Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:48:35.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Reflective Equilibrium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Adrian Blau
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce, 1980. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth, 1999. ‘What is the point of equality?’, Ethics 109, 287337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard, 1989. ‘Equality and equal opportunity for welfare’, Philosophical Studies 56, 7793.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard, 1999. ‘Equality of opportunity for welfare defended and recanted’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 7, 488–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard, 2006. ‘Distributive justice and basic capability equality’, in Kaufman, Alexander, ed., Capabilities Equality. Abingdon: Routledge, 1743.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard, 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, David, 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, David, 2014. ‘Principles and intuitions in ethics’, Ethics 124, 665–95.Google Scholar
Butt, Daniel, 2007. ‘On benefiting from injustice’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37, 129–52.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., 1989. ‘On the currency of egalitarian justice’, Ethics 99, 906–44.Google Scholar
Cummins, Robert, 1998. ‘Reflection on reflective equilibrium’, in DePaul, Michael and Ramsey, William, eds., Rethinking Intuition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 113–28.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman, 1996. Justice and Justification. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael, 1986. ‘Reflective equilibrium and foundationalism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 23, 5969.Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael, 1993. Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ebertz, Roger, 1993. ‘Is reflective equilibrium a coherentist model?’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23, 193214.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry, 1987. ‘Equality as a moral ideal’, Ethics 98, 2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, 2007. Rawls. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald, 1996. Justificatory Liberalism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David, 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson, 1965. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M., 1975. ‘Rawls’ theory of justice’, in Daniels, Norman, ed., Reading Rawls. Oxford: Blackwell, 81107.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M., 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, 2003. ‘Three trends in moral and political philosophy’, Journal of Value Inquiry 37, 415–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, John, 1975. ‘Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality?’, American Political Science Review 69, 594606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Brad, 2012. ‘Theory vs anti-theory in ethics’, in Heuer, Ulrike and Lang, Gerald, eds., Luck, Value, and Commitment: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Bernard Williams. Oxford University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Kelly, Thomas and McGrath, Sarah, 2010. ‘Is reflective equilibrium enough?’, Philosophical Perspectives 24, 325–59.Google Scholar
Knight, Carl, 2006. ‘The method of reflective equilibrium’, Philosophical Papers 35, 209–25.Google Scholar
Knight, Carl, 2009. Luck Egalitarianism: Equality, Responsibility, and Justice. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Carl, 2015. ‘Abandoning the abandonment objection: luck egalitarian arguments for public insurance’, Res Publica 21, 119–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lazari-Radek, Katarzyna and Singer, Peter, 2012. ‘The objectivity of ethics and the unity of practical reason’, Ethics 123, 931.Google Scholar
Lewis, David, 1983. Philosophical Papers, volume 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maffetone, Sebastiano, 2010. Rawls: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Mandle, Jon, 2009. Rawls’s A Theory of Justice: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Daniel, 2008. ‘Analytical political philosophy’, in Leopold, David and Stears, Marc, eds., Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford University Press, 1128.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert, 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parfit, David, 2000. ‘Equality or priority?’, in Clayton, Matthew and Williams, Andrew, eds., The Ideal of Equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 81125.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 1975. ‘The independence of moral theory’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48, 522.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 1999. A Theory of Justice, revised edition. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, 2005. Political Liberalism, expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sandberg, Joakim and Juth, Niklas., 2011. ‘Ethics and intuitions: a reply to Singer’, Journal of Ethics 15, 209–26.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael, 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., 2003. ‘Rawls on justification’, in Freeman, Samuel, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press, 139–67.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., 2014. Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, 2003. ‘What is egalitarianism?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 31, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter, 1974. ‘Sidgwick and reflective equilibrium’, The Monist 58, 490517.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, 2005. ‘Ethics and intuitions’, Journal of Ethics 9, 331–52.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Young, Liane and Cushman, Fiery, 2010. ‘Moral intuitions’, in Doris, John and The Moral Psychology Research Group, eds., The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press, 246–72.Google Scholar
Steiner, Hillel, 1994. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tersman, Folke, 2008. ‘The reliability of moral intuitions’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86, 389405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varner, Gary, 2012. Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walden, Kenneth, 2013. ‘In defense of reflective equilibrium’, Philosophical Studies 166, 243–56.Google Scholar
Welch, John, 2014. Moral Strata: Another Approach to Reflective Equilibrium. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy, 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan, 2013. ‘Analytic political philosophy’, in Beaney, Michael, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 795822.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×