Book contents
- The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy
- The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations and Translations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 How Is Moral Obligation Possible?
- Chapter 2 Anticipations of Autonomy
- Chapter 3 Autonomy and Moral Rationalism
- Chapter 4 Autonomy and Moral Empiricism
- Chapter 5 Elements of Autonomy in Kant’s Lectures on Ethics (1770–1780)
- Chapter 6 Emerging Autonomy
- Chapter 7 Autonomy and the Legislation of Laws in the Prolegomena (1783)
- Chapter 8 How Can Freedom Be a Law to Itself?
- Chapter 9 Moral Autonomy as Political Analogy
- Chapter 10 What Emerged
- Chapter 11 Kant’s Threefold Autonomy after the Groundwork
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2018
Book contents
- The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy
- The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations and Translations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 How Is Moral Obligation Possible?
- Chapter 2 Anticipations of Autonomy
- Chapter 3 Autonomy and Moral Rationalism
- Chapter 4 Autonomy and Moral Empiricism
- Chapter 5 Elements of Autonomy in Kant’s Lectures on Ethics (1770–1780)
- Chapter 6 Emerging Autonomy
- Chapter 7 Autonomy and the Legislation of Laws in the Prolegomena (1783)
- Chapter 8 How Can Freedom Be a Law to Itself?
- Chapter 9 Moral Autonomy as Political Analogy
- Chapter 10 What Emerged
- Chapter 11 Kant’s Threefold Autonomy after the Groundwork
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant's Moral Philosophy , pp. 213 - 223Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Achenwall, Gottfried Forthcoming. Natural Law, ed. Kleingeld, Pauline, trans. Vermeulen, Corinna, with an introduction by Guyer, Paul. London: Bloomsbury PressGoogle Scholar
Achenwall, Gottfried and Pütter, Johann Stephan 1995. Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts (Elementa Iuris Naturae), ed. Schröder, Jan. Frankfurt am Main: Insel VerlagGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2006. Il senso dell’etica: Kant e la costruzione di una teoria morale. Bologna: il MulinoGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2013. “Legge e obbligatorietà: La struttura dell’idea di autolegislazione morale in Kant,” Studi Kantiani 26, 55–70Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2015. “Kant’s Lectures on Ethics and Baumgarten’s Moral Philosophy,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 15–33Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2017. “Rationalism and Perfectionism,” in The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Golob, Sacha and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2018a. “Kant and Feder on the Will, Happiness, and the Aim of Moral Philosophy,” in Dyck and Wunderlich 2018, 232–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano 2018b. “Moral Realism by Other Means: The Hybrid Nature of Kant’s Practical Rationalism,” in Moral Realism or Anti-Realism in Kant, ed. Schmidt, Elke and dos Santos, Robinson. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 153–176Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, Ruffing, Margit (eds.) 2013. Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin and Boston: de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean 1718. “Jugement d’un anonyme sur l’original de cet abrégé,” in Les Devoirs de l’Homme et du Citoien, ed. Pufendorf, Samuel 4th edn. Amsterdam: De Coup and Kuyper, II, 429–495. English translation: Pufendorf, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, eds. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003, 267–305.Google Scholar
Bartuschat, Wolfgang 2004. “Kant über Grundsatz und Grundsätze in der Moral,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 12, 283–298Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb 1740. Ethica Philosophica. Halle: Hemmerde (second edition 1751, third edition 1763) [Second and third editions reprinted in AA 27:737–869, 27:873–1028]Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb 1760. Initia Philosophiae Practicae Primae. Halle: Hemmerde [Reprint in AA 19:7–91]Google Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim 2010. Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Samuel 1706. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation, in The Works of Samuel Clarke, vol. 2. London: Knapton 1738Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel 1756. Abhandlung von dem Daseyn und den Eigenschaften Gottes, von den Verbindlichkeiten der Natürlichen Religion, und der Wahrheit und Gewißheit der Christlichen Offenbarung. Braunschweig–Hildesheim: SchröderGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Samuel 1991. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, in British Moralists 1650–1800, ed. Raphael, D. D.. Oxford University Press, 190–225Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2014. Lectures on the History of Moral and Political Philosophy. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Konrad 2001. “‘Depositum.’ Zur logischen Struktur eines kantischen Beispiels für moralisches Argumentieren,” in Gerhardt et al. 2001, 116–130Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August 1744. Anweisung vernünftig zu leben, Darinnen nach Erklärung der Natur des menschlichen Willens die natürlichen Pflichten und allgemeinen Klugheitslehren im richtigen Zusammenhange vorgetragen werden. Leipzig: Gleditsch, third edition 1767 [Reprint: ed. Giorgio Tonelli. Hildesheim: Olms 1969]Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August 1745. Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten, wiefern sie den zufälligen entgegen gesetzet werden. Leipzig: Gleditsch [Reprint: ed. Giorgio Tonelli. Hildesheim: Olms 1969]Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph 1731. A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality; with, A Treatise of Freewill, ed. Hutton, Sarah. Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (ed.) 2010. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver (eds.) 2015. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey 2012. “Chimerical Ethics and Flattering Moralists: Baumgarten’s Influence on Kant’s Moral Theory in the Observations and Remarks,” in Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide, ed. Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard. Cambridge University Press, 38–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey and Wunderlich, Falk (eds.) 2018. Kant and His German Contemporaries. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August 1776. Allgemeine Theorie des Denkens und Empfindens. Berlin: Voß [Reprint: Frankfurt/Main: Athenäum 1972]Google Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August 1781. Sittenlehre der Vernunft: Zum Gebrauche seiner Vorlesungen. Berlin: Nicolai [Reprint: Frankfurt/Main: Athenäum 1971]Google Scholar
Epictetus, , 1925–1928. The Discourses as Reported by Arrian, the Manual, and Fragments, trans. Oldfather, W.A., 2 vols. London and Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Esser, Andrea Marlen 2016. “Applying the Concept of the Good: The Final End and the Highest Good in Kant’s Third Critique,” in The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy, ed. Höwing, Thomas. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feil, Ernst 1987. Antithetik neuzeitlicher Vernunft: “Autonomie-Heteronomie” und “rational-irrational.” Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, II 1780. Ueber die deutsche Litteratur, die Mängel die man ihr vorwerfen kann, die Ursachen derselben und die Mittel sie zu verbessern, trans. von Dohm, Christian Konrad Wilhelm. Berlin: DeckerGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick 2015. “Herder: Religion and Moral Motivation,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 34–50Google Scholar
Garve, Christian 1787. Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten [1783]. Neue verbesserte und mit einigen Anmerkungen vermehrte Ausgabe, second edition, 3 vols. Breslau: Korn [Reprint: ed. Kurt Wölfel, Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms 1986]Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (eds.) 2001. Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin and New York: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Gill, Michael 1998. “On the Alleged Incompatibility between Sentimentalism and Moral Confidence,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15, 411–440Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah 2015. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Goy, Ina 2007. “Immanuel Kant über das moralische Gefühl der Achtung,” Zeit-schrift für philosophische Forschung 61, 337–360Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2000. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2007. “Perfection, Autonomy, and Heautonomy: The Path of Reason from Wolff to Kant,” in Wolff und die europäische Aufklärung: Akten des 1. Internationalen Wolff-Kongresses, ed. Stolzenberg, Jürgen. Hildesheim: Olms, 299–322Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2011. “Kantian Perfectionism,” in Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics, ed. Jost, Lawrence and Wuerth, Julian. Cambridge University Press, 194–214Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2012a. “Freedom as the Foundation of Morality: Kant’s Early Efforts,” in Shell and Velkley 2012, 77–98Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2012b. “Review of Delfosse, Heinrich P., Norbert Hinske, Gianluca Sadun Bordoni, Einleitung des ‘Naturrechts Feyerabend’” (2010), Ratio Juris 25, 110–116Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1963. “Über Kants früheste Ethik,” Kant-Studien 54, 404–431. Translation: “Concerning Kant’s Earliest Ethics,” in Shell and Velkley 2012, 13–37Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1989. “Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique,” in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, ed. Förster, Eckart. Stanford University Press, 29–46Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1992. “The Moral Image of the World,” in Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford University Press, 3–28Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1994. “Ethics of Autonomy,” in The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 89–121Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. 1991. Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E., 1992. Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Philipp-Alexander 2012. Kants Einleitung in die Rechtslehre von 1784: Immanuel Kants Rechtsbegriff in der Moralvorlesung “Mrongovius II” und der Naturrechtsvorlesung “Feyerabend” von 1784 sowie in der “Metaphysik der Sitten” von 1797. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag GöttingenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J. 2004. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Dieter 2004. “Wolffs Begriff der natürlichen Verbindlichkeit als Bindeglied zwischen empirischer Psychologie und Moralphilosophie,” in Christian Wolffs Psychologie: Systematische und historische Untersuchungen, ed. Rudolph, Oliver-Pierre and Goubet, Jean-François. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 145–169Google Scholar
Hüning, Dieter 2015. “Gesetz und Verbindlichkeit. Zur Begründung der praktischen Philosophie bei Samuel Pufendorf und Christian Wolff,” in Das Band der Gesellschaft. Verbindlichkeitsdiskurse im 18: Jahrhundert, ed. Bunke, Simon, Mihaylova, Katerina and Ringkamp, Daniela. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 37–57Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis 1725. Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, ed. Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis 1728. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections: With Illustrations on the Moral Sense, ed. Garrett, Aaron. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002Google Scholar
Jachmann, Reinhold Bernhard 1993. “Immanuel Kant geschildert in Briefen an einen Freund,” in Immanuel Kant, ed. Gross, Felix and Malter, Rudolf. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 103–187Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick 2004. “Self-Legislation in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86, 257–306Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick 2005. “Interpreting Kant’s Theory of Divine Commands,” Kantian Review 9, 128–149Google Scholar
Kames, Home, Henry, Lord 1751. Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion, ed. Catherine Moran, Mary. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. 2005Google Scholar
Kames, Home, Henry, Lord 1768. Versuch über die ersten Gründe der Sittlichkeit und der natürlichen Religion in zween Theilen, trans. Rautenberg, Christian Günter. Braunschweig: MeyerGoogle Scholar
Keller, Pierre 1998. Kant and the Demands of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel J. 2002. Kant’s Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 1993. “The Problematic Status of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant,” Philosophical Forum 25, 134–150Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 1998. “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36, 77–97Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 2010. “Moral Consciousness and the ‘Fact of Reason,’” in Reath and Timmermann 2010, 55–72Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 2017. “Contradiction and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law,” Kant-Studien 108, 89–115Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 2018. “The Principle of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory: Its Rise and Fall,” in Kant on Persons and Agency, ed. Watkins, Eric. Cambridge University Press, 61–79Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline and Willaschek, Marcus. Unpublished. “Autonomy without Paradox: Kant, Self-Legislation, and the Moral Law”Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2011. “Johann Georg Sulzers ‘vermischte Sittenlehre.’ Ein Beitrag zur Vorgeschichte und Problemstellung von Kants Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,” in Johann Georg Sulzer (1720–1779): Aufklärer zwischen Christian Wolff und David Hume, ed. Grunert, Frank and Stiening, Gideon. Berlin: de Gruyter, 309–322Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2013. “Kants Erörterung der ‘libertas indifferentiae’ in der Metaphysik der Sitten und ihre philosophische Bedeutung,” in Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus / International Yearbook of German Idealism, 9/2011, ed. Rush, Fred and Stolzenberg, Jürgen. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 22–50Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2015a. “Freiheit, Recht und Selbsterhaltung. Zur philosophischen Bedeutung von Kants Begriff der Verbindlichkeit,” in Normativität des Lebens – Normativität der Vernunft?, ed. Rothhaar, Markus and Hähnel, Martin. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 95–116Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2015b. “Knowing, Feeling, Desiring – Self-Possession. Reflections on the Connection between the Faculties in Kant’s Doctrine of the Categorical Imperative,” in Kant’s Lectures/Kants Vorlesungen, ed. Dörflinger, Bernd, La Rocca, Claudio, Louden, Robert, and de Azevedo-Marques, Ubirajara Rancan. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, 143–161Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2016. “Sutor, Johann Paul Junior (1752–82),” in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth Century German Philosophers, ed. Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London, New York: Bloomsbury, 767–768Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2018. “The Antithetic between Freedom and Natural Necessity: Garve’s Problem and Kant’s Solution,” in Dyck and Wunderlich 2018, 250–264.Google Scholar
König, Peter 1994. Autonomie und Autokratie: Über Kant’s Metaphysik der Sitten. Berlin: de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Korkman, Petter 2003. “Voluntarism and Moral Obligation: Barbeyrac’s Defence of Pufendorf Revisited,” in Early Modern Natural Law Theories, ed. Hochstrasser, T. J. and Schröder, Peter. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 195–225Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1986. “Skepticism about Practical Reason,” Journal of Philosophy 83, 5–25Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Krauß, Wilhelm 1926. Untersuchungen zu Kants moralphilosophischen Vorlesungen. PhD dissertation, TübingenGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred 2004. “Einleitung,” in Kant, Immanuel. Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, ed. Stark, Werner. Berlin: de Gruyter, vii–xxxvGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred 2015. “Collins: Kant’s Proto-Critical Position,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 51–67Google Scholar
Kulenkampff, Jens 2004. “Moralisches Gefühl oder moral sense – wie berechtigt ist Kants Kritik?” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 12, 234–251Google Scholar
Langton, Rae 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1706. “Monita quaedam ad Samuelis Pufendorfii Principia,” in Opera Omnia, ed. Dutens, Louis. Genève: Fratres de Tournes 1768, vol. 4. III, 275–28. Translation in Leibniz. Political Writings, ed. Patrick Riley. Cambridge University Press 1972, 64–75Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1710. Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal, in Die Philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, ed. Gerhardt, Carl Immanuel. Berlin: Weidman 1875–90, vol. VI [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1978]Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1860. Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff, ed. Gerhardt, Carl Immanuel. Halle: Schmidt [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1971]Google Scholar
Luther, Martin 1883. Dr. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe [Weimarer Ausgabe]. Weimar: Böhlau 1883–2009Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas 1684. Traité de morale: Réimprimé d’après l’édition de 1707, avec les variantes des éditions de 1684 et 1697. Paris: Thorin 1882Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich 1764. Allgemeine practische Weltwisheit, Halle: Hemmerde [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 2008]Google Scholar
Meiners, Christoph 1801. Allgemeine kritische Geschichte der Ethik oder Lebens-Wissenschaft. Zweyter Theil. Göttingen: DieterichGoogle Scholar
Meissner, Heinrich Adam 1737. Philosophisches Lexicon aus Christian Wolffs sämtlichen deutschen Schriften. Bayreuth: VierlingGoogle Scholar
Menzer, Paul (ed.) 1924. Eine Vorlesung Kants über Ethik. Berlin: Pan Verlag Rolf HeiseGoogle Scholar
Mohr, Georg 2005. “‘Moral Sense’ – Zur Geschichte einer Hypothese und ihrer Kritik bei Adam Smith,” in Adam Smith als Moralphilosoph, ed. Fricke, Christel and Schütt, Hans-Peter. Berlin: de Gruyter, 304–330Google Scholar
Moran, Richard 2001. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Moran, Kate A. 2012. Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington: Catholic University of America PressGoogle Scholar
Naragon, Steve 2015. “Moral Philosophy.” http://users.manchester.edu/FacStaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Lectures/lecturesListDiscipline.htm#moralPhilosophyGoogle Scholar
Naragon, Steve 2016. “Moral Philosophy Notes.” http://users.manchester.edu/FacStaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Notes/notesMoral.htmGoogle Scholar
Naragon, Steve 2016a. “The Powalski Notes.” http://users.manchester.edu/FacStaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Notes/notesMoral.htm#an-PowalskiGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2003. “Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplement 77, 1–21Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2013. “Postscript: Heteronomy as the Clue to Kantian Autonomy,” in Kant on Moral Autonomy, ed. Sensen, Oliver. Cambridge University Press, 282–288Google Scholar
Park, Chan-Goo 1995. Das moralische Gefühl in der britischen moral-sense-Schule und bei Kant. Tübingen: unpublished dissertationGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence R. 2014. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant on “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason.” London and New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Patzig, Günther 1985. “Principium diiudicationis” und “Principium executionis,” in Handlungstheorie und Transzendentalphilosophie, ed. Prauss, Gerold. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 204–218Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry 2002. German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel 1991. On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, trans. Silverthorne, Michael, ed. Tully, James. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel 2003. The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature (1673), trans. Andrew Tooke (1691), ed. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Indianapolis: Liberty FundGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick 2010. “The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge University Press, 290–309Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick 2015. “Did Kant Justify the French Revolution Ex Post Facto?,” in Clewis 2015, 327–347Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 2005. “The Myth of Instrumental Rationality,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1, 1–28Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2006. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2010. “Formal Principles and the Form of a Law,” in Reath and Timmermann 2010, 31–54Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2013a. “The Ground of Practical Laws,” in Bacin et al. 2013, vol. 3, 571–581Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2013b. “Kant’s Conception of Autonomy of the Will,” in Sensen 2013a, 32–52Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2015. “Did Kant Hold That Rational Volition Is Sub Ratione Boni?,” in Reason, Value, and Respect: Kantian Themes from the Philosophy of Thomas E. Hill, Jr., ed. Johnson, Robert and Timmons, Mark. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens (eds.) 2010. Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick 1986. The General Will before Rousseau: The Transformation of the Divine into the Civic. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1762. Émile, ou de l’éducation, in Oeuvres complètes, ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel, Paris: Gallimard 1969, vol. 4Google Scholar
Schadow, Steffi 2013. Achtung für das Gesetz. Moral und Motivation bei Kant. Berlin and Boston: de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Schmucker, Josef 1961. Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seinen vorkritischen Schriften und Reflektionen. Meisenheim: HainGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1996. “Barbeyrac and Leibniz on Pufendorf,” in Samuel Pufendorf und die Europäische Frühaufklärung: Werk und Einfluss eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 181–189Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1997. “Introduction,” to Kant: Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge University Press, xiii–xxviiGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (ed.) 2003. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 2009. “Kant against the ‘Spurious Principles of Morality,’” in Timmermann 2009a, 140–158Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 2010. “Voluntarism and the Foundations of Ethics,’” in Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 202–221Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2005. Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit: Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studie. Berlin and New York: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Precritical Project. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens 1999. Kategorische und andere Imperative. Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-HolzboogGoogle Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens 2000. “Die Vorlesungsnachschriften zu Kants praktischer Philosophie in der Akademie-Ausgabe,” in Zustand und Zukunft der Akademie-Ausgabe von Immanuel Kants Gesammelten Schriften (Kant-Studien 91, Sonderheft), ed. Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner. Berlin: de Gruyter, 178–188Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens 2011. Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten – Ein Intellektuelles Porträt: Studien Zur Metaphysik und Ethik von Kants Leitautor. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-HolzboogGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2012. “The Role of Feelings in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Studi Kantiani 25, 45–58Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2013c. “Kant’s Constructivism,” in Constructivism in Ethics, ed. Bagnoli, Carla. Cambridge University Press, 63–81Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2015a. “Moral Obligation and Free Will,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 138–155Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2015b. “Autonomie,” in Kant-Lexikon, ed. Willaschek, Marcus et al. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, vol. 1: 203–206Google Scholar
Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) 2012. Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner 1993. Nachforschungen zu Briefen und Handschriften Immanuel Kants. Berlin: AkademieGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner 1995. “Kant als akademischer Lehrer,” in Königsberg und Riga, ed. Ischreyt, Heinz. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 51–68Google Scholar
Stark, Werner 1999. “Zu Kant’s Moralkolleg der 1770er Jahre,” in Aufklärung und Interpretation, ed. Klemme, Heiner F., Ludwig, Bernd, Pauen, Michael, and Stark, Werner. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 73–104Google Scholar
Stark, Werner 2004. “Nachwort,” in Immanuel Kant, Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, ed. Stark, Werner. Berlin: de Gruyter, 371–407Google Scholar
Stern, Robert 2012. Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sulzer, Johann Georg 1773. Vermischte philosophische Schriften: Aus den Jahrbüchern der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin gesammelt. Leipzig: Weidmann and ReichGoogle Scholar
Sutor, Johann Paul 1774. Allgemeine practische Weltweisheit: Ein Versuch für die Philosophie in Bayern. Jena: FickelscheerGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, Oliver 2008. “Ethica Deceptrix: The Significance of Baumgarten’s Notion of a Chimerical Ethics for the Development of Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” in Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. Rohden, Valerio et al. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 451–462Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2007. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (ed.) 2009a. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2009b. “Acting from Duty: Inclination, Reason and Moral Worth,” in Timmermann 2009a, 45–62Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2013. “Kantian Dilemmas? Moral Conflict in Kant’s Ethical Theory,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95, 36–64Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2015: “Mrongovius II: A Supplement to the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Denis and Sensen 2015, 68–83Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton 2006. “Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws,” Philosophical Topics 31, 371–407Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio 1967. Kant und die antiken Skeptiker, in Studien zu Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Hildesheim: Olms, 93–123Google Scholar
Warda, Arthur 1922. Immanuel Kants Bücher: Mit einer getreuen Nachbildung des bisher einzigen bekannten Abzuges des Versteigerungskataloges der Bibliothek Kants. Berlin: BreslauerGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric and Willaschek, Marcus 2017. “Kant’s Account of Cognition,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55, 83–112Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus 1997. “Why the ‘Doctrine of Right’ Does Not Belong in the Metaphysics of Morals,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 5, 205–227Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1703. Philosophia practica universalis, mathematica methodo conscripta. Leipzig: GötzeGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1713. Vernünftige Gedancken von den Kräfften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkäntniß der Wahrheit, 14th edition. Halle: Renger 1754 [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1978]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1718. Ratio praelectionum Wolfianarum in Mathesin et Philosophiam universam. Halle: Renger 1735 [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1972]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1719. Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt, 11th edition. Halle: Renger 1751 [Reprint: ed. Charles A. Corr. Hildesheim: Olms 1983]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1720. Vernünfftige Gedancken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen (Deutsche Ethik), fourth edition. Frankfurt, Leipzig: Renger 1733 [Reprint: ed. H. W. Arndt, Hildesheim: Olms 1996]. Translation of selections in Schneewind 2003, 333–350Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1726. Ausführliche Nachricht von seinen eigenen Schriften, die er in deutscher Sprache von den verschiedenen Theilen der Weltweißheit herausgegeben, second edition. Frankfurt am Mayn: Hort 1733 [Reprint: Hildesheim–New York: Olms 1973]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1728. Discursus praeliminaris de philosophia in genere. Einleitende Abhandlung über Philosophie im allgemeinen, ed. Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog 1996Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1738–39. Philosophia practica universalis, methodo scientifica pertractata, Pars prior, theoriam complectens, qua omnis actionum humanarum differentia, omnisque juris ac obligationum omnium, principia, a priori demonstrantur. Frankfurt, Leipzig: Renger [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1971–79]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1750. Philosophia moralis sive Ethica, methodo scientifica pertractata. Pars prima. Halle: Renger [Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms 1970]Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2002. “The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy,” in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. Timmons, Mark. Oxford University Press, 1–22Google Scholar
Zedler, Johann Heinrich (ed.) 1731–54. Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon aller Wissenschaften und Künste. Halle and Leipzig: ZedlerGoogle Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa 2006. “Respect for the Law and the Use of Dynamical Terms in Kant’s Theory of Moral Motivation,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88, 31–53Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter 2015. “‘Without Hope and Fear’: Kant’s Naturrecht Feyerabend on Bindingness and Obligation,” in Clewis 2015, 346–361Google Scholar