Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:25:40.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Keck constraints on a varying fine-structure constant: wavelength calibration errors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Michael T. Murphy
Affiliation:
Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria 3122, Australia email: mmurphy@swin.edu.au
John K. Webb
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
Victor V. Flambaum
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Keck telescope's High Resolution Spectrograph (HIRES) has previously provided evidence for a smaller fine-structure constant, α, compared to the current laboratory value, in a sample of 143 quasar absorption systems: Δα/α=(-0.57±0.11)×10−5. The analysis was based on a variety of metal-ion transitions which, if α varies, experience different relative velocity shifts. This result is yet to be robustly contradicted, or confirmed, by measurements on other telescopes and spectrographs; it remains crucial to do so. It is also important to consider new possible instrumental systematic effects which may explain the Keck/HIRES results. Griest et al. (2009) recently identified distortions in the echelle order wavelength scales of HIRES with typical amplitudes ±250 m s−1. Here we investigate the effect such distortions may have had on the Keck/HIRES varying α results. Using a simple model of these intra-order distortions, we demonstrate that they cause a random effect on Δα/α from absorber to absorber because the systems are at different redshifts, placing the relevant absorption lines at different positions in different echelle orders. The typical magnitude of the effect on Δα/α is ~0.4×10−5 for individual absorbers which, compared to the median error on Δα/α in the sample, ~1.9×10−5, is relatively small. Consequently, the weighted mean value changes by less than 0.05×10−5 if the corrections we calculate are applied. Unsurprisingly, with corrections this small, we do not find direct evidence that applying them is actually warranted. Nevertheless, we urge caution, particularly for analyses aiming to achieve high precision Δα/α measurements on individual systems or small samples, that a much more detailed understanding of such intra-order distortions and their dependence on observational parameters is important if they are to be avoided or modelled reliably.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Griest, K., Whitmore, J. B., Wolfe, A. M., Prochaska, J. X., Howk, J. C., & Marcy, G. W. 2009, ApJ, submitted, arXiv:0904.4725v1Google Scholar