Entry into Force and Conditions for the Exercise of Jurisdiction: Cross-Cutting Issues

Stefan Barriga; Niels Blokker

doi:10.1017/9781139058360.019

17 - Entry into Force and Conditions for the Exercise of Jurisdiction: Cross-Cutting Issues

from Part III - Crime of Aggression under Current International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2017

Stefan Barriga and

Niels Blokker

Edited by

Claus Kreß and

Stefan Barriga

Show author details

Claus Kreß: Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Stefan Barriga: Affiliation:
United Nations, New York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Crime of Aggression
A Commentary
, pp. 621 - 645

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139058360.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Ambos, K., Treatise on International Criminal Law, vol. II (3 vols., Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C., The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Corten, O. and Klein, P. (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

International Criminal Court, Selected Basic Documents Related to the International Criminal Court (The Hague: International Criminal Court, 2011).Google Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McNair, A. D., The Law of Treaties (Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Reuter, P., Introduction to the Law of Treaties, translated by Mico, J. and Haggenmacher, P., 2nd edn (London: Kegan Paul, 1995).Google Scholar

Sayapin, S., The Crime of Aggression in International Criminal Law: Historical Development, Comparative Analysis and Present State (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2014).CrossRef Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Triffterer, O., Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Munich: Beck, 2008).Google Scholar

United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, Historical Review of Developments relating to Aggression (New York: United Nations, 2003).Google Scholar

Villiger, M. E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Anggadi, F., French, G. and Potter, J., ‘Negotiating the Elements of the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 58–80.Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Exercise of Jurisdiction and Entry into Force of the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Dive, G., Goes, B. and Vandermeersch, D. (eds.), From Rome to Kampala: The First Two Amendments to the Rome Statute (Brussels: Éditions Bruylant, 2012), 31–53.Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 3–57.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Wenaweser, C., ‘Forks in the Road: Personal Reflections on Negotiating the Kampala Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Linton, S., Simpson, G. and Schabas, W. (eds.), For the Sake of Present and Future Generations: Essays on International Law, Crime and Justice in Honour of Roger S. Clark (Leiden: Brill, 2015), 283–97.Google Scholar

Brunnée, J., ‘Treaty Amendments’, in Hollis, D. B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford University Press, 2012), 347–66.Google Scholar

Condorelli, L. and Villalpando, S., ‘Referral and Deferral by the Security Council’, in Cassese, A., Gaeta, P., Jones, J. R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press, 2002), 627–55.Google Scholar

Gardiner, R., ‘The Vienna Convention Rules on Treaty Interpretation’, in Hollis, D. B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford University Press, 2012), 475–506.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., Barriga, S., Grover, L. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘Negotiating the Understandings on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 81–97.Google Scholar

Murphy, S. D., ‘The Crime of Aggression at the ICC’, in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook on the Use of Force (Oxford University Press, 2013), 533–60.Google Scholar

Wagner, M., ‘The ICC and its Jurisdiction: Myths, Misperceptions and Realities’, in von Bogdandy, A. and Wolfrum, R. (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (Leiden: Brill, 2003), 409–502.Google Scholar

Akande, D., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Security Council: Is there Room for Judicial Control of Decisions of the Political Organs of the United Nations?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 46 (1997), 309–43.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. E., ‘Judging the Security Council’, American Journal of International Law, 90 (1996), 1–39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Grover, L., ‘A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 105 (2011), 517–33.Google Scholar

Blokker, N. and Kreß, C., ‘A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 889–95.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Ambiguities in Articles 5(2), 121 and 123 of the Rome Statute’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 41 (2009), 413–27.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Considered at the First Review Conference on the Court, Kampala, 31 May–11 June 2010’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 689–711.Google Scholar

Heinsch, R., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala: Success or Burden for the Future?’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 713–43.Google Scholar

Koh, H. H. and Buchwald, T. F., ‘The Crime of Aggression: The United States Perspective’, American Journal of International Law, 109 (2015), 257–95.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Manson, R., ‘Identifying the Rough Edges of the Kampala Compromise’, Criminal Law Forum, 21 (2010), 417–43.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001), 247–68.CrossRef Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Aggression and Legality: Custom in Kampala’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 165–87.Google Scholar

Politi, M., ‘The ICC and the Crime of Aggression: A Dream that Came Through and the Reality Ahead’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 267–88.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘The International Criminal Court’s Exercise of Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression – at Last … in Reach … over Some’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 745–89.Google Scholar

Roberts, K., ‘Second-Guessing the Security Council: The International Court of Justice and its Powers of Judicial Review’, Pace International Law Review, 7 (1995), 281–327.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘The Complex Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 897–904.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, K., ‘Das Verbrechen der Aggression vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof: Ein politischer Erfolg mit rechtlichen Untiefen’, Juristen Zeitung, 65 (2010), 745–52.Google Scholar

Trahan, J., ‘The Rome Statute’s Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference’, International Criminal Law Review, 11 (2011), 49–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Van Schaack, B., ‘Negotiating at the Interface of Power and Law: The Crime of Aggression’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 49 (2011), 505–601.Google Scholar

Watson, G. R., ‘Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and the World Court’, Harvard International Law Journal, 34 (1993), 1–45.Google Scholar

Weisbord, N., ‘Bargaining Practices: Negotiating the Kampala Compromise for the International Criminal Court’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 76 (2014), 85–117.Google Scholar

Wenaweser, C., ‘Reaching the Kampala Compromise on Aggression: The Chair’s Perspective’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 883–87.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A., ‘Amending the Amendment Provisions of the Rome Statute: The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression and the Law of Treaties’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 209–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Review Conference RC/Res.5, ‘Amendments to Article 8 of the Rome Statute’, 10 June 2010, in Review Conference Official Records, RC/11, part II, 13.Google Scholar

Resolution ICC-ASP/9/Res.3, ‘Strengthening the International Criminal Court and the Assembly of States Parties’, 10 December 2010.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1593 (2005) concerning Sudan, 31 March 2005, UN Doc. S/RES/1593.Google Scholar

Security Council, Resolution 1970 (2011) concerning peace and security in Africa, 26 February 2011, UN Doc. S/RES/1970.Google Scholar