Spina bifida

Ineke M. Pit-Ten Cate; Jim Stevenson

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543579.237

Spina bifida

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2014

Ineke M. Pit-Ten Cate and

Edited by

John Weinman and

Ineke M. Pit-Ten Cate: Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Jim Stevenson: Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Susan Ayers: Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum: Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus: Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman: Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston: Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman: Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West: Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Spina bifida is a congenital neural tube defect, characterized by a fault in the spinal column in which one or more vertebrae fail to form properly leaving a gap or split. Spina bifida occulta is a common condition in which the bones may be incomplete but the defect is covered by skin and the spinal cord usually is unaffected, hence most people do not have any symptoms or clinical problems. Spina bifida aperta refers to an open defect of the spine in which the spinal cord does not form properly and is exposed. There are two forms; meningocele and myelomeningocele. In meningocele, the visible cyst on the back contains cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the meninges but no nerve tissue. In the more common and serious myelomeningocele, the cyst contains both the nerve tissue and its coverings, hence there is always some degree of paralyses and loss of sensation below the affected vertebrae. Spina bifida is often associated with malformations of the brain stem and cerebellum (Arnold Chiari malformations) and hydrocephalus (Shonkoff & Marshall, 1990). Hydrocephalus occurs when there is an abnormal accumulation of CSF within the ventricles and or subarachnoid space of the brain.

The incidence of spina bifida varies from country to country, for example, the incidence in Ireland is 8 per 1000 live births whilst in South East Asia the condition is rare (Chauvel, 1991).

Type: Chapter
Information: Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 889 - 891

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543579.237 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammerman, R. T., Kane, V. R., Slomka, G. T.et al. (1998). Psychiatric symptomatology and family functioning in children and adolescents with spina bifida. Journal Of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 5, 449–65.Google Scholar

Appleton, P. L., Minchom, P. E., Ellis, N. C.et al. (1994). The self-concept of young people with spina bifida: a population based study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 36, 198–215.Google Scholar

Barakat, L. P. & Linney, J. A. (1992). Children with physical handicaps and their mothers – the interrelation of social support, maternal adjustment, and child adjustment. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 17, 725–39.Google Scholar

Brookshire, B. L., Fletcher, J. M., Bohan, T. P.et al. (1995). Verbal and nonverbal skill discrepancies in children with hydrocephalus – a 5-year longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20, 785–800.Google Scholar

Castree, B. J. & Walker, J. H. (1981). The young adult with spina bifida. British Medical Journal, 283, 1040–2.Google Scholar

Chauvel, P. J. (1991). Spina bifida and hydrocephalus. In Capute, A. J., Accardo, P. J. (Eds.). Developmental disabilities in infancy and childhood (pp. 383–93). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.

Chernoff, R. G., List, D. G., DeVet, K. A. & Ireys, H. T. (2001). Maternal reports of raising children with chronic illnesses: the prevalence of positive thinking. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1, 104–7.Google Scholar

Dise, J. E. & Lohr, M. E. (1998). Examination of deficits in conceptual reasoning abilities associated with spina bifida. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 77, 247–51.Google Scholar

Donders, J., Rourke, B. P. & Canady, A. I. (1991). Neuropsychological functioning of hydrocephalic children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 607–13.Google Scholar

Dorner, S. (1975). The relationship of physical handicap to stress in families with an adolescent with spina bifida. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 17, 765–76.Google Scholar

Havermans, T. & Eiser, C. (1991). Mothers perceptions of parenting a child with spina-bifida. Child Care Health and Development, 17, 259–73.Google Scholar

Holmbeck, G. N. & Faier-Routman, J. (1995). Spinal lesion level, shunt status, family relationships, and psychosocial adjustment in children and adolescents with spina bifida myelomeningocele. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20, 817–32.Google Scholar

Holmbeck, G. N., Gorey-Ferguson, L., Hudson, T.et al. (1997). Maternal, paternal, and marital functioning in families of preadolescents with spina bifida. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 167–81.Google Scholar

Hunt, G. M. & Oakeshott, P. (2003). Outcome in people with open spina bifida at age 35: prospective community based cohort study. British Medical Journal, 326, 1365–6.Google Scholar

Kronenberger, W. G. & Thompson, R. J. (1992). Medical stress, appraised stress, and the psychological adjustment of mothers of children with myelomeningocele. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 405–11.Google Scholar

McCormick, M. C., Charney, E. B. & Stemmler, M. M. (1986). Assessing the impact of a child with spina bifida on the family. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 28, 53–61.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, P. & Hunt, G. M. (2003). Long-term outcome in open spina bifida. British Journal of General Practice, 53, 632–6.Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics (2004). Cogenital anomaly statistics in England and Wales 2004. www.statistics.gov.uk.

Pit-ten Cate, I. M. (2001). Positive and negative experiences of parents of children with spina bifida and/or hydrocephalus. Paper presented at the centre for research into psychological development seminar series, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Pit-ten Cate, I. M., Kennedy, C. R. & Stevenson, J. (2002). Disability and quality of life in spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 44, 317–22.Google Scholar

Shonkoff, J. P. & Marshall, P. C. (1990). Biological bases of developmental dysfunction. In Meisels, S. J. E. & Shonkoff, J. P. (Eds.). Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 35–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wills, K. E. (1993). Neuropsychological functioning in children with spina-bifida and or hydrocephalus. Journal Of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 247–65.Google Scholar

Book contents

Spina bifida

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive