Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T15:13:33.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of age and species on agronomic performance, chemical composition and in vitro gas production of some tropical multi-purpose tree species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2012

O. M. ARIGBEDE
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, P.O. Box 10, Hunan 410125, P.R. China Pasture and Range Management Department,College of Animal Science and Livestock Production, University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2240, Abeokuta, Nigeria
Z. L. TAN*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, P.O. Box 10, Hunan 410125, P.R. China
U. Y. ANELE
Affiliation:
Pasture and Range Management Department,College of Animal Science and Livestock Production, University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2240, Abeokuta, Nigeria
Z. H. SUN
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, P.O. Box 10, Hunan 410125, P.R. China
S. X. TANG
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, P.O. Box 10, Hunan 410125, P.R. China
X. F. HAN
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, P.O. Box 10, Hunan 410125, P.R. China
C. S. ZHOU
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, P.O. Box 10, Hunan 410125, P.R. China
B. ZENG
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, P.O. Box 10, Hunan 410125, P.R. China
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: zltan@isa.ac.cn

Summary

Five tropical multi-purpose tree species (MPTS), Enterolobium cyclocarpum, Moringa oleifera, Millettia griffoniana, Pterocarpus santalinoides and Treculia Africana, and one exotic species (Leucaena leucocephala), which acted as the control, planted in a randomized complete block design, were selected to evaluate the potentials as feed supplements for herds in dry seasons of south-western Nigeria. Samples of the MPTS leaves were collected in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, weighed, dried and milled for estimation of biomass production, chemical analysis and measurement of in vitro gas production. Results showed significant differences (P < 0·001) in the biomass production of the MPTS. E. cyclocarpum consistently recorded the highest biomass production, height and collar diameter throughout the experimental period. There were also differences (P ⩽ 0·001) in dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and ash contents of the MPTS across species and years after planting. M. oleifera recorded the highest CP content of 240 g/kg DM. Interactions were observed between species and year for neutral detergent fibre (NDFom), acid detergent fibre (ADFom) and lignin contents of the MPTS. M. griffoniana and M. oleifera had lower tannin contents, whereas E. cyclocarpum, P. santalinoides, T. africana and L. leucocephala had higher tannin contents. The values reported for mineral contents showed that their levels in the MPTS were adequate for ruminants and there were no differences in the contents of most minerals. In vitro gas production results showed that the potential gas production ‘b’ was highest in M. griffoniana and lowest in P. santalinoides and there were species and year interactions (P ⩽ 0·001) for volatile fatty acid profiles of the supernatant after 96 h incubation. The estimated organic matter digestibility (OMD) and metabolizable energy (ME) of the MPTS were generally high. The high biomass production, CP and low fibre contents, as well as in vitro fermentation characteristics found for the MPTS evaluated in the current study suggest that these are better alternatives in comparison with L. leucocephala. It can be concluded that the MPTS evaluated have potential as sources of feed supplements for ruminants in dry seasons, especially in south western Nigeria.

Type
Animal Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akkasaeng, R., Gutteridge, R. C. & Wanapat, M. (1989). Evaluation of trees and shrubs for forage and fuelwood in Northeast Thailand. International Tree Crops Journal 5, 209220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anele, U. Y., Arigbede, O. M., Olanite, J. A., Adekunle, I. O., Jolaosho, A. O., Onifade, O. S. & Oni, A. O. (2008). Early growth and seasonal chemical composition of three indigenous multipurpose tree species (MPTS) in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Agroforestry Systems 73, 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Apori, S. O., Castro, E. B., Shand, W. J. & Orskov, E. R. (1998). Chemical composition, in-sacco degradation and in vitro gas production of some Ghanian browse plants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 76, 129137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARC (1984). Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No.1. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Arigbede, O. M., Anele, U. Y., Jolaosho, A. O., Olanite, J. A., Onifade, O. S. & Wahab, T. A. (2008). Chemical composition and in vitro gas production of African bread fruit (Treculia africana) var. Decne. Archivos de Zootecnia 57, 113121.Google Scholar
Arigbede, O. M. & Ekpenyon, T. E. (2004). Evaluation of three indigenous multi- purpose tree species for agroforestry purposes on alfisols in South Western Nigeria. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 108114.Google Scholar
Camacho, L. M., Rojo, R., Salem, A. Z. M., Provenza, F. D., Mendoza, G. D., Aviles, F. & Montanez-Valdez, O. D. (2010). Effect of season on chemical composition and in situ degradability in cows and in adapted and unadapted goats of three Mexican browse species. Animal Feed Science and Technology 155, 206212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Mello, J. P. F. (1992). Chemical constraints to the use of tropical legumes in animal nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 38, 237361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalzell, S. A., Stewart, J. L., Tolera, A. & McNeill, D. M. (1998). Chemical composition of Leucaena and implications for forage quality. In ACIAR Proceedings of the Workshop Leucaena – Adaptation, Quality and Farming Systems, Hanoi, Vietnam, 9–14 February 1998 (Eds Shelton, H. M., Gutteridge, R. C., Mullen, B. F. & Bray, R. A.), pp. 227246. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR.Google Scholar
Jabbar, M. A., Larbi, A. & Reynolds, L. (1996). Alley Farming for Improving Small Ruminant Productivity in West Africa: ILRI's Experience. Socioeconomics & Policy Research Working Paper No. 20. Addis Ababa: International Livestock Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kang, B. T., Salako, F. K., Akobundu, I. O., Pleysier, J. L. & Chianu, J. N. (1997). Amelioration of a degraded Oxic Paleustalf by leguminous and natural fallows. Soil Use and Management 13, 130136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanal, R. C. & Subba, D. B. (2001). Nutritional evaluation of leaves from some major fodder trees cultivated in the hills of Nepal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 92, 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanyasunya, T. P., Wang, H. R., Kariuki, S. T., Kuria, D. M., Chek, A. L. & Mukisira, E. A. (2007). Effect of maturity on the mineral content of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 7, 5358.Google Scholar
Larbi, A., Smith, J. W., Adekunle, I. O. & Kurdi, I. O. (1996). Studies on multipurpose fodder trees and shrubs in West Africa: variation in determinants of forage quality in Albizia and Paraserianthes species. Agroforestry Systems 33, 2939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ly, J., Samkol, P. & Preston, T. R. (2001). Nutritional evaluation of tropical leaves for pigs: pepsin/pancreatin digestibility of thirteen plant species. Livestock Research for Rural Development 13(5). Available online at http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd113/135/ly135.htm (verified 29 November 2011).Google Scholar
Mahipala, M. B. P. K., Krebs, G. L., McCafferty, P., Dods, K. & Suriyagoda, B. M. L. D. B. (2009). Faecal indices predict organic matter digestibility, short chain fatty acid production and metabolizable energy content of browse-containing sheep diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 154, 6875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, H. P. S. (2003). Quantification of Tannins in Tree and Shrub Foliage. A Laboratory Manual. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, H. P. S., Blümmel, M., Borrowy, N. K. & Becker, K. (1993). Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 61, 161165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, H. P. S., Singh, B. & Negi, S. S. (1989). Relationship of rumen degradability with microbial colonization, cell wall constituents and tannin levels in some tree leaves. Animal Production 49, 299303.Google Scholar
Malcolmson, G. H. (1988). Leucaena Establishment and Extension. Project Report Q0088007. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Department of Primary Industries.Google Scholar
Mbugua, D. M., Kiruiro, E. M. & Pell, A. N. (2008). In vitro fermentation of intact and fractionated tropical herbaceous and tree legumes containing tannins and alkaloids. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, L. R. (1997). Minerals for Grazing Ruminants in Tropical Regions. Florida, USA: University of Florida.Google Scholar
McNabb, W. C., Waghorn, G. C., Barry, T. N. & Shelton, I. D. (1993). The effect of condensed tannins in Lotus pedunculatus on the digestion and metabolism of methionine, cystine and inorganic sulphur in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 70, 647661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menke, K. H. & Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28, 755.Google Scholar
Monforte-Briceno, G. E., Sandoval-Castro, C. A., Ramırez-Aviles, L. & Capetillo Leal, C. M. (2005). Defaunating capacity of tropical fodder trees: effects of polyethylene glycol and its relationship to in vitro gas production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123, 313327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murro, J. K., Muhikambele, V. R. M. & Sarwatt, S. V. (2003). Moringa oleifera leaf meal can replace cottonseed cake in the concentrate mix fed with Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) hay for growing sheep. Livestock Research for Rural Development 15(11). Available online at http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/11/murr1511.htm (verified 29 November 2011).Google Scholar
Odenyo, A. A., Osuji, P. O., Reed, J. D., Smith, A. H., Mackie, R. I., McSweeney, C. S. & Hanson, J. (2003). Acacia angustissima: its anti-nutrients constituents, toxicity and possible mechanisms to alleviate the toxicity – a short review. Agroforestry Systems 59, 141147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oni, A. O., Onwuka, C. F. I., Oduguwa, O. O., Onifade, O. S. & Arigbede, O. M. (2008). Utilization of citrus pulp based diets and Enterolobium cyclocarpum (JACQ.GRISEB) foliage by West African dwarf goats. Livestock Science 117, 184191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajaguru, A. S. B. (1990). Shrubs and tree fodder used for livestock feeding in Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the 2nd Regional Workshop on Multipurpose Tree Species (Ed. H. Gunasena, P. M.), pp. 8691. Bangkok, Thailand: Winrock International (F/FRED).Google Scholar
Sallam, S. M. A. (2005). Nutritive value assessment of the alternative feed resources by gas production and rumen fermentation in vitro . Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 1, 200209.Google Scholar
Salunkhe, D. K., Chavan, J. K. & Kadam, S. S. (1990). Dietary Tannins: Consequences and Remedies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc.Google Scholar
SAS (2002). User's Guide: Statistics. Version 9·1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Satjapradja, O. & Sukandi, T. (1981). Agroforestry with red Calliandra (Calliandra calothyrsus). Indonesian Agriculture Research Development Journal 3, 8588.Google Scholar
Shelton, H. M., Lowry, J. B., Gutteridge, R. C., Bray, R. A. & Wildin, J. H. (1991). Sustaining productive pastures in the tropics. 7. Tree and shrub legumes in improved pastures. Tropical Grasslands 25, 119128.Google Scholar
Soliva, C. R., Zeleke, A. B., Clement, C., Hess, H. D., Fievez, V. & Kreuzer, M. (2008). In vitro screening of various tropical foliages, seeds, fruits and medicinal plants for low methane and high ammonia generating potentials in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 5371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Z. H., Liu, S. M., Tayo, G. O., Tang, S. X., Tan, Z. L., Lin, B., He, Z. X., Hang, X. F., Zhou, Z. S. & Wang, M. (2009). Effects of cellulase or lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation and in vitro gas production of several morphological fractions of maize stover. Animal Feed Science and Technology 152, 219231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ty, H. X. (1996). Adaptability trials with Calliandra calothyrsus in Vietnam. In: Proceedings of an International Workshop on the Genus Calliandra, January 23–27, 1996, Bogor, Indonesia. Forest, Farm, and Community Tree Research Reports Special Issue, 1996 (Ed. Evans, D. O.), pp. 120126. Arkansas, USA: Winrock International, Morrilton.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghorn, G. C. (1990). Effect of condensed tannin on protein digestion and nutritive value of fresh herbage. Proceedings of Australian Society of Animal Production. 18, 412415.Google Scholar