Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:47:12.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 27 - Biopsychosocial Factors in Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis for Fetal Anomaly

from Section 4 - Obstetrics and Maternal Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

By
Louise D. Bryant
Edited by
Leroy C. Edozien  and
P. M. Shaughn O'Brien
Leroy C. Edozien
Affiliation:
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
P. M. Shaughn O'Brien
Affiliation:
Keele University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Biopsychosocial Factors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology , pp. 237 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tabor, A, Alfirevic, Z. Update on procedure-related risks for prenatal diagnosis techniques. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2009;27(1):1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edozien, LC. Beyond biology: the biopsychosocial model and its application in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2015;122(7):900–3. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szegda, K, Markenson, G, Bertone-Johnson, ER, Chasan-Taber, L. Depression during pregnancy: a risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes? A critical review of the literature. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2014;27(9):960–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, JM, Hewison, J, Bekker, HL, Bryant, LD, Cuckle, HS. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment. 2004;8(33).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lou, S, Mikkelsen, L, Hvidman, L, Petersen, OB, Nielsen, CP. Does screening for Down’s syndrome cause anxiety in pregnant women? a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(1):15–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, JM, Franck, L, Michie, S. Assessing the psychological effects of prenatal screening tests for maternal and foetal conditions: a systematic review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2012;30(3):222–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. STAI (Form Y). (‘Self-Evaluation Questionnaire’). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.Google Scholar
Grant, K-A, McMahon, C, Austin, M-P. Maternal anxiety during the transition to parenthood: a prospective study. J Affect Disord. 2008;108(1–2):101–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobelka, C, Mattman, A, Langlois, S. An evaluation of the decision-making process regarding amniocentesis following a screen-positive maternal serum screen result. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2009;29(5):514–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, J, Bricker, L, Henderson, J, Martin, M-A, Mugford, M, Nielson, J, et al. Women’s views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth. 2002;29(4):225–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alhusen, JL. A literature update on maternal‐fetal attachment. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2008;37(3):315–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Åhman, A, Runestam, K, Sarkadi, A. Did I really want to know this? pregnant women’s reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening. Patient Education and Counseling. 2010;81(1):87–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zechmeister, I. Fetal images: the power of visual technology in antenatal care and the Implications for women’s reproductive freedom. Health Care Analysis. 2001;9:387–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breathnach, F, Malone, F. Ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities and aneuploidies in first and second trimesters. In: Rodeck, CH, Whittle, M, editors. Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice. Second ed. London: Elsevier; 2009. pp. 265–71.Google Scholar
Larsson, A-K, Svalenius, EC, Maršál, K, Ekelin, M, Nyberg, P, Dykes, A-K. Parents’ worried state of mind when fetal ultrasound shows an unexpected finding a comparative study. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(12):1663–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Åhman, A, Axelsson, O, Maras, G, Rubertsson, C, Sarkadi, A, Lindgren, P. Ultrasonographic fetal soft markers in a low-risk population: prevalence, association with trisomies and invasive tests. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(4):367–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristofalo, E, Dipietro, J, Costigan, K, Nelson, P, Crino, J. Women’s response to fetal choroid plexus cysts detected by prenatal ultrasound. Journal of Perinatology. 2006;26(4):215–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsson, A-K, Crang-Svalenius, E, Dykes, A-K. Information for better or for worse: interviews with parents when their foetus was found to have choroid plexus cysts at a routine second trimester ultrasound. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009; 30(1):48–57. doi: 10.1080/01674820802621775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, MJ, Roman, AS, Lusskin, S, Chen, D, Dulay, A, Funai, EF, et al. Maternal anxiety and ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in a multiethnic population. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2007;27(1):40–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, MS, Hall, S, Langford, K, Marteau, TM. Psychological impact of the detection of soft markers on routine ultrasound scanning: A pilot study investigating the modifying role of information. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2002;22(7):569–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baillie, C, Smith, J, Hewison, J, Mason, G. Ultrasound screening for chromosomal abnormality: women’s reactions to false positive results. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2000;5:377–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolan, M, Hodnett, E. Discovery of soft markers on fetal ultrasound: maternal implications. Midwifery. 2009;25(6):654–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croton, JA. The long-term maternal sequelae to false positive soft marker screens in prenatal ultrasound screening [Ph.D.]. Leeds: University of Leeds (United Kingdom); 2006.Google Scholar
Hippman, C, Oberlander, TF, Honer, WG, Misri, S, Austin, JC. Depression during pregnancy: the potential impact of increased risk for fetal aneuploidy on maternal mood. Clinical Genetics. 2009;75(1):30–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, JL, Holden, JM, Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viaux-Savelon, S, Dommergues, M, Rosenblum, O, Bodeau, N, Aidane, E, Philippon, O, et al. Prenatal ultrasound screening: false positive soft markers may alter maternal representations and mother-infant interaction. PloS one. 2012;7(1):e30935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Košec, V, Nakić Radoš, S, Gall, V. Development and validation of the prenatal diagnostic procedures anxiety scale. Prenatal diagnosis. 2014;34(8):770–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, C, Hill, M, Chitty, LS. Women’s experiences and preferences for service delivery of non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy in a public health setting: A mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, P, Bergman, K, O’Connor, T, Glover, V. Maternal antenatal anxiety and amniotic fluid cortisol and testosterone: possible implications for foetal programming. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20(4):489–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glover, V, Bergman, K, Sarkar, P, O’Connor, TG. Association between maternal and amniotic fluid cortisol is moderated by maternal anxiety. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34(3):430–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrouste, C, Le, J, Maurin, E. The choice of detecting Down syndrome: does money matter? Health Economics. 2011;20(9):1073–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghaemmaghami, P, Dainese, SM, La Marca, R, Zimmermann, R, Ehlert, U. The association between the acute psychobiological stress response in second trimester pregnant women, amniotic fluid glucocorticoids, and neonatal birth outcome. Dev Psychobiol. 2014;56(4):734–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregg, AR, Van den Veyver, IB, Gross, SJ, Madankumar, R, Rink, BD, Norton, ME. Noninvasive prenatal screening by next-generation sequencing. Annual review of genomics and human genetics. 2014;15:327–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuckle, H, Benn, P, Pergament, E. Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy as a clinical service. Clinical biochemistry. 2015;48(15):932–41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.02.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, C, Hill, M, Silcock, C, Daley, R, Chitty, L. Non‐invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: A cross‐sectional survey of service users’ views and likely uptake. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014;121(5):582–94. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzumori, N, Ebara, T, Kumagai, K, Goto, S, Yamada, Y, Kamijima, M, et al. Non‐specific psychological distress in women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing because of advanced maternal age. Prenatal diagnosis. 2014;34(11):1055–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinshpun‐Cohen, J, Miron‐Shatz, T, Ries‐Levavi, L, Pras, E. Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age. Health Expectations. (ePub ). 2015;18(6):2306–17. doi: 10.1111/hex.12200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, M, Wright, D, Daley, R, Lewis, C, McKay, F, Mason, S, et al. Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C, Choudhury, M, Chitty, LS. ‘Hope for safe prenatal gene tests’. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non-invasive prenatal testing. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2015;35(5):420–7. doi: 10.1002/pd.4488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor-Phillips, S, Freeman, K, Geppert, J, Agbebiyi, A, Uthman, OA, Madan, J, Clarke, A, Quenby, S, Clarke, A. Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2016;6(1):e010002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewison, J. Psychological aspects of individualized choice and reproductive autonomy in prenatal screening. Bioethics. 2015;29(1):9–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jafri, H, Ahmed, S, Ahmed, M, Hewison, J, Raashid, Y, Sheridan, E. Islam and termination of pregnancy for genetic conditions in Pakistan: Implications for Pakistani health care providers. Prenatal diagnosis. 2012;32(12):1218–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newson, AJ. Ethical aspects arising from non-invasive fetal diagnosis. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2008;13(2):103–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, L, Ahmed, S, Hewison, J. Conveying information about screening. In: Rodeck, C, Whittle, M, editors. Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice. Second ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009. p. 225.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×