McCarthy, C., Reparations and Victim Support in the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Pikis, G. M., The Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court: Analysis of the Statute, the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, the Regulations of the Court and Supplementary Instruments (Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayapin, S., The Crime of Aggression in International Criminal Law: Historical Development, Comparative Analysis and Present State (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2014).Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Shelton, D., Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 3–57.Google Scholar

Broomhall, B., ‘Commentary on Article 51: Rules of Procedure and Evidence’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn (Munich: Beck, 2008), 1033–52.Google Scholar

Donat-Cattin, D., ‘Commentary on Article 75: Reparations to Victims’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn (Munich: Beck, 2008), 1399–1412.Google Scholar

Eckelmans, F., ‘The ICC’s Practice on Victim Participation’, in Bonacker, T. and Safferling, C. (eds.), Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2013), 189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernández de Gurmendi, F., ‘Definition of Victims and General Principles’, in Lee, R. (ed.), The International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 2001), 427–34.Google Scholar

Fernández de Gurmendi, F., ‘Final Reflection: The Challenges of the International Criminal Court’, in Olasolo, H. (ed.), Essays on International Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart, 2012), 194–98.Google Scholar

Gowlland-Debbas, V., ‘Some Remarks on Compensation for War Damages under Jus Ad Bellum’, in de Guttry, A., Venturini, G. and Post, H. H. G. (eds.), The 1998–2000 War between Eritrea and Ethiopia (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009), 435–48.Google Scholar

Jennings, M., ‘Commentary on Article 79: Trust Fund for Victims’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn (Munich: Beck, 2008), 1439–42.Google Scholar

Koutroulis, V., ‘Use of Force in Arbitrations and Fact-Finding Reports’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 605–26.Google Scholar

Olasolo, H. and Kiss, A., ‘Victims Participation According to the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court’, in Olasolo, H. (ed.), Essays on International Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart, 2012), 143–75.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., ‘International Recognition of Victims’ Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 6 (2006), 203–79.Google Scholar

Boeving, J. N., ‘Aggression, International Law and the ICC: An Argument for the Withdrawal of Aggression from the Rome Statute’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43 (2004–5), 557–611.Google Scholar

Creegan, E., ‘Justified Uses of Force and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 59–82.Google Scholar

Friman, H., ‘The International Criminal Court and Participation of Victims: A Third Party to the Proceedings?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 22 (2009), 485–500.Google Scholar

Greenwood, C., ‘The Relationship between Ius ad Bellum and Ius in Bello’, Review of International Studies, 9 (1983), 221–34.Google Scholar

Kretzmer, D., ‘Targeted Killings of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence?’, European Journal of International Law, 16 (2005), 171–212.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Mallinder, L., ‘Can Amnesties and International Justice be Reconciled?’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1 (2007), 208–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, C., ‘Victim Redress and International Criminal Justice: Competing Paradigms, or Compatible Forms of Justice?’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orentlicher, D., ‘Settling Accounts Revisited: Reconciling Global Norms and Local Agency’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1 (2007), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, A., ‘The Equal Application of the Laws of War: A Principle under Pressure’, International Review of the Red Cross, 90(872) (2008), 931–62.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, F., ‘Individual Civil Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 249–65.Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Delegitimizing Aggression: First Steps and False Starts after the First World War’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 7–40.Google Scholar

Stahn, C., ‘The “End”, the “Beginning of the End” or the “End of the Beginning”? Introducing Debates and Voices on the Definition of “Aggression”’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 875–82.Google Scholar

Trahan, J., ‘The Rome Statute’s Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference’, International Criminal Law Review, 11 (2011), 49–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Braun, L. and Micus, A., ‘Judicial Independence at Risk: Critical Issues regarding the Crime of Aggression Raised by Selected Human Rights Organizations’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 111–32.Google Scholar

Zegveld, L., ‘Victims’ Reparations Claims and International Criminal Courts’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 79–111.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 116.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus, Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Hearing on the Confirmation of the Charges, ICC-02/05-03/09-89, 29 October 2010.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, Fourth Decision on Victims’ Participation, ICC-01/05-01/08, 12 December 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, Decision (i) ruling on legal representatives’ applications to question Witness 33 and (ii) setting a schedule for the filing of submissions in relation to future applications to question witnesses, ICC-01/05-01/08-1729, 9 September 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Katanga/Chui, Decision on the Set of Procedural Rights Attached to Procedural Status of Victim at the Pre-Trial Stage of the Case, ICC-01/04-01/07, 13 May 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Katanga/Chui, Grounds for the Decision on the 345 Applications for Participation in the Proceedings Submitted by Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-1491-Red-tENG, 23 September 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, Decision on Victims’ Participation and Victims’ Common Legal Representation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-02/11-01/11-138, 4 June 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, Second Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-02/11-01/11-384, 6 February 2013.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings Submitted by VPRS 1 to VPRS 6 in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/06-172, 29 June 2006.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Victims’ Participation, ICC-01/04-01/06-1119, 18 January 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment on the Appeals of the Prosecutor and the Defence against Trial Chamber I’s Decision on Victims’ Participation of 18 January 2008, ICC-01/04-01/06-1432, 10 July 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Annex 1 Decision on the Applications by Victims to Participate in the Proceedings, ICC-01/04-01/06-1556-Corr-Anx1, 15 December 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Redacted Version of ‘Decision on “Indirect Victims”’, ICC-01/04-01/06-1813, 8 April 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Redacted Version of the Corrigendum of Decision on the Applications by 15 Victims to Participate in the Proceedings, ICC-01/04-01/06-2659-Corr-Red, 8 February 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06-2842, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06-2901, 10 July 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to be Applied to Reparations, ICC-01/04-01/06-2904, 7 August 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment on the Appeals Against the “Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to be Applied to Reparations” of 7 August 2012 with AMENDED Order for Reparations (Annex A) and Public Annexes 1 and 2, ICC-01/04-01/06-3129, 3 March 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Muthaura et al., Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-01/09-02/11-267, 26 August 2011.Google Scholar

Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings of VPRS 1, VPRS 2, VPRS 3, VPRS 4, VPRS 5 and VPRS 6, ICC-01/04-101-tEN-Corr, 17 January 2006.Google Scholar

Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Corrigendum to the ‘Decision on the Applications for Participation Filed in Connection with the Investigation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’, ICC-1/04-423-Corr, 31 January 2008.Google Scholar

Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Order to the VPRS Concerning Victims’ Representations Pursuant to Article 15(3) of the Statute, ICC-01/09-4, 10 December 2009.Google Scholar

Situation in Uganda, Decision on Victims’ Applications for Participation a/0010/06, a/0064/06 to a/0070/06, a/0081/06 to a/0104/06 and a/0111/06 to a/0127/06, ICC-02/04, 10 August 2007.Google Scholar

Al-Skeini and Others v. United Kingdom [GC], No. 55721/07, ECHR 2011.Google Scholar

Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission, Final Award between the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the State of Eritrea, Ethiopia’s Damages Claims, 17 August 2009.Google Scholar

Hassan v. United Kingdom [GC], No. 29750/09, ECHR 2014.Google Scholar

United Nations Claims Commission, Governing Council Decision 1, Criteria for Expedited Processing of Urgent Claims, UN Doc. S/AC.26/1991/1, 2 August 1991.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 116.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus, Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Hearing on the Confirmation of the Charges, ICC-02/05-03/09-89, 29 October 2010.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, Fourth Decision on Victims’ Participation, ICC-01/05-01/08, 12 December 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, Decision (i) ruling on legal representatives’ applications to question Witness 33 and (ii) setting a schedule for the filing of submissions in relation to future applications to question witnesses, ICC-01/05-01/08-1729, 9 September 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Katanga/Chui, Decision on the Set of Procedural Rights Attached to Procedural Status of Victim at the Pre-Trial Stage of the Case, ICC-01/04-01/07, 13 May 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Katanga/Chui, Grounds for the Decision on the 345 Applications for Participation in the Proceedings Submitted by Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-1491-Red-tENG, 23 September 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, Decision on Victims’ Participation and Victims’ Common Legal Representation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-02/11-01/11-138, 4 June 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, Second Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-02/11-01/11-384, 6 February 2013.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings Submitted by VPRS 1 to VPRS 6 in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/06-172, 29 June 2006.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Victims’ Participation, ICC-01/04-01/06-1119, 18 January 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment on the Appeals of the Prosecutor and the Defence against Trial Chamber I’s Decision on Victims’ Participation of 18 January 2008, ICC-01/04-01/06-1432, 10 July 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Annex 1 Decision on the Applications by Victims to Participate in the Proceedings, ICC-01/04-01/06-1556-Corr-Anx1, 15 December 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Redacted Version of ‘Decision on “Indirect Victims”’, ICC-01/04-01/06-1813, 8 April 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Redacted Version of the Corrigendum of Decision on the Applications by 15 Victims to Participate in the Proceedings, ICC-01/04-01/06-2659-Corr-Red, 8 February 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06-2842, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06-2901, 10 July 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to be Applied to Reparations, ICC-01/04-01/06-2904, 7 August 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment on the Appeals Against the “Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to be Applied to Reparations” of 7 August 2012 with AMENDED Order for Reparations (Annex A) and Public Annexes 1 and 2, ICC-01/04-01/06-3129, 3 March 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Muthaura et al., Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-01/09-02/11-267, 26 August 2011.Google Scholar

Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings of VPRS 1, VPRS 2, VPRS 3, VPRS 4, VPRS 5 and VPRS 6, ICC-01/04-101-tEN-Corr, 17 January 2006.Google Scholar

Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Corrigendum to the ‘Decision on the Applications for Participation Filed in Connection with the Investigation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’, ICC-1/04-423-Corr, 31 January 2008.Google Scholar

Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Order to the VPRS Concerning Victims’ Representations Pursuant to Article 15(3) of the Statute, ICC-01/09-4, 10 December 2009.Google Scholar

Situation in Uganda, Decision on Victims’ Applications for Participation a/0010/06, a/0064/06 to a/0070/06, a/0081/06 to a/0104/06 and a/0111/06 to a/0127/06, ICC-02/04, 10 August 2007.Google Scholar

Al-Skeini and Others v. United Kingdom [GC], No. 55721/07, ECHR 2011.Google Scholar

Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission, Final Award between the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the State of Eritrea, Ethiopia’s Damages Claims, 17 August 2009.Google Scholar

Hassan v. United Kingdom [GC], No. 29750/09, ECHR 2014.Google Scholar

United Nations Claims Commission, Governing Council Decision 1, Criteria for Expedited Processing of Urgent Claims, UN Doc. S/AC.26/1991/1, 2 August 1991.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A/RES/60/147.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A/RES/40/34.Google Scholar

ICTR, Rules of Procedure and Evidence (adopted 29 June 1995), as amended 10 April 2013.Google Scholar

ICTY, Rules of Procedure and Evidence (adopted 11 February 1994), as amended 22 May 2013.Google Scholar

ILC, Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection, General Assembly, 61st Session. [Provisional Verbatim Record], Supplement No. 10 (A/61/10), 2006.Google Scholar

ILC, Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), 2001.Google Scholar

Orentlicher, D., ‘Impunity: Report of the Independent Expert to Update the Set of Principles to Combat Impunity: Addendum’, E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1., 2005.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 687 (1991) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 3 April 1991, UN Doc. S/RES/687.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 692 (1991) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 20 May 1991, UN Doc. S/RES/692.Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment 29: States of Emergency’, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11, 2001.Google Scholar

Assembly of States Parties, ‘Report of the Bureau on Stocktaking: The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities’, ICC-ASP/8/49, 18 March 2010.Google Scholar

Assembly of States Parties, Resolution ICC-ASP/3/Res.7 Establishment of the Secretariat of the Trust Fund for Victims (adopted 10 September 2004).Google Scholar

Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-ASP/4/Res.3 (adopted 3 December 2005).Google Scholar

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, ‘The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities’, RC/ST/V/INF.4, 30 May 2010.Google Scholar

African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (adopted 17 June 1981, entered into force 21 October 1986), CAB/LEG/67/3 rev.5.Google Scholar

American Convention on Human Rights (adopted 22 November 1969, entered into force 18 July 1978), OEA/Ser. L/V/II.Google Scholar

Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (adopted 10 December 1984, entered into force 26 June 1987), 1465 UNTS 85.Google Scholar

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights as Amended by Protocols 11 and 14 (adopted 4 November 1950, entered into force 3 September 1953), ETS 5.Google Scholar

International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance (adopted 20 December 2006, entered into force 23 December 2010), 2716 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976), 999 UNTS 171.Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 23 May 1969, entered into force 27 January 1980), 1155 UNTS 331.Google Scholar

African Union, Decision on the Report of the Commission on the Meeting of African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal, Doc. Assembly/AU/13 (XIII) 3, Assembly/AU/Dec. 245(XIII).Google Scholar

Agreement between the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Government of the State of Eritrea, 12 December 2000.Google Scholar

Amnesty International, ‘International Criminal Court: Making the Right Choices at the Review Conference’, 2010.Google Scholar

Coalition for the International Criminal Court, ‘Report on the First Review Conference on the Rome Statute’, 2010.Google Scholar

Ferencz, B., ‘Illegal Armed Force as a Crime against Humanity’, available at: http://crimeofaggression.info/documents/5/Ferencz_B_Illegal_Armed_Force.pdf, last accessed 28 September 2014.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, J. and Doswald-Beck, L., Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol. 1: Rules (ICRC, Cambridge University Press, 2005), available at: www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Seminar on Victim’s Access to the ICC, Paris, 27–29 April 1999, UN Doc. PCNICC/1999/INF/2 and PCNICC/1999/L.5/Add.1.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. and Lee, D. (eds.), US Operational Law Handbook 2014 (Charlottesville, VA: International and Operational Law Department, Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, 2014).Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Germany (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), in Parry, C. (ed.), Consolidated Treaty Series, vol. CCXXV (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1969–81).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A/RES/60/147.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A/RES/40/34.Google Scholar

ICTR, Rules of Procedure and Evidence (adopted 29 June 1995), as amended 10 April 2013.Google Scholar

ICTY, Rules of Procedure and Evidence (adopted 11 February 1994), as amended 22 May 2013.Google Scholar

ILC, Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection, General Assembly, 61st Session. [Provisional Verbatim Record], Supplement No. 10 (A/61/10), 2006.Google Scholar

ILC, Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), 2001.Google Scholar

Orentlicher, D., ‘Impunity: Report of the Independent Expert to Update the Set of Principles to Combat Impunity: Addendum’, E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1., 2005.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 687 (1991) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 3 April 1991, UN Doc. S/RES/687.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 692 (1991) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 20 May 1991, UN Doc. S/RES/692.Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment 29: States of Emergency’, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11, 2001.Google Scholar

Assembly of States Parties, ‘Report of the Bureau on Stocktaking: The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities’, ICC-ASP/8/49, 18 March 2010.Google Scholar

Assembly of States Parties, Resolution ICC-ASP/3/Res.7 Establishment of the Secretariat of the Trust Fund for Victims (adopted 10 September 2004).Google Scholar

Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-ASP/4/Res.3 (adopted 3 December 2005).Google Scholar

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, ‘The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities’, RC/ST/V/INF.4, 30 May 2010.Google Scholar

African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (adopted 17 June 1981, entered into force 21 October 1986), CAB/LEG/67/3 rev.5.Google Scholar

American Convention on Human Rights (adopted 22 November 1969, entered into force 18 July 1978), OEA/Ser. L/V/II.Google Scholar

Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (adopted 10 December 1984, entered into force 26 June 1987), 1465 UNTS 85.Google Scholar

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights as Amended by Protocols 11 and 14 (adopted 4 November 1950, entered into force 3 September 1953), ETS 5.Google Scholar

International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance (adopted 20 December 2006, entered into force 23 December 2010), 2716 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976), 999 UNTS 171.Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 23 May 1969, entered into force 27 January 1980), 1155 UNTS 331.Google Scholar

African Union, Decision on the Report of the Commission on the Meeting of African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal, Doc. Assembly/AU/13 (XIII) 3, Assembly/AU/Dec. 245(XIII).Google Scholar

Agreement between the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Government of the State of Eritrea, 12 December 2000.Google Scholar

Amnesty International, ‘International Criminal Court: Making the Right Choices at the Review Conference’, 2010.Google Scholar

Coalition for the International Criminal Court, ‘Report on the First Review Conference on the Rome Statute’, 2010.Google Scholar

Ferencz, B., ‘Illegal Armed Force as a Crime against Humanity’, available at: http://crimeofaggression.info/documents/5/Ferencz_B_Illegal_Armed_Force.pdf, last accessed 28 September 2014.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, J. and Doswald-Beck, L., Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol. 1: Rules (ICRC, Cambridge University Press, 2005), available at: www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Seminar on Victim’s Access to the ICC, Paris, 27–29 April 1999, UN Doc. PCNICC/1999/INF/2 and PCNICC/1999/L.5/Add.1.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. and Lee, D. (eds.), US Operational Law Handbook 2014 (Charlottesville, VA: International and Operational Law Department, Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, 2014).Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Germany (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), in Parry, C. (ed.), Consolidated Treaty Series, vol. CCXXV (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1969–81).Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 116.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus, Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Hearing on the Confirmation of the Charges, ICC-02/05-03/09-89, 29 October 2010.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, Fourth Decision on Victims’ Participation, ICC-01/05-01/08, 12 December 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, Decision (i) ruling on legal representatives’ applications to question Witness 33 and (ii) setting a schedule for the filing of submissions in relation to future applications to question witnesses, ICC-01/05-01/08-1729, 9 September 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Katanga/Chui, Decision on the Set of Procedural Rights Attached to Procedural Status of Victim at the Pre-Trial Stage of the Case, ICC-01/04-01/07, 13 May 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Katanga/Chui, Grounds for the Decision on the 345 Applications for Participation in the Proceedings Submitted by Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-1491-Red-tENG, 23 September 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, Decision on Victims’ Participation and Victims’ Common Legal Representation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-02/11-01/11-138, 4 June 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, Second Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-02/11-01/11-384, 6 February 2013.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings Submitted by VPRS 1 to VPRS 6 in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/06-172, 29 June 2006.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Victims’ Participation, ICC-01/04-01/06-1119, 18 January 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment on the Appeals of the Prosecutor and the Defence against Trial Chamber I’s Decision on Victims’ Participation of 18 January 2008, ICC-01/04-01/06-1432, 10 July 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Annex 1 Decision on the Applications by Victims to Participate in the Proceedings, ICC-01/04-01/06-1556-Corr-Anx1, 15 December 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Redacted Version of ‘Decision on “Indirect Victims”’, ICC-01/04-01/06-1813, 8 April 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Redacted Version of the Corrigendum of Decision on the Applications by 15 Victims to Participate in the Proceedings, ICC-01/04-01/06-2659-Corr-Red, 8 February 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06-2842, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06-2901, 10 July 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to be Applied to Reparations, ICC-01/04-01/06-2904, 7 August 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment on the Appeals Against the “Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to be Applied to Reparations” of 7 August 2012 with AMENDED Order for Reparations (Annex A) and Public Annexes 1 and 2, ICC-01/04-01/06-3129, 3 March 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Muthaura et al., Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings, ICC-01/09-02/11-267, 26 August 2011.Google Scholar

Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings of VPRS 1, VPRS 2, VPRS 3, VPRS 4, VPRS 5 and VPRS 6, ICC-01/04-101-tEN-Corr, 17 January 2006.Google Scholar

Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Corrigendum to the ‘Decision on the Applications for Participation Filed in Connection with the Investigation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’, ICC-1/04-423-Corr, 31 January 2008.Google Scholar

Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Order to the VPRS Concerning Victims’ Representations Pursuant to Article 15(3) of the Statute, ICC-01/09-4, 10 December 2009.Google Scholar

Situation in Uganda, Decision on Victims’ Applications for Participation a/0010/06, a/0064/06 to a/0070/06, a/0081/06 to a/0104/06 and a/0111/06 to a/0127/06, ICC-02/04, 10 August 2007.Google Scholar

Al-Skeini and Others v. United Kingdom [GC], No. 55721/07, ECHR 2011.Google Scholar

Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission, Final Award between the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the State of Eritrea, Ethiopia’s Damages Claims, 17 August 2009.Google Scholar

Hassan v. United Kingdom [GC], No. 29750/09, ECHR 2014.Google Scholar

United Nations Claims Commission, Governing Council Decision 1, Criteria for Expedited Processing of Urgent Claims, UN Doc. S/AC.26/1991/1, 2 August 1991.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A/RES/60/147.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, 29 November 1985, UN Doc. A/RES/40/34.Google Scholar

ICTR, Rules of Procedure and Evidence (adopted 29 June 1995), as amended 10 April 2013.Google Scholar

ICTY, Rules of Procedure and Evidence (adopted 11 February 1994), as amended 22 May 2013.Google Scholar

ILC, Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection, General Assembly, 61st Session. [Provisional Verbatim Record], Supplement No. 10 (A/61/10), 2006.Google Scholar

ILC, Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), 2001.Google Scholar

Orentlicher, D., ‘Impunity: Report of the Independent Expert to Update the Set of Principles to Combat Impunity: Addendum’, E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1., 2005.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 687 (1991) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 3 April 1991, UN Doc. S/RES/687.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 692 (1991) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 20 May 1991, UN Doc. S/RES/692.Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment 29: States of Emergency’, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11, 2001.Google Scholar

Assembly of States Parties, ‘Report of the Bureau on Stocktaking: The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities’, ICC-ASP/8/49, 18 March 2010.Google Scholar

Assembly of States Parties, Resolution ICC-ASP/3/Res.7 Establishment of the Secretariat of the Trust Fund for Victims (adopted 10 September 2004).Google Scholar

Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-ASP/4/Res.3 (adopted 3 December 2005).Google Scholar

Review Conference of the Rome Statute, ‘The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities’, RC/ST/V/INF.4, 30 May 2010.Google Scholar

African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (adopted 17 June 1981, entered into force 21 October 1986), CAB/LEG/67/3 rev.5.Google Scholar

American Convention on Human Rights (adopted 22 November 1969, entered into force 18 July 1978), OEA/Ser. L/V/II.Google Scholar

Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (adopted 10 December 1984, entered into force 26 June 1987), 1465 UNTS 85.Google Scholar

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights as Amended by Protocols 11 and 14 (adopted 4 November 1950, entered into force 3 September 1953), ETS 5.Google Scholar

International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance (adopted 20 December 2006, entered into force 23 December 2010), 2716 UNTS 3.Google Scholar

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976), 999 UNTS 171.Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 23 May 1969, entered into force 27 January 1980), 1155 UNTS 331.Google Scholar

African Union, Decision on the Report of the Commission on the Meeting of African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal, Doc. Assembly/AU/13 (XIII) 3, Assembly/AU/Dec. 245(XIII).Google Scholar

Agreement between the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Government of the State of Eritrea, 12 December 2000.Google Scholar

Amnesty International, ‘International Criminal Court: Making the Right Choices at the Review Conference’, 2010.Google Scholar

Coalition for the International Criminal Court, ‘Report on the First Review Conference on the Rome Statute’, 2010.Google Scholar

Ferencz, B., ‘Illegal Armed Force as a Crime against Humanity’, available at: http://crimeofaggression.info/documents/5/Ferencz_B_Illegal_Armed_Force.pdf, last accessed 28 September 2014.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, J. and Doswald-Beck, L., Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol. 1: Rules (ICRC, Cambridge University Press, 2005), available at: www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Seminar on Victim’s Access to the ICC, Paris, 27–29 April 1999, UN Doc. PCNICC/1999/INF/2 and PCNICC/1999/L.5/Add.1.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. and Lee, D. (eds.), US Operational Law Handbook 2014 (Charlottesville, VA: International and Operational Law Department, Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, 2014).Google Scholar

Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Germany (signed 28 June 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920), in Parry, C. (ed.), Consolidated Treaty Series, vol. CCXXV (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1969–81).Google Scholar