Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:25:24.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Discovering Familiar Places

Learning through Mobile Place-Based Games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Constance Steinkuehler
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Kurt Squire
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Sasha Barab
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access

Summary

February 12, 2100: Walking down by the river’s shore it is hard to believe that as recently as a hundred years ago this bank of the river was dry land. Today all of this land is frequently under water as a result of increasingly wild weather events. Looking across the river you see the steady red light on the tower indicating that yet again, rain is in the forecast and people need to be ready to move to higher ground.

Traveling back a hundred years as a TimeLab researcher, you are surprised to learn that the risk of flooding was rather low in the past. Concerned for your family and friends, you think it would be great if the river didn’t have to rise – if this land could still be as dry as it was back then. Perhaps that is unrealistic and it is best to use this experience to prepare for still worse conditions in the future. But…perhaps it is possible that you can convince your ancestors to make a few small changes that will make your home in the year 2100 better.

This scenario is part of the experience that players have during the augmented reality (AR) game TimeLab 2100 developed at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) as part of a series of research and development initiatives referred to as MITAR. The goal of MITAR is to provide experiences that merge the best of real and virtual in order to involve learners of all ages in games that are engaging, thought-provoking, and fun.

MITAR has its origins in a series of AR games developed at MIT and rooted in environmental science and public health. In games such as Environmental Detectives (Squire and Klopfer, 2007) and Mystery@MIT (Klopfer, 2008), players role-play as scientists, engineers, and other members of the scientific enterprise as they try to solve local environmental problems through active research. This research consists of interviewing virtual experts and witnesses, reviewing primary documents and background research, and using virtual sampling equipment to obtain readings for possible contaminants in the air, water, and soil. Since this game is AR, it takes place in real space such that if a player wants to interview the mayor, he or she would need to stand outside town hall to obtain that interview on his or her mobile device. If the player wants to take a reading of the bacteria in a lake, he or she would need to walk down to the shore of that lake to use his or her virtual sampling equipment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Games, Learning, and Society
Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age
, pp. 327 - 354
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athman, J.Monroe, M. 2004 The Effects of Environment-Based Education on Students’ Achievement MotivationJournal of Interpretation Research 9 9Google Scholar
Barab, S. A.Roth, W.-M. 2006 Intentionally-Bound Systems and Curricular-Based Ecosystems: An Ecological Perspective on KnowingEducational Researcher 35 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barab, S. A.Gresalfi, M.Arici, A. 2009 Why Educators Should Care About GamesEducational Leadership 67 76Google Scholar
Chambers, D. W. 2006 Stereotypic Images of the Scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist TestScience Education 67 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A.Halverson, R. 2009 Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in AmericaNew YorkTeachers College PressGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. 2008
Duffin, M.Murphy, M.Johnson, B. 2008 http://www.peecworks.org
Dweck, C. 2000 Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and developmentNew YorkPsychology PressGoogle Scholar
Eliot, T. S. 1968 Four quartetsNew YorkHarvest BooksGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, M.Mische, A. 1998 What Is Agency?American Journal of Sociology 103 962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friere, P. 1993 Pedagogy of the oppressedNew YorkContinuum BooksGoogle Scholar
Hart, R. 1997 Children’s participationNew YorkUNICEFGoogle Scholar
Hetland, L.Winner, E.Veenema, S.Sheridan, K. 2007 Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts educationNew YorkTeachers College PressGoogle Scholar
Klopfer, E. 2008 Augmented learning: Research and design of mobile educational gamesCambridge, MAMIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louv, R. 2005 Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature deficit disorderChapel Hill, NCAlgonquin BooksGoogle Scholar
Moursund, D. 2009 http://iae-pedia.org/Computational_Thinking
National Research Council 2009 Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuitsWashington, DCNational Academies PressGoogle Scholar
PEEC 2010 http://www.promiseofplace.org/Research_Evaluation/Display?id=105
Polanyi, M. 1974 Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophyChicagoThe University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Resnick, M. 2007 http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers.html
Schwartz, B. 2005 The paradox of choice: Why less is more?New YorkHarper PerennialGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. 1987 Joining the literacy clubPortsmouth, NHHeinemannGoogle Scholar
Sobel, D. 2004 Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communitiesGreat Barrington, MAOrion SocietyGoogle Scholar
Squire, K.Klopfer, E. 2007 Case Study Analysis of Augmented Reality Simulations on Handheld Computer. Journal of the Learning Sciences 16 371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Education 2008 Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel reportWashington, DCUSDOEGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. 2008 Computational Thinking and Thinking About ComputingPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 366 3717CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×