Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:42:41.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gendered Citation Practices in American Antiquity and Other Archaeology Journals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Scott R. Hutson
Scott R. Hutson*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Citation is one of many practices affected by the sociopolitics of archaeology. Examination of citation practices in American Antiquity, the Journal of Field Archaeology, Ancient Mesoamerica, and Southeastern Archaeology yields mixed results with regard to equity issues for women. In American Antiquity, the Journal of Field Archaeology, and Ancient Mesoamerica, men cite women at rates that are statistically similar to the rates at which women cite women. Historical data show that this has not always been the case for American Antiquity. In Southeastern Archaeology, men cite women significantly less than women cite women. Despite statistical parity between the sexes in three of the four journals, both men and women in American Antiquity and Ancient Mesoamerica cite women less than expected given the rate at which women publish. Such under-referencing of women might imply a devaluation of women's archaeological labor. This paper also examines other factors besides the gender of the citing author that might affect the rate of citation to women.

Résumé

Résumé

El cómo se hace referenda a publicaciones de otros arqueólogos es una de las muchas actividades afectadas por la politica arqueológica. Investigaciones de referencias en American Antiquity, el Journal of Field Archaology, Ancient Mesoamerica y Southeastern Archaeology arrojan resultados mixtos alrededor del tema de igualdad para mujeres. En American Antiquity, el Journal of Field Archaeology, y Ancient Mesoamerica, los hombres citan a mujeres en cantidades estadísticamente iguales al nivel en que las mujeres citan a mujeres. Datos históricos muestran que eso no siempre ha sido el caso para American Antiquity. En Southeastern Archaeology, los hombres citan a mujeres significamente menos que las mujeres citan a mujeres. A pesar de la paridad entre los sexos en tres de las cuatro revistas, autores de ambos sexos en American Antiquity y Ancient Mesoamerica, citan a mujeres menos de lo que se espera dada la proporcion en que publican las mujeres. Tal nivel bajo de citas a mujeres implica que el trabajo de las mujeres está menospreciado. Este estudio tambien examina fadores ademds del genero del autor que pueden afedar a la cantidad de citas a mujeres.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 331 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaudry, M., and White, J. 1994 Cowgirls with the Blues? A Study of Women’s Publication and the Citation of Women’s Work in Historical Archaeology. In Women in Archaeology, edited by Claassen, C., pp. 138–158. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Bradley, C, and Dahl, U. 1994 Productivity and Advancement of Women Archaeologists. In Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology, edited by Nelson, M., Nelson, S., and Wylie, A., pp. 189–194. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 5.Google Scholar
Conkey, M., and Williams, S. 1991 Original Narratives: The Political Economy of Gender in Archaeology. In Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Post-Modem Era, edited by di Leonardo, M., pp. 102–139. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Claassen, C, M. O’Neal, T. Wilson, E. Arnold, and Lansdell, B. 1999 Hearing and Reading Southeastern Archaeology: A Review of the Annual Meetings of the SEAC from 1983 through 1995 and the Journal Southeastern Archaeology. Southeastern Archaeology 18:85–97.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 1994 Women in Mesoamerican Archaeology: Why are the Best Men Winning? In Women in Archaeology, edited by Claassen, C., pp. 159–172. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Garfield, E. 1984 Anthropology Journals: What They Cite and What Cites Them. Current Anthropology 25:514–28.Google Scholar
Gero, J. 1991 Gender Divisions of Labor in the Construction of Archaeological Knowledge. In The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference, edited by Walde, D. and Willows, N. D., pp. 96–102. Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Calgary.Google Scholar
Hammel, E., Mason, C., Prater, A., and Lundy, R. 1995 Gender and the Academic Career in North American Anthropology: Differentiating Intramarket from Extramarket Bias. Current Anthropology 36:366–380.Google Scholar
Institute for Statistical Information 1998-1999 Social Science Citation Index: Journal Citation Reports, 1998-1999 Annuals. ISI Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kehoe, A. 1992 The Muted Class: Unshackling Tradition. In Exploring Gender through Archaeology, edited by Claassen, C., pp. 23–32. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Kramer, C, and Stark, M. 1988 The Status of Women in Archaeology. Anthropology Newsletter 29(9): 11–12.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. 1990 The Erasure of Women’s Writing in Sociocultural Anthropology. American Ethnologist 17:611–627.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, M. J. 1988 Citation Context Classification of a Citation Classic Concerning Citation Context Classification. Social Studies of Science 18:515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, M. J., and Murugesan, P. 1975 Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations. Social Studies of Science 5:86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, M., Potter, J., and Yeardley, S. 1983 Why an Analysis of Scientific Discourse Is Needed. In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, edited by Knorr-Cetina, K. D. and Mulkay, M., pp. 171–204. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. C. 1994 Expanding Networks for Women in Archaeology. In Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology, edited by Nelson, M., Nelson, S., and Wylie, A., pp. 199–202. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 5.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. C, Nelson, S. M., and Wylie, A. (editors) 1994 Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 5.Google Scholar
Parezo, N., and Bender, S. 1994 From Glacial to Chilly Climate: A Comparison Between Archaeology and Socio-Cultural Anthropology. In Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology, edited by Nelson, M., Nelson, S., and Wylie, A., pp. 189–194. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 5.Google Scholar
Preucel, R. 1995 The Post-Processual Condition. Journal of Archaeological Research 3:147–175.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. 1987 Re-Constructing Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sterud, E. 1978 Changing Aims of Americanist Archaeology: A Citations Analysis of American Antiquity—1946-1975. American Antiquity 43:294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, K., and Beaudry, M. 1992 Women’s Participation in American Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology: A Comparative Look at the Journals American Antiquity and Historical Archaeology. In Exploring Gender through Archaeology, edited by Claassen, C., pp. 11–22. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1994 The Trouble with Numbers: Workplace Climate Issues in Archaeology. In Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology, edited by Nelson, M., Nelson, S., and Wylie, A., pp. 65–71. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 5.Google Scholar
Zeder, M. 1997 The American Archaeologist: A Profile. Altamira, Walnut Creek, California Google Scholar