Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T15:13:16.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Practitioners View of Fly Ash Utilisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Ronald H. Mills*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A4
Get access

Abstract

Partial substitution of Portland cement (PC) with fly ash (FA) offers the practitioner expanded scope for optimal utilisation of materials. This method requires careful evaluation of the resulting blended cement beyond the basic age-strength relationship. For the construction practitioner, workability, rate of strength gain, and inherent variability are major factors in meeting strength requirements and determining costs. A blend may be characterised by a mass efficiency factor which is the mass ratio of PC to FAwhich will yield the same target strength at fixed maturity and workability. Alternatively, the maturity efficiency factor may be determined as the ratio of log maturity values for the cements to reach a given target strength. Both efficiency factors incorporate important economic parameters of interest to the practitioner.

Because of its glassy character, FA attracts calcium hydroxide as well as sodium and potassium ions released into solution by the PC component. The risk of alkali-aggregate reaction may therefore be reduced. This characteristic may prove to be of such over-riding importance that a new approach to mix design may become necessary. The essence of such an approach would be the provision of sufficient FA to absorb reactive species released by the PC. This might involve increased PC+FA and water, with concomitant reduction in aggregate and in fineness modulus.

Dimensional changes such as shrinkage and creep affect the distribution of load between steel and concrete in columns, the deflection of beams and slabs, and cracking where displacements are restrained. In the case of PC concrete, both creep and shrinkage depend on the volume ratio of hydration products and the movement of pore water caused by drying and by mechanical load. In general the magnitude of creep and shrinkage varies with Vp, the volume proportion of cement paste, and reduces with wo*. Part substitution of PC with FA generally results in increase of Vp, but this is compensated by decrease in wo*. The nature of the hydration products varies with PCiFA ratio, and thus quantities such as the internal surface area, the hydraulic mean radius of pores and the effective modulus—the ratio of stress to total strain—must be evaluated.

In general the data required by the practitioner is not available in the literature and he must have recourse to ad hoc tests in order to establish basic workability-time-temperature-strength data. This is, potentially, a fruitful area of research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Helmuth, Richard, Fly Ash in cement and Concrete, Portland Cement Association. Skokie, 1987.Google Scholar
2. ACI Committee 211, Standard Practices for Selecting Proportions for Normal. Heavy weight and Mass Concrete, ACI211, 1–81, pp. 211.1–1 to 32.Google Scholar
3. Mills, R.H., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, V 65, Boston 1985, pp.Google Scholar
4. Mills, R.H., ASTM STP 897, pp. 89105, Philadelphia 1986.Google Scholar
5. Saul, A.G.A., Mag. Concr. Res., V. 2, No. 6, March 1951, pp. 127140.Google Scholar
6. Bergstrom, S.G, Mag. Concr. Res., Vol.5, No. 14, Dec. 1953, pp. 6165.Google Scholar
7. Plowman, J.M., Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol.8, No. 22, March 1956, pp. 1322.Google Scholar
8. Gebler, S.H. and Klieger, P., Proc. Second Int. Conference, ACI SP-91, pp. 1–50), Madrid 1986.Google Scholar
9. Carette, G.G., Malhotra, V.M., Bedard, C., deBenedictis, V. and Plumat, M., Proc. Second Int. Conf. Madrid, 1986, ACI SP91-11, pp. 249–272.Google Scholar
10. Manz, O.E., Proc. Second Int. Conf. Madrid, 1986, ACI SP91-1 1, pp. 659–680.Google Scholar
11. Varma, J.P., M.Sc. Thesis, University of Calgary, 1969.Google Scholar
12. Munday, J.G.L., Ong, L., Wong, L.B. and Dhir, R.K., Proc. Int. Sym. Use of PFA in concrete. Univ. of Leeds, Ed. Cabrera and Aesens, pp. 243261.Google Scholar
13. Ghosh, R.S. and Timusk, J., ACI Journal 78:5:351357, 1981.Google Scholar
14. Swamy, R.N. and Mohmud, H.B., Third Canmet/ACI International Conference, Trondheim, 1989, ACI 114, Paper SP114-21.Google Scholar
15. Xu, Aimin., Third Canmet/ACI International Conference, Trondheim, 1989. Supplementary Papers, pp. 173–187.Google Scholar