in development sites’. Cultural Survival Quarterly fall, 5456.Google Scholar
Mclntosh, Alastair. 1990. ‘Rethinking chieftaincy and the future of rural local government: a preliminary investigation’, Transformation (Durban) 13, 2745.Google Scholar
Meadows, Donella H., Meadows, Dennis L., Randers, Jorgen, and Behrens, William W. III. 1974. The Limits to Growth. New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar
Mehta, Ajay S. 1996. ‘Micro-politics of voluntary action: an anatomy of change in two villages’, Cultural Survival Quarterly, fall 2630.Google Scholar
Moore, Mick. 1997. ‘Death without taxes: democracy, state capacity, and aid dependence in the Fourth World’, in White, G. and Robinson, M. (eds), Towards a Democratic Developmental State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1986. Social Facts and Fabrications: ‘customary’ law on Kilimanjaro, 1880-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk 1991. ‘Reflexion sur une mission au Burkina Faso’. Mimeo, 45 September.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk, Bourgoignie, Marie-Noelle, Mathieu, Paul, Kamara, Oumar, and Ouedraogo, Moussa. 1991. ‘Rapport de mission, Burkina Faso, Club du Sahel/ARD/PNGT, du 4 au 16 September 1991’. Draft report to Club of the Sahel, 18 September, mimeo.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1992. Democratisation in Africa: African views, African voices, ed. Kpundeh, Sahr John. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Ngaido, Tidiane. 1996. ‘Redefining the Boundaries of Control: post-colonial tenure policies and dynamics of social and tenure change in western niger’. Doctoral dissertation, Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Niger, République du. 1992. ‘Projet d'Ordonnance portant organisation de la commercialisation et du transport de bois dans les grandes agglomérations, et la fiscalité qui lui est applicable’. Ordonnance No. 92–037 du 21 aout 1992.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinore. 1990. Governing the Commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ouali, Firmin, Kiemdé, Paul, and Yaméogo, Dénise. 1994. ‘Etude de base sur l'état de la décentralisation au Burkina’. Summary report, Commission nationale de la decentralisation, Premier Ministere, Burkina Faso, June.Google Scholar
Ouédraogo, Hubert M. G. 1994. ‘Les coutumes relatives à la gestion des ressources naturelles au Burkina Faso’. Rome: FAO, Programme de Cooperation Technique, FAO/LEG: TCP/BKF/2352.Google Scholar
Painter, Thomas, Sumberg, James, and Price, Thomas. 1994. ‘Your terroir and my “action space”: implications of differentiation, mobility and diversification for the approche terroir in Sahelian West Africa’. Africa 64 (4), 447–64.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1991. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peluso, Nancy Lee. 1992. Rich Forests, Poor People: resource control and resistance in Java. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perham, Margery. 1960. Lugard: the years of authority, 1898-1945. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Posey, Darrel. 1985. ‘Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapo Indians of the Brazilian Amazon’. Agroforestry Systems 3, 139–58.Google Scholar
Ranger, Terence. 1993. ‘The Invention of Tradition revisited: the case of colonial Africa’. 62111 in Ranger, Terence and Vaughan, Olufemi (eds), Legitimacy and the State in Twentieth-century Africa: essays in honour of A. H. M. Kirk-Greene, Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C. 1993. ‘Market-state relations and environmental policy: limits of state capacity in Senegal’, in Lipschutz, Ronnie D. and Conca, Ken (eds), The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C. 1995a. ‘From exclusion to participation: turning Senegal's forestry policy around?World Development 23 (9), 1587–99.Google Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C. 1995b. ‘Local Forest Control in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Senegal and the Gambia: a review and critique of new participatory policies’, Review of Policies in the Traditional Energy Sector (RPTES), Discussion Paper series, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C. 1996. ‘Participation without representation: chiefs, councils and rural representation’, Cultural Survival Quarterly, special issue on Participation, ed. Peters, Pauline, 40–4.Google Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C. 1998a. ‘Theorising access: forest profits along Senegal's charcoal commodity chain’, Development and Change 29 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C. 1998b. ‘Forest rebellion and local representation: a struggle to participate in Makacoulibantang, Senegal’, in Zerner, Charles (ed.), People, Plants and Justice: resource extraction and conservation in tropical developing countries. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C. 1998c. ‘A History of Fear: imagining deforestation in the West African Sahel’. Paper presented at the International Workshop on the Biogeography of Open/Savanna Woodlands in Africa, Leeds: School of Geography, University of Leeds, 10 December.Google Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C. 1998d. ‘Integral Rural Development: authority and accountability in decentralised natural resource management’, working paper, Africa Technical Division, Washinton DC: World Bank, August.Google Scholar
Roberts, Richard. 1997. ‘Conflicts over property in the middle Niger valley at the beginning of the twentieth century’, African Economic History 25, 7996.Google Scholar
Rocheleau, Dianne E. 1991. ‘Gender, ecology, and the science of survival: stories and lessons from Kenya’, Agriculture and Human Values 8, 156–65.Google Scholar
Nieuwaal, Rouveroy van, van, Emile. 1987. ‘Chiefs and African states: some introductory notes and an extensive bibliography on African chieftaincy’. Journal of Legal Pluralism 25-6, 1-46.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Edward J. 1975. Politics, Bureaucracy and Rural Development in Senegal. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sénégal, République du. 1964. ‘Loi No. 64/46 du 17 juin 1964, rélative au domaine national’, Journal officiel de la Republique du Sénégal.Google Scholar
Sénégal, République du. 1972. ‘Décret No. 72–636 du 29 mai 1972 rélatif aux attributions des chefs de circonscriptions administratives et chefs de village’, Journal officiel de la République du Sénégal, 17 June 1972.Google Scholar
Sénégal, République du. 1993. ‘Code forestier, loi No. 93–06 du 4 février 1993’, Ministère de l'environnement et de la protection de la nature.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Barrie. 1998. ‘“First the forest”: conservation, ‘community’ and ‘participation’ in south-west Cameroon’, Africa 68 (1), 2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipton, Parker. 1995. ‘Luo entrustment: foreign finance and the soil of the spirits in Kenya’, Africa 65 (2): 165–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. 1989. Staying Alive. Atlantic Highlands NJ: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Singh, Naresh, and Titi, Vangile. 1995. Empowerment: towards sustainable development. Atlantic Highlands NJ: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Spierenburg, Marja. 1995. ‘The Role of the Mhondoro Cult in the Struggle for Control over Land in Dande (Northern Zimbabwe): social commentaries and the influences of adherents’. Harare: Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, and Amsterdam: School of Social Science Research, October.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Sian. 1996. ‘Towards a non-equilibrium ecology: perspectives from an arid land’, Journal of Biogeography 23, 15.Google Scholar
Suret-Canale, Jean. 1966. ‘La fin de la chefferie en Guinee’, Journal of African History VII (3), 459–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suret-Canale, Jean. 1970. ‘The Fouta-Djalon chieftaincy’, in Crowder, Michael and Ikime, Obaro (eds), West African Chiefs: their changing status under colonial rule and independence, 7997. New York: Africana.Google Scholar
Tendler, Judith. 1997. Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Jamie. 1995. ‘Community Institutions and the Governance of Local Woodstocks in the Context of Mali's Democratic Transition’. Paper presented at the thirty-eighth annual meeting of the African Studies Association, 36 November, Orlando FL.Google Scholar
Thomson, Jamie, and Coulibaly, Cheibane. 1994. ‘Decentralisation in the Sahel: regional synthesis’. SAH/D (94) 427, Regional Conference on Land Tenure and Decentralisation in the Sahel, Praia, Cape Verde, CILSS, OECD, Club du Sahel, January.Google Scholar
Tiffen, Mary, Mortimore, Michael, and Gichuki, F. 1994. More People, Less Erosion: environmental recovery in Kenya. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Camilla. 1993. ‘Gestion de terroir: principles, first lessons and implications for action’. Discussion paper prepared for UNSO, March.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Megan. 1991. Curing their Ills: colonial power and African illness. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vollenhoven, J. van. 1920. Une Ante du chef. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Watts, Michael J. 1993. ‘Idioms of land and labor: producing politics and rice in Senegambia’, in Bassett, Thomas J. and Crummey, Donald E. (eds), Land in African Agrarian Systems, 157221. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Brian. 1972. Eboue. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Western, David, and Wright, R. Michael. 1994. ‘Background to community-based conservation’, in David, Western R.Wright, Michael and Strum, Shirley C. (eds), Natural Connections: perspectives in community-based conservation, pp. 115. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1996. The World Bank Participation Sourcebook. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar