Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:42:49.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How International Norms Shape Voter Choices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Katerina Linos
Katerina Linos*
Affiliation:
Harvard Society of Fellows; Berkeley Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Cutting Edge
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 103 , 2009 , pp. 278 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Dobbin, Frank, Simmons, Beth & Garrett, Geoffrey, The Global Diffusion of Public Policies, 33, Ann. Rev. Soc. 449 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goodman, Ryan & Jinks, Derek, How to Influence State: Socialization and International Human Rights Law, 54 Duke L. J. 621 (2004)Google Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Anne Marie Slaughter, A New World Order (2004); Raustiala, Kal, The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law, 43 Va. J. Int’l L. 1 (2002)Google Scholar.

3 See, e.g., Bender, Bruce & Lott, John, Legislative Voting and Shirking: A Critical Review of the Literature, 87 Pub. Choice 67, 68 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Powell, Bingham G. Political Representation in Comparative Politics, 7 Ann. Rev. Pol. Sci. 273 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 For debates surrounding the use of empirical methods in international law, see Hathaway, Oona, The New Empiricism in Human Rights: Insights and Implications, 98 ASIL Proc. 206 (2004)Google Scholar; Goodman, Ryan & Jinks, Derek, The Difference Law Makes: Research Design, Institutional Design, and Human Rights, 98 ASIL Proc. 198 (2004)Google Scholar.

5 For a more extensive discussion of E.U. social directives and their impact on E.U. member state countries, see Linos, Katerina, How Can International Organizations Shape National Welfare States? Evidence from Compliance with European Union Directives, 40 Comp. Pol. Stud. 547 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Linos, Katerina, Path Dependence in Discrimination Law, 35 Yale J. Int’l L. 115 (2010)Google Scholar (discussing ECJ interpretations of E.U. Directives and Treaty provisions in the social policy field).