Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:18:26.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Risk Analysis1

from Part II - Some Widely Used Analysis Tools and Topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

M. Granger Morgan
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Theory and Practice in Policy Analysis
Including Applications in Science and Technology
, pp. 274 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, B.N., Magaw, R., and Gold, L.S. (1987). “Ranking Possible Carcinogenic Hazards,” Science, 236, pp. 271280.Google Scholar
Burke, J.G. (1966). “Bursting Boilers and the Federal Power,” Technology and Culture, 7, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Case, A. and Deaton, A. (2015). “Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112(49), pp. 1507815083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W.C. (1980). “Witches, Floods and Wonder Drugs,” in Schwing, R.C. and Albers, W.A. Jr. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?, Plenum, pp. 287318.Google Scholar
Crouch, E.A.C. and Wilson, R. (1982). Risk/Benefit Analysis, Ballinger, 218pp.Google Scholar
EPA SAB (2001). Improved Science-Based Environmental Stakeholder Processes: A Commentary by the EPA Science Advisory Board, EPA-SAB-EC-COM-01-006, 25pp. Available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/cee3f362f1a1344e8525718e004ea078/$file/eecm01006_report_appna-e.pdf.Google Scholar
Fischbeck, P.S. and Farrow, R.S. (eds.) (2001). Improving Regulation: Cases in Environment, Health and Safety, Resources for the Future, 461pp.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. (1978). “Fault Trees: Sensitivity of Estimated Failure Probabilities to Problem Representation,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, pp. 342355.Google Scholar
Glickman, T.S. and Gough, M. (1990). Readings in Risk, Resources for the Future, distributed by Johns Hopkins University Press, 262pp.Google Scholar
Graham, J.D. and Vaupel, J. (1981). “Value of Life: What Difference Does It Make?,” Risk Analysis, 1, pp. 692704.Google Scholar
Graham, J.D. and Wiener, J.B. (1995). Risk versus Risk: Trade-offs in Protecting Health and the Environment, Harvard University Press, 337pp.Google Scholar
Heinzerling, L. (1998). “Regulatory Costs of Mythic Proportions,” The Yale Law Journal, 107(7), pp. 19812070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karcher, S.C., VanBriesen, J.M., and Nietch, C.T. (2012). Assessing the Challenges Associated with Developing an Integrated Modeling Approach for Predicting and Managing Water Quality and Quantity from the Watershed through the Drinking Water Treatment System, U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-12/030, 55pp.Google Scholar
Keeney, R.L. (1995). “Understanding Life-Threatening Risks,” Risk Analysis, 15, pp. 627637.Google Scholar
Keeney, R.L., Kulkarni, R.B., and Nair, K. (1978). “Assessing the Risk of an LNG Terminal,” Technology Review, 81(1), pp. 6472.Google Scholar
Kuzmack, A.M. and McGaughy, R.E (1975). Quantitative Risk Assessment for Community Exposure to Vinyl Chloride, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 122pp.Google Scholar
Lave, L.B. (1981). The Strategy of Social Regulation: Decision Frameworks for Policy, Brookings, 166pp.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. (2016). Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires behind the Rise of the Radical Right, Doubleday, 449pp.Google Scholar
Möller-Gulland, J., McGlade, K., and Lago, M. (2011). “Effluent Tax in Germany,” EPI Water Report WP3 EX-POST, Evaluating Economic Policy Instrument for Sustainable Water Management in Europe, 39pp. Available at: www.feem-project.net/epiwater/docs/d32-d6-1/CS14_Germany.pdf.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.G. (1981a) “Probing the Question of Technology-Induced Risk,” IEEE Spectrum, 18(11), pp. 5864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M.G. (1981b) “Choosing and Managing Technology-Induced Risk,” IEEE Spectrum, 18(12), pp. 5360.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.G. and Lave, L.B. (1990). “Ethical Considerations in Risk Communication Practice and Research,” guest editorial in Risk Analysis, 10(3), pp. 355358.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.G. and McMichael, F.C. (1981). “A Characterization and Critical Discussion of Models and Their Use in Environmental Policy,” Policy Sciences, 14, pp. 345370.Google Scholar
Morrall, J.F., III (1986). “A Review of the Record,” Regulation, pp. 2534.Google Scholar
Morrall, J.F., III (2003). “Saving Lives: A Review of the Record,” AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper 03-6, 28pp.Google Scholar
Morris, S.C. (1990). Cancer Risk Assessment: A Quantitative Approach, M. Dekker, 408pp.Google Scholar
Notarianni, K.A. (2000). “The Role of Uncertainty in Improving Fire Protection Regulation,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 256pp.Google Scholar
Notarianni, K.A. and Fischbeck, P.S. (2001). “Performance with Uncertainty: A Process for Implementing Performance-Based Fire Regulations,” in Fischbeck, P.S. and Farrow, G.S. (eds.), Improving Regulation: Cases in Environment Health and Safety, Resources for the Future, pp. 233256.Google Scholar
NRC (1983). Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academies Press, 191 pp.Google Scholar
NRC (1993). Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children, National Academies Press, 386pp.Google Scholar
NRC (1994). Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, National Academies Press, 651pp.Google Scholar
NRC (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Academies Press, 249pp.Google Scholar
Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury Press, 355pp.Google Scholar
Pope, C.A., III, Burnett, R.T., Turner, M.C., Cohen, A., Krewski, D., Jerrett, M., Gapstur, S.M., and Thun, M.J. (2011). “Lung Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Associated with Ambient Air Pollution and Cigarette Smoke: Shape of the Exposure–Response Relationships,” Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(11), pp. 16161621.Google Scholar
Ramsberg, J.A.L. and Sjöberg, L. (1997). “The Cost-Effectiveness of Lifesaving Interventions in Sweden,” Risk Analysis, 17(4), pp. 467478.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, N.C. (1981). “The Application of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Techniques to Energy Technologies,” Annual Reviews of Energy, 6, pp. 123138.Google Scholar
Seinfeld, J.H. and Pandis, S. (2006). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, Wiley, 1203pp.Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. (1980). “Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk,” in Schwing, R.S. and Albers, W.A. Jr. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?, Plenum, pp. 181214.Google Scholar
Tengs, T.O., Adams, M.E., Pliskin, J.S., Safran, D.G., Siegel, J.E., Weinstein, M.C., and Graham, J.D. (1995). “Five-Hundred Live Saving Interventions and Their Cost-Effectiveness,” Risk Analysis, 15, pp. 369390.Google Scholar
Tengs, T.O. and Graham, J.D. (1996). “Chapter 8: The Opportunity Costs of Social Investments in Life-Saving,” in Hahn, R.W. (ed.), Risks and Costs of Lives Saved, Oxford University Press, pp. 167182.Google Scholar
Thomann, R.V. and Mueller, J.A. (1987). Principles of Surface Water Quality Modeling and Control, Harper & Row, 644pp.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. (1980). “Aesthetics of Risk: Culture or Context,” in Schwing, R.C. and Albers, W.A. Jr. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?, Plenum, pp. 273285.Google Scholar
Train, R. (1976). “Interim Procedures and Guidelines for Health Risk and Economic Impact Assessments of Suspected Carcinogens,” EPA Office of the Administrator, 15pp.Google Scholar
US EPA (1984). “Risk Assessment and Management: Framework for Decision Making,” US EPA 600-9-85, 37pp.Google Scholar
WASH-1400 (1975). Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-75/014 (WASH-1400), 207pp.Google Scholar
Wellen, C., Kamran-Disfani, A.-R., and Arhonditsis, G.B. (2015). “Evaluation of the Current State of Distributed Watershed Nutrient Water Quality Modeling,” Environmental Science & Technology, 49(6), pp. 32783290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, M.C., Infante, P.F., and Chu, K.C. (1982). “A Quantitative Estimate of Leukemia Mortality Associated with Occupational Exposure to Benzene,” Risk Analysis, 2(3), pp. 195204.Google Scholar
Wiener, J.B., Rogers, M.D., Hammitt, J.K., and Sand, P.H. (eds.) (2011). The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe, RFF Press/Earthscan/Routledge, 582pp.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1979). “No Risk Is the Highest Risk of All,” American Scientist, 67, Jan.–Feb., pp. 3237.Google Scholar
Wilmoth, J.R. (1998). “The Future of Human Longevity: A Demographer’s Perspective,” Science, 280, pp. 395397.Google Scholar
Wynder, E.L. and Hoffmann, D. (1979). “Tobacco and Health: A Societal Challenge,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 300, pp. 894903.Google Scholar
Zannetti, P. (ed.) (2003–2010). Air Quality Modeling: Theories, Methodologies, Computational Techniques, and Available Databases and Software, Vol. I, Fundamentals; Vol. II, Advanced Topics; Vol. III, Special Issues; Vol. IV, Advances and Updates, EnviroComp and Air & Waste Management Association.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Risk Analysis1
  • M. Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
  • Book: Theory and Practice in Policy Analysis
  • Online publication: 24 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316882665.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Risk Analysis1
  • M. Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
  • Book: Theory and Practice in Policy Analysis
  • Online publication: 24 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316882665.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Risk Analysis1
  • M. Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
  • Book: Theory and Practice in Policy Analysis
  • Online publication: 24 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316882665.011
Available formats
×