Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T06:55:24.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The State Conduct Element

from Part III - Crime of Aggression under Current International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2017

Claus Kreß
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Stefan Barriga
Affiliation:
United Nations, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Crime of Aggression
A Commentary
, pp. 412 - 564
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Ader, W., Gewaltsame Rettungsmaßnahmen zum Schutz eigener Staatsangehöriger im Ausland (Munich: Verlag V. Florentz, 1988).Google Scholar
Ambos, K., Treatise on International Criminal Law: The Crimes and Sentencing, vol. II (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Aust, H. P., Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avirgan, T. and Honey, M., War in Uganda. The Legacy of Idi Amin (London: Zed Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Barriga, S. and Kreß, C., The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bennouna, M., Le consentement à l’ingérence militaire dans les conflits internes (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1974).Google Scholar
Biggar, N., In Defence of War (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Boister, N. and Cryer, R., Documents on the Tokyo International Military Trial. Charter, Indictment and Judgments (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bowett, B., Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Bruha, T., Die Definition der Aggression. Faktizität und Normativität des UN-Konsensbildungsprozesses der Jahre 1968 bis 1974 zugleich ein Beitrag zur Strukturanalyse des Völkerrechts (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1980).Google Scholar
Cassese, A., International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Cassese, A., Gaeta, P., Baig, L., Fan, M., Gosnell, C. and Whiting, A., Cassese’s International Criminal Law, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Chayes, A., The Cuban Missile Crisis (Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Clark Arend, A. and Beck, R. J., International Law and the Use of Force (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Corten, O., The Law Against War. The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility. Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 3rd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
De Ruiter, D. and van der Wolf, W. (eds.), Aggression and International Criminal Law (The Hague: International Courts Association, 2011).Google Scholar
de Wet, E., The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, L. (ed.), San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Fabre, C. and Lazar, S. (eds.), The Morality of Defensive War (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Falk, R. A. (ed.), The Vietnam War and International Law, vol. I (4 vols., Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression. A Documentary History and Analysis (2 vols., Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. and Ohlin, J. D., Defending Humanity: When Force is Justified and Why (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Franck, T. M., Recourse to Force. State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Gardam, J., Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Gazzini, T., The Changing Rules on the Use of Force in International Law (Manchester: Juris Publishing/Manchester University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Genoni, M. A. M., Die Notwehr im Völkerrecht (Zurich: Schulthess, 1987).Google Scholar
Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Green, J., The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Greenwood, C., Essays on War in International Law (London: Cameron & May, 2006).Google Scholar
Gutierrez Espada, C., El Estado de Necesidad y el Uso de la Fuerza en Derecho Internacional (Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, 1987).Google Scholar
Heller, K. J., The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Henderson, C., The Persistent Advocate and the Use of Force. The Impact of the United States upon the Jus ad Bellum in the Post-Cold War Era (Surrey: Ashgate, 2010).Google Scholar
Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hummrich, M., Der völkerrechtliche Straftatbestand der Aggression (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2001).Google Scholar
Jennings, R. and Watts, A., Oppenheim’s International Law, 9th edn, vol. I (2 vols., London: Longman, 1992).Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J., Uncertainty in International Law. A Kelsenian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Kamto, K., L’Aggression en droit international (Paris: Editions A. Pedone, 2010).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., Recent Trends in the Law of the United Nations (London: Stevens, 1951).Google Scholar
Klintworth, G., Vietnam’s Intervention in Cambodia (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1989).Google Scholar
Kolb, R., Ius contra Bellum. Le droit international relatif au maintien de la paix, 2nd edn (Basel and Brussels: Helbing Lichtenhahn and Bruylant, 2009).Google Scholar
Kreß, C., Gewaltverbot und Selbstverteidigungsrecht nach der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen bei staatlicher Verwicklung in Gewaltakte Privater (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1995).Google Scholar
Krisch, N., Selbstverteidigung und kollektive Sicherheit (Berlin: Springer, 2001).Google Scholar
Kühn, M., Unilaterale Präventive Selbstverteidigung – Eine Untersuchung zur ‘präventiven Selbstverteidigung’ im Völkerrecht (Frankfurt am Main: Res Publica, 2009).Google Scholar
Lamberti Zanardi, P. L., La Legittima Difesa nel Diritto Internazionale (Milan: A. Giufrè, 1972).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. (ed.), International Law. A Treatise by L. Oppenheim, 7th edn, vol. II (2 vols., New York: David McKay, 1952).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. (ed.), Oppenheim’s International Law. A Treatise, 8th edn, vol. I (2 vols., London: Longmans, 1955).Google Scholar
Lieblich, E., International Law and Civil War. Intervention and Consent (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Lubell, N., Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Melzer, N. (ed.), Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2009).Google Scholar
Murphy, S. D., Kidane, W. and Snider, T. R., Litigating War. Arbitration of Civil Injury by the Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Nolte, G., Eingreifen auf Einladung (Berlin: Springer, 1999).Google Scholar
Nyiri, N., The United Nation’s Search for a Definition of Aggression (New York: Peter Lang, 1989).Google Scholar
Panzera, A. F., Attivita’ Terroristiche e Diritto Internazionale (Naples: Editore Jovene, 1978).Google Scholar
Pillitu, P. A., Lo Stato di Necessità nel Diritto Internazionale (Perugia: Università di Perugia. Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di Giurisprudenza, 1981).Google Scholar
Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar
Pompe, C., Aggressive War an International Crime (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1953).Google Scholar
Reymond, J., L’Attribution de comportements d’organes de facto et d’agents de l’etat en droit international. Etude sur la responsabilité internationale des etats (Geneva: Editions Schulthess, 2013).Google Scholar
Rifaat, A. M., International Aggression. A Study of the Legal Concept: Its Development and Definition in International Law (Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1979).Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter. Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Sayapin, S., The Crime of Aggression in International Criminal Law. Historical Development, Comparative Analysis and Present State (The Hague: Asser Press/Springer, 2014).Google Scholar
Schiffbauer, B., Vorbeugende Selbstverteidigung im Völkerrecht. Eine systematische Ermittlung des gegenwärtigen friedenssicherungsrechtlichen Besitzstandes aus völkerrechtsdogmatischer und praxisanalytischer Sicht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2012).Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., (ed.), Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare. Prepared by the International Group of Experts at the Invitation of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Sellars, K., Crimes Against Peace and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Solera, O., Defining the Crime of Aggression (London: Cameron May, 2007).Google Scholar
Stone, J., Aggression and World Order. A Critique of United Nations Theories of Aggression (London: Stevens, 1958).Google Scholar
Tesón, F. R., Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality, 2nd edn (Irvington-on-Hudson: Transnational, 1997).Google Scholar
Wandscher, C., Internationaler Terrorismus und Selbstverteidigungsrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2006).Google Scholar
Weller, M., Iraq and the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Werle, G. and Jeßberger, F., Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wheeler, N. J., Saving Strangers. Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Wilson, H. A., International Law and the Use of Force by National Liberation Movements (Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Wilson, P., Aggression, Crime and International Security. Moral, Political and Legal Dimensions of International Relations (New York: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Anggadi, F., French, G. and Potter, J., ‘Negotiating the Elements of the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 5897.Google Scholar
Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 357.Google Scholar
Besson, S., ‘Sovereignty’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. IX (10 vols. and index, Oxford University Press, 2012), 366–91.Google Scholar
Blokker, N., ‘Outsourcing the Use of Force: Towards More Security Council Control of Authorized Operations?’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 202–26.Google Scholar
Bowett, D. W., ‘The Use of Force to Protect Nationals Abroad’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Current Regulation of the Use of Force (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), 3955.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, in Moore, J. N. (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), 217–28.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., ‘The Principle of Non-Use of Force in Contemporary International Law’, in Butler, W. E. (ed.), The Non-Use of Force in International Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1989), 1727.Google Scholar
Byers, M. and Chesterman, S., ‘Changing the Rules about Rules? Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention and the Future of International Law’, in Holzgrefe, J. L. and Keohane, R. O. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge University Press, 2003), 177203.Google Scholar
Corten, O., ‘Necessity’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 861–78.Google Scholar
Darcy, S., ‘Retaliation and Reprisal’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 879–96.Google Scholar
Deeks, A. S., ‘Taming the Doctrine of Pre-Emption’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 661–78.Google Scholar
Dekker, I. F. and Werner, W. G., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the Eritrea–Ethiopia Armed Conflict’, in de Guttry, A., Post, H. H. G. and Venturini, G. (eds.), The 1998–2000 War between Eritrea and Ethiopia. An International Legal Perspective (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009), 243–57.Google Scholar
Dominicé, C., ‘Attribution of Conduct to Multiple States and the Implication of a State in the Act of Another State’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010), 281–89.Google Scholar
Emerton, P. and Handfield, T., ‘Understanding the Political Defensive Privilege’, in Fabre, C. and Lazar, S. (eds.), The Morality of Defensive War (Oxford University Press, 2014), 4068.Google Scholar
Falk, R. A., ‘The Cambodian Operation and International Law’, in Falk, R. A. (ed.), The Vietnam War and International Law, vol. III (4 vols., Princeton University Press, 1972), 3357.Google Scholar
Fife, R. E., ‘Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States’, in Bergsmo, M. (ed.), Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden. Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), 5373.Google Scholar
Forteau, M., ‘Rescuing Nationals Abroad’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 947–61.Google Scholar
Fox, G. H., ‘Intervention by Invitation’, in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 816–40.Google Scholar
Gaja, G., ‘The Long Journey towards Repressing Aggression’, in Cassese, A., Gaeta, P. and Jones, J. R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2002), 427–41.Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Military Intervention at the Invitation of a Government’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations (Oxford University Press, 2010), 229–32.Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘When Does Self-Defence End?’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 736–51.Google Scholar
Gray, C., ‘The Protection of Nationals Abroad: Russia’s Use of Force in Georgia’, in Constantinides, A. and Zaikos, N. (eds.), The Diversity of International Law. Essays in Honour of Professor Kalliopi K. Koufa (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 133–51.Google Scholar
Gray, C., ‘The Charter Limitations on the Use of Force: Theory and Practice’, in Lowe, V., Roberts, A., Welsh, J. and Zaum, D. (eds.), The United Nations Security Council and War. The Evolution of Thought and Practice since 1945 (Oxford University Press, 2010), 8698.Google Scholar
Green, J. A., ‘Passportisation, Peacekeepers and Proportionality: The Russian Claim of the Protection of Nationals Abroad in Self-Defence’, in Green, J. A. and Waters, C. P. M. (eds.), Conflict in the Caucasus: Implications for the International Legal Order (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 5479.Google Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘Self-Defence’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. IX (10 vols. and index, Oxford University Press, 2012), 103–13.Google Scholar
Heintschel von Heinegg, W., ‘Blockades and Interdictions’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 925–46.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, J-M., ‘Armed Forces’, in Wolfrum, R., The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. I (10 vols. and index, Oxford University Press, 2012), 637–40.Google Scholar
Hofmann, R., ‘Annexation’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. I (10 vols. and one annex, Oxford University Press, 2012), 409–18.Google Scholar
Jennings, R., ‘International Force and the International Court of Justice’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Current Regulation of the Use of Force (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), 323–35.Google Scholar
Johnstone, I., ‘When the Security Council is Divided: Imprecise Authorizations, Implied Mandates, and the “Unreasonable Veto”’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 227–50.Google Scholar
Keller, H., ‘Friendly Relations Declaration (1970)’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. IV (10 vols. and an annex, Oxford University Press, 2012), 250–60.Google Scholar
Klein, P., ‘The Attribution of Acts to International Organizations’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010), 298315.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘International Criminal Law’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. V (10 vols. and index, Oxford University Press, 2012), 717–32.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Law of Armed Conflicts’, in Tams, C. J. and Sloan, J. (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2013), 263–98.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The Nuremberg Judgment of Crimes against Peace and the Crime of Aggression’, in Universität zu Köln and Japanisches Kulturinstitut (eds.), Beiträge aus dem Symposium Japan and Germany – 150 Years of Cooperation. Dynamics of Traditional Research Societies in a Rapidly Changing World (Munich: Iudicium, 2013), 6980.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘Germany and the Crime of Aggression’, in Linton, S., Simpson, G. and Schabas, W. A. (eds.), For the Sake of Present and Future Generations. Essays on International Law, Crime and Justice in Honour of Roger S. Clark (Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff, 2015), 3151.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The ICC’s First Encounter with the Crime of Genocide. The Case against Al Bashir’, in Stahn, C. (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (Oxford University Press, 2015), 669704.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The International Court of Justice and the “Principle of Non-Use of Force”’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 561604.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., Barriga, S., Grover, L. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘Negotiating the Understandings on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 8197.Google Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘Article 42’, in Simma, B., Khan, D-E., Nolte, G. and Paulus, A. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary, 3rd edn, vol. I (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 1330–50.Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, D., ‘A Study of the Scope and Operation of the Rights of Individual and Collective Self-Defence under International Law’, in White, N. D. and Henderson, C. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law. Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, and Jus post Bellum (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013), 170228.Google Scholar
Lamberti Zanardi, P. L., ‘Indirect Military Aggression’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), 111–19.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, R., ‘Too Much History: From War as Sanction to the Sanctioning of War’ in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 3555.Google Scholar
Lillich, R. B., ‘Humanitarian Intervention: A Reply to Ian Brownlie and a Plea for Constructive Alternatives’, in Moore, J. N. (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), 229–52.Google Scholar
Lubell, N., ‘The Problem of Imminence in an Uncertain World’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 697719.Google Scholar
Mathias, D. S., ‘The United States and the Security Council’, in Blokker, N. and Schrijver, N. (eds.), The Security Council and the Use of Force. Theory and Reality: A Need for Change? (Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 173–88.Google Scholar
McDonald, A. and Bruha, T., ‘Bombardment’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. I (10 vols. and one annex, Oxford University Press, 2012), 979–85.Google Scholar
Moir, L., ‘Action against Host States of Terrorist Groups’, in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 720–36.Google Scholar
Moore, J. N., ‘Legal Dimensions of the Decision to Intercede in Cambodia’, in Falk, R. A. (ed.), The Vietnam War and International Law, vol. III (4 vols., Princeton University Press, 1972), 5895.Google Scholar
Nollkämper, A., ‘Attribution of Forcible Acts to States: Connections between the Law on the Use of Force and the Law of State Responsibility’, in Blokker, N. and Schrijver, N. (eds.), The Security Council and the Use of Force. Theory and Reality – A Need for Change? (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 133–71.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E., ‘The Prohibition of the Use of Force’, in White, N. D. and Henderson, C. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law. Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, and Jus post Bellum (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013), 89119.Google Scholar
Randelzhofer, A. and Dörr, O., ‘Article 2(4)’, in Simma, B., Khan, D-E., Nolte, G. and Paulus, A. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary, 3rd edn, vol. I (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 200–34.Google Scholar
Randelzhofer, A. and Nolte, G., ‘Article 51’, in Simma, B., Khan, D-E., Nolte, G. and Paulus, A. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary, 3rd edn, vol. II (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 1397–428.Google Scholar
Rodin, D., ‘The Myth of National Self-Defence’, in Fabre, C. and Lazar, S. (eds.), The Morality of Defensive War (Oxford University Press, 2014), 6989.Google Scholar
Rodley, N., ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 775–96.Google Scholar
Schindler, D., ‘L’emploi de la force par un etat belligérant sur le territoire d’un etat non belligerent’, in Autores, Varios, Estudios de Derecho Internacional. Homenaje al Professor Miaja de la Muela, vol. II (2 vols., Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, 1979), 847–64.Google Scholar
Schrijver, N., ‘The Ban on the Use of Force in the UN Charter’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 465–87.Google Scholar
Schwebel, S. M., ‘Wars of Liberation: as Fought in U.N. Organs’, in Moore, J. N. (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), 446–57.Google Scholar
Simma, B., ‘Genocide and the International Court of Justice’, in Safferling, C. and Conze, E. (eds.), The Genocide Convention Sixty Years after its Adoption (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2010), 259–72.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. R., ‘United States Military Action in Cambodia: Questions of International Law’, in Falk, R. A. (ed.), The Vietnam War and International Law, vol. III (4 vols., Princeton University Press, 1972), 2332.Google Scholar
Tams, C. J., ‘Prospects for Humanitarian Uses of Force’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), Realizing Utopia. The Future of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), 359–74.Google Scholar
Trapp, K. N., ‘Can Non-State Actors Mount an Armed Attack?’, in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 679–96.Google Scholar
van den Herik, L. and Schrijvers, N. (eds.), ‘Leiden Policy Recommendations on Counter-Terrorism and International Law’, in Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented Legal Order. Meeting the Challenges (Cambridge University Press, 2013), 706–26.Google Scholar
Wählich, M., ‘Peace Settlements and the Prohibition of the Use of Force’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 962–87.Google Scholar
Walter, C., ‘Article 53’, in Simma, B., Khan, D-E., Nolte, G. and Paulus, A. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary, 3rd edn, vol. II (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 1478–524.Google Scholar
Weeramantry, J. R., ‘International Law as to the Use of Force’, in de Guttry, A., Post, H. H. G. and Venturini, G. (eds.), The 1998–2000 War between Eritrea and Ethiopia. An International Legal Perspective (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009), 227–42.Google Scholar
Weller, M., ‘Introduction: International Law and the Problem of War’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 334.Google Scholar
Westdickenberg, G. and Fixson, O., ‘Das Verbrechen der Aggression im Römischen Statut des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofes’, in Frowein, J. Abr., Scharioth, K., Winkelmann, I. and Wolfrum, R. (eds.), Verhandeln für den Frieden/Negotiating for Peace Liber Amicorum Tono Eitel (Berlin: Springer, 2003), 483525.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., ‘Definition of the Crime of Aggression: State Responsibility or Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), 9396.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., ‘Anticipatory Self-Defence against Terrorists’, in van den Herik, L. and Schrijver, N. (eds.), Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order. Meeting the Challenges (Cambridge University Press, 2013), 356–72.Google Scholar
Wippman, D., ‘Pro-Democratic Intervention’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 797815.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. and Freiburg, E., ‘Article 8 bis. Crime of Aggression’, in Triffterer, O. and Ambos, K. (eds.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 3rd edn (Munich: Beck, 2015), 568606.Google Scholar
Ambos, K., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala’, German Yearbook of International Law, 53 (2010), 463509.Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, C., ‘“The Legitimacy to Legitimise”: The Security Council’s Action in Libya under Resolution 1973 (2011)’, International Community Law Review, 14 (2012), 359–79.Google Scholar
Bakircioglu, O., ‘The Right to Self-Defence in National and International Law: The Role of the Imminence Requirement’, Indiana International and Comparative Law Review, 19 (2009), 148.Google Scholar
Bannelier, K., ‘Military Interventions Against ISIL in Iraq, Syria and Libya and the Legal Basis of Consent’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 29 (2016), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bannelier, K. and Christakis, T., ‘Under the Security Council’s Watchful Eyes: Military Intervention by Invitation in the Malian Conflict’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26 (2013), 855–74.Google Scholar
Barriga, S. and Grover, L., ‘A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 105 (2011), 517–33.Google Scholar
Bazyler, M. J., ‘Reexamining the Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention in Light of the Atrocities in Kampuchea and Ethiopia’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 23 (1987), 547619.Google Scholar
Bethlehem, D., ‘Self-Defense against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors, American Journal of International Law, 106 (2012), 770–77.Google Scholar
Beyerlin, U., ‘Die israelische Befreiungsaktion von Entebbe in völkerrechtlicher Sicht’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 37 (1977), 213–43.Google Scholar
Blum, Y. Z., ‘State Response to Acts of Terrorism’, German Yearbook of International Law, 19 (1976), 223–37.Google Scholar
Boon, K. E., ‘Are Control Tests Fit for the Future? The Slippage Problem in Attribution Doctrines’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 15 (2014), 330–77.Google Scholar
Bothe, M., ‘Die Erklärung der Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen über die Definition der Aggression’, Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht, 18 (1975), 127–45.Google Scholar
Bowett, D., ‘Reprisals Involving the Recourse to Armed Force’, American Journal of International Law, 66 (1972), 136.Google Scholar
Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 154 (1977-I), 301–99.Google Scholar
Byers, M., ‘Preemptive Self-Defense: Hegemony, Equality and Strategies of Legal Change’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 11 (2003), 171–90.Google Scholar
Byers, M., ‘Agreeing to Disagree: Security Council Resolution 1441 and Intentional Ambiguity’, Global Governance, 10 (2004), 165–86.Google Scholar
Castellino, J., ‘The Secession of Bangladesh in International Law’, Asian Yearbook of International Law, 7 (1997), 83104.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S. K., ‘Some Legal Problems of Support Role in International Law: Tanzania and Uganda’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 30 (1981), 755–68.Google Scholar
Clark, R. S., ‘Rethinking Aggression as a Crime and Formulating Its Elements: The Final Work-Product of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 15 (2002), 859–90.Google Scholar
Clark, R. S., ‘Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Considered at the first Review Conference on the Court, Kampala, 31 May–11 June 2010’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 689711.Google Scholar
Cryer, R. and Simester, A. P., ‘Iraq and the Use of Force: Do the Side-Effects Justify the Means?’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 7 (2006), 941.Google Scholar
Day, S. F., ‘Legal Considerations in Noncombatant Evacuation Operations’, Naval Law Review, 40 (1992), 4564.Google Scholar
Deeks, A. S., ‘“Unwilling or Unable”: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 52 (2012), 483550.Google Scholar
Deeks, A. S., ‘Consent to the Use of Force and International Law Supremacy’, Harvard International Law Journal, 54 (2013), 160.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, L., ‘The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation of the Government’, British Yearbook of International Law, 56 (1985), 189252.Google Scholar
Eichensehr, K. E., ‘Defending Nationals Abroad: Assessing the Lawfulness of Forcible Hostage Rescues’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 48 (2007–8), 451–84.Google Scholar
Eustathiades, C. T., ‘La définition de l’agression adoptée aux Nations Unies et la légitime défense’, Révue Hellénique de Droit International Law, 28 (1975), 597.Google Scholar
Falk, R. A., ‘The Beirut Raid and the International Law of Retaliation’, American Journal of International Law, 63 (1969), 415–43.Google Scholar
Farer, T. J., ‘The Regulation of Foreign Intervention in Civil Armed Conflict’, Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 142 (1974-II), 297416.Google Scholar
Farer, T. J., ‘Panama: Beyond the Charter Paradigm’, American Journal of International Law, 84 (1990), 503–15.Google Scholar
Fernández de Gurmendi, S. A., ‘The Working Group on Aggression at the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court’, Fordham International Law Journal, 25 (2001–2), 589605.Google Scholar
Fonteyne, J-P.L., ‘The Customary International Law Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention: Its Current Validity under the UN Charter’, California Western International Law Journal, 4 (1974), 203–70.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M., ‘What Happens Now? The United Nations after Iraq’, American Journal of International Law, 97 (2003), 607–20.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M. and Rodley, N. S., ‘After Bangladesh: The Law of Humanitarian Intervention by Military Force’, American Journal of International Law, 67 (1973), 275305.Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘The Temporal Dimension of Self-Defence: Anticipation, Pre-emption, Prevention and Immediacy’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 11 (2006), 361–69.Google Scholar
Glennon, M. J., ‘The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression’, Yale Journal of International Law, 35 (2009), 71114.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. J., ‘Use of Force for the Protection of Nationals Abroad: The Entebbe Incident’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 9 (1977).Google Scholar
Gray, C., ‘The Eritrea/Ethiopia Claims Commission Oversteps its Boundaries: A Partial Award?European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006), 699721.Google Scholar
Green, J., ‘The Ratione Temporis Elements of Self-Defence’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 2 (2015), 97118.Google Scholar
Greig, D. W., ‘Self-Defence and the Security Council: What does Article 51 Require?’, International & Comparative Law Review, 40 (1991), 366402.Google Scholar
Grimal, F. and Melling, G., ‘The Protection of Nationals Abroad: Lawfulness or Toleration? A Commentary’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 16 (2011), 541–54.Google Scholar
Guiden, T., ‘Defending America’s Cambodian Incursion’, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 11 (1994), 215–70.Google Scholar
Guiora, A. N., ‘Self-Defense – From the Wild West to 9/11: Who, What, When’, Cornell International Law Journal, 41 (2008), 631–74.Google Scholar
Hakimi, M., ‘Defensive Force against Non-State Actors: The State of Play’, International Law Studies, 91 (2015), 131.Google Scholar
Halverstam, M., ‘The Right of Self-Defense Once the Security Council Takes Action’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 17 (1996), 229–48.Google Scholar
Hassan, F., ‘Realpolitik in International Law: After Tanzanian–Ugandan Conflict “Humanitarian Intervention Reexamined”’, Willamette Law Review, 17 (1981), 859912.Google Scholar
Heinsch, R., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala: Success or Burden for the Future?’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 713–43.Google Scholar
Heller, K. J., ‘The Uncertain Legal Status of the Aggression Understandings’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 229–48.Google Scholar
Henderson, C., ‘Contested States and the Rights and Obligations of the Jus Ad Bellum’, Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 21 (2013), 367407.Google Scholar
Henderson, C., ‘The Provision of Arms and “Non-Lethal” Assistance to Governmental and Opposition Forces’, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36 (2013), 642–81.Google Scholar
Henderson, C., ‘The UK Government’s Legal Opinion on Forcible Measures in Response to the Use of Chemical Weapons by the Syrian Government’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 64 (2015), 179–96.Google Scholar
Hilpold, P., ‘Humanitarian Intervention: Is There a Need for a Legal Reappraisal?’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001), 437–67.Google Scholar
Hilpold, P., ‘Intervening in the Name of Humanity: R2P and the Power of Ideas’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 17 (2012), 4979.Google Scholar
Jennings, R. Y., ‘The Caroline and McLeod Cases’, American Journal of International Law, 32 (1938), 8299.Google Scholar
Kioko, K., ‘The Right of Intervention under the African Union’s Constitutive Act: From Non-Interference to Non-Intervention’, International Review of the Red Cross, 85 (2003), 807–25.Google Scholar
Koh, H. H. and Buchwald, T. F., ‘The Crime of Aggression: The United States Perspective’, American Journal of International Law, 109 (2015), 257–95.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘Strafrecht und Angriffskrieg im Licht des “Falles Irak”’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 115 (2003), 294351.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The German Chief Federal Prosecutor’s Decision Not to Investigate the Alleged Crime of Preparing Aggression against Iraq’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2 (2004), 245–64.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘Remarks’, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 105 (2011), 160–62.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘Review of “Armed Attack” and Article 51 of the UN Charter. Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice. By Tom Ruys’, British Yearbook of International Law, 83 (2012), 160–70.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 1 (2014), 1154.Google Scholar
Kreß, C. and Tams, C. J., ‘Wider die normative Kraft des Faktischen. Die Krim-Krise aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht’, Internationale Politik, 69 (2014), 1619.Google Scholar
Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, D., ‘The Inherent Right of Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 235–82.Google Scholar
Laursen, A., ‘The Use of Force and (the State of) Necessity’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 37 (2004), 487526.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J. M., ‘All Necessary Means to Protect Civilians: What the Intervention in Libya says about the Relationship between the Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 17 (2012), 117–46.Google Scholar
Lillich, R. B., ‘Forcible Self-Help to Protect Human Rights’, Iowa Law Review, 53 (1967), 325–51.Google Scholar
Lobel, J., ‘The Use of Force to Respond to Terrorist Attacks: the Bombing of Sudan and Afghanistan’, Yale Journal of International Law, 24 (1999), 537–57.Google Scholar
Mancini, M., ‘A Brand New Definition for the Crime of Aggression: The Kampala Outcome’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 81 (2012), 227–48.Google Scholar
Mrazek, J., ‘Prohibition on the Use of Force: Self-Defence and Self-Help in International Law’, Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 27 (1989), 81111.Google Scholar
Müllerson, R., ‘Jus Ad Bellum: Plus ca Change (le Monde) plus c’est la même Chose (le Droit)’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 7 (2002), 149–89.Google Scholar
Nanda, V. P., ‘Tragedies in Northern Iraq, Liberia, Yugoslavia, and Haiti: Revisiting the Validity of Humanitarian Intervention under International Law – Part I’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 20 (1992), 305–34.Google Scholar
Nolte, G., ‘Restoring Peace by Regional Action: International Legal Aspects of the Liberian Conflict’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches und öffentliches Recht, 53 (1993), 603–37.Google Scholar
Nolte, G., ‘The Resolution of the Institut de Droit International on Military Assistance on Request’, Révue Belge de Droit International, (2012), 233–54.Google Scholar
Nolte, G., ‘Multipurpose Self-Defence, Proportionality Disoriented: A Response to David Kretzmer’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 283–90.Google Scholar
Nowrot, K. and Schabacker, E. W., ‘The Use of Force to Restore Democracy: International Legal Implications of the ECOWAS Intervention in Sierra Leone’, American University International Law Review, 14 (1998), 321412.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M., ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 189207.Google Scholar
Ofodile, A. C., ‘The Legality of ECOWAS Intervention in Liberia’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 32 (1994), 380418.Google Scholar
Paulus, A., ‘The War Against Iraq and the Future of International Law: Hegemony or Pluralism?Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004), 691733.Google Scholar
Paust, J. J., ‘Entebbe and Self-Help: the Israeli Response to Terrorism’, Fletcher Forum, 2 (1978), 8691.Google Scholar
Payandeh, M., ‘The United Nations, Military Intervention, and Regime Change in Libya’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 52 (2012), 355403.Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Extraterritorial Naturalizations: Between the Human Right to Nationality, State Sovereignty and Fair Principles of Jurisdiction’, German Yearbook of International Law, 53 (2010), 623725.Google Scholar
Quigley, J., ‘The Legality of the United States Invasion of Panama’, Yale Journal of International Law, 15 (1990), 276315.Google Scholar
Raby, J., ‘The State of Necessity and the Use of Force to Protect Nationals’, Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 26 (1988), 253–72.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. M., ‘Coercion and Self-Determination: Construing Charter Article 2(4)’, American Journal of International Law, 78 (1984), 642–45.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. M., ‘Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 84 (1990), 866–76.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. M. and Armstrong, A., ‘The Past and Future of the Claim of Preemptive Self-Defense’, American Journal of International Law, 100 (2006), 525–50.Google Scholar
Roberts, A., ‘The So-Called Right of Humanitarian Intervention’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3 (2000), 351.Google Scholar
Roberts, A., ‘Law and the Use of Force After Iraq’, Survival, 45 (2003), 3156.Google Scholar
Rockefeller, M. L., ‘The “Imminent Threat” Requirement for the Use of Preemptive Military Force: Is it Time for a Non-Temporal Standard?’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 33 (2004), 131–49.Google Scholar
Röling, B. V. A., ‘On Aggression, on International Criminal Law, on International Criminal Jurisdiction’, Nederlands Tidschrift Voor Internationaal Recht, 2 (1955), 167–96.Google Scholar
Ronzitti, N., ‘Expanding Law of Self-Defence’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 11 (2006), 343–59.Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘Crossing the Thin Blue Line: An Inquiry into Israel’s Recourse to Self-Defense against Hezbollah’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 43 (2007), 265–94.Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘The “Protection of Nationals” Doctrine Revisited’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 13 (2008), 233–71.Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘Of Arms, Funding and “Non-lethal Assistance”: Issues Surrounding Third State Intervention in the Syrian Civil War’, Chinese Journal of International Law, 13 (2014), 1353.Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘The Meaning of “Force” and the Boundaries of the Jus Ad Bellum: Are “Minimal” Uses of Force Excluded from UN Charter Article 2(4)?’, American Journal of International Law, 108 (2014), 159210.Google Scholar
Schachter, O., ‘The Right of States to Use Armed Force’, Michigan Law Review, 82 (1984), 1620–46.Google Scholar
Schachter, O., ‘The Lawful Use of Force by a State against Terrorists in Another Country’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, 19 (1989), 209–31.Google Scholar
Scheffer, D., ‘The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 897904.Google Scholar
Schindler, D., ‘Die Grenzen des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltverbots’, Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht, 26 (1985), 1141.Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, K., ‘Das Verbrechen der Aggression vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof: Ein politischer Erfolg mit rechtlichen Untiefen’, Juristen Zeitung, 65 (2010), 745–52.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Counter-Terrorism and the Use of Force in International Law’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, 32 (2002), 53116.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Preemptive Strategies in International Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 24 (2003), 515–48.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘“Change Direction” 2006: Israeli Operations in Lebanon and the International Law of Self-Defense’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 29 (2007–8), 127–64.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Responding to Transnational Terrorism under the Jus Ad Bellum: A Normative Framework’, Naval Law Review, 56 (2008), 142.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘The Syrian Intervention: Assessing the Possible International Law Justifications’, International Law Studies, 89 (2013), 744–56.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Legitimacy versus Legality Redux: Arming the Syrian Rebels’, Journal of National Security Law and Policy, 7 (2014), 139–59.Google Scholar
Schweisfurth, T., ‘Operations to Rescue Nationals in Third States Involving the Use of Force in Relation to Human Rights’, German Yearbook of International Law, 23 (1980), 159–80.Google Scholar
Sciso, E., ‘L’Aggressione Indiretta nella Definizione dell’Assemblea Generale delle Nazione Unite’, Rivista di Diritto Internazionale, 66 (1983), 253–90.Google Scholar
Shah, N. A., ‘Self-defence, Anticipatory Self-defence and Pre-emption: International Law’s Response to Terrorism’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 12 (2007), 95126.Google Scholar
Shah, N. A., ‘The Use of Force under Islamic Law’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 343–65.Google Scholar
Sofaer, A. D., ‘On the Necessity of Pre-emption’, European Journal of International Law, 14 (2003), 209–26.Google Scholar
Solera, O., ‘The Definition of the Crime of Aggression: Lessons Not Learned’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 42 (2010), 801–21.Google Scholar
Stahn, C., ‘Terrorist Acts as “Armed Attack”: The Right of Self-Defense, Article 51 (1/2) of the UN Charter, and International Terrorism’, Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 27 (2003), 3554.Google Scholar
Stone, J., ‘Hopes and Loopholes in the 1974 Definition of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 71 (1977), 224–46.Google Scholar
Taft, W. H. IV, ‘Self-Defence and the Oil Platforms Decision’, Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (2004), 295306.Google Scholar
Talmon, S., ‘Recognition of Opposition Groups as the Legitimate Representative of a People’, Chinese Journal of International Law, 12 (2013), 219–53.Google Scholar
Tams, C., ‘The Use of Force against Terrorists’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 359–97.Google Scholar
Tladi, D., ‘The Nonconsenting State: The Problem with Bethlehem’s Principle 12’, American Journal of International Law, 107 (2013), 570–76.Google Scholar
Trahan, J., ‘Defining “Aggression”: Why the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court Has Faced Such a Conundrum’, Loyola Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 24 (2002), 439774.Google Scholar
Trahan, J., ‘The Rome Statute’s Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference’, International Criminal Law Review, 11 (2011), 49104.Google Scholar
Trahan, J., ‘Defining the “Grey Area” where Humanitarian Intervention may not be Fully Legal, but is not the Crime of Aggression’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 2 (2015), 4280.Google Scholar
Van Schaack, B., ‘Negotiating at the Interface of Power & Law: The Crime of Aggression’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 49 (2011), 505601.Google Scholar
Waldock, C. H. M., ‘The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law’, Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 81 (1952-II), 451517.Google Scholar
Walzer, W., ‘The Crime of Aggressive War’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007) 635–43.Google Scholar
Wenaweser, C., ‘Reaching the Kampala Compromise on Aggression: The Chair’s Perspective’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 883–87.Google Scholar
Weston, B. H., ‘Security Council Resolution 678 and Persian Gulf Decision-Making: Precarious Legitimacy’, American Journal of International Law, 85 (1991), 516–35.Google Scholar
Wills, A. G., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the Resort to Force against Entities in Statu Nascendi’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012) 83110.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., ‘Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force in Self-Defence’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55 (2006), 963–72.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘International Law and the Use of Force: What Happens in Practice?’ Indian Yearbook of International Law (2013), 345–67.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, F. and Elias, O., ‘Humanitarian Considerations in the Work of the United Nations Compensation Commission’, International Review of the Red Cross, 85 (2003), 555–81.Google Scholar
Yost, D. S., ‘NATO and the Anticipatory Use of Force’, International Affairs, 83 (2007), 3968.Google Scholar
Zedalis, R., Protection of Nationals Abroad: Is Consent the Basis for Legal Obligation?’, Texas Journal of International Law 25 (1990), 209–70.Google Scholar
Zourek, Z., ‘Enfin une définition de l’agression’, Annuaire Français de Droit International, 20 (1974), 930.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ Reports (2007), 43.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co. Ltd (New Application 1962) (Belgium v. Spain), Second Phase, ICJ Reports (1970), 3.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium), Provisional Measures of 10 May 1999, CR 99/15.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium), Oral Proceedings, Public Sitting, 10 May 1999.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium), ICJ Reports (2004), 279.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (2003), 161.Google Scholar
Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Islamic Republic of Iran), ICJ Reports (1980), 3.Google Scholar
House of Lords, R v. Jones et al. [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark and the Netherlands), ICJ Reports (1969), 3.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, ICTY-94-1-AR72, 2 October 1995.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadić, Judgment, ICTY-94-1-A, 14 July 1999.Google Scholar
‘A Just and Lasting Peace’, Nobel Lecture by Barack H. Obama, 10 December 2009.Google Scholar
Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2010), 403.Google Scholar
Ago, R., ‘Addendum to the 8th Report on State Responsibility’, Yb ILC (1980), vol. II(1), 1370.Google Scholar
Council of Europe, ‘Venice Commission’, ‘Opinion on the Federal Law on the Amendments to the Federal Law on Defence of the Russian Federation’, Opinion No. 572/2010, 21 December 2010, CDL-AD(2010)052.Google Scholar
Independent International Fact Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia, Report, vol. II (3 vols., September 2009).Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Le Principe de Non-intervention dans le Guerres Civiles. 15 August 1975’, Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, 56 (1975), 544–49.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Problèmes Actuels du Recours à la Force en Droit International. La Légitime Défense’, 10ième Commission sous.groupe A (27 October 2007).Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Military Assistance on Request’, 10th Commission – Sub-group C (8 September 2011).Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar
United Nations, Documents of the United Nations Conference on International Organization, vol. VI (22 vols., New York: United Nations Publications, 1945).Google Scholar
United Nations, Historical Review of Developments relating to Aggression (New York: United Nations Publications, 2003).Google Scholar
US Government, ‘The National Security Strategy of the United States of America’, The White House, Washington, DC, 17 September 2002.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×