References
AdamsJr., R. B., Rule, N. O., FranklinJr., R. G., Wang, E., Stevenson, M. T., Yoshikawa, S., Nomura, M., Sato, W., Kveraga, K., & Ambady, N.. (2010). Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(1), 97–108.
Amit, E., Algom, D., & Trope, Y. (2009). Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(3), 400–15.
Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk‐taking. European Journal of Social Psychology 34(6), 511–36.
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science 23(7), 764–71.
Andone, C. (2013). Argumentation in Context. Vol. 5: Argumentation in Political Interviews. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2002). From “blame by praise” to “praise by blame”: Analysis of vocal patterns in ironic communication. International Journal of Psychology 37(5), 266–76.
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32(6), 793–826.
Austin, J. L. (1961). The meaning of a word. In Urmson, J. O. & Warnock, G. J. (eds.), Philosophical Papers of J. L. Austin (pp. 23–43). Oxford University Press.
Averbeck, J. M., & Hample, D. (2008). Ironic message production: How and why we produce ironic messages. Communication Monographs 75(4), 396–410.
Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(4), 609–22.
Barlow, J. M., Kerlin, J. R., & Pollio, H. R. (1971). Training Manual for Identifying Figurative Language: Metaphor Research Group. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Barr, D. J. (1999). A theory of dynamic coordination for conversational interaction. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.
Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language 46(2), 391–418.
Barr, D. J., (2005). Making sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocentrism in language use. In Colston, H. L. & Katz, A. N. (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 21–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A. (eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blankenship, K. L. (2005). The role of different markers of linguistic powerlessness in persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24(1), 3–24.
Blankenship, K. L. (2006). Rhetorical question use and resistance to persuasion: An attitude strength analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 25(2), 111–28.
Blankenship, K. L, & Craig, T. Y. (2006). Rhetorical question use and resistance to persuasion: An attitude strength analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 111–28.
Blankenship, K. L., & Holtgraves, T. (2005). The role of different markers of linguistic powerlessness in persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 3–24.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt & Company.
Boerger, M. A. (2005). Variations in figurative language use as a function of mode of communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34(1), 31–49.
Bolinger, D. (1950). Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 6, 117–36.
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2010). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition 118(1), 123–9.
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13(2), 185–9.
Bosco, F. M., Vallana, M., & Bucciarelli, M. (2012). The inferential chain makes the difference between familiar and novel figurative expressions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24(5), 525–40.
Bott, L., & Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3), 437–57.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108(3), 624–52.
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature, 391 (6669), 756–756.
Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science 247(4938), 44–8.
Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology 22(1), 72–110.
Bowes, A., & Katz, A. (2011). When sarcasm stings. Discourse Processes 48(4), 215–36.
Boylan, J., & Katz, A. N. (2013). Ironic expression can simultaneously enhance and dilute perception of criticism. Discourse Processes 50(3), 187–209.
Brinol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(6), 1040–53.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R. (1958). Words and Things. New York: Free Press.
Brown, R. W., Black, A. H., & Horowitz, A. E. (1955). Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50(3), 388.
Bryant, G. A. (2010). Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes 47(7), 545–66.
Bryant, G. A. (2011). Verbal irony in the wild. Pragmatics & Cognition 19(2), 291–309.
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol 17(2), 99–119.
Bryant, G. A., (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech 48(3), 257–77.
Burg, A., O’Keefe, D., & Schaffer, J. (writers), & Ackerman, A. (director). (1997). The strike [television series episode]. In Berg, A., Schaffer, J., Seinfeld, J., Shapiro, G. & West, H. (producers), Seinfeld. Los Angeles, CA: Castle Rock Entertainment.
Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the verbal irony procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol 26(3), 186–205.
Burgers, C. F., van Mulken, M. J. P., & Schellens, P. J. (2013). On irony, images and creativity: A corpus-analytic approach. In Veale, T., Feyaerts, K., & Forceville, C. J. (eds.), Creativity and the Agile Mind: A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Multifaceted Phenomenon (pp. 293–311). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Burns, Z. C., Caruso, E. M., & Bartels, D. M. (2012). Predicting premeditation: Future behavior is seen as more intentional than past behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141(2), 227–32.
Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalising “metaphor” for applied linguistic research. In Low, G. & Cameron, L. (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, L. (2003). Advances in Applied Linguistics: Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.
Campbell, J. D., & Katz, A. N. (2012). Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony? Discourse Processes 49(6), 459–80.
Canton, N., Gale, B., Kennedy, K., Marshall, F., & Spielberg, S. (producers) & Zemeckis, R. (director). (1985). Back to the Future [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Universal Pictures.
Carston, R. (1998). Informativeness, relevance, and scalar implicature. In Carston, R. & Uchida, S. (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2011). Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition 3(02), 283–312.
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280(5364), 747–9.
Carter, R. (2004). Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. New York: Routledge.
Caruso, E. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2008). A wrinkle in time: Asymmetric valuation of past and future events. Psychological Science 19(8), 796–801.
Caruso, E. M., & Gino, F. (2011). Blind ethics: Closing one’s eyes polarizes moral judgments and discourages dishonest behavior. Cognition 118(2), 280–5.
Caruso, E. M. & Shafir, E. (2006). Now that I think about it, I’m in the mood for laughs: Decisions focused on mood. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19(2), 155–69.
Caruso, E. M., Waytz, A., & Epley, N. (2010). The intentional mind and the hot hand: Perceiving intentions makes streaks seem likely to continue. Cognition 116(1), 149–53.
Caucci, G. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (2012). Social and paralinguistic cues to sarcasm. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 25(1), 1–22.
Chettih, S., Durgin, F. H., & Grodner, D. J. (2012). Mixing metaphors in the cerebral hemispheres: What happens when careers collide? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38(2), 295.
Clapton, E. P. (1977). Wonderful tonight. On Slowhand [vinyl recording]. London: RSO Records.
Claridge, C. (2011). Hyperbole in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Exaggeration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H. (1977). Inferences in comprehension. In Laberge, D. & Samuels, S. (eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Perception and Comprehension (pp. 245–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, H. H. (1983). Making sense of nonce sense. In Flores D’Arcais, G. B. & Jarvella, R. J. (eds.), The Process of Language Understanding (pp. 297–331). New York: Wiley.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1), 121–6.
Clark, H. H., (2007). On the pretense theory of irony. In Gibbs, R. W. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (pp. 25–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A. K., Webber, B., & Sag, I. A. (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22(2), 245–58.
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22(1), 1–39.
Climie, E. A., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Eye gaze provides a window on children’s understanding of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development 9(3), 257–85.
Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009). Individual differences, judgment biases, and theory-of-mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry. Journal of Research in Personality 43(1), 18–24.
Colston, H. L. (1997). “I’ve never seen anything like it”: Overstatement, understatement and irony. Metaphor and Symbol 12 (1), 43–58.
Colston, H. L. (1999). The pragmatic functions of rebuttal analogy. Metaphor and Symbol 14(4), 259–80.
Colston, H. L. (2000a). “Dewey defeats Truman”: Interpreting ironic restatement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19(1), 44–63.
Colston, H. L. (2000b). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition 8(2), 277–324.
Colston, H. L. (2002a). Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 34(2), 111–42.
Colston, H. L. (2002b). Pragmatic justifications for nonliteral gratitude acknowledgments: “Oh sure, anytime.” Metaphor and Symbol 17(3), 205–26.
Colston, H. L. (2005). Social and cultural influences on figurative and indirect language. In Colston, H. & Katz, A. (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 99–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colston, H. L. (2007). What figurative language development reveals about the mind. In A. C. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (eds.), Mental States, Vol. 2: Language and Cognitive Structure (pp. 191–212). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Colston, H. L. (2008). A new look at common ground: Memory, egocentrism, and joint meaning. In I. Kecskes & J. Mey (eds.), Intention, Common Ground, and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer (pp. 151–88). New York: de Gruyter.
Colston, H. L. (2009). Figurative pragmatics: From structure to social status. In Turner, K. & Fraser, B. (eds.), Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey, a Festschrift (pp. 49–56). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Colston, H. L. (2010). Irony, analogy and truth. In Nerlich, B. & Burkhardt, A. (eds.), Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes (pp. 339–54). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Colston, H. L. (2014). Complexities of pragmatic effects in blended figures: The case of metaphtonymy. Paper presented at the First International Symposium on Figurative Thought and Language, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Colston, H. L. (2015). Irony performance and perception: Motivations underlying use and comprehension. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Association, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Colston, H. L., & Brooks, E. N. (2008). Pragmatic effects of metonymy. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago.
Colston, H. L., & Connelly, C. (2004). Figurative language and composure display. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (1998). Analogy and irony: Rebuttal to “rebuttal analogy.” Metaphor and Symbol 13(1), 69–75.
Colston, H. L., (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol 17(1), 57–80.
Colston, H. L., (2007). A brief history of irony. In Gibbs, R. W. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (pp. 3–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colston, H. L., & Jindrich, P. L. (2000). “Been there, done that”: Comprehending asyndeton. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Miami, FL.
Colston, H. L., & Katz, A. N. (2005). Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. (1998). You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27(4), 499–513.
Colston, H. L., & Kinney, E. (2015). Producing figurative pragmatic effects: Endings justifying meanings. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Colston, H. L., & Kodet, A. (2008). Embodiment in word meanings. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Colston, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2004). Gender differences in verbal irony use. Metaphor and Symbol 19(4), 289–306.
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J. (1998). Contrast effects in the pragmatic accomplishments of irony and understatement. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
Colston, H. L., (2000a). Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics 32(11), 1557–83.
Colston, H. L., (2000b). Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes 30(2), 179–99.
Colston, H. L., & Peitz, S. L. (2000). See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Comprehension of phatic disbelief expressions. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88(4), 715.
Corts, D. P. (2006). Factors characterizing bursts of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Discourse Studies 8(2), 211–33.
Corts, D. P., & Meyers, K. (2002). Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31(4), 391–408.
Corts, D. P., & Pollio, H. R. (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol 14(2), 81–100.
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge University Press.
Coulson, S. (2008a). Framing and blending in persuasive discourse. In Favretti, Rema Rossini (ed.), Frames, Corpora, and Knowledge Representation (pp. 33–42). Bologna: Bononia University Press.
Coulson, S. (2008b). Metaphor comprehension and the brain. In Gibbs, R.W. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3–4), 175–96.
Coulson, S., (2005). Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10), 1510–36.
Covington, M., & Curry, M. (2008). A brief history of putting lipstick on a pig. Time Magazine 172(9).
Cowan, A., David, L., & Seinfeld, J. (writers) & Cherones, T. (director). (1994). The opposite [television series episode]. In David, L., Shapiro, G., & West, H. (producers), Seinfeld. Los Angeles, CA: Castle Rock Entertainment.
Craig, T. Y., & Blankenship, K. L. (2011). Language and persuasion: Linguistic extremity influences message processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30(3), 290–310.
Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Vol. 28: Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press.
Cushing, H., D’Cruz, J., & Gay-Rees, J. (producers) & Banksy, (director). (2010). Exit Through the Gift Shop [motion picture]. London: Paranoid Pictures.
Dascal, M. (2003). Interpretation and Understanding. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
David, L., Seinfeld, J., Cowan, A. (writers), & Cherones, T. (director). (1994). The Opposite [television series episode]. In T. Gammill, M. Pross, & J. Seinfeld (producers), Seinfeld. Los Angelis, CA: Castle Rock Entertainment.
De Neys, W., & Schaeken, W. (2007). When people are more logical under cognitive load. Experimental Psychology 54(2), 128–33.
De Saussure, L. (2013). Background relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 59, 178–89.
Demorest, A., Silberstein, L., Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1983). Telling it as it isn’t: Children’s understanding of figurative language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1(2), 121–34.
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning a social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(1), 3–19.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 125(2), 276–302.
Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language & Social Interaction 33(4), 347–73.
Epley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2004). Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research 17(2), 171–87.
Epley, N., Caruso, E., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(5), 872–89.
Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(3), 327–39.
Eugenides, J. (2011). The Marriage Plot. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Fass, D. (1991). Met*: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics 17(1), 49–90.
Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science 20(4), 502–8.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22(2), 133–87.
Fauconnier, G., (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fausey, C. M., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(5), 644–50.
Fausey, C. M., & Matlock, T. (2011). Can grammar win elections? Political Psychology 32(4), 563–74.
Feldhaus, R. O., & Honeck, R. P. (1989). The conceptual basis of graded categories. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(3), 271–88.
Ferré, G. (2014). Multimodal hyperbole. Multimodal Communication 3(1), 25–50.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2), 117–40.
Filik, R. (2008). Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition 106(2), 1038–46.
Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Wallington, K., & Page, J. (2014). Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40(3), 811–28.
Filik, R., & Moxey, L. M. (2010). The online processing of written irony. Cognition 116(3), 421–36.
Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26(2), 237–59.
Forgas, J. P., & Williams, K. D. (2001). The Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology: Social Influence—Direct and Indirect Processes. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Foster, W. (writer), & Freleng, F. (director). (1955). Hare brush [television series episode]. In Selzer, E. (producer), Looney Tunes. Los Angeles, CA: Warner Brothers.
Friesen, G., & Meyer, A. (producers), & Hughes, J. (director). (1985). The Breakfast Club [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Universal Pictures.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4), 531–4.
Furthman, J. (producer), & von Sternberg, J. (director). (1957). Jet Pilot [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: RKO Radio Pictures.
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989a). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25(3), 203–19.
Fussell, S. R., (1989b). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology 19(6), 509–25.
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(3), 453–66.
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Ena Inesi, M., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science 17(12), 1068–74.
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(6), 1450–66.
Garnham, A. (1982). Testing psychological theories about inference making. Memory & Cognition 10(4), 341–9.
Gehring, W. J., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neuroscience 3(5), 516–20.
Gelbart, L., & Marks, L. (writers), & Cooper, J. (director). (1973). The incubator [television series episode]. In Gelbart, L., Metcalfe, B., & Reynolds, G. (producers), M*A*S*H. Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox Television.
Gerrig, R. J. (1989). Suspense in the absence of uncertainty. Journal of Memory and Language 28(6), 633–48.
Gibbs, R. W. (1981a). Memory for requests in conversation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(6), 630–40.
Gibbs, R. W. (1981b). Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(4), 431–44.
Gibbs, R. W. (1983). Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9(3), 524.
Gibbs, R. (1986a). Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes 7, 17–30.
Gibbs, R. (1986b). What makes some indirect speech acts conventional? Journal of Memory and Language 25, 181–96.
Gibbs, R. (1987). Memory for requests in conversation revisited. American Journal of Psychology 100, 179–91.
Gibbs, R. (1993). Process and products in making sense of tropes. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. (1999). Speakers’ intuitions and pragmatic theory. Cognition 69, 355–9.
Gibbs, R. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol 15, 5–27.
Gibbs, R. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 457–86.
Gibbs, R. (2003a). Embodiment and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language 84, 1–15.
Gibbs, R. (2003b). Embodied standing and the psychological semantics of stand. In Newman, J. (ed.), The Linguistics of Standing, Lying, and Sitting. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Gibbs, R. (2005). Review of M. Dascal “Interpretation and understanding.” Pragmatics & Cognition 13, 405–13.
Gibbs, R. (2006a). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. (2006b). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language 21, 434–58.
Gibbs, R. (2007). Experimental tests of figurative meaning construction. In G. Radden, K-M. Kopcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 19–32). Amsterdam, Benjamins.
Gibbs, R. (2011a). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48, 529–62.
Gibbs, R. (2011b). Multiple constraints on theories of metaphor. Discourse Processes 48, 375–84.
Gibbs, R. (2012). Are ironic acts deliberate. Journal of Pragmatics 44(1), 104–15.
Gibbs, R. W., & Bryant, G. A. (2008). Striving for optimal relevance when answering questions. Cognition 106(1), 345–69.
Gibbs, R. W., Bryant, G. A., & Colston, H. L. (2014). Where is the humor in verbal irony? International Journal of Humor Research, 27(4), 575–596.
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (2002). The risks and rewards of ironic communication. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (eds.), Say Not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication (pp. 181–94). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Gibbs, R., (2006). Figurative language. In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd ed. (pp. 835–62). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Gibbs, R., (2007a). Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Gibbs, R., (2007b). Psycholinguistic aspects of phraseology: American tradition. In Burger, H., Dobrovolskij, D., Kuhn, P., & Norrick, N.. (eds.), Phraseologie/Phraseology: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. New York: de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R., (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., & Izett, C. D. (2005). Irony as persuasive communication. In H. Colston & A. Katz (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 131–52). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gibbs, R. W., & Kearney, L. R. (1994). When parting is such sweet sorrow: The comprehension and appreciation of oxymora. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23(1), 75–89.
Gibbs, R. W., & McCarrell, N. S. (1990). Why boys will be boys and girls will be girls: Understanding colloquial tautologies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19(2), 125–45.
Gibbs, R. W., & Mueller, R. A. G. (1988). Conversational sequences and preference for indirect speech acts. Discourse Processes 11(1), 101–16.
Gibbs, R. W., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics 36(7), 1189–210.
Gibbs, R. W., Leggitt, J. S., & Turner, E. A. (2002). What’s special about figurative language in emotional communication? In Frussel, S. R. (ed.), The Verbal Communication of Emotions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 125–49). Oxon, UK: Erlbaum.
Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28(5), 576–93.
Gibbs, R. W., & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind & Language 21(3), 379–403.
Gibbs, R. W., & Van Orden, G. (2012). Pragmatic choice in conversation. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(1), 7–20.
Gil, J. M. (2011). Relevance theory and unintended transmission of information. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(1), 1–40.
Giora, R. (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Ganzi, J., Levi, N. A., & Sabah, H. (2005). On negation as mitigation: The case of negative irony. Discourse Processes 39(1), 81–100.
Giora, R., Livnat, E., Fein, O., Barnea, A., Zeiman, R., & Berger, I. (2013). Negation generates nonliteral interpretations by default. Metaphor and Symbol 28(2), 89–115.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(3), 558–65.
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review 97(1), 3.
Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge.
Goldberg, D., Medjuck, J., & Reitman, I. (producers), & Reitman, I. (director). (1981). Stripes [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Columbia Pictures.
Grady, J. E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In Gibbs, R. W. & Steen, G. J. (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997 (pp. 101–24). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word. New York: Springer.
Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Advances in Discourse Processes Series. Vol. 17: Structures and Procedures of Implicit Knowledge. Westport, CT: Ablex.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5), 1029–46.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293(5537), 2105–8.
Greene, S. B., Gerrig, R. J., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language 33(4), 511–26.
Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. Foundations of Language 4, 225–42.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Speech Acts. Vol. 3: Syntax and Semantics (pp. 225–42). New York: Seminar Press.
Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(1), 111–27.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108(4), 841–44.
Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Holroyd, C. B., & Simons, R. F. (2006). The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology 71(2), 148–54.
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450(7169), 557–9.
Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(4), 447–63.
Hanna, S. (2011). Awareness in metaphor understanding: “The Lingering of the Literal.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 65–82.
Harris, M. Friel, B., Mickelson, , & Rett, N. (2006). Attribution of discourse goals for using concrete- and abstract-tenor metaphors and similes with or without discourse context. Journal of Pragmatics 38(6), 863–79.
Harris, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes 36(3), 147–65.
Harris, R. J., & Mosier, N. J. (1999). Memory for metaphors and similes in discourse. Discourse Processes 28(3), 257–70.
Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., & Sun, P. (2011). Beastly: What makes animal metaphors offensive? Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30(3), 311–25.
Helzer, E. G., Connor-Smith, J. K., & Reed, M. A. (2009). Traits, states, and attentional gates: Temperament and threat relevance as predictors of attentional bias to social threat. Anxiety, Stress & Coping 22(1), 57–76.
Helzer, E. G., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science 22(4), 517–22.
Hilpert, M. (2010). An empirical approach to the use and comprehension of mixed metaphors. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 8(1), 66–92.
Hirsh, J. B. (2010). The weight of being: Psychological perspectives on the existential moment. New Ideas in Psychology 28(1), 28–36.
Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science 23(6), 578–81.
Holroyd, Clay B. & Coles, Michael G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679–709.
Holtgraves, T. (1997). Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(3), 624.
Honeck, R. P. (1997). A Proverb in Mind: The Cognitive Science of Proverbial Wit and Wisdom. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition 96(2), 127–42.
Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition 59(1), 91–117.
Hsieh, S. C. (2006). A corpus-based study on animal expressions in Mandarin Chinese and German. Journal of Pragmatics 38(12), 2206–22.
Huang, L., Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychological Science 22(1), 95–102.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion 23(4), 714–25.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion 9(3), 435–9.
Inesi, M. E. (2010). Power and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 112(1), 58–69.
Inesi, M. E., Botti, S., Dubois, D., Rucker, D., & Galinski, A. D. (2011). Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science 22(8), 1042–48.
Ishida, Y., & Abe, J. (2010). Is the victim of irony identified by echoic mention? Shinrigaku Kenkyu: The Japanese Journal of Psychology 80(6), 485–93.
Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(11), 1161–6.
Johnson, B., Young, A., Young, M., Williams, C., & Rudd, P. (1980). Back in Black. On Back in Black [CD]. New York: Albert/Atlantic Records.
Johnson, M. G., & Malgady, R. G. (1979). Some cognitive aspects of figurative language: Association and metaphor. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8(3), 249–65.
Kang, S. K., Hirsh, J. B., & Chasteen, A. L. (2010). Your mistakes are mine: Self-other overlap predicts neural response to observed errors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(1), 229–32.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(2), 410.
Katz, A. N. (1982). Metaphoric relationships: The role of feature saliency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11(4), 283–96.
Katz, A. N. (2005). Discourse and sociocultural factors in understanding nonliteral language. In Colston, H. L. & Katz, A. N. (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 183–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Katz, A. N., Blasko, D. G., & Kazmerski, V. A. (2004). Saying what you don’t mean: Social influences on sarcastic language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13(5), 186–9.
Katz, A. N., Lenhardt, M., & Mitchell, K. (2007). On acknowledging thanks for performing a favor. Metaphor and Symbol 22(3), 233–50.
Katz, A. N., & Pexman, P. M. (1997). Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol 12(1), 19–41.
Kecskes, I. (2007). Synergic concepts in the bilingual mind. In Kecskes, I. & Albertazzi, L. (eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Bilingualism (pp. 29–61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Kecskes, I., & Mey, J. (2008). Mouton Series in Pragmatics. Vol. 4: Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kecskes, I., & Papp, T. (2003). How to demonstrate the conceptual effect of L2 on L1? Methods and techniques In Cook, V. (ed.), Effects of the Second Language on the First (pp. 247–65). Trowbridge, UK: Cromwell Press.
Keenan, E. L., & Li, C. N. (1976). Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Subject and Topic (pp. 247–301). New York: Academic Press.
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonaldIII, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, Cameron S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303(5660), 1023–6.
Keysar, B. (1994). Discourse context effects: Metaphorical and literal interpretations. Discourse Processes 18(3), 247–69.
Keysar, B. (2008). Egocentric processes in communication and miscommunication. In Kecskes, I. & Mey, J. (eds.), Mouton Series in Pragmatics. Vol. 4: Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer (pp. 277–96). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 11(1), 32–8.
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 39(1), 1–20.
Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language 34(1), 89–109.
Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1999). Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure? Journal of Pragmatics 31(12), 1559–78.
Keysar, B., & Henly, A. S. (2002). Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness. Psychological Science 13(3), 207–12.
Kimmel, M. (2008). Properties of cultural embodiment: Lessons from the anthropology of the body. In Frank, R. M., Dirven, R., Ziemke, T., & Bernardez, E. E. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics Research: Body, Language, and Mind. Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness (pp. 77–108). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kimmel, M. (2009). Metaphors of the EU constitutional debate: Ways of charting discourse coherence in a complex metaphor field. Metaphorik.de 17, 49–100.
Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics 42(1), 97–115.
Kopp, R. R. (1995). Metaphor Therapy: Using Client-Generated Metaphors in Psychotherapy. Bristol, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
Kotthoff, H. (2002). Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality: Double or contrastive perspectivation in conversation. In Kallmeyer, V. (ed.), Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse (pp. 201–30). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kotthoff, H. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35(9), 1387–411.
Kovaz, D., Kreuz, R. J., & Riordan, M. A. (2013). Distinguishing sarcasm from literal language: Evidence from books and blogging. Discourse Processes 50(8), 598–615.
Kovecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones? Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 11–25.
Kowatch, K., Whalen, J. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Irony comprehension in action: A new test of processing for verbal irony. Discourse Processes 50(5), 301–15.
Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science 21(11), 1716–23.
Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1991a). Constructing shared communicative environments. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 172–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Krauss, R. M., (1991b). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others’ knowledge in reference. Social Cognition 9(1), 2–24.
Kreuz, R. J. (2000). The production and processing of verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol 15(1–2), 99–107.
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118(4), 374.
Kreuz, R. J., Kassler, M. A., Coppenrath, L., & McLain Allen, B. (1999). Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 31(12), 1685–700.
Kreuz, R. J., & Link, K. E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(2), 127–43.
Kreuz, R. J., Long, D. L., & Church, M. B. (1991a). On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6(3), 149–62.
Kreuz, R. J., Long, D. L., (1991b). On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6(3), 149–62.
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(1), 21–31.
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124(1), 3–21.
Kurtz, G. (producer), & Lucas, G. (director). (1977). Star Wars: A New Hope [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: Lucasfilm & Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.
Kwapil, J. M., Brey, V. A., & Colston, H. L. (2006). Register violations as a form of verbal irony. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Minneapolis, MN.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press.
Lamm, R. W. (1970). Does anybody really know what time it is? On The Chicago Transit Authority [CD]. Chicago: Columbia Records.
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(2), 311.
Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34(2), 191–8.
Leach, E. (1964). Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal abuse. In Lenneberg, E. (ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language (pp. 23–63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lee, C. J., & Katz, A. N. (1998). The differential role of ridicule in sarcasm and irony. Metaphor and Symbol 13(1), 1–15.
Legowski, T., & Brownlee, K. (2001). Working with metaphor in narrative therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy 12(1), 19–28.
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levitt, H., Korman, Y., & Angus, L. (2000). A metaphor analysis in treatments of depression: Metaphor as a marker of change. Counselling Psychology Quarterly 13(1), 23–35.
Link, K. E., & Kreuz, R. J. (2005). Do men and women differ in their use of nonliteral language when they talk about emotions? In Colston, H. & Katz, A.(eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 99–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Litovkina, A. T. (2009). Law is hell: Death and the afterlife in American lawyer jokes. Acta Juridica Hungarica 50(3), 311–28.
Litovkina, A. T. (2011). “Where there’s a will there’s a lawyer’s bill”: Lawyers in Anglo-American anti-proverbs. Acta Juridica Hungarica 52(1), 82–96.
Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology 7(4), 560–72.
Loftus, E. F. (1993). Psychologists in the eyewitness world. American Psychologist 48(5), 550–2.
Loftus, E. F. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist 58(1), 867–73.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4(1), 19.
Long, D. L., & Golding, J. M. (1993). Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? Discourse Processes 16(1–2), 55–73.
Long, D. L., Golding, J. M., & Graesser, A. C. (1992). A test of the on-line status of goal-related inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 31(5), 634–47.
Long, D. L., Kreuz, R. J., & Church, M. (1989). A functional approach to irony. In Mio, J. S. (chair), Meaning What We Don’t Say: Challenges of Nonliteral Communication (symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Reno, NV).
Lorre, C., Prady, B., Engel, S., Rosenstock, R., Goetsch, D., Molaro, S. (writers), & Cendrowski, M. (director). (2008). The white asparagus triangulation [television series episode]. In P. Chakos & F. O. Balyeu (producers), The Big Bang Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Chuck Lorre Productions & Warner Bros. Television.
Loue, S. (2008). The Transformative Power of Metaphor in Therapy. New York: Springer.
Lovie, P. (1985). A note on an unexpected anchoring bias in intuitive statistical inference. Cognition 21(1), 69–72.
Lucas, G. (producer), & Lucas, G. (director). (1977). Star Wars. Episode IV: A New Hope [motion picture]. Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox.
Lunsford, R. F. (2014). Manipulative arguments in political speech. Paper presented at the 6th Symposium on Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics Conference, Seville, Spain.
Lusch, V. R., & Colston, H. L. (2000). A gender difference in asyndeton. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Miami, FL.
Luu, P., Tucker, D. M., Derryberry, D., Reed, M., & Poulsen, C. (2003). Electrophysiological responses to errors and feedback in the process of action regulation. Psychological Science 14(1), 47–53.
MacDonaldIII, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, Cameron S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288(5472), 1835–8.
Maddux, W. W., Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). When in Rome ... learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(6), 731–41.
Magee, J. C., Milliken, F. J., & Lurie, A. R. (2010). Power differences in the construal of a crisis: The immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(3), 354–70.
Maglio, S. J., & Trope, Y. (2012). Disembodiment: Abstract construal attenuates the influence of contextual bodily state in judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141(2), 211–16.
Malgady, R. G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Measurement of figurative language: Semantic feature models of comprehension and appreciation. In Honeck, R. P. & Hoffman, R. (eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language (pp. 17–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Malt, B. C., & Eiter, B. (2004). Even with a green card, you can be put out to pasture and still have to work: Non-native intuitions of the transparency of common English idioms. Memory & Cognition 32(6), 896–904.
Markel, N. N., & Hamp, E. P. (1960). Connotative meanings of certain phoneme sequences. Studies in Linguistics 15(1), 47–61.
Mason, Z. J. (2004). CorMet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics 30(1), 23–44.
Mateo, J., & Yus, F. (2013). Towards a cross-cultural pragmatic taxonomy of insults. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1), 87–114.
McGlone, M. S. (2011). Hyperbole, homunculi, and hindsight bias: An alternative evaluation of conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48(8), 563–74.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1990). Textual inferences: Models and measures. In Balota, D. A., Flores D’Arcais, G. B., & Rayner, K. (eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 403–22). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McKoon, G., (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review 99(3), 440.
Meibauer, J. (2008). Tautology as presumptive meaning. Pragmatics & Cognition 16(3), 439–70.
Mieder, W. (2008). “Proverbs Speak Louder than Words”: Folk Wisdom in Art, Culture, Folklore, History, Literature, and Mass Media. New York: Lang.
Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9(6), 788–98.
Mitchell, J. P. (2008). Contributions of functional neuroimaging to the study of social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(2), 142–6.
Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50(4), 655–63.
Muscatell, K. A., Morelli, S. A., Falk, E. B., Way, B. M., Pfeifer, J. H., Galinsky, A. D., Eisenberger, N. I., et al. (2012). Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network. NeuroImage 60(3), 1771–7.
Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D. D. (2001). Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal of Pragmatics 33(1), 1–20.
Newman, L. S., & Uleman, J. S. (1990). Assimilation and contrast effects in spontaneous trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16(2), 224–40.
Norrick, N. R. (2001). On the conversational performance of narrative jokes: Toward an account of timing. Humor 14(3), 255–74.
Noveck, I. A., (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78(2), 165–188.
Noveck, I. A., & Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85(2), 203–10.
O’Brien, E. J., Shank, D. M., Myers, J. L., & Rayner, K. (1988). Elaborative inferences during reading: Do they occur on-line? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14(3), 410.
Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (2008). Connecting the dots: Mental spaces and metaphoric language in discourse. In Oakley, T. & Hougaard, A. (eds.), Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Okamoto, S. (2002). Politeness and the perception of irony: Honorifics in Japanese. Metaphor and Symbol 17(2), 119–39.
Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are not just nice. Educational Theory 25(1), 45–53.
Ortony, A., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. A., & Jones, L. E. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language 24(5), 569–94.
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition 86(3), 253–82.
Parault, S. J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Sound-symbolism: A piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(4), 329–51.
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and theraputic implications. Behaviour Research and Therapy 31(6), 539–48.
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science 8(3), 162–6.
Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Telling stories: The health benefits of narrative. Literature and Medicine 19(1), 3–18.
Perfetti, C. A. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In Resnick, Lauren B. (ed). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 307–335). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, England.
Perfetti, C. A. (1993). Why inferences might be restricted. Discourse Processes 16(1–2), 181–92.
Perfetti, C. A., & Resnick, L. B. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In Resnick, L. B. (ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 307–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C. A., & Roth, S. (1981). Some of the interactive processes in reading. In Lesgold, A. M. & Perfetti, C. A. (eds.), Interactive Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(3), 432.
Pexman, P. M. (2005). Social factors in the interpretation of verbal irony: The roles of speaker and listener characteristics. In Colston, H. L. & Katz, A. N. (eds.), Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences (pp. 209–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(4), 286–90.
Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N. (2000). Discourse factors that influence online reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes 29(3), 201–22.
Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., (2007). Reading of metaphor and irony. In Gibbs, R. W. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (pp. 231–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2002). Understanding irony: How do stereotypes cue speaker intent? Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(3), 245–74.
Pexman, P. M., Zdrazilova, L., McConnachie, D., Deater-Deckard, K., & Petrill, S. A. (2009). “That was smooth, Mom”: Children’s production of verbal and gestural irony. Metaphor and Symbol 24(4), 237–48.
Pexman, P. M., & Zvaigzne, M. T. (2004). Does irony go better with friends? Metaphor and Symbol 19(2), 143–63.
Pfaff, K. L., Gibbs, R. W., & Johnson, M. D. (1997). Metaphor in using and understanding euphemism and dysphemism. Applied Psycholinguistics 18(01), 59–83.
Pinker, S. (2008). The stupidity of dignity. New Republic 28, 28–31.
Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., & Vincze, L. (2011). Agreement and its multimodal communication in debates: A qualitative analysis. Cognitive Computation 3(3), 466–79.
Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., (2015). Direct and indirect verbal and bodily insults and other forms of aggressive communication. In F. D’Errico, I. Poggi, A. Vinciarelli, & L. Vincze (eds.), Conflict and Multimodal Communication: Social Research and Machine Intelligence (pp. 243–64). Charn, Switzerland: Springer.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9(2–3), 219–29.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39.
Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Recanati, F. (2007). Perspectival Thought: A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford University Press.
Recchia, H. E., Howe, N., Ross, H. S., & Alexander, S. (2010). Children’s understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 28(2), 255–74.
Richards, N. (2001). An idiomatic argument for lexical decomposition. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1), 183–92.
Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1999). Motivated search for common ground: Need for closure effects on audience design in interpersonal communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(9), 1101–14.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306(5695), 443–47.
Riloff, E. (2014, August). Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Quebec, Canada.
Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., De Silva, L., Gilbert, N., & Huang, R. (2013). Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 704–14). Seattle, WA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Available at: http://www.cs.utah.edu/~alnds/papers/sarcasm_2013.pdf.
Ritchie, L. D. (2004a). Common ground in metaphor theory: Continuing the conversation. Metaphor and Symbol 19(3), 233–44.
Ritchie, L. D. (2004b). Lost in “conceptual space”: Metaphors of conceptual integration. Metaphor and Symbol 19(1), 31–50.
Ritchie, L. D. (2004c). Metaphors in conversational context: Toward a connectivity theory of metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol 19(4), 265–87.
Ritchie, L. D. (2005). Frame-shifting in humor and irony. Metaphor and Symbol 20(4), 275–94.
Ritchie, L. D. (2008). X is a journey: Embodied simulation in metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol 23(3), 174–99.
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science 5(3), 159–63.
Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(5), 483–95.
Rockwell, P. (2007). Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36(5), 361–9.
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1982). Things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11(2), 203–37.
Russo, R. (1997). Straight Man. New York: Random House.
Ryder, N. & Leinonen, E. (2011). Relevance theory and language interpretation. In J. Guendouzi, F. Loncke, M.J. Williams, (eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistic and cognitive processes: Perspectives in communication disorders (pp. 747–760). New York, NY: Psychology Press, US.
Ryder, N., & Leinonen, E. (2014). Pragmatic language development in language impaired and typically developing children: Incorrect answers in context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43(1), 45–58.
Sanders, R. E., Wu, Y., & Bonito, J. A. (2013). The calculability of communicative intentions through pragmatic reasoning. Pragmatics & Cognition 21(1), 1–34.
Sardinha, T. B. (2006). Collocation lists as instruments for metaphor detection in corpora. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos Em Lingüística Teórica E Aplicada 22(2), 249–74.
Sardinha, T. B. (2012). An assessment of metaphor retrieval methods. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martinez, M. Sanchez-Garcia, & A. M. Piquer-Piriz (eds.), Metaphor in Use: Context, Culture, and Communication (pp. 21–50), Amsterdam, Benjamins.
Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scharrer, L., & Christmann, U. (2011). Voice modulations in German ironic speech. Language and Speech 54(4), 435–65.
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science 3(4), 207–17.
Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. Qualitative Report 10(2), 358–94.
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(8), 1096–109.
Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology 21(2), 211–32.
Schourup, L. (2011). The discourse marker now: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 43(8), 2110–29.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 59–82). Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Seguin, M. (2007). A typically sarcastic tone of voice? Yeah, right! Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa 35, 161.
Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Common ground and different realities: World Englishes and English as a lingua franca. World Englishes 28(2), 236–45.
Semino, E., Heywood, J., & Short, M. (2004). Methodological problems in the analysis of metaphors in a corpus of conversations about cancer. Journal of Pragmatics 36(7), 1271–94.
Sequeiros, X. R. (2011). On metaphor, relevance, and pragmatic interpretation in Spanish. Modern Language Review 106(4), 1028–53.
Shteynberg, G. (2010). A silent emergence of culture: The social tuning effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(4), 683–9.
Singer, M., & Remillard, G. (2004). Retrieving text inferences: Controlled and automatic influences. Memory & Cognition 32(8), 1223–37.
Slugoski, B. R., & Turnbull, W. (1988). Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7(2), 101–21.
Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(4), 578–96.
Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1), 130–6.
Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In Hirschfeld, L. A. & Gelman, S. A. (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (pp. 39–67). Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.
Sperber, D., (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Sperber, D., (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Spotorno, N., & Noveck, I. A. (2014). When is irony effortful? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(4), 1649–65.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(5), 797–811.
Steen, G. J. (2002). Towards a procedure for metaphor identification. Language and Literature 11(1), 17–33.
Steen, G. J. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 26–64.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research. Vol. 14: A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Stover, H. (2011). Awareness in metaphor understanding: “The lingering of the literal.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 65–82.
Swartzwelder, J. (writer), & Anderson, B. (director). (1997). Homer vs. the 18th Amendment [television series episode]. In Brooks, J. L. (producer), The Simpsons. Los Angeles, CA: Gracie Films.
Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Tannen, D. (2005). Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics 40(11), 1823–64.
Todd, A. R., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Perspective taking combats the denial of intergroup discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(3), 738–45.
Todd, A. R., Hanko, K., Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives. Psychological Science 22(1), 134–41.
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language 24(5), 595–611.
Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on‐line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes 16(1–2), 3–34.
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language 24(5), 612–30.
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes 12(1), 1–25.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117(2), 440–63.
Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicity display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics 32(12), 1777–806.
Utsumi, A. (2007). Interpretive diversity explains metaphor-simile distinction. Metaphor and Symbol 22(4), 291–312.
Uttich, K., & Lombrozo, T. (2010). Norms inform mental state ascriptions: A rational explanation for the side-effect effect. Cognition 116(1), 87–100.
Valencia-Laver, D. L., & Light, L. L. (2000). The occurrence of causal bridging and predictive inferences in young and older adults. Discourse Processes 30(1), 27–56.
Van de Voort, M. E. C., & Vonk, W. (2014). You don’t die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms. In Everaert, M., van der Linden, E. J., Schenk, A., & Schreuder, R. (eds.), Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 283–99). New York: Psychology Press.
Van den Broek, P. (1988). The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language 27(1), 1–22.
Van den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In Balota, D. A., Flores D’Arcais, G. B., & Rayner, K. (eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes 39(2–3), 299–316.
Vitti, J. (writer), & Marcantel, M. (director). (2002). Weekend at Burnsie’s [television series episode]. In Brooks, J. L. (producer), The Simpsons. Los Angeles, CA: Gracie Films.
Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wałaszewska, E. (2011). Broadening and narrowing in lexical development: How relevance theory can account for children’s overextensions and underextensions. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1), 314–26.
Wałaszewska, E. (2014). The offensiveness of animal metaphors: A relevance-theoretic view. Paper presented at the 6th Symposium on Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics. Seville, Spain.
Ward, G. L., & Hirschberg, J. (1991). A pragmatic analysis of tautological utternances. Journal of Pragmatics 15(6), 507–20.
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science 16(10), 780–4.
White, H. D. (2011). Relevance theory and citations. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14), 3345–61.
Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The Power of Silence. New York: Guildford Press.
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 322(5901), 606–7.
Wilson, D. (2011). Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 128, 195–213.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua 87(1), 53–76.
Wilson, D., (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31(4), 721–31.
Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125(4), 387.
Winner, E. (1988). The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winner, E., & Gardner, H. (1993). Metaphor and irony: Two levels of understanding. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 425–43). Cambridge University Press.
Withy, E. (2013). Of selfies, shelfies and other cray-cray language. Edmonton Journal, December 17.
Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2011). Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 35(8), 1456–88.
Woodland, J., & Voyer, D. (2011). Context and intonation in the perception of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol 26(3), 227–39.
Wu, S., & Keysar, B. (2007). The effect of information overlap on communication effectiveness. Cognitive Science 31(1), 169–81.
Xu, X., Zuo, X., Wang, X., & Han, S. (2009). Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. Journal of Neuroscience 29(26), 8525–9.
Yang, Y. (2013). A corpus-based study of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in spoken Chinese. Language Sciences 38, 1–21.
Yao, J., Song, J., & Singh, M. (2013). The ironical Chinese bei construction and its accessibility to English speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 55, 195–209.
Yu, R., & Zhou, X. (2006). Brain responses to outcomes of one’s own and other’s performance in a gambling task. Neuroreport 17(16), 1747–51.
Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science 313(5792), 1451–2.
Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically-motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4(3), 443–6.
Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text comprehension. In Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R. (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
