Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:08:58.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lichen species density and abundance over ten years in permanent plots in inland Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2008

Per Johansson  and
Göran Thor
Per Johansson*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7002, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Göran Thor
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7002, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
*
*per.johansson@nvb.slu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the austral summer of 1991–92, 120 sample plots were established along 11 transects at various distances from the Swedish research stations Wasa and Svea in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. These plots were re-examined in 2001–02 to evaluate overall changes and possible local impact from human activities around the research stations on the terrestrial vegetation, formed by lichens and mosses. The results showed high consistencies over the ten years, but nevertheless suggest a slight overall increase in both lichen species density and abundance, measured as the number of lichen records. We did not find evidence for any severe human impact on the lichens and mosses around the research stations. However, sample plots located close to the Svea station had been affected by station maintenance, which has caused local decline of lichen species such as Umbilicaria decussata. In contrast to the overall consistency and slight increase in lichens we found a decline of Rhizoplaca melanophthalma.

Keywords

Antarctic Treatyenvironmental monitoringlichen diversitySWEDARPterrestrial vegetation
Type
Life Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 115 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbraud, C. & Weimerskirch, H. 2001. Emperor penguins and climate change. Nature, 411, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brabyn, L., Beard, C., Seppelt, R.D., Rudolph, E.D., Türk, R. & Green, T.G.A. 2006. Quantified vegetation change over 42 years at Cape Hallett, East Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 18, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannone, N. 2006. A network for monitoring terrestrial ecosystems along a latitudinal gradient in Continental Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 18, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T.G.A., Seppelt, R.D. & Sancho, L.G. 1999. Plant life in Antarctica. In Pugnaire, F.I. & Valladares, F., eds. Handbook of functional plant ecology. New York: Marcel Dekker, 495–543.Google Scholar
Kanda, H.& Inoue, M. 1994. Ecological monitoring of moss and lichen vegetation in the Syowa station area, Antarctica. Proceedings of the NIPR Symposium on Polar Biology, 7, 221–231.Google Scholar
Longton, R.E. 1988. Biology of polar bryophytes and lichens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 391 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melick, D.R. & Seppelt, R.D. 1997. Vegetation patterns in relation to climatic and endogenous changes in Wilkes Land, continental Antarctica. Journal of Ecology, 85, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modig, A. 1999. Environmental project – SWEDARP 1997–98.In Grönlund, E., ed. Polarforskningssekretariatets årsbok 1998, Cruise report. Stockholm: Swedish Polar Research Secretariat, 52.Google Scholar
Øvstedal, D.O. & Lewis Smith, R.I. 2001. Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 405 pp.Google Scholar
Robinson, S.A., Wasley, J.& Tobin, A.K. 2003. Living on the edge – plants and global change in continental and maritime Antarctica. Global Change Biology, 9, 1681–1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sancho, L.G. & Pintado, A. 2004. Evidence of high annual growth rate for lichens in the maritime Antarctic. Polar Biology, 27, 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 1994. Vascular plants as bioindicators of regional warming in Antarctica. Oecologia, 99, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R.I.L. 1995. Colonization by lichens and the development of lichen-dominated communities in the maritime Antarctic. Lichenologist, 27, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Søchting, U. & Olech, M. 2000. Caloplaca scolecomarginata spec. nova and C. frigida spec. nova, two new lichen species from Antarctica. In Schroeter, B., Schlensog, M. & Green, T.G.A., eds. New aspects in cryptogamic research. contributions in honour of Ludger Kappen. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 75. Berlin: J. Cramer, 19–26.Google Scholar
Swartling, A. 2003. Monitoring of soil contamination at Wasa and Aboa stations, Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Report. Stockholm: Swedish Polar Research Secretariat.Google Scholar
Thor, G. 1997. Establishment of permanent plots with lichens and mosses for monitoring local human impact on environment in Heimefrontfjella and Vestfjella, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Antarctic Record, 41, 652–672.Google Scholar
Wall, D.H. 2005. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in terrestrial habitats of Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 17, 523–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van De Berg, W.J., Van Den Broeke, M.R., Reijmer, C.H. & Van Meijgaard, E. 2005. Characteristics of the Antarctic surface mass balance (1958–2002) using a regional atmospheric climate model. Annals of Glaciology, 41, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, D.G., Marshall, G.J., Connolley, W.M., King, J.C. & Mulvaney, R. 2001. Climate change: devil in the detail. Science, 293, 1777–1779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wasley, J., Robinson, S.A., Lovelock, C.E. & Popp, M. 2006. Climate change manipulations show Antarctic flora is more strongly affected by elevated nutrients than water. Global Change Biology, 12, 1800–1812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar