Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T05:51:01.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Geohazard Analysis for Disaster Risk Reduction and Sustainability

from Part VII - Future Earth and Risk, Safety and Security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2018

Tom Beer
Affiliation:
IUGG Commission on Climatic and Environmental Change (CCEC)
Jianping Li
Affiliation:
Beijing Normal University
Keith Alverson
Affiliation:
UNEP International Environmental Technology Centre
Get access

Summary

Understanding of disasters associated with geohazard events, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and lava flows, landslides and tsunamis, results from recent advances in basic sciences, and particularly advances in Earth observations, analysis, and modelling. This allows for comprehensive hazard assessments combining knowledge of seismology, volcanology, geology, oceanography, geodesy, electromagnetism, hydrology, and soil properties with modelling tools and forecasting. In the chapter some advances in analysis of seismic and lava flow hazards are analyzed, and an interaction of risk components (geohazard, vulnerability, and exposure) is presented. Some past major geohazard events and their impact on society and sustainability are overviewed. Disaster risk reduction in the framework of sustainable development goals is then discussed
Type
Chapter
Information
Global Change and Future Earth
The Geoscience Perspective
, pp. 349 - 363
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adey, P., Anderson, B. and Guerrero, L. L. (2011). An ash cloud, airspace and environmental threat. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 338343.Google Scholar
Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2014). The spatial-temporal dimensions of landslide disasters. In: Extreme Natural Hazards, Disaster Risks and Societal Implications, eds. Ismail-Zadeh, A., Fucugauchi, J. U., Kijko, A., Takeuchi, K., and Zaliapin, I.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 6176.Google Scholar
Babayev, G., Ismail-Zadeh, A. and Le Mouël, J.-L. (2010). Scenario-based earthquake hazard and risk assessment for Baku (Azerbaijan). Natural Hazard and Earth System Sciences, 10, 26972712.Google Scholar
Baker, J. (2013) Seismology: Quake catcher. Nature, 498, 290292.Google Scholar
Beer, T. and Ismail-Zadeh, A., eds. (2003). Risk Science and Sustainability. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Braile, L. W., Hinze, W. J., Keller, G. R., Lidiak, E. G. and Sexton, J. L. (1986). Tectonic development of the New Madrid Rift Complex, Mississippi Embayment, North America. Tectonophysics, 131, 121.Google Scholar
Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58, 15831606.Google Scholar
Costa, A. and Macedonio, G. (2005). Numerical simulation of lava flows based on depth-averaged equations. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L05304, DOI: 10.1029/2004GL021817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutter, S, Ismail-Zadeh, A., Alcántara-Ayala, I. et al. (2015). Pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature, 522, 277279.Google Scholar
Dietterich, H. R., Cashman, K. V., Rust, A. C. and Lev, E. (2015). Diverting lava flows in the lab. Nature Geoscience, 8, 494496.Google Scholar
Dilley, M., Chen, R. S., Deichmann, W., Lerner-Lam, A. L. and Arnold, M. (2005). Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis. Washington DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, A. R. and Oppenheimer, C. (2011). The 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption and the reconstruction of geography, The Geographical Journal, 177, 411.Google Scholar
Donovan, A. R. and Oppenheimer, C. (2014). Extreme volcanism: disaster risks and societal implications. In: Extreme Natural Hazards, Disaster Risks and Societal Implications, eds. Ismail-Zadeh, A., Fucugauchi, J. U., Kijko, A., Takeuchi, K., and Zaliapin, I.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 2946.Google Scholar
Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Dooling, S., and Gorokhovich, Y. (2013). The human impact of volcanoes: a historical review of events 1900–2009 and systematic literature review. PLOS Currents Disasters, 1, DOI: 10.1371/currents.dis.841859091a706efebf8a30f4ed7a1901.Google Scholar
Evans, S., Roberts, N., Ischuk, A., Delaney, K., Morozova, G. and Tutubalina, O. (2009). Landslides triggered by the 1949 Khait Earthquake, Tajikistan, and associated loss of life. Engineering Geology, 109, 195212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, E., Hidaka, M., Goto, A. and Umino, S. (2009). Simulations of measures to control lava flows. Bulletin of Volcanology, 71, 401408.Google Scholar
Gabrielov, A. M., Levshina, T. A. and Rotwain, I. M. (1990). Block model of earthquake sequence. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 61, 1828.Google Scholar
Giardini, D., Grünthal, G., Shedlock, K. M. and Zhang, P. (1999). The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map. Annali di Geofisica, 42, 12251228.Google Scholar
Ghafory-Ashtiany, M. (2014). Earthquake risk and risk reduction capacity building in Iran. In: Extreme Natural Hazards, Disaster Risks and Societal Implications, eds. Ismail-Zadeh, A., Fucugauchi, J. U., Kijko, A., Takeuchi, K. and Zaliapin, I.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 267278.Google Scholar
Ghafory-Ashtiany, M. and Hosseini, M. (2008). Post Bam recovery and reconstruction. Natural Hazard, 44, 229241.Google Scholar
Gluckman, P. (2016). The science–policy interface. Science, 353, 969, DOI: 10.1126/science.aai8837.Google Scholar
Green, H. W. II and Burnley, P. C. (1989). A new self-organizing mechanism for deep-focus earthquakes. Nature, 341, 733737.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. W. (2000). The dynamics of lava flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 32, 477518.Google Scholar
Griggs, D. T. and Baker, D. W. (1969). The origin of deep-focus earthquakes. In Properties of Matter Under Unusual Conditions, eds. Mark, H. and Fernbach, S.. New York: Wiley, pp. 2342.Google Scholar
Gupta, H. K., Purnachandra Rao, N., Rastogi, B. K., and Sarkar, D. (2001). The deadliest intraplate earthquake. Science, 291, 21012102.Google Scholar
Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34, 185188.Google Scholar
Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S. et al., eds. (2008). Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Huybers, P. and Langmuir, C. (2009). Feedback between deglaciation, volcanism, and atmospheric CO2. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 286, 479491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F. et al., eds.]. Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IRDR (2013). Issue Brief: Disaster Risk Reduction and Sustainable Development. Beijing: Integrated Research on Disaster Risk. Available at: www.irdrinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/IRDR-ICSU-Brief-DRR-SD.pdf (retrieved on 05.08.2016).Google Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A. T., Panza, G. F. and Naimark, B. M. (2000). Stress in the descending relic slab beneath Vrancea, Romania. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 157, 111130.Google Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A. and Takeuchi, K. (2007a). Preventive disaster management of extreme natural events. Natural Hazards, 42, 459467.Google Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A. T., Le Mouël, J. L., Soloviev, A., Tapponnier, P. and Vorobieva, I. (2007b). Numerical modeling of crustal block-and-fault dynamics, earthquakes and slip rates in the Tibet-Himalayan region. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 258, 465485.Google Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A., Schubert, G., Tsepelev, I., and Korotkii, A. (2008). Thermal evolution and geometry of the descending lithosphere beneath the SE-Carpathians: An insight from the past. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 273, 6879.Google Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A., Le Mouël, J.-L. and Soloviev, A. (2012a). Modeling of extreme seismic events. In Extreme Events and Natural Hazards: The Complexity Perspective, eds. Sharma, S. A., Bunde, A., Dimri, V. P. and Baker, D. N., Geophysical Monograph 196. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, pp. 7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A., Matenco, L., Radulian, M., Cloetingh, S. and Panza, G. (2012b). Geodynamic and intermediate-depth seismicity in Vrancea (the south-eastern Carpathians): Current state-of-the-art. Tectonophysics, 530 –531, 5079.Google Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A. (2014). Extreme seismic events: from basic science to disaster risk mitigation. In Extreme Natural Events, Disaster Risks and Societal Implications, eds. Ismail-Zadeh, A. Fucugauchi, J., Kijko, A., et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A., and Cutter, S. eds. (2015). Disaster Risks Research and Assessment to Promote Risk Reduction and Management. Paris: ICSU-ISSC.Google Scholar
Ismail-Zadeh, A., Cutter, S. L., Takeuchi, K., and Paton, D. (2017). Forging a paradigm shift in disaster science, Natural Hazards, 86(2), 969988.Google Scholar
Kantorovich, L., Keilis-Borok, V. I. and Molchan, G. (1973). Seismic risk and principles of seismic zoning. In Computational and Statistical Methods for Interpretation of Seismic Data, ed. Keilis-Borok, V. I.. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 320 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kilburn, C. R. J. and Petley, D. N. (2003). Forecasting giant, catastrophic slope collapse: lessons from Vajont, Northern Italy. Geomorphology, 54, 2132.Google Scholar
Korotkii, A., Kovtunov, D., Ismail-Zadeh, A., Tsepelev, I. and Melnik, O. (2016). Quantitative reconstruction of thermal and dynamic characteristics of lava from surface thermal measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 205, 17671779.Google Scholar
Latter, J. H. (1981). Tsunamis of volcanic origin: summary of causes, with particular reference to Krakatoa, 1883. Bulletin of Volcanology, 44, 467490.Google Scholar
Malamud, B. D. and Turcotte, D. L. (1999). Self-organized criticality applied to natural hazards. Natural Hazards, 20, 93116.Google Scholar
McBean, G. (2014). The grand challenges of integrated research on disaster risk. In Extreme Natural Hazards, Disaster Risks and Societal Implications, eds. Ismail-Zadeh, A., Fucugauchi, J. U., Kijko, A. et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1525.Google Scholar
Moroi, T. and Takemura, M. (2004). Mortality estimation by causes of death due to the 1923 Kanto earthquake (in Japanese with English abstract). Journal of the Japan Association of Earthquake Engineers, 4(4), 2145.Google Scholar
Re, Munich (2014). Topics Geo - Annual review of natural catastrophes 2013. Analyses, assessments, positions. Munich: MunichRe (retrieved on 05.08.2016).Google Scholar
Re, Munich (2015). Loss events worldwide 1980 – 2014: 10 costliest events ordered by overall losses. MunichRe, NatCatSERVICE. Avaialble at: www.munichre.com/site/corporate/get/documents_E-567437233/mr/assetpool.shared/Documents/5_Touch/_NatCatService/Significant-Natural-Catastrophes/2014/10-costliest-events-ordered-by-overall-losses.pdf (retrieved on 12.02.2017).Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, C. (2003). Climatic, environmental and human consequences of the largest known historic eruption: Tambora volcano (Indonesia) 1815. Progress in Physical Geography, 27, 230259.Google Scholar
Panza, G. F., Irikura, K., Kouteva, M., Peresan, A., Wang, Z. and Saragoni, R. (2010). Advanced seismic hazard assessment. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 168, DOI: 10.1007/s00024–010-0179–9.Google Scholar
Reuters (2014). Obama declares Hawaiian lava flow to be major disaster. Reuters, November 4, 2014. Available at: www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-lava-hawaii-idUSKBN0IO07E20141104 (retrieved on 12.02.2017).Google Scholar
Reuters (2016). Magnitude 6.6 quake jolts western Japan, no tsunami warning or major damage. Reuters, October 21, 2016. Available at: www.reuters.com/article/us-earthquake-japan-idUSKCN12L0F3 (retrieved on 12.02.2017).Google Scholar
Satake, K. (2014). The 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake and tsunami. In: Extreme Natural Hazards, Disaster Risks and Societal Implications, eds. Ismail-Zadeh, A., Fucugauchi, J. U., Kijko, A., Takeuchi, K., and Zaliapin, I.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 310321.Google Scholar
Schuster, R. L., and Alford, D. (2004). Usoi landslide dam and lake Sarez, Pamir Mountains, Tajikistan. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 10, 151168.Google Scholar
Semenza, E. and Ghirotti, M. (2000). History of the 1963 Vaiont slide: the importance of geological factors. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 59, 8797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sendai Framework (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Available at: www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/43291 (retrieved on 05.08.2016)Google Scholar
Simkin, T. and Siebert, L. (1994). Volcanoes of the World: A Regional Directory, Gazetteer, and Chronology of Volcanism during the Last 10,000 Years. Tucson, AZ: Geoscience Press.Google Scholar
Sokolov, V. and Ismail-Zadeh, A. (2015). Seismic hazard from instrumentally recorded, historical and simulated earthquakes: Application to the Tibet-Himalayan region. Tectonophysics, 657, 187204.Google Scholar
Sokolov, V. and Ismail-Zadeh, A. (2016). On the use of multiple-site estimations in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106(5), DOI: 10.1785/01201503062016.Google Scholar
Soloviev, A. A. and Ismail-Zadeh, A. T. (2003). Models of dynamics of block-and-fault systems. In Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction, eds. Keilis-Borok, V. I. and Soloviev, A. A. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 69138.Google Scholar
Stein, S., Geller, R. and Liu, M. (2011). Bad assumptions or bad luck: why earthquake hazard maps need objective testing. Seismological Research Letters, 82, 623626.Google Scholar
Stone, R. (2009). Peril in the Pamirs. Science, 326, 16141617.Google Scholar
Tsepelev, I., Ismail-Zadeh, A., Melnik, O. and Korotkii, A. (2016). Numerical modelling of fluid flow with rafts: An application to lava flows. Journal of Geodynamics, 97, 3141.Google Scholar
Turcotte, D. L. and Schubert, G. (2014). Geodynamics, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
UN (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
UN (2017). Report of the open-ended intergovernmental expert working group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction. Available at: www.preventionweb.net/files/50683_oiewgreportenglish.pdf (retrieved on 12.02.2017)Google Scholar
UNGA (1987). United Nations General Assembly Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. New York: UN Headquarters. Available at: www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm (retrieved on 05.08.2016).Google Scholar
UNISDR (2005). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. World Conference on Disaster Reduction. Available at: www.unisdr.org/2005/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/Hyogo-declaration-english.pdf (retrieved on 05.08.2016).Google Scholar
UNISDR (2009). The Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR2009). Geneva: UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.Google Scholar
UNISDR (2013). The Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR2013). Geneva: UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.Google Scholar
Wu, Z., and Ma, T. (2014). The 2008 Wenchuan, China, earthquake. In: Extreme Natural Hazards, Disaster Risks and Societal Implications, eds. Ismail-Zadeh, A., Fucugauchi, J. U., Kijko, A., Takeuchi, K., and Zaliapin, I.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 301309.Google Scholar
Wyss, M., Nekraskova, A. and Kossobokov, V. (2012). Errors in expected human losses due to incorrect seismic hazard estimates. Natural Hazards, 62, 927935.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×