Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T12:37:41.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transplantation

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Konstadina Griva
Affiliation:
University College London
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College London
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

With medical advances transplantation has become a common approach to treating an increasing number of end stage organ failure disorders. Kidney, heart, liver and bone marrow transplantation are being performed in many countries at an increasing rate largely limited by the availability of organs (United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS], 2001). In addition, significant progress has been made in transplantation procedures involving pancreas, lung, cornea, skin and islet cells. Simultaneous multiple organ transplantation is advocated as the treatment of choice for patients with multiple organ failure (Schweitzer et al., 1997) (see, for example, ‘Coronary heart disease: heart failure’). Transplantation of external body parts such as hands (e.g. Klapheke et al., 2000) and transplants from animals (e.g. White & Nicholson, 1999) are driving transplantation research and practice into new territories.

Progress in surgical techniques, organ preservation and improved methods to decrease graft rejection, including advances in histocompatibility testing and immunosuppression have resulted in unprecedented graft and patient survival rates (Niklason & Langer, 2001). For example, today 88% of patients receiving a kidney, 77% of patients received a heart and 80% of patients receiving a liver will have a functioning graft one year after the operation (British Transplantation Society [BTS], 2003).

Despite the rapid proliferation in the number of transplant programmes and the number of transplant candidates worldwide, the number of organ donors has remained relatively stable. Most organs come from cadaver donors, with head trauma and cerebral vascular accidents being the cause of death in 85% of cadaver donors (UNOS, 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bornstein, R. A., Starling, R. C., Myerowitz, P. D. & Haas, G. J. (1995). Neuropsychological function in patients with end-stage heart failure before and after cardiac transplantation. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 91, 260–5.Google Scholar
Botsford, A. L. (1995). Review of literature on heart transplant recipients return to work: predictors and outcomes. Social Work in Health Care, 21, 87–9.Google Scholar
Bravata, D. M. & Keeffe, E. B. (2001). Quality of life and employment after liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation, 7, S119–23.Google Scholar
Bravata, D. M., Olkin, I., Barnato, A. E., Keeffe, E. B. & Owens, D. K. (1999). Health-related quality of life after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. Liver Transplantation Surgery, 5, 318–31.Google Scholar
Bremer, B. A., Wert, K. M., Durica, A. L. & Weaver, A. (1997). Neuropsychological, physical and psychosocial functioning of individuals with end-stage renal disease. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 19, 348–52.Google Scholar
British Transplantation Society (2003). Standards for Solid Organ Transplantation in the United Kingdom, (2nd edn.). London, UK: British Transplantation Society.
Bunzel, B. & Laederach-Hoffmann, K. (2000). Solid organ transplantation: are there predictors for compliance? A literature overview. Transplantation, 15, 711–16.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. L., Whiteside, C., Katz, J. & Devins, G. M. (2000). Differences in quality of life across renal replacement therapies: a meta-analytic comparison. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 35, 29–37.Google Scholar
Geest, S. & Moons, P. (2000). The patient's appraisal of side-effects: the blind spot in quality-of-life assessments in transplant recipients. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 15, 457–9.Google Scholar
Dew, M. A., Switzer, G. E., DiMartini, A.et al. (2000). Psychosocial assessments and outcomes in organ transplantation. Progress in Transplantation, 10, 239–61.Google Scholar
Dew, M. A., Switzer, G. E., Goycoolea, J. M.et al. (1997). Does transplantation produce quality of life benefits? A quantitative analysis of the literature. Transplantation, 64, 1261–73.Google Scholar
Engle, D. (2001). Psychosocial aspects of the organ transplant experience. What has been established and what we need for the future. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 521–9.Google Scholar
Fallon, M., Gould, D. & Wainwright, S. P. (1997). Stress and quality of life in the renal transplant patient: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 562–70.Google Scholar
Farmer, M. E. (1994). Cognitive deficits related to major organ failure: The potential role of neuropsychological testing. Neuropsychological Review, 4, 117–60.Google Scholar
Fine, R. N., Alonso, E. M., Fischel, J. E.et al. (2004). Pediatric transplantation of the kidney, liver and heart: summary report. Pediatric Transplantation, 8, 75–86.Google Scholar
Franke, G. H., Reimer, J., Kohnle, M.et al. (1999). Quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients after successful kidney transplantation: development of the ESRD symptom checklist – transplantation module. Nephron, 83, 31–9.Google Scholar
Grady, K. L., Jalowiec, A. & White-Williams, C. (1996). Improvement in quality of life in patients with heart failure who undergo transplantation. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 15, 749–57.Google Scholar
Goldman, L. S. (1993). Liver transplantation using living donors: preliminary donor psychiatric outcomes. Psychosomatics, 34, 235–40.Google Scholar
Griva, K., Hansraj, S., Thompson, D.et al. (2004). Neuropsychological performance after kidney transplantation: a comparison between transplant types and in relation to dialysis and normative data. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 19, 1866–74.Google Scholar
Griva, K., Ziegelmann, J. P., Thompson, D.et al. (2002). Quality of life and emotional responses in cadaver and living related renal transplant recipients. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 17, 2204–11.Google Scholar
Gubby, L. (1998). Assessment of quality of life and related stressors following liver transplantation. Journal of Transplant Co-ordination, 8, 113–18.Google Scholar
Harder, H., Cornelissen, J. J., Gool, A. R.et al. (2002). Cognitive functioning and quality of life in long-term adult survivors of bone marrow transplantation. Cancer, 95, 183–92.Google Scholar
Hathaway, D., Winsett, R., Prendergast, M. & Subaiya, I. (2003). The first report from the patient outcomes registry for transplant effects on life (PORTEL): differences in side-effects and quality of life by organ type, time since transplant and immunosuppressive regimens. Clinical Transplantation, 17, 183–94.Google Scholar
Jalowiec, A., Grady, K. L., White-Williams, C.et al. (1997). Symptom distress three months after heart transplantation. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 16, 604–14.Google Scholar
Jalowiec, A., Grady, K. L. & White-Williams, C. (1994). Stressors in patients awaiting a heart transplant. Behavioural Medicine, 19, 145–54.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. A. (1990). Medical technology and public meaning: The case of viable organ transplantation. In Shanteau, J. & Harris, R. J. (Eds.). Organ donation and transplantation: psychological and behavioural factors (pp. 168–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Julian, B. A., Quarles, L. D. & Niemann, K. M. (1992). Musculoskeletal complications after renal transplantation: pathogenesis and treatment. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 19, 99–120.Google Scholar
Keown, P. (2001). Improving quality of life – the new target for transplantation. Transplantation, 72, S67–S74.Google Scholar
Kiley, D. J., Lam, C. J. & Pollack, R. (1993). A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation. Transplantation, 55, 51–6.Google Scholar
Klapheke, M. M., Marcell, C., Taliaferro, G. & Creamer, B. (2000). Psychiatric assessment of candidates for hand transplantation. Microsurgery, 20, 453–7.Google Scholar
Kong, I. L. & Molassiotis, A. (1999). Quality of life, coping and concerns in Chinese patients after renal transplantation. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 36, 313–22.Google Scholar
Kramer, L., Madl, C., Stockenhuber, F.et al. (1996). Beneficial effect of renal transplantation on cognitive brain function. Kidney International, 49, 833–8.Google Scholar
Laederach-Hofmann, K. & Bunzel, B. (2000). Non compliance in organ transplant recipients: a literature review. General Hospital Psychiatry, 22, 414–24.Google Scholar
Levenson, J. L. & Olsbrisch, (1993). Psychiatric aspects of heart transplantation. Psychosomatics, 34, 314–23.Google Scholar
Limbos, M. M., Joyce, D. P., Chan, C. K. & Kesten, S. (2000). Psychological functioning and quality of life in lung transplant candidates and recipients. Chest, 118, 408–16.Google Scholar
Liu, I. Y., LaCroix, A. Z., White, L. R., Kittner, S. J. & Wolf, P. A. (1990). Cognitive impairment and mortality: a study of possible confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology, 132, 136–43.Google Scholar
McQuellon, R. P., Russell, G. B., Cella, D. F.et al. (1997). Quality of life measurement in bone marrow transplantation: development of the functional assessment of cancer therapy–bone marrow transplant (FACT–BMT) scale. Bone Marrow Transplantation Journal, 19, 357–68.Google Scholar
Meyers, C. A., Weitzner, M., Byrne, K.et al. (1994). Evaluation of the neurobehavioral functioning of patients before, during, and after bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12, 820–6.Google Scholar
Moons, P., Geest, S., Abraham, I., Cleemput, J. V. & Vanhaecke, J. (1998). Symptom experience associated with maintenance immunosuppression after heart transplantation: patients' appraisal of side effects. Heart and Lung: the Journal of Critical Care, 27, 315–25.Google Scholar
Nevins, T. E. & Matas, A. J. (2004). Medication non compliance: another iceberg's tip. Transplantation, 77, 776–8.Google Scholar
Niklason, L. E. & Langer, R. (2001). Prospects for organ and tissue replacement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 573–6.Google Scholar
Olbrisch, M. E., Benedict, S. M., Ashe, K. & Levenson, J. L. (2002). Psychological assessment and care of organ transplant patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 771–83.Google Scholar
Padovan, C., Yoursy, T., Schleuning, M.et al. (1998). Neurological and neuroradiological findings in long-term survivors of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Annals of Neurology, 43, 627–33.Google Scholar
Pinson, C. W., Feurer, I. D., Payne, J. L.et al. (2000). Health-related quality of life after different types of solid organ transplantation. Annals of Surgery, 232, 597–607.Google Scholar
Putzke, J. D., Williams, M. A., Daniel, F. J.et al. (2000). Activities of daily living among heart transplant candidates: neuropsychological and cardiac function predictors. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 19, 995–1006.Google Scholar
Ramsey-Goldman, R., Dunn, J. E., Dunlop, D. D.et al. (1999). Increased risk of fracture in patients receiving solid organ transplants. Journal of Bone Mineral Research, 14, 456–63.Google Scholar
Rianthavorn, P., Ettenger, R. B., Malekzadeh, M., Marik, J. L. & Struber, M. (2004). Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid-organ transplants. Transplantation, 77, 778–82.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, E. J., Anderson, L., Kuo, P. C.et al. (1997). Safe pancreas transplantation in patients with coronary artery disease. Transplantation, 63, 1294–9.Google Scholar
Simmons, R. G., Klein-Marine, S. & Simmons, R. L. (1987). Gift of life: the effect of organ transplantation on individual, family and societal dynamics. New York: Transaction books.
Switzer, G. E., Simmons, R. G. & Dew, M. A. (1996). Helping unrelated strangers: physical and psychological reactions to the bone marrow donation process among anonymous donors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 469–90.Google Scholar
Tarter, R. & Switala, J. (2000). Cognitive assessment in organ transplantation. In Trzepacz, P., & Demartini, A. (Eds.). The transplant patient: biological, psychiatric and ethical issues in organ transplantation (pp. 164–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarter, R.E, Switala, J. A., Arria, A., Plail, J. & Thiel, D. H. (1990). Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. Comparison before and after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation, 50, 632–7.Google Scholar
Teschan, P. E., Ginn, H. E., Bourne, J. R.et al. (1979). Quantitative indices of clinical uremia. Kidney International, 15, 676–97.Google Scholar
United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) (2001). 2000 annual report of the U. S. Scientific Registry for transplantation recipients and the organ procurement and transplant network: transplant data: 1990–1999. Retrieved September 7, 2004, from http://www.unos.org.
White, S. A. & Nicholson, M. L. (1999). Xenotransplantation. British Journal of Surgery, 86, 1499–514.Google Scholar
Ziegelmann, J. P., Griva, K., Hankins, M.et al. (2002). The transplant effects questionnaire (TxEQ): The development of a questionnaire for assessing the multidimensional outcome of organ transplantation – example of end stage renal disease (ESRD). British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 393–408.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×