Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:52:34.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Transport systems assessment

from Part II - Analysing national infrastructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Jim W. Hall
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Martino Tran
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Adrian J. Hickford
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Robert J. Nicholls
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of National Infrastructure
A System-of-Systems Approach
, pp. 88 - 113
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, M., Hajos, B. and Busch, T. (2013). Long term demand and financial forecast methodology for a large scale regional public transport network in Germany. European Transport Conference. Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
Scotland, Audit (2011). Edinburgh trams: interim report. Audit Scotland. Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
Blainey, S. P. and Preston, J. M. (2016). “Determining future infrastructure pathways: a long term model of transport demand and capacity.” Transportation. Submitted.Google Scholar
Brand, C., Tran, M. and Anable, J. (2012). “The UK transport carbon model: An integrated life cycle approach to explore low carbon futures.” Energy Policy 41: 107124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A. and Goodwin, P. (2004). Smarter choices: changing the way we travel. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
Committee on Climate Change (2010). The fourth carbon budget – reducing emissions through the 2020s. London, UK.Google Scholar
Committee on Climate Change (2013). The fourth carbon budget review – technical report: Sectoral analysis of the cost-effective path to the 2050 target. London, UK, Committee on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Ltd, Crossrail (2014). “Funding.” Retrieved from www.crossrail.co.uk/about-us/funding.Google Scholar
Davies, H. (2013) Aviation capacity in the UK: emerging thinking.Google Scholar
DfT (2009). National Transport Model: high level overview. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
DfT (2011a). Response to the Peer Review of NAPALM. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
DfT (2011b). UK aviation forecasts. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
DfT (2012a). Railways Act 2005 Statement for Control Period 5. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
DfT (2012b). Road transport forecasts 2011: Results from the Department for Transport's National Transport Model. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
DfT (2013a). Draft National Policy Statement for national networks. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
DfT (2013b). Transport Statistics for Great Britain. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
European Commission (2011). Roadmap to a single European transport area – towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. White paper. Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Fu, M. and Kelly, A. J. (2012). “Carbon related taxation policies for road transport: Efficacy of ownership and usage taxes, and the role of public transport and motorist cost perception on policy outcomes.” Transport Policy 22: 5769.Google Scholar
Glaister, S. (2010). Governing and paying for England's roads. London, UK, R. Foundation.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. (1996). “Empirical evidence on induced traffic.” Transportation 23(1): 3554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusbin, D., Hoornaert, B., Mayeres, I. and Nautet, M. (2010). The PLANET model methodological report: modelling of short sea shipping and bus-tram-metro. Brussels, Belgium, Federal Planning Bureau.Google Scholar
Highways Agency (2014). M1 Junctions 25–28 Widening Scheme. Retrieved from www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/m1-junctions-25-28-widening-scheme/.Google Scholar
Hill, N., Morris, M. and Skinner, I. (2010). SULTAN: Development of an illustrative scenarios tool for assessing potential impacts of measures on EU transport GHG. EU Transport GHG: Routes to 2050? Task 9 Report VII produced by EC Directorate-General Environment and AEA Technology plc.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2013). Investing in Britain's future. London, UK.Google Scholar
HS2 Ltd (2010). High Speed Rail – London to the West Midlands and beyond: HS2 demand model analysis. London, UK, HS2 Ltd.Google Scholar
IMechE (2011). Electric Vehicle Recharging Infrastructure. London, UK, Institution of Mechanical Engineers.Google Scholar
Koetse, M. J. and Rietveld, P. (2009). “The impact of climate change and weather on transport: An overview of empirical findings.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 14(3): 205221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, G., Putrus, G., Jiang, T. and Kotter, R. (2013). The effect of cycling on the state of health of the electric vehicle battery. 48th Universities' Power Engineering Conference. Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Le Vine, S. and Jones, P. (2012). On the move: making sense of car and train travel trends in Britain. London, UK, RAC Foundation.Google Scholar
Mackett, R. (2015). “Improving accessibility for older people – Investing in a valuable asset.” Journal of Transport & Health 2(1): 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, G., Mullen, C., Bache, I., Bartle, I. and Flinders, M. (2014). “Carbon reduction and travel behaviour: Discourses, disputes and contradictions in governance.” Transport Policy 35: 7178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey & Co (2009). Roads toward a low-carbon future: Reducing CO2 emissions from passenger vehicles in the global road transportation system. New York, USA, McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
MDS Transmodal Ltd (2008). GBFM Version 5.0 report. MDS Transmodal Ltd.Google Scholar
Metz, D. (2012). “Demographic determinants of daily travel demand.” Transport Policy 21: 2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard-Ball, A. and Schipper, L. (2010). “Are we reaching peak travel? Trends in passenger transport in eight industrialized countries.” Transport Reviews 31(3): 357378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAO (2009). Department for Transport: the failure of Metronet. London, UK, National Audit Office.Google Scholar
National Grid and Ricardo plc (2011). Bucks for balancing: can plug-in vehicles of the future extract cash – and carbon – from the power grid? London, UK, Ricardo plc.Google Scholar
Network Rail and Passenger Focus (2012). Future priorities for the West Coast Main Line: released capacity from a potential high speed line. London, UK, Network Rail.Google Scholar
OLEV (2011). Making the connection: the plug-in vehicle infrastructure strategy. London, UK, Office for Low Emission Vehicles, DfT.Google Scholar
Page, M., Kelly, C. and Bristow, A. (2004). Exploring scenarios to 2050 for hydrogen use in transport in the UK. European Transport Conference, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
PwC (2013). Transportation & logistics companies reap the benefits of US shale gas boom. PwC Press release.Google Scholar
Schafer, A., Dray, L., Andersson, E., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Berg, M., Boulouchos, K., Dietrich, P., Froidh, O., Graham, W., Kok, R., Majer, S., Nelldal, B., Noembrini, F., Odoni, A., Pagoni, I., Perimenis, A., Psaraki, V., Rahman, A., Safarinova, S. and Vera-Morales, M. (2011). TOSCA Project Final Report: Description of the main S&T results/foregrounds. EC FP7 Project Report.Google Scholar
Skinner, I., van Essen, H., Smokers, R. and Hill, N. (2010). Towards the decarbonisation of the EU's transport sector by 2050. EU Transport GHG: Routes to 2050? Final Report produced by EC Directorate-General Environment and AEA Technology plc.Google Scholar
Gleave, Steer Davies and DeltaRail, (2007). Network Modelling Framework – background documentation: overview document. Scotland. London, UK, DfT, ORR, Transport.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J. and Zheng, L. (2013). National long-term land transport demand model. Wellington, New Zealand, NZ Transport Agency.Google Scholar
URS and Wilson, Scott (2011). Modelling longer distance demand for travel phase 3: Final Report – Volume 1 Main Report. URS/Scott Wilson. Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2011). The acceptability of road pricing. London, UK, R. Foundation.Google Scholar
WSP Group (2011). NTEM Planning Data version 6.2: Guidance Note. London, UK, Department for Transport.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×