Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:33:29.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene in Total Joint Components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Timothy M. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Biomechanics, The Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70 Street, New York, NY 10021
Clare M. Rimnac
Affiliation:
Department of Biomechanics, The Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70 Street, New York, NY 10021
Donald L. Bartel
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

This article reviews the problem of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene component surface degradation in total hip and total knee prostheses, including its clinical implications. Several factors affecting surface damage have been identified from a combination of the observations of in-vivo degradation made on retrieved components, experimental measurement of contact stresses on polyethylene components as a result of contact with their metallic counterpart, and analytical studies of both contact stress and the stresses beneath the polyethylene surface. Both the observations of in-vivo surface degradation and the analytical studies demonstrate that surface degradation is a more severe problem in total knee replacements than in total hip replacements. The performance of polyethylene components, as affected by design factors such as material thickness and material modification, is also considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Morscher, E., in The Cementless Fixation of Hip Endoprostheses, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984), pp. 19.Google Scholar
2. Charnley, J., in Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979), pp. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Insall, J.N., Hood, R W., Flawn, L. B., Sullivan, D.J., J. Bone Joint Surg. 65A, 619628 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hood, R.W., Wright, T.M., Burstein, A.H., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 17, 829842 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Rose, R.M., Crugnola, A., Ries, M., Cimino, W.R., Paul, I., Radin, E.L., Clin. Orthop. 145, 277286 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Rostoker, W., Chao, E.Y.S., Galante, J.O., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 12, 317335 (1978).Google Scholar
7. Wright, T.M., Burstein, A.H., Bartel, D.L., in Corrosion and Degradation of Implant Materials: Second Symposium. ASTM STP 859, edited by Fraker, A. and Griffin, C. (American Society for Testing and Materials,Philadelphia, 1985), pp. 415428.Google Scholar
8. “Poly TwoTM Carbon-Polyethylene Composite”. Technical Report, Zimmer U.S.A., Warsaw, IN, Jan. 1977.Google Scholar
9. BarteI, D.L., Burstein, A.H., Toda, M.D., Edwards, D.L., J. Biomech. Eng. 107, 193199 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Eyerer, P and Ke, Y.C. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 18, 11371151 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Connelly, G.M., Rimnac, C.M., Wright, T.M., Hertzberg, R.W., Manson, J.A., J. Orthop. Res. 2, 119125 (1984).Google Scholar