Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:48:08.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ontogeny of Pteranodon and other pterosaurs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

S. Christopher Bennett
S. Christopher Bennett*
Affiliation:
Museum of Natural History and Department of Systematics and Ecology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Immature specimens of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon were identified using three size-independent criteria: (1) fusion of various cranial and postcranial elements; (2) degree of epiphyseal ossification; and (3) bone grain or degree of ossification of limb-bone shafts. Immature individuals make up 15% of available specimens of Pteranodon and do not differ significantly in size from mature individuals. This and the extensive fusion of the mature skeleton suggest that Pteranodon had determinate growth. The bone of limb-bone shafts of immature individuals is fibro-lamellar bone, which suggests that they grew rapidly to adult size. The size-independent criteria can also be used to identify immature and mature individuals of other pterosaur taxa, and other large pterodactyloids also probably exhibited rapid determinate growth.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , Winter 1993 , pp. 92 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andrews, R. M. 1982. Patterns of growth in reptiles. Pp. 273–320in Gans, C. and Pough, F. H., eds. Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 13, Physiology D. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. C. 1988. Pteranodon subadults, and the ontogeny of pterosaurs. In Abstracts of Papers, 48th Annual Meeting, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 8(Suppl. to no. 3):9A. [Abstract.]Google Scholar
Bennett, S. C. 1991. Morphology of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon and systematics of the Pterodactyloidea. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. C. 1992. Sexual dimorphism of Pteranodon and other pterosaurs, with comments on cranial crests. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12:422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkman, D. 1988. Size-independent criteria for estimating relative age in Ophiacodon and Dimetrodon (Reptilia, Pelycosauria) from the Admiral and lower Belle Plains formations of west-central Texas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 8:172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callison, G., and Quimby, H. M. 1984. Tiny dinosaurs: are they fully grown? Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 3:200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, D. A., and Kellner, A.W.A. 1985. Panorama of the flying reptiles study in Brazil and South America. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 57:453–466.Google Scholar
Currey, J. 1984. The mechanical adaptations of bones. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ricqles, A. J. 1976. On bone histology of fossil and living reptiles, with comments on its functional and evolutionary significance. Pp. 123–150in Bellairs, A. d'A. and Cox, C. B., eds. Morphology and biology of reptiles. Linnaean Society Symposium Series 3. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Galton, P. M. 1982. Juveniles of the stegosaurian dinosaur Kentrosaurus from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania, East Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2:47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattin, D. E. 1982. Stratigraphy and depositional environment of Smoky Hill Chalk Member, Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) of the type area, western Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin 225:1–108.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H. 1984. Determinate growth in the Baenidae (Testudines): taxonomic, ecological, and stratigraphic significance. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 3:148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. 1977. Size independent criteria for estimating relative age and relationships among growth parameters in a group of fossil reptiles (Reptilia: Ichthyosauria). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 14:1916–1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateer, N. J. 1976. A statistical study of the genus Pterodactylus. Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, N.S. 6:97–105.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1851. Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Cretaceous formations. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 5:1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, L. I. 1971. A presenca de Pterosauria no Cretaceo inferior da Chapada do Araripe, Brasil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 43(Suppl.):451–461.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry, 2d ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1970. Die Pterodactyloidea (Pterosauria) der Oberjura-Plattenkalke Süddeutschlands. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Wissenschaftlichen Klasse, Abhandlungen 141.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1975. Die Rhamphorhynchoidea (Pterosauria) der Oberjura-Plattenkalke Süddeutschlands. Palaeontographica, A 148:1–33, 148: 132–186, 149: 1–30.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1985. Neue Pterosaurier aus der Santana-Formation der Chapada do Araripe, Brasilien. Palaeontographica, A 187:105–182.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P. 1991. Weitere Pterosaurierfunde aus der Santana-Formation (Apt) der Chapada do Araripe, Brasilien. Palaeontographica 215:43–101.Google Scholar