Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T22:02:26.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lattice Imaging of Silicide-Silicon Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

L. J. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 (U.S.A.)
J. W. Mayer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 (U.S.A.)
K. N. Tu
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 (U.S.A.)
T. T. Sheng
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 (U.S.A.)
Get access

Extract

The interfaces of both epitaxial and non-epitaxial silicides and silicon were investigated by the direct lattice imaging method using cross-sectional samples. Non-epitaxial CoSi2 on silicon was observed to have a curved interface. Epitaxial CoSi2 , however, was found to be smooth within a facet. No evidence of an amorphous layer at the interface was obtained.

Epitaxial NiSi2 on Si(001) was found to be heavily faceted. The facets are on {111} and {100} planes with the former more frequently observed. The interface between Si(111) and NiSi2 is also faceted but less so than that for Si(001). The interface is very rough on a large scale. Straight boundary lines corresponding to faceted planes were observed which indicated that the interfaces on an atomic scale were quite smooth. Defect clusters and planar defects were also observed at the interfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Tu, K. N. and Mayer, J. W., in Poate, J. M., Tu, K. N. and Mayer, J. W. (eds.), Thin Films- Interdiffusion and Reactions, Wiley, New York, 1978, p. 359.Google Scholar
2 Walser, R. M. and Bene, R. W., Appl. Phys. Lett., 28 (1976) 624.Google Scholar
3 Föll, H., Ho, P. S. and Tu, K. N., J. Appl. Phys., 52 (1981) 250.Google Scholar
4 Föll, H., Ho, P. S. and Tu, K. N., Philos. Mag. A, 45 (1982) 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Murarka, S. P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 17(1980) 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Ishiwara, H., in Baglin, J. E. E. and Poate, J. M. (eds.), Proc. Symp. on Thin Film Interfaces and Interactions, Los Angeles, CA, 1979, Electrochemical Society, Princeton, NJ, 1980, p. 159.Google Scholar
7 Bean, J. C. and Poate, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 37(1980) 643.Google Scholar
8 Chen, L. J., Hung, L. S. and Mayer, J. W., Appl. Surf Sci., to be published.Google Scholar
9 Sheng, T. T. and Chang, C. C., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 23 (1976) 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Sinclair, R., in Hren, J. J., Goldstein, J. I. and Joy, D. C. (eds.), Introduction to Analytical Electron Microscopy, Plenum, New York, 1979, p. 507.Google Scholar
11 Chen, L. J., Mayer, J. W. and Tu, K. N., Proc. Symp. on Thin Films and Interfaces, Boston, MA, November 16–19, 1981, in Thin Solid Films, 93 (1982) 135.Google Scholar