Book contents
- The Medieval Manuscript Book
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
- The Medieval Manuscript Book
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction: manuscripts and cultural history
- Chapter 2 Bibliographical theory and the textuality of the codex: toward a history of the premodern book
- Chapter 3 What is a manuscript culture?
- Chapter 4 Decoding the material book: cultural residue in medieval manuscripts
- Chapter 5 Organizing manuscript and print: from compilatio to compilation
- Chapter 6 Containing the book: the institutional afterlives of medieval manuscripts
- Chapter 7 Medieval manuscripts: media archaeology and the digital incunable
- Chapter 8 The circulation of texts in manuscript culture
- Chapter 9 Multilingualism and late medieval manuscript culture
- Chapter 10 Miscellaneity and variance in the medieval book
- Chapter 11 Vernacular authorship and the control of manuscript production
- Chapter 12 Medieval French and Italian literature: towards a manuscript history
- Chapter 13 Afterword: social history of the book and beyond
- Bibliography
- Index
- Series page
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2015
Book contents
- The Medieval Manuscript Book
- Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature
- The Medieval Manuscript Book
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction: manuscripts and cultural history
- Chapter 2 Bibliographical theory and the textuality of the codex: toward a history of the premodern book
- Chapter 3 What is a manuscript culture?
- Chapter 4 Decoding the material book: cultural residue in medieval manuscripts
- Chapter 5 Organizing manuscript and print: from compilatio to compilation
- Chapter 6 Containing the book: the institutional afterlives of medieval manuscripts
- Chapter 7 Medieval manuscripts: media archaeology and the digital incunable
- Chapter 8 The circulation of texts in manuscript culture
- Chapter 9 Multilingualism and late medieval manuscript culture
- Chapter 10 Miscellaneity and variance in the medieval book
- Chapter 11 Vernacular authorship and the control of manuscript production
- Chapter 12 Medieval French and Italian literature: towards a manuscript history
- Chapter 13 Afterword: social history of the book and beyond
- Bibliography
- Index
- Series page
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Medieval Manuscript BookCultural Approaches, pp. 255 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Alighieri, Dante, Commedia: a digital version, ed. Shaw, P. (Birmingham, UK: Scholarly Digital Editions, 2010).Google Scholar
Alighieri, D., De vulgari eloquentia, ed. and tr. S. Botterill (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Alighieri, D., Purgatorio, trans. Jean Hollander and Robert Hollander (New York: Doubleday, 2003).Google Scholar
Alighieri, D., Rime: I documenti, I.1–2, ed. De Robertis, D. (Florence: Le Lettere, 2002).Google Scholar
Alighieri, D., La vita nuova di Dante Alighieri, ed. Barbi, M. (Florence: Bemporad, 1932).Google Scholar
Bernard of Clairvaux, Sancti Bernardi opera, ed. Rochais, H. et al., 10 vols. (Rome: Editiones Cistercienses, 1957–98).Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni, Boccaccio’s expositions on Dante’s Comedy, trans. Papio, M. (University of Toronto Press, 2009).Google Scholar
St. Bonaventure, Commentaria in quatuor libros sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi, Bonaventurae opera, 10 vols. (Rome: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1882–1902).Google Scholar
Branca, V., ed. Tutte le opere di Giovanni Boccaccio, 10 vols. (Milan: Mondadori, 1964–98).Google Scholar
Brunetto Latini, Il tesoretto (The little treasure), ed. J. B. Holloway (New York: Garland, 1981).Google Scholar
Carnicelli, D. D., ed., Lord Morley’s “Tryumphes of Fraunces Petrarcke”: the first English translation of the “Trionfi” (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Carrai, S. and Marrani, G., eds., Il canzoniere Escorialense e il frammento marciano dello stilnovo. Real Biblioteca de El Escorial, E.III.23; Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, It. IX.529. Vol. 6. I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2009).Google Scholar
Chaucer, G., The Riverside Chaucer, ed. Benson, L. D, 3rd edn. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989).Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine, Le livre des fais et bonnes meurs du sage roy Charles V, ed. Solente, Suzannz, 2 vols. (Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion, 1936–40).Google Scholar
Cicero, , De inventione, De optimo genere oratorum, Topica, ed. and trans. Hubbell, H. M. (Harvard University Library, 1949).Google Scholar
The continuations of the Old French “Perceval” of Chrétien de Troyes, 5 vols., ed. Roach, W. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press/The American Philosophical Society, 1949–83).Google Scholar
Cosmas of Prague, The Chronicle of the Czechs, trans. Wolverton, L. (Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Edmonds, C., An annotated catalogue of the library at Lamport Hall (London: n.p., 1880).Google Scholar
Erasmus, Collected works of Erasmus, vol. II, trans. Mynors, R. A. B. and Thomson, D. F. S., annotated Ferguson, W. K. (University of Toronto Press, 1974–).Google Scholar
Eustache d’Amiens, Du bouchier d’Abevile: fabliau du XIIIe siecle, ed. J. Rychner (Geneva: Droz, 1975).Google Scholar
François d’Assise: écrits, vies, témoignages, ed. Dalarun, J., 2 vols. (Paris: Éd. du Cerf, 2010).Google Scholar
Froissart, Jean, Chroniques: livres III et IV, ed. Ainsworth, P. and Varvaro, A. (Paris: Librairie générale française/Livre de poche, 2004).Google Scholar
da Pisa, Giordano, Avventuale fiorentino 1304, ed. Serventi, S. (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2006).Google Scholar
da Pisa, G., Quaresimale fiorentino 1305–1306, ed. Delcorno, C. (Florence: Sansoni, 1974).Google Scholar
Guittone d’Arezzo, Canzoniere: i sonetti d’amore del codice Laurenziano, ed. L. Leonardi (Turin: Einaudi, 1994).Google Scholar
di Girolamo, C., ed., I poeti della scuola siciliana. Vol. II: Poeti della corte di Federico II (Milan: Mondadori, 2008).Google Scholar
The Gesta Guillelmi of William of Poitiers, ed. Chibnall, M. and Davis, R. H. C. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Hugh of St. Victor, The Didascalicon of Hugh of St. Victor: a medieval guide to the arts, trans. Taylor, Jerome (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Hus, J., “Výklad Viery, Desatera a Páteře,” in Hrabák, J. and Daňhelka, J., eds., Výbor z české literatury doby husitské, 2 vols. (Prague: Nakladatelství ČSAV, 1960), vol. I, 141–50.Google Scholar
Kane, G. and Donaldson, E. T., eds., Piers Plowman: the B version. Will’s visions of Piers Plowman, Do-Well, Do-Better and Do-Best (London: Athlone Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Langland, W., Piers Plowman: the Z version, ed. Rigg, A. G. and Brewer, C. (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983).Google Scholar
Leonardi, L., ed., Il canzoniere Escorialense e il frammento marciano dello stilnovo. Real Biblioteca de El Escorial, E.III.23; Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, It. IX.529, ed. S. Carrai and G. Marrani. Vol. 6. I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2009).Google Scholar
Leonardi, L., ed., Il canzoniere Laurenziano. Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Redi 9. Vol. 2. I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2000).Google Scholar
Leonardi, L., ed., Il canzoniere Palatino. Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, Banco Rari 217, ex Palatino 418. Vol. 3. I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2000).Google Scholar
Leonardi, L.,ed., Il canzoniere Riccardiano di Guittone: Biblioteca Riccardiana, Ricc. 2533, vol. V: I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2010).Google Scholar
Leonardi, L.,ed., Il canzoniere Vaticano Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Vat. Lat. 3793, Vol. 1. I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2000).Google Scholar
Luard, H. R., ed., Matthaei Parisiensis, monachi Sancti Albani, Chronica majora, 7 vols. (London, 1872).Google Scholar
McGurk, P., Dumville, D. N., Godden, M. R., and Knock, A., eds., An eleventh-century Anglo-Saxon illustrated miscellany: British Library Cotton Tiberius B.V part 1: together with leaves from British Library Cotton Nero D.II, Early English Manuscripts in Facsimile 21 (Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger, 1983).Google Scholar
de France, Marie, Le lai de Lanval, ed. Rychner, J., with Ianuals ljoð, ed. Aebischer, Paul (Geneva: Droz/Paris: Minard, 1958).Google Scholar
Minnis, A. J., and Scott, A. B., eds., Medieval literary theory and criticism, c.1100–c.1375 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Orgel, S., ed., Christopher Marlowe: the complete poems and translations (New York: Penguin, 2007).Google Scholar
Orlando, S., ed., Rime due e trecentesche tratte dall’Archivio di Stato di Bologna (Bologna: Commisione per i testi di lingua, 2005).Google Scholar
Pearsall, D. and Cunningham, I. C., eds., The Auchinleck Manuscript: National Library of Scotland Advocates’ MS. 19.2.1 (London: Scolar, 1977; rpt. 1979).Google Scholar
Percy, T., ed., Reliques of ancient English poetry consisting of old heroic ballads, songs, and other pieces of our earlier poets, chiefly of the lyric kind, 4 vols. (London: J. Dodsley, 1765).Google Scholar
I poeti della scuola siciliana. Vol. I: Giacomo da Lentini, ed. Roberto Antonelli (Milan: Mondadori, 2008).Google Scholar
I poeti della scuola siciliana. Vol. II: Poeti della corte di Federico II, ed. Costanzo di Girolamo (Milan: Mondadori, 2008).Google Scholar
I poeti della scuola siciliana. Vol. III: Poeti siculo-toscani, ed. Rosario Coluccia (Milan: Mondadori, 2008).Google Scholar
Recueil des rouleaux des morts (VIIIe siècle – vers 1536), ed. Dufour, J., 5 vols. (Paris, 2005–13).Google Scholar
Roques, M., ed., Les romans de Chrétien de Troyes, édités d’après la copie de Guiot (Bibl. Nat. fr. 794), vol. I: Eric et Enide (Paris: Champion, 1963).Google Scholar
Rymer, T., Foedera, conventiones, litterae, et cujuscunque generis acta publica inter reges Angliae et alios (1101–1654), 10 vols. (London: George Eyre and Andrew Strahan, 1704–35).Google Scholar
Sabie, F., The fisher-mans tale: of the famous actes, live and loue of Cassander a Grecian knight (London: Richard Johnes, 1595).Google Scholar
Sabie, F., Flora’s fortune: the second part and finishing of the Fisher-mans tale (London: Richard Johnes, 1595).Google Scholar
Salimbene de Adam, , Cronica, ed. Scalia, G., Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis, 2 vols. (Turhout: Brepols, 1998–9).Google Scholar
Simek, J., ed., Die “Acht Seligkeiten” des Prager Predigers Heinrich von St. Gallen (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo spazio letterario del Medioevo, 5 vols., vol. II: La circolazione del testo, ed. Cavallo, G. and Boitani, P. (Rome: Salermo Ed., 1994).Google Scholar
Stevenson, W. H., ed., Asser’s Life of King Alfred: together with the Annals of Saint Neots erroneously ascribed to Asser (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904).Google Scholar
Studi critici, ed. Leonardi, L., vol. IV: I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2000).Google Scholar
Adamska, A., “Latin and three vernaculars in East Central Europe from the point of view of the history of social communication” in Garrison, M., Orbán, Á. P., and Mostert, M., eds., Spoken and written language: relations between Latin and the vernacular languages in the earlier Middle Ages (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013), 325–64.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. J. G., Medieval illuminators and their methods of work (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Amsler, M., Affective literacies: writing and multilingualism in the late Middle Ages (Turnhout: Brepols, 2011).Google Scholar
Antonelli, R., “Struttura materiale e disegno storiografico del canzoniere Vaticano” in Leonardi, L., ed., Studi critici, vol. IV, I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2000), 3–23.Google Scholar
Avril, F., “Les manuscrits enluminés de Guillaume de Machaut” in Guillaume de Machaut: poète et compositeur. Actes et colloques: Reims (19–22 avril 1978) (Paris: Éditions Klincksieck, 1982), 117–33.Google Scholar
Avril, F. and Renaud, N., Les manuscrits à peintures en France, 1440–1520 (Paris: Flammarion, 1993).Google Scholar
Azzam, W., Collet, O., and Foehr-Janssens, Y., “Les manuscrits littéraires français: pour une sémiotique du recueil médiéval,” Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire, 83 (2005), 639–69.Google Scholar
Bahr, A., Fragments and assemblages: forming compilations of medieval London (University of Chicago Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D. C. and Murphy, J. L., “The books of Myles Blomefylde,” The Library, 5th ser., 31 (1976), 377–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, A., “From the Clerk’s tale to The winter’s tale” in Morse, R. and Windeatt, B., eds., Chaucer traditions: studies in honour of Derek Brewer (Cambridge University Press, 1990), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, E. E., “The Cottonian fragments of Aethelweard’s Chronicle,” Bulletin of the Institute for Historical Research, 24 (May 1951), 46–62.Google Scholar
Barker, N., “The Aldine italic” in Myers, R. and Harris, M., eds., A millennium of the book: production, design and illustration in manuscript and print, 900–1900 (New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 1994), 45–60.Google Scholar
Baron, S. A., Lindquist, E. N., and Shevlin, E. F., eds., Agent of change: print culture studies after Elizabeth L. Eisenstein (University of Massachusetts Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Baswell, C., “Multilingualism on the page” in Strohm, , ed., Oxford twenty-first century approaches, 38–50.Google Scholar
Bat Yehouda, Z., Les encres noires au Moyen Âge (Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 2003).Google Scholar
Bataillon, L., et al., eds., La production du livre universitaire au Moyen Âge: exemplar et pecia. Actes du symposium tenu au Collegio San Bonaventura de Grottaferrata en mai 1983 (Paris: CNRS, 1988).Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W., “Dry pumice and the programmatic language of Catullus 1,” Classical Philology, 93 (1998), 125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, E., Histoire de la littérature française: Moyen Âge, 1050–1486 (Paris: Bordas, 1988).Google Scholar
Bažil, M., “In theutonico eadem sunt: Zur Variabilität der Beziehung zwischen Latein und Volkssprache in den zweisprachigen geistlichen Spielen bis zum Anfang des 14. Jahrhunderts,” Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum, 141 (2012), 173–89.Google Scholar
Beadle, R. and Burrow, C., eds., Manuscript miscellanies, c. 1450–1700 = English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700, 16 (2012) (special issue).Google Scholar
Beal, P., “Notions in garrison: the seventeenth-century commonplace book” in Hill, W. Speed, ed., New ways of looking at old texts: papers of the Renaissance English text society, 1985–1991 (Binghamton, NY: Renaissance English Text Society, 1993), 131–47.Google Scholar
Beal, P., ed., Index of English literary manuscripts, 3 vols. (London: Mansell, 1980–93).Google Scholar
Bédier, J., “La tradition manuscrite du Lai de l’ombre,” Romania, 54 (1928), 161–96 and 321–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bédier, J., La tradition manuscrite du Lai de l’ombre: réflexions sur l’art d’éditer les anciens textes (Paris: E. Champion, 1929; rpt. 1970).Google Scholar
Bedos-Rezzak, B., “Diplomatic sources and medieval documentary practices: an essay in interpretive methodology” in Van Engen, J., ed., The past and future of medieval studies (Notre Dame University Press, 1994), 313–43.Google Scholar
Bell, D., “The libraries of religious houses in the late Middle Ages,” in Leedham-Green, and Webber, , eds., The Cambridge history of libraries in Britain and Ireland, vol. I, To 1640, 126–51.Google Scholar
Bell, K. K. and Couch, J. N., eds., The texts and contexts of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Laud misc. 108: the shaping of English vernacular narrative (Leiden: Brill, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellon-Méguelle, H., Du temple de Mars à la chambre de Vénus: le beau jeu courtois dans les Voeux du paon (Paris: Champion, 2008).Google Scholar
Beltran, E., “L’humanisme français au temps de Charles VII et de Louis XI” in Bozzolo, C. and Ornato, E., eds., Préludes à la Renaissance: aspects de la vie intellectuelle en France au XVe siècle (Paris: CNRS, 1992), 123–62.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W., “Paris, capital of the nineteenth century” in Demetz, P., ed., Reflections: essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings, trans. Jephcott, E., with a preface by Wieseltier, L. (New York: Schocken Books, 2007), 146–62.Google Scholar
Benson, C. D., Public Piers Plowman: modern scholarship and late medieval culture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Bériou, N., L’avènement des maîtres de la parole: la prédication à Paris au XIIIe siècle, 2 vols. (Paris: Institut d’études augustiniennes 1998).Google Scholar
Bischoff, B., “Centri scrittorii e manoscritti mediatori di civiltà dal VI secolo all’età di Carlomagno” in Cavallo, G., ed., Libri e lettori nel medioevo: guida storica e critica (Rome–Bari: Laterza, 1977), 27–72.Google Scholar
Bischoff, B., Latin palaeography: antiquity and the Middle Ages, trans. Cróinín, D. Ó and Ganz, D. (Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, A. M., Too much to know: managing information before the scholarly age (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Blake, N. F., “Geoffrey Chaucer and the manuscripts of The Canterbury tales,” Journal of the Early Book Society, 1 (1997), 95–122.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F., “Manuscript to print” in Griffiths, and Pearsall, , eds., Book production and publishing in Britain, 1375–1475, 403–32.Google Scholar
Boffey, J. and Thompson, J. J., “Anthologies and miscellanies: production and choice of texts” in Griffiths, and Pearsall, , eds., Book production and publishing in Britain, 1375–1475, 279–316.Google Scholar
Bohler, T., ed., Le goût du lecteur à la fin du Moyen Âge (Paris: Léopard d’or, 2006).Google Scholar
Bolter, J. D. and Grusin, R., Remediation: understanding new media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Bourgain, P., “L’édition des manuscrits” in Martin, H.-J. and Chartier, R., eds., Histoire de l’édition française, vol. I, Le livre conquérant: du Moyen Âge au milieu du XVIIe siècle (Paris: Promodis, 1982), 49–75.Google Scholar
Bourgain, P., “La naissance officielle de l’oeuvre: l’expression métaphorique de la mise au jour” in Weijers, O., ed., Vocabulaire du livre et de l’écriture au Moyen Âge: actes de la table ronde, Paris 24–26 septembre 1987 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1989), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutcher, W., “‘Who taught thee Rhetoricke to deceive a maid?’: Christopher Marlowe’s Hero and Leander, Juan Boscán’s Leandro, and Renaissance vernacular humanism,” Comparative Literature, 52 (2000), 11–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, J. M., “Hoccleve’s two copies of ‘Lerne to dye’: implications for textual critics,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 83 (1989), 437–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzolo, C., and Ornato, E., Pour une histoire du livre manuscrit au Moyen Âge: trois essais de codicologie quantitative (Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1983).Google Scholar
Bozzolo, C., and Ornato, E., Les fluctuations de la production manuscrite à la lumière de l’histoire de la fin du Moyen Âge français (Paris: Bibliothèque nationale, 1981), 51–75.Google Scholar
Bozzolo, C., and Ornato, E., “Les lectures des Français aux XIVe et XVe siècles: une approche quantitative” in Rossi, L., Jacob-Hugon, C., and Bähler, U., eds., Ensi firent li ancessor: mélanges de philologie médiévale offerts à Marc-René Jung, 2 vols. (Alexandria: Edizioni dell’Orso 1996), vol. II, 713–62.Google Scholar
Bozzolo, C., Ornato, E., and Coq, D., “La production du livre en quelques pays d’Europe occidentale aux XIVe et XVe siècles,” Scrittura e civiltà, 8 (1984), 129–60.Google Scholar
Branca, V., Il Cantico di Frate Sole: studio delle fonti e testo critico (Florence: Olschki, 1950).Google Scholar
Branca, V., Tradizione delle opere di Giovanni Boccaccio, vol. II, Un secondo elenco di manoscritti e studi sul testo del “Decameron” con due appendici (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1991).Google Scholar
Brandmüller, W., Das Konzil von Konstanz, 1414–1418, 2 vols. (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1991).Google Scholar
Brown, M. P., A guide to Western historical scripts from antiquity to 1600 (University of Toronto Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Brown, M. P., “Sir Robert Cotton, collector and connoisseur?” in Brown, M. P. and McKendrick, S., eds., Illuminating the book: makers and interpreters. Essays in honour of Janet Backhouse (University of Toronto Press, 1998), 281–98.Google Scholar
Brown, M. P., Understanding illuminated manuscripts: a glossary of technical terms (London and Malibu, CA: British Library and J. Paul Getty Museum, 1994).Google Scholar
Brugnolo, F., “Il libro di poesia nel Trecento” in Santagata, M. and Quondam, A., eds., Il libro di poesia dal copista al tipografo (Parma: Panini, 1989), 9–23.Google Scholar
Bühler, C. F., The fifteenth-century book: the scribes, the printers, the decorators (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burghart, M., and Rehbein, M., “The present and future of the TEI community for manuscript encoding,” Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, 2 (2012), http://jtei.revues.org/372.Google Scholar
Buringh, E., Medieval manuscript production in the Latin West: explorations with a global database (Leiden: Brill, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, K., Codex and context: reading Old French verse narrative in manuscript, 2 vols. (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002).Google Scholar
Busby, K., “Le contexte manuscrit du Songe d’Enfer de Raoul de Houdenc” in Collet, O. and Foehr-Janssens, Y., eds., Le recueil au Moyen Âge: le Moyen Âge central (Turnhout: Brepols, 2010), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, K., “Fabliaux and the new codicology” in Karczewska, K. and Conley, T., eds., The world and its rival: essays on literary imagination in honor of Per Nykrog (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999), 137–60.Google Scholar
Busby, K., “The manuscripts of Marie de France” in Whalen, L. E., ed., A companion to Marie de France (Leiden: Brill, 2011), 303–17.Google Scholar
Busonero, P., “La fascicolazione del manoscritto nel basso medioevo” in Busonero, P. et al., eds., La fabbrica del codice: materiali per la storia del libro nel tardo medioevo (Rome: Viella, 1999), 31–139.Google Scholar
Butler, E., “Recollecting Alfredian English in the sixteenth century,” Neophilologus, 98 (2014), 145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, S., The matter of the page: essays in search of ancient and medieval authors (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Butterfield, A., “Mise-en-page in the Troilus manuscripts: Chaucer and French manuscript culture,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 58 (1995), 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, A., “The Earls of Kildare and their books at the end of the Middle Ages,” The Library, 7th ser., 14 (2013), 129–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadioli, L., “Scoperta di un inedito: il volgarizzamento toscano del Lancelot en prose,” Medioevo Romanzo, 37 (2013), 178–83.Google Scholar
Caie, G. D., “The significance of the early manuscript glosses (with special reference to the Wife of Bath’s Prologue),” Chaucer Review, 10 (1975–6), 350–60.Google Scholar
Caie, G. D., “The significance of marginal glosses in the earliest manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales” in Jeffrey, D. L., ed., Chaucer and scriptural tradition (University of Ottawa Press, 1984), 75–88.Google Scholar
Cameron, S., Choosing not choosing: Dickinson’s fascicles (University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Camille, M., Master of death: the lifeless art of Pierre Remiet, illuminator (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Campbell, M., “‘Desunt nonnulla’: the construction of Marlowe’s Hero and Leander as an unfinished poem,” English Literary History, 51 (1984), 241–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelli, R., Sull’Escorialense (lat. E.III.23): problemi e proposte di edizione (Verona: Fiorini, 2006).Google Scholar
Cardon, B., “Het mecenaat van Johannes van Myrle” in Handschriften uit de abdij van Sint-Truiden: provinciaal museum voor religieuze kunst, Begijnhofkerk, Sint-Truiden, 28 juni–5 oktober 1986, exhibition catalogue (Leuven: Peeters, 1986), 220–30.Google Scholar
Careri, M., Ruby, C., and Short, I., Livres et écritures en français et en occitan au XIIe siècle: catalogue illustré (Rome: Viella, 2011).Google Scholar
Careri, M., Féry-Hue, F., Gasparri, F., Hasenohr, G., Labory, G., Lefèvre, S., Leurquin, A.-F., and Ruby, C., Album de manuscrits français du XIIIe siècle: mise en page et mise en texte (Rome: Viella, 2001).Google Scholar
Carlson, D., English humanist books: writers and patrons, manuscript and print, 1475–1525 (University of Toronto Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Casamassima, E., “Dentro lo scrittoio del Boccaccio: i codici della tradizione,” Il Ponte, 34 (1978), 730–9.Google Scholar
A catalogue of the manuscripts in the Cottonian library (London: printed for S. Hooper, 1777).Google Scholar
A catalogue of the manuscripts in the Cottonian library, deposited in the British Museum (London: n.p., 1802).Google Scholar
Cecchi, E., and Sapegno, N., eds., Storia della letteratura italiana, 10 vols. (Milan: Garzanti, 1987–1988).Google Scholar
Cerquiglini, B., Eloge de la variante: histoire critique de la philologie (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1989).Google Scholar
Cerquiglini, B., In praise of the variant: a critical history of philology, trans. Wing, B. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Cerquiglini-Toulet, J., “Quand la voix s’est tue: la mise en recueil de la poésie lyrique aux XIVe et XVe siècles” in Baumgartner, E. and Boulestreau, N., eds., La présentation du livre: actes du colloque de Paris X-Nanterre, 4, 5, 6 décembre 1985 (Centre de recherches du Département de français de Paris X-Nanterre, 1987), 313–27.Google Scholar
Chaganti, S., “Vestigial signs: inscription, performance, and The dream of the rood,” PMLA, 125 (2010), 48–72.Google Scholar
Chartier, R., The order of books: readers, authors and libraries in Europe between the fourteenth and eighteenth centuries, trans. Cochrane, L. G. (Stanford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Chartier, Y. “Musical treatises” in Strayer, ed., Dictionary of the Middle Ages, vol. VIII, 654b.Google Scholar
Christianson, C. P., A directory of London stationers and book artisans, 1300–1500 (New York: The Bibliographical Society of America, 1990).Google Scholar
Christianson, C. P., “The rise of London’s book-trade” in Hellinga, L. and Trapp, J. B., eds., The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. III, 1400–1557 (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 128–47.Google Scholar
Chubb, T. C., The life of Giovanni Boccaccio (New York: Albert and Charles Boni, 1930).Google Scholar
Clarke, K. P., Chaucer and Italian textuality (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M., The art of all colours: medieval recipe books for painters and illuminators (London: Archetype Publications, 2001).Google Scholar
Collet, O., and Foehr-Janssens, Y., eds., Le recueil au Moyen Âge: le Moyen Âge central (Turnhout: Brepols, 2010).Google Scholar
Compère, M.-M., Couzinet, M.-D., and Pédeflous, O., “Éléments pour l’histoire d’un genre editorial: la feuille classique en France aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles,” Histoire de l’éducation, 124 (2009), 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, M. “Compiling the book,” in Gillespie, and Wakelin, , eds., The production of books in England, 1350–1500, 129–49.Google Scholar
Connolly, M. and Radulescu, R., eds., Insular books: vernacular miscellanies in late medieval Britain, forthcoming in Proceedings of the British Academy.Google Scholar
Constable, G., “The popularity of twelfth-century spiritual writers in the late Middle Ages” in Molho, A. and Tedeschi, J. A., eds., Renaissance studies in honor of Hans Baron (Florence: Sansoni, 1971), 3–28.Google Scholar
Contini, G., “Questioni attributive nell’àmbito della lirica siciliana” in Atti del Congresso internazionale di Studi federiciani (Palermo: Renna, 1952), 367–95.Google Scholar
Copeland, R., Rhetoric, hermeneutics, and translation in the Middle Ages: academic traditions and vernacular texts (Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courcelle, P., “Histoire d’un brouillon cassiodorien” in Opuscula selecta: bibliographie et recueil d’articles publiés entre 1938 et 1980 (Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes, 1984), 77–98.Google Scholar
Crane, M. T., Framing authority: sayings, self, and society in sixteenth-century England (Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Crathern, A. T., “A romanticized version of Hero and Leander,” Modern Language Notes, 46 (1931), 382–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, O. G. S., “Some medieval theories about the Nile,” Geographical Journal, 114 (1949), 6–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croenen, G., Figg, K., and Taylor, A., “Authorship, patronage, and literary gifts: the books Froissart brought to England in 1395,” Journal of the Early Book Society, 11 (2008), 1–42.Google Scholar
Croenen, G., Rouse, M. A., and Rouse, R. H., “Pierre de Liffol and the manuscripts of Froissart’s Chronicles,” Viator, 33 (2002), 261–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crone, P., Pre-industrial societies: anatomy of the pre-modern world (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989, 2nd edn. 2003).Google Scholar
Cummings, B. and Simpson, J., eds., Cultural reformations: medieval and Renaissance in literary history (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cursi, M., Il “Decameron”: scritture, scriventi, lettori: storia di un testo (Rome: Viella, 2007).Google Scholar
Dagenais, J., The ethics of reading in manuscript culture: glossing the “Libro de buen amor” (Princeton University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dane, J., The myth of print culture: essays on evidence, textuality, and bibliographical method (University of Toronto Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dane, J., Out of sorts: on typography and print culture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Dane, J., “Page layout and textual autonomy in Harley MS 2253 ‘lenten ys come wip love to toune,’” Medium Aevum, 68 (1999), 32–41.Google Scholar
Dane, J., What is a book?: the study of early printed books (Notre Dame University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Darnton, R., The case for books, past, present, and future (New York: Public Affairs, 2009).Google Scholar
Darnton, R. and Roche, D., eds., Revolution in print: the press in France, 1775–1800 (University of California Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Davies, M., Aldus Manutius: printer and publisher of Renaissance Venice (Malibu, CA: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 1995).Google Scholar
Davis, J., “Marketing secondhand goods in late medieval England”, Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 2 (2010), 270–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Hamel, C., Glossed books of the Bible and the origins of the Paris booktrade (Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 1984).Google Scholar
De Hamel, C., “The leaf book” in De Hamel, C. et al., Disbound and dispersed: the leaf book considered (Chicago: Newberry Library and the Caxton Club, 2005), 6–23.Google Scholar
de Looze, L. N., Manuscript diversity, meaning, and variance in Juan Manuel’s “El conde Lucanor” (University of Toronto Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekkers, E., “Pour une histoire de la bibliographie chrétienne dans l’antiquité et au Moyen Âge” in Van Uytfanghe, M. and Demeulenaere, R., eds., Aevum inter utrumque: mélanges offerts à Gabriel Sanders, professeur émérite à l’Université de Gand (Steenbrugge: In Abbatia S. Petri, 1991), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekkers, E. and Hoste, A., “De la pénurie des manuscrits anciens des ouvrages le plus souvent copiés” in Hissette, R., Michiels, G., and Van den Auweele, D., eds., Sapientiae doctrina: mélanges de théologie et de littérature médiévales offerts à Dom Hildebrand Bascour OSB (Leuven: Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, 1980), 24–37.Google Scholar
Delcorno, C., Giordano da Pisa e l’antica predicazione volgare (Florence: Olschki, 1975).Google Scholar
Dempster, G., “Chaucer’s manuscript of Petrarch’s version of the Griselda story,” Modern Philology, 41 (1943), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, G., “Salvatore Battaglia’s edition of the Teseida,” Modern Philology, 41 (1940), 205–14.Google Scholar
Derolez, A., The palaeography of Gothic manuscript books: from the twelfth to the early sixteenth century (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Deshman, R., Eye and mind: collected essays in Anglo-Saxon and early medieval art, ed. Cohen, A. (Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, 2010).Google Scholar
Diaz y Diaz, M. C., “La circulation des manuscrits dans la Péninsule ibérique du VIIIe au XIe siècle,” Cahiers de Civilisation Médiévale, 12 (1969), 219–41 and 383–92.Google Scholar
Dictionnaire des lettres françaises: le Moyen Âge, ed. Hasenohr, G. and Zink, M. (Paris: Livre de Poche, 1992).Google Scholar
Dillon, E., Medieval music-making and the Roman de Fauvel (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Dodgson, L. M., “A library at Pott Chapel (Pott Shrigley, Cheshire), c.1493,” The Library, 5th ser., 15 (1960), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolbeau, F., “Brouillons et textes inachevés parmi les oeuvres d’Augustin,” Sacris erudiri, 45 (2006), 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doležalová, L., “Multiple copying and the interpretability of codex contents: ‘memory miscellanies’ compiled by Gallus Kemli (1417–1480/1) of Sankt Gallen” in Doležalová, and Rivers, , eds., Medieval manuscript miscellanies, 139–65.Google Scholar
Doležalová, L., Rider, J., and Zironi, A., eds., Obscurity in medieval texts (Krems: Institut für Realienkunde des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit, 2013).Google Scholar
Doležalová, L. and Rivers, K., eds., Medieval manuscript miscellanies: composition, authorship, use (Krems: Institut für Realienkunde des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit, 2013).Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. T., “Canterbury Tales, D117: a critical edition” in Donaldson, , Speaking of Chaucer (New York: Norton, 1970), 119–30.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. T., “The psychology of editors of medieval texts” in Donaldson, Speaking of Chaucer (New York: Norton, 1970), 102–18.Google Scholar
Doyle, A. I., “The work of a late 15th-century English scribe, William Ebesham,” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 39 (1956–7), 298–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, A. I. and Parkes, M. B., “The production of copies of the Canterbury tales and the Confessio amantis in the early fifteenth century” in Parkes, M. B. and Watson, A. G., eds., Medieval scribes, manuscripts, and libraries: essays presented to N. R. Ker (London: Scolar Press, 1978), 163–210.Google Scholar
Drogin, M., Anathema: medieval scribes and the history of book curses (Totowa, NJ: Allanheld and Schram, 1983).Google Scholar
Duffy, E., Marking the hours: English people and their prayers, 1240–1570 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dumville, D., “A Note on the post-Conquest additions” in McGurk, P., Dumville, D. N., Godden, M. R., and Knock, A., eds., An eleventh-century Anglo-Saxon illustrated miscellany: British Library Cotton Tiberius B. V, Part I, together with leaves from British Library Cotton Nero D. II, Early English Manuscripts in Facsimile 21 (Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger, 1983), 104–6.Google Scholar
Dumville, D., “The sixteenth-century history of two Cambridge books from Sawley,” Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 7 (1980), 427–44.Google Scholar
Durand, C., Illustrations médiévales de la légende de Troie: catalogue commenté des manuscrits français illustrés du Roman de Troie et de ses dérivés (Turnhout: Brepols, 2014).Google Scholar
Duval, F., Lectures françaises de la fin du Moyen Âge: petite anthologie commentée de succès littéraires (Geneva: Droz, 2007).Google Scholar
Duval, F., “La mise en prose du Pèlerinage de l’âme de Guillaume de Digulleville par Jean Galopes,” Romania, 128 (2010), 394–427 and 129 (2011), 129–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duval, F., “La traduction latine du Pèlerinage de l’âme de Guillaume de Digulleville par Jean Galopes (1427)” in Fery-Hue, F., ed., Traduire de vernaculaire en latin au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance: méthodes et finalités (Paris: Ecole des Chartes, 2013), 182–220.Google Scholar
Echard, S. and Partridge, S., eds., The book unbound: editing and reading medieval manuscripts and texts (University of Toronto Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G., “Editing and ideology: Stephen Batman and the Book of privy counselling” in Lester, G., ed., Chaucer in perspective: Middle English essays in honour of Norman Blake (Sheffield Academic Press, 1999), 267–78.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. S. G. and Horobin, S., “Further books annotated by Stephen Batman,” The Library, 7th ser., 11 (2010), 227–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eis, G., Vom Werden altdeutscher Dichtung: literarhistorische Proportionen (Berlin: E. Schmidt, 1962).Google Scholar
Eisenstein, E., Divine art, infernal machine: the reception of printing in the West from first impressions to the sense of an ending (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, E., The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe, 2 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Eisner, M., Boccaccio and the invention of Italian literature: Dante, Petrarch, Cavalcanti, and the authority of the vernacular (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faivre d’Arcier, L., Histoire et géographie d’un mythe: la circulation des manuscrits du “De excidio Troiae” de Darès le Phrygien (XVIIIe–XVe siècles) (Paris: Ecole des Chartes, 2006).Google Scholar
Febvre, L., and Martin, H.-J., The coming of the book: the impact of printing, 1450–1800, ed. Nowell-Smith, G. and Wootton, D., trans. Gerard, D. (London: NLB, 1976).Google Scholar
Fein, S., ed., Studies in the Harley manuscript: the scribes, contents, and social contexts of British Library MS Harley 2253 (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2000),CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, M. P., “Compositional calculation in Philippe de Vitry,” Studi Musicali, 37 (2008), 13–36.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, D. and McCleery, A., An introduction to book history (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Finkelstein, D. and McCleery, A., eds., The book history reader, 2nd edn. (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Fiorilla, M., “Nota al testo” in Quondam, A., Fiorilla, M., and Alfano, G., eds., Giovanni Boccaccio: Decameron, (Milan: Rizzoli, 2013), 109–23.Google Scholar
Fletcher, H. G., In praise of Aldus Manutius: a quincentenary exhibition (New York: Pierpont Morgan Library, 1995).Google Scholar
Folena, G., “Überlieferungsgeschichte der altitalienischen Literatur” in Hunger, H., ed., Geschichte der Textüberlieferung der antiken und mittelalterlichen Literatur, 2 vols. (Zürich: Atlantis Verlag, 1964).Google Scholar
Foot, M., Bookbinders at work: their roles and methods (New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll, 2006).Google Scholar
Foys, M., Virtually Anglo-Saxon: old media, new media, and early medieval studies in the late age of print (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2007).Google Scholar
Foys, M. and Bradshaw, S., “Developing digital mappaemundi: an agile mode for annotating medieval maps,” Digital Medievalist, 7 (2011), www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal/7/foys/.Google Scholar
Frank, R., ed., The politics of editing medieval texts: papers given at the twenty-seventh annual conference on editorial problems, University of Toronto, 1–2 November 1991 (New York: AMS, 1993).Google Scholar
Fraser, R., Book history through postcolonial eyes: rewriting the script (London: Routledge, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frese, D. W., An Ars legendi for Chaucer’s Canterbury tales: reconstructive reading (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1991).Google Scholar
Fuller, Sarah, “Did Philippe de Vitry write a treatise Ars nova?” in Pérès, M., ed., L’enseignement de la musique au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance (Paris: Fondation Royaumont, 1987), 29–30.Google Scholar
Fuller, Sarah, “A phantom treatise of the fourteenth century? The Ars nova,” Journal of Musicology, 4 (1985–6), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J. H., Catullus and his Renaissance readers (Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J. H., “Catullus in the Renaissance” in Skinner, , ed., A companion to Catullus, 439–60.Google Scholar
Gallick, S., “The continuity of the rhetorical tradition: manuscript to incunabulum,” Manuscripta, 23 (1979), 44–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvez, M., Songbook: how lyrics became poetry in medieval Europe (University of Chicago Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganz, D., “Book production in the Carolingian empire and the spread of Carolingian minuscule” in McKitterick, R., ed., The new Cambridge medieval history, vol. II, c. 700–c. 900 (Cambridge University Press, 1995), 786–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, E. G., Writing with scissors: American scrapbooks from the Civil War to the Harlem Renaissance (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Gaunt, S., “Genres in motion: rereading the ‘Grundriss’ 40 years on,” Medioevo Romanzo, 37 (2013), 24–43.Google Scholar
Ghellinck, J. de, “Originale et originalia,” Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi, 14 (1939), 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, A., “Caxton’s Chaucer and Lydgate quartos: miscellanies from manuscript to print,” Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 12 (2000), 1–25.Google Scholar
Gillespie, A., “The history of the book,” New Medieval Literatures, 9 (2007), 245–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, A., “Poets, printers, and early English Sammelbände,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 67 (2004), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, A., Print culture and the medieval author: Chaucer, Lydgate, and their books, 1473–1557 (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, A., “Reading Chaucer’s words to Adam,” Chaucer Review, 42 (2008), 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, A. and Wakelin, D., eds., The production of books in England, 1350–1500 (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, V., and Hudson, A., eds., Probable truth: editing medieval texts from Britain in the twenty-first century (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitelman, L., Always already new: media, history, and the data of culture (Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, J., Politics and history in the tenth century: the work and world of Richer of Reims (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Golob, N., ed., Medieval autograph manuscripts: proceedings of the XVIIth Colloquium of the Comité International de Paléographie Latine: held in Ljubljana, 7–10 September 2010, Bibliologia 36 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, T., “Matthew Parker and his manuscripts: a study of an Elizabethan library and its use” in Leedham-Green, and Webber, , eds., The Cambridge history of libraries in Britain and Ireland, vol. I, To 1640, 322–44.Google Scholar
Graham, T., ed., The recovery of Old English: Anglo-Saxon studies in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute, 2000).Google Scholar
Greene, G. K., “Ars nova” in Strayer, , ed., Dictionary of the Middle Ages, vol. I, 548a–b.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W., Dramatic documents from the Elizabethan playhouses: stage plots: actors’ parts: prompt books, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 1931).Google Scholar
Grévin, B., Le parchemin des cieux: essai sur le Moyen Âge du langage (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. and Pearsall, D., eds., Book production and publishing in Britain, 1375–1475 (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Guenée, B., “‘Authentique et approuvé’: recherches sur les principes de la critique historique au Moyen Âge” in La lexicographie du latin médiéval et ses rapports avec les recherches actuelles sur la civilisation du Moyen Âge (Paris: CNRS, 1979), 216–29.Google Scholar
Gullick, M., “From parchmenter to scribe: some observations on the manufacture and preparation of medieval parchment based upon a review of the literary evidence” in Rück, P., ed., Pergament: Geschichte, Struktur, Restaurierung, Herstellung (Sigmaringen: Thorbecke, 1991), 145–57.Google Scholar
Gumbert, J. P., “The sizes of manuscripts: some statistics and notes” in van Uchelen, A. R. A., ed., Hellinga Festschrift / feestbundel / mélanges: forty-three studies in bibliography presented to Prof. Dr. Wytze Hellinga on the occasion of his retirement from the Chair of Neophilology in the University of Amsterdam at the end of the year 1978 (Amsterdam: Nico Israel, 1981), 277–88.Google Scholar
Hackel, H. Brayman, Reading material in early modern England: print, gender, and literacy (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hall, J. B., “The editing and emendation of medieval Latin texts: two case histories,” Stvdi Medievali, 3rd ser., 19 (1978), 443–66.Google Scholar
Hall, J. B., “A reply to Dr. Rigg’s ‘response’,” Stvdi Medievali, 3rd ser., 24 (1983), 385–7.Google Scholar
Hanna, R., “Analytical survey 4: Middle English manuscripts and the study of literature,” New Medieval Literatures, 4 (2001), 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R., “Booklets in medieval manuscripts: further considerations,” Studies in Bibliography, 39 (1986), 100–11.Google Scholar
Hanna, R., “The Hengwrt manuscript and the canon of The Canterbury tales,” English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700, 1 (1989), 64–84.Google Scholar
Hanna, R., Introducing English medieval book history: manuscripts, their producers and their readers (Liverpool University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Hanna, R., “Miscellaneity and vernacularity: conditions of literary production in late medieval England” in Nichols and Wenzel, eds., The whole book, 37–51.Google Scholar
Hanna, R., Pursuing history: Middle English manuscripts and their texts (Stanford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Hanna, R., Hunt, T., Keightley, R. G., Minnis, A., and Palmer, N. F., “Latin commentary tradition and vernacular literature” in Minnis, A. and Johnson, I., eds., The Cambridge history of literary criticism, vol. II, The Middle Ages (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 363–421.Google Scholar
Hanning, R., “‘I shall finde it in a maner glose’: versions of textual harrassment in medieval literature” in Finke, L. A. and Shichtman, M. B., eds., Medieval texts and contemporary readers (Cornell University Press, 1987), 27–50.Google Scholar
Harris, K., “Patrons, buyers and owners: the evidence for ownership, and the rôle of book owners in book production and the book trade” in Griffiths, and Pearsall, , eds., Book production and publishing in Britain, 1375–1475, 163–99.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A., ed., Teaching bibliography, textual criticism, and book history (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2006).Google Scholar
Hedeman, A. D., “Valois legitimacy: editorial changes in Charles V’s Grandes chroniques de France,” Art Bulletin, 66 (1984), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmrath, J., Das Basler Konzil, 1431–1449: Forschungsstand und Probleme (Köln: Böhlau, 1987).Google Scholar
van Hemelryck, T., and Marzano, S., eds., Le recueil au Moyen Âge: la fin du Moyen Âge (Turnhout: Brepols, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindman, S. L., Christine de Pizan’s “Epistre Othéa”: painting and politics at the court of Charles VI (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1986).Google Scholar
Hindman, S. L., “The iconography of Queen Isabeau de Bavière (1410–1415): an essay in method,” Gazette des beaux-arts, 102 (1983), 102–10.Google Scholar
Hlaváček, I., “Dreisprachigkeit im Bereich der Bohmischen Krone: Zum Phänomen der Sprachbenutzung im böhmischen diplomatischen Material bis zur hussitischen Revolution” in Adamska, A. and Mostert, M., eds., The development of literate mentalities in East Central Europe (Turnhout: Brepols, 2003), 289–310.Google Scholar
Hobbins, D., Authorship and publicity before print: Jean Gerson and the transformation of late medieval learning (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, O., Assembling the lyric self: authorship from troubadour song to Italian poetry book (University of Minnesota Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Holtz, L., “Autore, copista, anonimo” in Cavallo, G., Leonardi, C., and Menestò, E., eds., Lo spazio letterario del Medioevo, vol. I, pt. 1 (Rome: Salerno, 1992), 325–52.Google Scholar
Holtz, L., “L’humanisme de Loup de Ferrières” in Leonardi, C., ed., Gli umanesimi medievali: atti del II congresso dell’internationales Mittellateinerkomitee, Firenze, Certosa del Galluzzo, 11–15 settembre 1993 (Florence: SISMEL, 1998), 201–13.Google Scholar
Honemann, V., “Zu Leben und Werk des Saganer Augustinerchorherren Andreas Ritter” in Päsler, R. G. and Schmidtke, D., eds., Deutschsprachige Literatur des Mittelalters im östlichen Europa: Forschungsstand und Forschungsperspektiven (Heidelberg: Winter, 2006), 293–313.Google Scholar
Horobin, S., “Adam Pinkhurst, Geoffrey Chaucer, and the Hengwrt Manuscript of the Canterbury Tales,” Chaucer Review, 44 (2010): 351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horobin, S., “A manuscript found in the library of Abbotsford House and the lost legendary of Osbern Bokenham,” English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700, 14 (2008), 132–64.Google Scholar
Horobin, S., “Stephen Batman and his manuscripts of Piers Plowman,” Review of English Studies, 62 (2010), 358–72.Google Scholar
Howard, D., The idea of the Canterbury tales (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, A., “From Oxford to Prague: the writings of John Wyclif and his English followers in Bohemia,” The Slavonic and East European Review, 75 (1997), 642–57.Google Scholar
Hughes, A., “Western European music” in Strayer, , ed., Dictionary of the Middle Ages, vol. XII, 579a.Google Scholar
Huglo, M., “The cantatorium: from Charlemagne to the fourteenth century” in Jeffery, P., ed., The study of medieval chant: paths and bridges, east and west: in honor of Kenneth Levy (Rochester: Boydell Press, 2001), 89–104.Google Scholar
Huizenga, E., “Unintended signatures: Middle Dutch translators of surgical works” in Goyens, M., de Leemans, P., and Smets, A., eds., Science translated: Latin and vernacular translations of scientific treatises in medieval Europe (Leuven University Press, 2008), 415–48.Google Scholar
Hult, D., “Reading it right: the ideology of text editing,” in Brownlee, M. S., Brownlee, K., and Nichols, S. G., eds., The new medievalism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991), 111–30.Google Scholar
Humphreys, K. W., The book provisions of the medieval friars, 1215–1400 (Amsterdam: Erasmus Booksellers, 1964).Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W., “The introduction to the ‘Artes’ in the twelfth century” in Studia mediaevalia in honorem admonum Reverendi Patris Raymundi Josephi Martin (Bruges: De Tempel, 1948), 85–112.Google Scholar
Huot, S., From song to book: the poetics of writing in Old French lyric and lyrical narrative poetry (Cornell University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Hussey, M., and Niles, J. D., eds., The genesis of books: studies in the scribal culture of medieval England in honour of A. N. Doane (Turnhout: Brepols, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illich, I., In the vineyard of the text: a commentary to Hugh’s “Didascalicon” (University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Ivy, G. S., “The bibliography of the manuscript-book,” in Wormald, F. and Wright, C. E., eds., The English library before 1700 (London: Athlone Press, 1958), 32–65.Google Scholar
James, M. R., A descriptive catalogue of the manuscripts in the library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, 2 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 1912).Google Scholar
Jauß, H. R., Alterität und Modernität der mittelalterlichen Literatur (Munich: Fink, 1977).Google Scholar
Jauß, H. R., “Theorie der Gattungen und Literatur des Mittelalters” in Delbouille, M., ed., Grundriß der romanischen Literaturen des Mittelalters, vol. I, Généralités (Heidelberg: Winter, 1972), 103–38.Google Scholar
Jayne, S., Library catalogues of the English Renaissance (University of California Press, 1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayne, S. and Johnson, F. R., eds., The Lumley library: the catalogue of 1609 (London: British Museum, 1956).Google Scholar
Jenkins, H., Convergence culture: where old and new media collide (New York: NYU Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Jiroušková, L., Die Visio Pauli: Wege und Wandlungen einer orientalischen Apokryphe im lateinischen Mittelalter: unter Einschluß der alttsechischen und deutschsprachigen Textzeugen (Leiden: Brill, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, A., The nature of the book: print and knowledge in the making (University of Chicago Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, M., “Sir Degrevant in the ‘Findern Anthology’ (Cambridge, University Library MS Ff.1.6),” forthcoming in Studies in Bibliography 59.Google Scholar
Johnston, M., “Two Leicestershire romance codices: Cambridge, University Library MS Ff.2.38 and Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Ashmole 61,” Journal of the Early Book Society, 15 (2012), 85–100.Google Scholar
Jullien de Pommerol, M.-H., “Le prêt de livres à la fin du Moyen Âge (XIIIe–XVe siècles),” in Guarda, D. Nebbiai-Dalla and Genest, J.-F., eds., Du copiste au collectionneur: mélanges d’histoire des textes et des bibliothèques en l’honneur d’André Vernet (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998), 339–74.Google Scholar
Jung, M.-R., La légende de Troie en France au Moyen Âge: analyse des versions françaises et bibliographie raisonnée des manuscrits (Basel/Tübingen: Francke, 1996).Google Scholar
Kadlec, J., “Raudnitz” in Röhrig, F., ed., Die Stifte der Augustiner-Chorherren in Böhmen, Mähren und Ungarn (Klosterneuburg: Verlag Mayer & Comp., 1994), 177–202.Google Scholar
Kay, S., “Analytical survey 3: the new philology,” New Medieval Literatures, 3 (1999), 295–326.Google Scholar
Kay, S., The chansons de geste in the age of romance: political fictions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, F. D., Sens and conjointure in the Chevalier de la charrette (The Hague: Mouton, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S. and Thompson, J. J., eds., Imagining the book (Turnhout: Brepols, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ker, N. R., Catalogue of manuscripts containing Anglo-Saxon (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Ker, N. R., English manuscripts in the century after the Norman Conquest (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Ker, N. R., Fragments of medieval manuscripts used as pastedowns in Oxford bindings, with a survey of Oxford binding, c. 1515–1620 (Oxford Bibliographical Society Publications, 1954).Google Scholar
Ker, N. R., “From ‘above top line’ to ‘below top line’: a change in scribal practice,” Celtica, 5 (1960), 13–16.Google Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, K., Books under suspicion: censorship and tolerance of revelatory writing in late medieval England (University of Notre Dame Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, K., “English Joachimism and its codicological content, with a list of known Joachite manuscripts of English origin or provenance before 1600,” in Wannenmacher, J, ed., Joachim of Fiore and the influence of inspiration: essays in memory of Marjorie Reeves (Aldershot: Ashgate Press, 2013), 183–230.Google Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, K., “English Joachite manuscripts and medieval optimism about the role of the Jews in history: a list for future studies,” Florilegium, 23 (2006), 97–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, K., “V: some of the earliest attempts to assemble the Canterbury tales” in Kerby-Fulton, K., Hilmo, M., and Olson, L., Opening up Middle English manuscripts: literary and visual approaches (Cornell University Press, 2012), 79–86.Google Scholar
Kerby-Fulton, K., Hilmo, M., and Olson, L., Opening up Middle English manuscripts: literary and visual approaches (Cornell University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Keynes, S., “The reconstruction of a burnt Cottonian manuscript: the case of Cotton Ms. Otho A. I,” British Library Journal, 22 (1996), 113–60.Google Scholar
Keynes, S., “Introduction to the 1998 reprint” in Campbell, A., ed., Encomium Emmae Reginae (Cambridge University Press, 1998), xiii–lxxi.Google Scholar
Kleberg, T., “Commercio librario ed editoria nel mondo antico: Roma e l’época greco-romana” in Cavallo, G., ed., Libri, editori e pubblico nel mondo antico: guida storica e critica (Rome-Bari: Laterza, 1977), 40–80.Google Scholar
Kleinhenz, C. and Busby, K., eds., Medieval multilingualism: the francophone world and its neighbours (Turnhout: Brepols, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. T., Bound to read: compilations, collections, and the making of Renaissance literature (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kock, T., Die Buchkultur der Devotio moderna: Handschriftenproduktion, Literaturversorgung und Bibliotheksaufbau im Zeitalter des Medienwechsels (Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1999).Google Scholar
Krause, K. M., and Stones, A., eds., Gautier de Coinci: miracles, music, and manuscripts (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristen, Z., “Písařské přípisky v explicitech rukopisů z českých zemí jako pramen historický,” Sborník Vysoké školy pedagogické v Olomouci. Historia, 1(1954), 54–66.Google Scholar
Kuskin, W., Symbolic Caxton: literary culture and print capitalism (Notre Dame University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “Biting, kissing and the treatment of feet: the transitional script of the long twelfth century” in Kwakkel, E., McKitterick, R., and Thomson, R., eds., Turning over a new leaf: change and development in the medieval book (Leiden University Press, 2012), 78–125.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “Commercial organization and economic innovation” in Gillespie, and Wakelin, , eds., The production of books in England, 182–91.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “The cultural dynamics of medieval manuscripts” in Biemans, J. et al., eds., Manuscripten en miniaturen: studies aangeboden aan Anne S. Korteweg bij haar afscheid van de Koninklijke Bibliotheek (Zutphen: Walburg Pers, 2007), 243–52.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “The digital eye of the palaeographer,” in Brookes, S., Rehbein, M., and Stokes, P., eds., Digital palaeography (Aldershot: Ashgate, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “Discarded parchment as writing support in English manuscript culture,” English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700, 17 (2012), 238–61.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “Dit boek heeft niet de vereiste breedte: afwijkende bladdimensies in de elfde en twaalfde eeuw,” Jaarboek voor Nederlandse Boekgeschiedenis, 19 (2012), 33–49.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “Hidden in plain sight: continental scribes in Rochester Cathedral Priory, 1075–1150” in Kwakkel, E., ed., Writing in context: insular manuscript culture, 500–1200 (Leiden University Press, 2013), 231–61.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “Late medieval text collections: a codicological typology based on single-author manuscripts” in Partridge, S. and Kwakkel, E., eds., Author, reader, book: medieval authorship in theory and practice (University of Toronto Press, 2012), 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “A meadow without flowers: what happened to the Middle Dutch manuscripts from the Charterhouse Herne?,” Quaerendo, 33 (2003), 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwakkel, E., “A new type of book for a new type of reader: the emergence of paper in vernacular book production,” The Library, 7th ser., 4 (2003), 219–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laidlaw, J., “Christine and the manuscript tradition” in Altmann, B. K. and McGrady, D., eds., Christine de Pizan: a casebook (New York: Routledge, 2003), 231–50.Google Scholar
Latour, B., Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. E., Guillaume de Machaut: secretary, poet, musician (Cornell University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leedham-Green, E. and Webber, T., eds., The Cambridge history of libraries in Britain and Ireland, vol. I, To 1640 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, P., “Konstanz und Basel als Büchermärkte während der großen Kirchenversammlungen”, in Lehmann, P., Erforschung des Mittelalters: ausgewählte Abhandlungen und Aufsätze, 5 vols. (Leipzig: Hiersemann, 1941–62), vol. I, 253–80.Google Scholar
Leo, D., “Authorial presence in illuminated Machaut manuscripts,” Ph.D. diss., New York University (2005).Google Scholar
Leo, D., Images, texts, and marginalia in a “Vows of the peacock” manuscript (New York, Pierpont Morgan Library MS G 24): with a complete concordance and catalogue of peacock manuscripts (Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar
Leonardi, L., “Introduzione” in Leonardi, L., ed., Il canzoniere Palatino: Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, Banco Rari 217, ex Palatino 418, vol. III, I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2000), ix–xii.Google Scholar
Leonardi, L., ed., Studi critici, vol. IV: I canzonieri della lirica italiana delle origini (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2000).Google Scholar
Leonardi, L., ed., La tradizione della lirica nel medioevo romanzo: problemi di filologia formale (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2011).Google Scholar
Lerer, S., Chaucer and his readers: imagining the author in late medieval England (Princeton University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerer, S., “Medieval literature and early modern readers: Cambridge University Library Sel. 5.51–5.63,” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 97 (2003), 311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerer, S., “Medieval English literature and the idea of the anthology,” PMLA, 118 (2003), 1251–67.Google Scholar
Lerer, S. and Dane, J. A., “Press variants in John Stow’s Chaucer (1561) and the text of ‘Adam Scriveyn,’” Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 11 (1999), 468–79.Google Scholar
Le Roux de Lincy, A. J. V, Paris et ses historiens aux XIVe et XVe siècles (Paris: Imprimerie Impériale, 1867).Google Scholar
Levi, E., I cantari leggendari del popolo italiano nei secoli XIV e XV, suppl. 16 of Giornale storico della letteratura italiana (Turin, 1914).Google Scholar
Loewenstein, , Ben Jonson and possessive authorship (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Lorenz, S., “Catullus and martial” in Skinner, , ed., A companion to Catullus, 418–38.Google Scholar
Lovatt, R., “College and university book collections and libraries” in Leedham-Green, and Webber, , eds., The Cambridge history of libraries in Britain and Ireland, vol. I, To 1640, 152–77.Google Scholar
Love, H., Scribal publication in seventeenth-century England (Oxford: Clarendon, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, M., The world of Aldus Manutius: business and scholarship in Renaissance Venice (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar
Lüdi, G., “56. Mehrsprachigkeit und Interferenzen” in Holtus, G., Metzeltin, M., and Schmitt, C., eds., Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik, vol. I.2 (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2001), 423–36.Google Scholar
Lyall, R. J., “Materials: the paper revolution” in Griffiths, and Pearsall, , eds., Book production and publishing in Britain, 1375–1475, 11–29.Google Scholar
McGrady, D., Controlling readers: Gillaume de Machaut and his late medieval audience (University of Toronto Press, 2006).Google Scholar
McGrady, D., “What is a patron: benefactors and authorship in Harley 4431, Christine de Pizan’s collected works” in Desmond, M., ed., Christine de Pizan and the categories of difference (University of Minnesota Press, 1998), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machan, T. W., “Language contact in Piers Plowman,” Speculum, 69 (1994), 359–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machan, T. W., “Medieval multilingualism and Gower’s literary practice,” Studies in Philology, 103 (2006), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machan, T. W., Textual criticism and Middle English texts (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1994).Google Scholar
Machan, T. W., “The visual pragmatics of code-switching in late Middle English literature” in Schendl, H. and Wright, L., eds., Code-switching in early English (Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 2011), 303–34.Google Scholar
Machan, T. W., ed., Medieval literature: texts and interpretation (Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1991).Google Scholar
Macken, R., “L’édition critique des ouvrages diffusés au Moyen Âge au moyen d’un exemplar universitaire” in Bataillon, L. et al., eds., La production du livre universitaire au Moyen Âge: exemplar et pecia: actes du symposium tenu au Collegio San Bonaventura de Grottaferrata en mai 1983 (Paris: CNRS, 1988), 285–308.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F., Bibliography and the sociology of texts (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKitterick, D., “Libraries and the organisation of knowledge” in Leedham-Green, and Webber, , eds., The Cambridge history of libraries in Britain and Ireland, vol. I, To 1640, 592–615.Google Scholar
McKitterick, D., Old books, new technologies: the representation, conservation and transformation of books since 1700 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKitterick, D., Print, manuscript and the search for order, 1450–1830 (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., Books, scribes and learning in the Frankish kingdoms, 6th–9th centuries (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1994).Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., “Carolingian book production: some problems,” The Library, 6th ser., 12 (1990), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKitterick, R., The Carolingians and the written word (Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLoughlin, K., “Magdalene College MS Pepys 2498 and Stephen Batman’s reading practices,” Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 10 (1994), 525–34.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., The Gutenberg galaxy: the making of typographic man (1962; rpt. University of Toronto Press, 2011).Google Scholar
McMullan, G. and Matthews, D., eds., Reading the medieval in early modern England (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
McNeal, T. H., “The Clerk’s tale as a possible source for Pandosto,” PMLA, 47 (1932), 453–60.Google Scholar
Les manuscrits de Chrétien de Troyes/The manuscripts of Chrétien de Troyes, ed. Busby, K., Nixon, T., Stones, A., and Walters, L., 2 vols. (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993).Google Scholar
Marotti, A., Manuscript, print, and the English Renaissance lyric (Cornell University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marotti, A. and Bristol, M., Print, manuscript, and performance: the changing relations of the media in early modern England (Ohio State University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Marrani, G., “Macrosequenze d’autore (o presunte tali) alla verifica della tradizione: Dante, Cavalcanti, Cino da Pistoia” in Leonardi, L., ed., La tradizione della lirica nel medioevo romanzo: problemi di filologia formale (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2011), 241–66.Google Scholar
Marrani, G., “I sonetti di Rustico Filippi,” Studi di filologia italiana, 57 (1999), 33–199.Google Scholar
Martin, H. J., and Vezin, J., eds., Mise en page et mise en texte du livre manuscrit (Paris: Éditions du Cercle de la librairie-Promodis, 1990).Google Scholar
Massai, S., Shakespeare and the rise of the editor (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Masten, J., “Bound for Germany: heresy, sodomy, and a new copy of Marlowe’s Edward II,” Times Literary Supplement, December 21, 2012, 17–19.Google Scholar
Matheson, L. and Mooney, L. R., “The Beryn Scribe and his texts: evidence for multiple-copy production of manuscripts in fifteenth-century England,” The Library, 7th ser., 4 (2003), 347–70.Google Scholar
Menegaldo, S., Le jongleur dans la littérature narrative des XIIe et XIIIe siècles: du personnage au masque (Paris: Champion, 2005).Google Scholar
Mercati, G., “Codici del convento di S. Francesco in Assisi nella Biblioteca Vaticana” in Miscellanea Francesco Ehrle: scritti di storia e paleografia pubblicati sotto gli auspici di S. S. Pio XI in occasione dell’ottantesimo natalizio dell’E.mo Cardinale Francesco Ehrle, vol. V, Biblioteca ed Archivio Vaticano, biblioteche diverse, Studi e testi, 41 (Rome: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1924), 83–127.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lee, R., “Manuscript studies, literary value, and the object of Chaucer studies,” Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 30 (2008), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, M. A., “English illuminators, ca. 1190–1450: a survey from documentary sources,” English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700, 4 (1993), 62–113.Google Scholar
Milde, W., “Handschrift” in Corsten, S., Pflug, G., and Schmidt-Künsemüller, F. A. et al., eds., Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2nd edn., 5 vols. (Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 1991), vol. III, 351–2.Google Scholar
Minnis, A., Medieval theory of authorship: scholastic attitudes in the later Middle Ages, 2nd edn. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Minnis, A. and Johnson, I., eds., The Cambridge history of literary criticism: vol. II, The Middle Ages (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Mooney, L., “Vernacular literary manuscripts and their scribes” in Gillespie, and Wakelin, , eds., The production of books in England, 192–211.Google Scholar
Mooney, L. and Stubbs, E., Scribes and the city: London guildhall clerks and the dissemination of Middle English literature, 1375–1425 (York Medieval Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Moran, J. H., “A common-profit library in fifteenth-century England and other books for chaplains,” Manuscripta, 28 (1984), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, N., Early Gothic manuscripts, 1250–1285, 2 vols., Survey of Manuscripts Illuminated in the British Isles 4 (London: Harvey Miller, 1988).Google Scholar
Morgan, N., “Illumination: pigments, drawing, and gilding,” in Morgan, and Thomson, , eds., The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. II, 1100–1400, 84–94.Google Scholar
Morgan, N. and Thomson, R. M., eds., The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. II, 1100–1400 (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Moss, A., Printed commonplace books and the structuring of Renaissance thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muzerelle, D., Vocabulaire codicologique: répertoire méthodique des termes français relatives aux manuscrits (Paris: CEMI, 1985).Google Scholar
Nasmith, J., Catalogus librorum manuscriptorum quos Collegio Corporis Christi et Beatae Mariae Virginis in Academia Cantabrigiensis legavit reverendissimus in Christo Pater Matthaeus Parker, Archiepiscopus Cantuariensis (Cambridge: J. Archdeacon, 1777).Google Scholar
Nebbiai-Dalla Guarda, D., Le discours des livres: bibliothèques et manuscrits en Europe, IXe–XVe siècle (Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neddermeyer, U., Von der Handschrift zum gedruckten Buch: Schriftlichkeit und Leseinteresse im Mittelalter und in der frühen Neuzeit: quantitative und qualitative Aspekte (Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1998).Google Scholar
Needham, P., The printer and the pardoner: an unrecorded indulgence printed by William Caxton for the hospital of St. Mary Rounceval, Charing Cross (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 1986).Google Scholar
Newcomb, L. H., “Greene, Robert (bap. 1558, d. 1592),” Oxford dictionary of national biography (Oxford University Press, 2004), online edition.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. G., “‘Art’ and ‘nature’: looking for (medieval) principles of order in Occitan Chansonnier N (Morgan 819)” in Nichols, and Wenzel, , eds., The whole book, 83–121.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. G., “Introduction: philology in a manuscript culture,” Speculum, 65 (1990), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. G., “Inventing Paris: the birth of a cultural capital in the long 14th century” in Wallace, D., ed., Europe: a literary history, 1348–1418 (Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Nichols, S. G., “Pour une lecture dynamique des manuscrits médiévaux: le cas du Roman de la rose” in Mélanges en l’honneur de Jacqueline Cerquiglini-Toulet, ed. Lefèvre, S. et al. (Paris: Éditions Champion, 2014).Google Scholar
Nichols, S. G., “Reading and seeing troubadours in a manuscript context,” Poetica, 38 (2006), 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. G. and Wenzel, S., eds., The whole book: cultural perspectives on the medieval miscellany (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, M., “Lydgate’s worst poem,” in Denny-Brown, A. and Cooper, L. H., eds., Lydgate matters: poetry and material culture in the fifteenth century (New York: Palgrave, 2008), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, M., “Making the aesthetic turn: Adorno, the medieval, and the future of the past,” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 34 (2004), 549–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Byrne, T., “Manuscript creation in Dublin,” in Kerby-Fulton, K., Thompson, J. J., and Baechle, S., eds., New directions in medieval manuscript studies and reading practices: essays in honor of Derek Pearsall (University of Notre Dame Press, 2014), 271–92.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, T., “Map and text: a mid ninth-century map for the Book of Joshua,” Imago Mundi, 57 (2005), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, B. M., I classici nel canone scolastico altomedievale (Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo, 1991).Google Scholar
Olsen, B. M., L’étude des auteurs classiques latins aux XIe et XIIe siècles, vol. I, Catalogue des manuscrits classiques Latins copiés du IXe au XIIe siècle: Apicius–Juvénal; vol. II, Catalogue des manuscrits classiques Latins copiés du IXe au XIIe siècle: Livius–Vitruvius, florilèges-essais de plume; vol. III/i, Les classiques dans les bibliothèques médiévales; vol. III/ii, Addenda et corrigenda-tables, 4 vols. (Paris: CNRS, 1982–2014).Google Scholar
Olson, G., “Author, scribe and curse: the genre of Adam Scriveyn,” Chaucer Review, 43 (2009), 414–27.Google Scholar
Olszowy-Schlanger, J., and Grondeux, A., eds., Dictionnaire hébreu–latin–français de la Bible hébraïque de l’Abbaye de Ramsey (XIIIe s.) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2008).Google Scholar
Orgel, S., “Introduction,” in Orgel, S., ed., Christopher Marlowe: the complete poems and translations (New York: Penguin, 2007).Google Scholar
Ornato, E., Apologia dell’apogeo: divagazioni sulla storia del libro nel tardo medioevo (Rome: Viella, 2000).Google Scholar
Ornato, E. et al., La face cachée du livre medieval: l’histoire du livre vue par Ezio Ornato, ses amis et ses collègues (Rome: Viella, 1997).Google Scholar
Ouy, G., La librairie des frères captifs: les manuscrits de Charles d’Orléans et Jean d’Angoulême (Turnhout: Brepols, 2007).Google Scholar
Ouy, G. and Reno, C., “Identification des autographes de Christine de Pizan,” Scriptorium, 34 (1980), 221–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overgaauw, E. A., “Where are the colophons? on the frequency of datings in late-medieval manuscripts” in Schlusemann, R., Hermans, J. M. M., and Hoogvliet, M., eds., Sources for the history of medieval books and libraries (Groningen: Egbert Forsten, 2000), 85–9.Google Scholar
Paden, W. D., “Manuscripts” in Akehurst, F. R. P. and Davis, J. M., eds., A handbook of the troubadours (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), 307–33.Google Scholar
Page, R. I., Matthew Parker and his books: Sandars lectures in bibliography delivered on 14, 16, and 18 May 1990 at the University of Cambridge (Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute, 1993).Google Scholar
Pahta, P., “Code-switching in medieval medical writing” in Taavitsainen, I. and Pahta, P., eds., Medical writing in early modern English (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 115–34.Google Scholar
Palazzo, E., A history of liturgical books from the beginning to the thirteenth century (Collegeville, MN: The Order of St. Benedict, 1998).Google Scholar
Palma, M., “Modifiche di alcuni aspetti materiali della produzione libraria latina nei secoli XII e XIII,” Scrittura e Civiltà, 12 (1988), 119–33.Google Scholar
Palmer, N. F., “Simul canternus, simul pausernus: zur mittelalterlichen Zisterzienserinterpunktion” in Lutz, E. C. et al., eds., Lesevorgänge: Prozesse des erkennens in mittelalterlichen Texten, Bildern und Handschriften (Zurich: Chronos, 2010), 483–569.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., “Archaizing hands in English manuscripts” in Carley, J. P. and Tite, C. G. C., eds., Books and collectors, 1200–1700: essays presented to Andrew Watson (London: The British Library, 1997), 101–41.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., “The influence of the concepts of ordinatio and compilatio on the development of the book” in Alexander, J. J. G. and Gibson, M. T., eds., Medieval learning and literature: essays presented to Richard William Hunt (Oxford: Clarendon, 1976), 115–41.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., “The literacy of the laity” in Parkes, M. B., Scribes, scripts and readers: studies in the communication, presentation and dissemination of medieval texts (London: The Hambledon Press, 1991), 275–97.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., Pause and effect: an introduction to the history of punctuation in the West (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1992).Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., “The provision of books” in Catto, J. I. and Evans, R., eds., The history of the University of Oxford, vol. II, Late medieval Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), 407–83.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., “Stephen Batman’s manuscripts” in Kanno, M. et al., eds., Medieval heritage: essays in honour of Tadahiro Ikegami (Tokyo: Yushudo, 1997), 125–56.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B., Their hands before our eyes: a closer look at scribes: the Lyell Lectures delivered in the University of Oxford, 1999 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Partridge, S., “‘The makere of this boke’: Chaucer’s retractions and the author as scribe and compiler” in Partridge, S. and Kwakkel, E., eds., Author, reader, book: medieval authorship in theory and practice (University of Toronto Press, 2012), 106–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, S., “The manuscript glosses to the Wife of Bath’s Prologue” in Robinson, P., ed., Chaucer: the Wife of Bath’s Prologue on CD-ROM (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Parussa, G., “Orthographes et autographes: quelques considérations sur l’orthographe de Christine de Pizan,” Romania, 117 (1999), 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquali, G., Storia della tradizione e critica del testo (Florence: Le Monnier, 1929, repr. 1988).Google Scholar
Pasquini, E., and Quaglio, A. E., Il duecento: dalle origini a Dante, 2 vols. (Bari: Laterza, 1970).Google Scholar
Patterson, L., Chaucer and the subject of history (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Patterson, L., “‘For the wyves love of Bathe’: feminine rhetoric and poetic resolution in the Roman de la rose and the Canterbury tales,” Speculum, 58 (1983), 656–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, L., Negotiating the past: the historical understanding of medieval literature (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Paulmier-Foucart, M., “Ecrire l’histoire au XIIIe siècle: Vincent de Beauvais et Hélinand de Froidmont,” Annales de l’Est, 33 (1981), 49–70.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D., “Gower’s Latin in the Confessio amantis” in Minnis, A. J., ed., Latin and vernacular: studies in late-medieval texts and manuscripts (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1989), 13–25.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D., The life of Geoffrey Chaucer: a critical biography (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Pearsall, D., “The whole book: late medieval English manuscript miscellanies and their modern interpreters” in Kelly, and Thompson, , eds., Imagining the book, 17–29.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D., ed., Manuscripts and readers in fifteenth-century England: the literary implications of manuscript study (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1983).Google Scholar
Pearsall, D., ed., Old English and Middle English poetry (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977).Google Scholar
Pearson, D., English bookbinding styles, 1450–1800: a handbook (London: British Library, 2004).Google Scholar
Pellegrin, E., “Les manuscrits de Loup de Ferrières” in Bibliothèques retrouvées: manuscrits, bibliothèques et bibliophiles du Moyen Âge et de la Renaissance: recueil d’études publiées de 1938 à 1985 (Paris: CNRS, 1988), 131–57.Google Scholar
Perry, C. and Watkins, J., eds., Shakespeare and the Middle Ages (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrucci, A., “Alle origini del libro moderno: libri da banco, libri da bisaccia, libretti da mano,” Italia Medioevale e Umanistica, 12 (1969), 295–313.Google Scholar
Petrucci, A., Writers and readers in medieval Italy: studies in the history of written culture, ed. and trans. Radding, C. M. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Planta, J., A catalogue of the manuscripts in the Cottonian library deposited in the British Museum (London: British Museum, 1802).Google Scholar
Pluta, O., “‘Quaedam regulae de modo titulandi seu apificandi pro novellis scriptoribus copulatae’: a late medieval tutorial for novice scribes” in Robinson, P. R., ed., Teaching writing, learning to write: proceedings of the XVIth colloquium of the comité international de paléographie Latine held at the Institute of English Studies, University of London, 2–5 September 2008 (London: King’s College London Centre for Late Antique and Medieval Studies, 2010), 241–71.Google Scholar
Poirel, D., Des symboles et des anges: Hugues de Saint-Victor et le réveil dionysien du XIIe siècle (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).Google Scholar
Polica, S., “Le commerce et le prêt de livres à Lucques dans la première moitié du XVe siècle,” Médiévales, 14 (1988), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, A. W. and Redgrave, G. R., A short-title catalogue of books printed in England, Scotland, and Ireland, and of English books printed abroad, 1475–1640, 2nd edn. (London: Bibliographical Society, 1976–91).Google Scholar
Potter, E., “The London bookbinding trade: from craft to industry,” The Library, 6th ser., 15 (1993), 259–80.Google Scholar
Poulin, J.-C., “Les libelli dans l’édition hagiographique avant le XIIe siècle” in Heinzelmann, M., ed., Livrets, collections et textes: études sur la tradition hagiographique latine (Ostfildern: Thorbecke, 2006), 15–193.Google Scholar
Pratt, R. A., “Chaucer and the hand that fed him,” Speculum, 41 (1966), 619–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, A., “The ghost of Asser” in Pulsiano, P. and Treharne, E. M., eds., Anglo-Saxon manuscripts and their heritage (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), 255–92.Google Scholar
Prescott, A., “‘Their present miserable state of cremation’: the restoration of the Cotton library” in Wright, C. J., ed., Sir Robert Cotton as collector: essays on an early Stuart courtier and his legacy (London: British Library, 1997), 391–454.Google Scholar
Prescott, A., “What’s in a number? The physical organisation of the manuscript collections of the British Library” in Doane, A. N. and Wolf, K., eds., Beatus vir: studies in early English and Norse manuscripts in memory of Phillip Pulsiano (Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2006), 471–525.Google Scholar
Price, L., How to do things with books in Victorian Britain (Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Pronay, N., and Taylor, W. A., Parliamentary texts of the Middle Ages (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R., eds., Il libro e il testo: atti del convegno internazionale: Urbino, 20–23 settembre 1982 (Università degli studi di Urbino, 1984).Google Scholar
RabilJr., A., ed. and trans., Knowledge, goodness, and power: the debate over nobility among quattrocento Italian humanists (Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1991).Google Scholar
Randall, L. M. C., Medieval and Renaissance manuscripts in the Walters Art Gallery, vol. I, France, 875–1420 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Ranković, S., et al., eds., Along the oral–written continuum: types of text, relations, and their implications (Turnhout: Brepols, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinburg, V., French books of hours: making an archive of prayer, c.1400–1600 (Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A report from the committee appointed to view the Cottonian library (London: R. Williamson and W. Bowyer, 1732).Google Scholar
Revard, C., “Gilote et Johane: an interlude in B. L. MS. Harley 2253,” Studies in Philology, 79 (1982), 122–46.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., ed., Texts and transmission: a survey of the Latin classics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. and Wilson, N. G., Scribes and scholars: a guide to the transmission of Greek and Latin literature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Reynolds, S., Medieval reading: grammar, rhetoric and the classical text (Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, B., “The textual history of the Decameron” in Kirkham, V., Sherberg, M., and Smarr, J. L., eds., Boccaccio: a critical guide to the complete works (University of Chicago Press, 2013), 41–9.Google Scholar
Rigg, A. G., “The editing of medieval Latin texts: a response,” Studi Medievali, 3rd ser., 24 (1983), 385–8.Google Scholar
Rivers, K., “Creating the memory of God in a medieval miscellany: Melk MS 1075, Jean de Hesdin (fl. 1350–1370), and late medieval monastic reform” in Doležalová, and Rivers, , eds., Medieval manuscript miscellanies, 112–38.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. H. and Skeat, T. C., The birth of the codex (Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Roberts, J., Guide to scripts used in English writings up to 1500 (London: British Library, 2005).Google Scholar
Roberts, J., “On giving Scribe B a name and a clutch of London manuscripts written c.1400,” Medium Aevum, 80 (2011), 247–70.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. R., “The ‘booklet’: a self-contained unit in composite manuscripts,” Codicologica, 3 (1980), 46–69.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. R., “The format of books: books, booklets and rolls” in Morgan, and Thomson, , eds., The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. II, 1100–1400, 41–54.Google Scholar
Roddewig, M., Dante Alighieri: die göttliche Komödie: vergleichende Bestandsaufnahme der Commedia-Handschriften (Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1984).Google Scholar
Roemer, C., “The papyrus roll in Egypt, Greece, and Rome” in Eliot, S. and Rose, J., eds., A companion to the history of the book (Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2009), 84–94.Google Scholar
Rossi, A., Il Decameron: pratiche testuali e interpretative (Bologna: Cappelli, 1982).Google Scholar
Rouse, R. H. and Rouse, M. A., Illiterati et uxorati: manuscripts and their makers: commercial book producers in medieval Paris, 1200–1500, 2 vols. (London: Harvey Miller, 2000).Google Scholar
Roux, B., Mondes en miniatures: l’iconographie du Livre du trésor de Brunetto Latini (Geneva: Droz, 2009).Google Scholar
Rychterová, P., “Gens, nacio, communitas – lingua, sanguis, fides: idea národa v českém díle Jana Husa” in Rychterová, P. and Soukup, P., eds., Heresis seminaria: pojmy a koncepty v bádání o husitství (Prague: Academia, 2013), 75–110.Google Scholar
Sabbadini, R., Le scoperte dei codici latini e greci ne’secoli XIV e XV, 2 vols. (Florence: Sansoni, 1905–14, repr. 1967).Google Scholar
Saenger, P., Space between words: the origins of silent reading (Stanford University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, E., and Wicker, H., eds., Vernacularity in England and Wales, c.1300–1550 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Martí, J., “Adam Pynkhurst’s ‘Necglygence and rape’ reassessed,” English Studies, 92 (2011), 360–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandkühler, B., Die frühen Dantekommentare und ihr Verhältnis zur mittelalterlichen Kommentartradition (Munich: Hueber, 1967).Google Scholar
Sandler, L. F., Gothic manuscripts, 1285–1385, 2 vols., Survey of Manuscripts Illuminated in the British Isles 5 (London: Harvey Miller, 1986).Google Scholar
Sargent, M., “What do the numbers mean? Observations on some patterns of Middle English manuscript transmission” in Connolly, M. and Mooney, L., eds., Design and distribution of late medieval manuscripts in England (York Medieval Press, 2008), 205–44.Google Scholar
Scase, W., “Afterword: the book in culture” in Gillespie, and Wakelin, , eds., The production of books in England, 1350–1500, 292–8.Google Scholar
Scase, W., “Reginald Pecock, John Carpenter and John Colyp’s ‘common-profit’ books: aspects of book ownership and circulation in fifteenth-century London,” Medium Aevum, 61 (1992), 261–74.Google Scholar
Scase, W., ed., The making of the Vernon manuscript: the production and contexts of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Eng. poet. a.1 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).Google Scholar
Schaik, V., The harp in the Middle Ages: the symbolism of a musical instrument (Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V., 1992).Google Scholar
Schrade, L., “The chronology of the Ars nova in Franc,” in Les colloques de Wégimont, vol. II (Paris, 1959).Google Scholar
Scott, K. L., “An hours and psalter by two Ellesmere illuminators” in Stevens, M. and Woodward, D., eds., The Ellesmere Chaucer: essays in interpretation (San Marino, CA and Tokyo: Yushoda, 1995), 87–119.Google Scholar
Scott, K. L., “A late fifteenth-century group of Nova statuta manuscripts” in de la Mare, A. C. and Barker-Benfield, B. C., eds., Manuscripts at Oxford: an exhibition in memory of Richard William Hunt (1908–1979), keeper of Western manuscripts at the Bodleian Library Oxford, 1945–1975, on themes selected and described by some of his friends (Oxford: Bodleian Library, 1980), 102–5.Google Scholar
Scragg, D., Conspectus of scribal hands writing English, 960–1100 (Cambridge: Boydell and Brewer, 2012).Google Scholar
Sherman, W., Used books: marking readers in Renaissance England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shonk, T., “A study of the Auchinleck Manuscript: bookmen and bookmaking in the early fourteenth century,” Speculum, 60 (1985), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signorini, M., “‘Tracce’ petrarchesche: tipologia, analisi, datazione” in Golob, , ed., Medieval autograph manuscripts, 227–44.Google Scholar
Silvia, D. S., “Glosses to the Canterbury tales from St. Jerome’s Epistola adversus Jovinianum,” Studies in Philology, 62 (1965), 28–39.Google Scholar
Simpson, J., Review of Ralph Hanna, London literature, in Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 26 (2006), 290–3.Google Scholar
Skála, E., “Vznik a vývoj česko-německého bilingvismu,” Slovo a slovesnost, 38 (1977), 197–207.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B., “Authorial arrangement of the collection: debate past and present” in Skinner, ed., A companion to Catullus, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šlejhar, J. K., Dějiny literatury české pro potřebu obchodního školství (Prague: E. Weinfurter, 1907).Google Scholar
Smith, M. M., “The design relationship between the manuscript and the incunable” in Myers, R. and Harris, M., eds., A millennium of the book: production, design and illustration in manuscript and print, 900–1900 (New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 1994), 23–43.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Catalogus librorum manuscriptorum bibliothecae Cottonianae (Oxford: E Theatro Sheldoniano, 1696).Google Scholar
Sokol, B. J., “Petowe, Henry (1575/6–1636?)” in Oxford dictionary of national biography (Oxford University Press, 2004), online edition.Google Scholar
Spunar, P., Repertorium auctorum Bohemorum provectum idearum post Universitatem Pragensem conditam illustrans, 2 vols. (Wroclaw: Ossolineum, 1985).Google Scholar
St Clair, W., The reading nation in the Romantic period (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Stallybrass, P., “Little jobs: broadsides and the printing revolution” in Baron, S. A., Lindquist, E. N., and Shevlin, E. F., eds., Agents of change: print culture studies after Elizabeth L. Eisenstein (University of Massachusetts Press, 2007), 315–41.Google Scholar
Stein, R. M., “Multilingualism” in Strohm, ed., Oxford twenty-first century approaches, 23–37.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J., Accounting for Dante: urban readers and writers in late medieval Italy (University of Notre Dame Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stella, F., “A ‘postcolonial’ approach to medieval Latin literature?” in Costa, F. G. and Mata, I., eds., Colonial/post-colonial: writing as memory in literature (Lisbon: Colibri, 2013), 13–23.Google Scholar
Stemmler, T., “Miscellany or anthology? the structure of medieval manuscripts: MS Harley 2253, for example” in Fein, ed., Studies in the Harley manuscript, 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemmler, T., “Miscellany or anthology? the structure of medieval manuscripts: MS Harley 2253, for example,” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 39 (1991), 231–7.Google Scholar
Stevens, M., Introduction to The Ellesmere Chaucer: essays in interpretation (San Marino, CA and Tokyo: Yushoda, 1995), 15–28.Google Scholar
Stock, B., The implications of literacy: written language and models of interpretation in the eleventh and twelfth centuries (Princeton University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, H. W., “Cultural crisis and material innovation: the Italian manuscript in the XIVth century,” Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire, 83 (2005), 869–86.Google Scholar
Storey, H. W., “Early editorial forms of Dante’s lyrics” in Barolini, T. and Storey, H. W., eds., Dante for the new millennium (New York: Fordham University Press, 2003), 16–43.Google Scholar
Storey, H. W., “Following instructions: remaking Dante’s Vita nova in the fourteenth century” in Barolini, T., ed., Medieval constructions in gender and identity: essays in honor of Joan M. Ferrante (Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2005), 117–32.Google Scholar
Storey, H. W., Transcription and visual poetics in the early Italian lyric (New York: Garland, 1993).Google Scholar
Storey, H. W. and Capelli, R., “Modalità di ordinamento materiale tra Guittone e Petrarca” in Lo Monaco, F., Rossi, L. C., and Scaffai, N., eds., “Liber,” “fragmenta,” “libellus” prima e dopo Petrarca: in ricordo di D’Arco Silvio Avalle (Florence: SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2006), 169–86.Google Scholar
Stotz, P., “Normgebundenheit, Normen-Entfaltung und Spontaneität im mittelalterlichen Latein” in Goyens, M. and Verbeke, W., eds., The dawn of the written vernacular in Western Europe (Leuven University Press, 2003), 39–50.Google Scholar
Straw, W., “Embedded memories” in Acland, C., ed., Residual media (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007), 3–15.Google Scholar
Strayer, J. R., ed., Dictionary of the Middle Ages, 13 vols. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1987).Google Scholar
Strohm, P., Theory and the premodern text (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Strohm, P., ed., Oxford twenty-first century approaches to literature: Middle English (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, E., “Clare Priory, London Austin friars and ‘Canterbury tales’ MSS” in Minnis, A. J., ed., Middle English poetry: texts and traditions: essays in honour of Derek Pearsall (York Medieval Press, 2001), 17–26.Google Scholar
Stubbs, E., “‘Here’s one I prepared earlier’: the work of scribe D on Oxford, Corpus Christi College, MS 198,” Review of English Studies, n.s. 58 (2007), 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, M., and Woodhuysen, H. G., The Oxford companion to the book, vol. I (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summit, J., Memory’s library: medieval books in early modern England (University of Chicago Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summit, J. and Wallace, D., eds., Medieval/Renaissance: after periodization, special issue of Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37 (2007).Google Scholar
Swanson, R. N., Universities, academics, and the Great Schism (Cambridge University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symes, C., “Manuscript matrix, modern canon” in Strohm, , ed., Oxford twenty-first century approaches, 7–22.Google Scholar
Taylor, A., Textual situations: three medieval manuscripts and their readers (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tether, L., The continuations of Chrétien’s ‘Perceval’: content and construction, extension and ending (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2012).Google Scholar
Thompson, S. O., “Paper manufacturing and early books” in Cosman, M. P. and Chandler, B., eds., Machaut’s world: science and art in the fourteenth century: papers from a conference held in New York, 2–3 December 1977 (New York Academy of Sciences, 1978), 167–76.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. M., “Monastic and cathedral book production” in Morgan, and Thomson, , eds., The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. II, 1100–1400, 136–67.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. M., “Parchment and paper, ruling and ink,” in Morgan, and Thomson, , eds., The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vol. II, 1100–1400, 75–83.Google Scholar
Tite, C. G. C., The early records of Sir Robert Cotton’s library: formation, cataloguing, use (London: British Library, 2003).Google Scholar
Tite, C. G. C., ed., Catalogue of the manuscripts in the Cottonian library 1696 (Catalogus librorum manuscriptorum bibliothecae Cottonianae) (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1984).Google Scholar
Todorovic, J., “Nota sulla Vita Nova di Giovanni Boccaccio” in Filosa, E. and Papio, M., eds., Boccaccio in America (Ravenna: Longo, 2012), 105–11.Google Scholar
Todorovic, J., “‘Un’operetta del famosissimo poeta, e teologo Dante Allighieri’: the editio princeps of the Vita nova,” Studi danteschi, 77 (2012), 293–310.Google Scholar
Toscano, G., La Biblioteca reale di Napoli al tempo della dinastia aragonese, catalogo esposizione Napoli Castel Nuovo, 30 settembre–15 dicembre 1998 (Valencia: Generalitat Valencia, 1998).Google Scholar
Tracy, L., “British Library MS Harley 630: Saint Alban’s and Lydgate,” Journal of the Early Book Society, 3 (2000), 36–58.Google Scholar
Treharne, T., “Fleshing out the text: the transcendent manuscript in the digital age,” Postmedieval, 4 (2013), 465–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turcan-Verkerk, A.-M., “Mannon de Saint-Oyen dans l’histoire de la transmission des textes,” Revue d’Histoire des Textes, 29 (1999), 169–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turville-Petre, T., “Some medieval English manuscripts in the North-East Midlands” in Pearsall, D., ed., Manuscripts and readers in fifteenth-century England: the literary implications of manuscript study: essays from the 1981 conference at the University of York (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1983), 125–41.Google Scholar
Tuve, R., Allegorical imagery: some mediaeval books and their posterity (Princeton University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Tyler, E., ed., Conceptualizing multilingualism in England, c.800–c.1250 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ugolini, F. A., I cantari d’argomento classico: con un’appendice di testi inediti (Geneva/Florence: Olschki, 1933).Google Scholar
Unsworth, J., “Scholarly primitives: what methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this?” Humanities computing: formal methods, experimental practice symposium, King’s College, London, May 13, 2000, http://people.lis.illinois.edu/~unsworth/Kings.5-00/primitives.html.Google Scholar
Urfels-Capot, A.-E., Le sanctoral du lectionnaire de l’office dominicain (1254–1256): édition et étude d’après le ms. Rome, Sainte-Sabine XIV L1: Ecclesiasticum officium secundum ordinem fratrum praedicatorum (Paris: Ecole des Chartes, 2007).Google Scholar
Van Dijk, S. J. P., “An advertisement sheet of an early fourteenth-century writing master at Oxford,” Scriptorium, 10 (1956), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dussen, M., “Aristotle’s tetragon: compilation and consensus during the Great Schism” in Van Dussen, M. and Soukup, P., eds., Religious controversy in Europe: textual transmission and networks of readership, 1378–1536 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013), 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Egmond, W., “The future of manuscript cataloguing” in Stevens, W. M., ed., Bibliographic access to medieval and Renaissance manuscripts: a survey of computerized data bases (Binghamton: Haworth Press, 1992), 153–8.Google Scholar
Van Engen, J., Sisters and brothers of the Common Life (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Vandelli, G., “Un autografo della ‘Teseide,’” Studi di filologia italiana, 2 (1929), 5–76.Google Scholar
Veltrusky, J., A sacred farce from medieval Bohemia: Mastičkář (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Vickers, B., Shakespeare, co-author: a historical study of five collaborative plays (Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villon, Francois, Poésies completes, ed. C. Thiry (Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 1991).Google Scholar
Voigts, L. E., “What’s the word? bilingualism in late-medieval England,” Speculum, 71 (1996), 813–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Moos, P., ed., Zwischen Babel und Pfingsten: Sprachdifferenzen und Gesprächsverständigung in der Vormoderne (8.–16. Jahrhundert) (Vienna: LIT Verlag, 2008).Google Scholar
Wall, W., The imprint of gender: authorship and publication in the English Renaissance (Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Wallace, D., “Afterword” in McMullan, and Matthews, , eds., Reading the medieval in early modern England, 220–7.Google Scholar
Wallace, D., Premodern places: Calais to Surinam, Chaucer to Aphra Behn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, L. J., “Le rôle du scribe dans l’organisation des manuscrits de Chrétien de Troyes,” Romania, 106 (1985), 303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, L., The lost history of Piers Plowman (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, M., The letters of the republic: publication and the public sphere in eighteenth-century America (Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Watkins, E., “The romances of the British Library, Cotton Vitellius D.III” in Doležalová, L. and Rivers, K., eds., Medieval manuscript miscellanies: composition, authorship, use (Krems: Institut für Realienkunde des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit, 2013), 256–69.Google Scholar
Watson, N., “Desire for the past,” Studies in the age of Chaucer, 21 (1999), 59–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, D., The making of Thomas Hoccleve’s “Series” (University of Liverpool Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, W. P., “Marlowe’s fable: Hero and Leander and the rudiments of eloquence,” Studies in Philology, 105 (2008), 388–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, T., “Script and manuscript production at Christ Church, Canterbury, after the Norman Conquest” in Eales, R. and Sharpe, R., eds., Canterbury and the Norman Conquest: churches, saints and scholars, 1066–1109 (London: The Hambledon Press, 1995), 145–58.Google Scholar
Wegner, P. D., A student’s guide to textual criticism of the Bible: its history, methods and results (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic/InterVarsity Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Wehmer, C., “Die Schreibmeisterblätter des späten Mittelalters” in Miscellanea Giovanni Mercati, vol. VI, Paleografia, bibliografia, varia (Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1946), 147–61.Google Scholar
Wenzel, S., “Sermon collections and their taxonomy” in Nichols, and Wenzel, , eds., The whole book, 7–21.Google Scholar
Wilcox, J., ed., Scraped, stroked, and bound: materially engaged readings of medieval manuscripts (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard, C. C., “The concept of true nobility at the Burgundian court,” Studies in the Renaissance, 14 (1967), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, J., Chaucer and his French contemporaries: natural music in the fourteenth century (University of Toronto Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wogan-Browne, et al., eds., The idea of the vernacular: an anthology of Middle English literary theory, 1280–1520 (University of Exeter Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Wogan-Browne, Language and culture in medieval Britain: the French of England, c.1100–c.1500 (Woodbridge: York Medieval Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Woudhuysen, H. R., Sir Philip Sidney and the circulation of manuscripts, 1558–1640 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, S., Deep time of the media: toward an archaeology of hearing and seeing by technical means, trans. Custance, G. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Zink, M., Introduction à la littérature française du Moyen Âge (Paris: Livre de Poche, 1993).Google Scholar
Zorich, D. M., A survey of digital humanities centers in the United States (Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2008), www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub143/reports/pub143/pub143.pdf.Google Scholar
Zufferey, F., Recherches linguistiques sur les chansonniers provençaux (Geneva: Droz, 1987).Google Scholar
Zumthor, P., “Intervocalité et mouvance” in La lettre et la voix: de la littérature médiévale (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1987), 160–8.Google Scholar
Zumthor, P., Towards a medieval poetics, trans. Bennett, Philip (University of Minnesota Press, 1992).Google Scholar